K993885 · Linvatec Corp. · JOS · Feb 10, 2000 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K993885
Device Name
ULTRABLATOR ELECTRODE
Applicant
Linvatec Corp.
Product Code
JOS · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2000
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is intended to be used in arthroscopic applications of resection, ablation, tissue modification, excision of soft tissue, hemostasis of blood vessels and in coagulating soft tissues. Arthroscopic surgery includes the following: Knee 1. Meniscectomy 2. Lateral Release 3. Chondroplasty 4. Synovectomy 5. ACL Debridement 6. Plica Removal 7. Meniscal Cystectomy Ankle 1. Fracture Debridement 2. Excision of Scar Tissue 3. Synovectomy 4. Chondroplasty Wrist 1. Synovectomy 2. Cartilage Debridement 3. Fracture Debridement Shoulder 1. Labral Tear Resection 2. Synovectomy 3. Excision of Scar Tissue 4. Acromioplasty 5. Bursectomy 6. Subacromial Decompression 7. Chondroplasty Elbow 1. Synovectomy 2. Tendon Debridement 3. Chondroplasty
Device Story
Monopolar electrosurgical electrode; used in arthroscopic procedures; connects to electrosurgical generator via ConMed pencil; tip ablates and coagulates soft tissue upon activation; used by surgeons in clinical settings; provides precise tissue resection and hemostasis; benefits patient through minimally invasive surgical access and controlled tissue modification.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Tests included 3,000 VAC Dielectric Withstand, 1.5 Times Maximum Voltage Withstand, 18 Minute Run Test, and Resection Effectiveness Test. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-1.
Indicated for patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the knee, ankle, wrist, shoulder, or elbow requiring soft tissue resection, ablation, modification, excision, or hemostasis. No specific age or gender contraindications provided.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
{0}------------------------------------------------
FEB 1 0 2000
Summary
The following information is supplied in accordance with Public Law 94-295, "Medical Device Amendment", Section 510(k) requiring premarket notification.
Linvatec manufactures all its products and maintains such records as it considers necessary to satisfy the known requirements of the Act. Linvatec Corporation, hereby notifies the Food and Drug Administration of its intent to market the following:
- 1. Manufacturer Identification:
Linvatec Corporation 11311 Concept Boulevard Largo, FL 33773-4908 Registration No. 1017294
| Contact Person: | Laura Seneff, RAC<br>Manager, Regulatory Affairs |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Phone Number: | 727-399-5234 |
| Fax Number: | 727-399-5264 |
- 2. Device Identification:
| Proprietary Name: | UltrAblator™ Electrode |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Electrode |
| Classification<br>Name/Reference: | Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and<br>accessories, 878.4400 |
| Proposed Class/<br>Device Product Code: | Class II, 79 JOS, Electrode, Electrosurgical |
- 3. Intended Use:
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is intended to be used in arthroscopic applications of resection, ablation, tissue modification, excision of soft tissue, hemostasis of blood vessels and in coagulating soft tissues. Arthroscopic surgery includes the following:
### Knee
- 1. Meniscectomy
- 2. Lateral Release
- 3. Chondroplasty
- 4. Synovectomy
- 5. ACL Debridement
- 6. Plica Removal
- 7. Meniscal Cystectomy
{1}------------------------------------------------
# Intended Use (Continued)
## Ankle
- 1. Fracture Debridement
- 2. Excision of Scar Tissue
- 3. Synovectomy
- 4. Chondroplasty
### Wrist
- 1. Synovectomy
- 2. Cartilage Debridement
- 3. Fracture Debridement
### Shoulder
- 1. Labral Tear Resection
- 2. Synovectomy
- 3. Excision of Scar Tissue
- 4. Acromioplasty
- 5. Bursectomy
- 6. Subacromial Decompression
- 7. Chondroplasty
## Elbow
- 1. Synovectomy
- 2. Tendon Debridement
- 3. Chondroplasty
- 4. Device Description:
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is a monopolar electrode which will be packaged individually or in a kit containing an UltrAblator™ Electrode, ConMed electrosurgical pencil, and a ConMed electrosurgical dispersive pad. The electrode is connected to an electrosurgical generator via the ConMed electrosurgical pencil. The device is inserted into the joint. Upon activation of the generator, the tip of the device electrosurgically ablates and coagulates tissue.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is a modification of Linvatec's Ablator Electrode which received FDA clearance under 510(k)# K983652 on March 23, 1999. The electrode will be made available in a range of sizes from 2.4" to 6.3" inches in working length, and in three angles, 0°, 30°, & 90°. The insulating material will be changed from polyolefin shrink to Vitek powder coat.
ConMed's electrosurgical dispersive pad has received clearance for marketing under 510(K) Number K791137. ConMed's electrosurgical pencil has received clearance to market the device under 510(K) Number K954633.
Linvatec is a wholly owned subsidiary of ConMed Corporation.
Advertisement and labeling are included in Exhibit 1.
Pictures of the device are included in Exhibit 2.
Engineering drawings are included in Exhibit 3.
- 5. Materials:
| Tip/Shaft: | 304 Stainless Steel, ASTM A-908 |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|
| Shrink Tube: | Vitek Coating, No ASTM Reference |
| Insulator: | Zirconia or Alumina, No ASTM Reference |
| Hub: | Nylon, ASTM GFN2 |
- 6. Labeling:
Proposed labeling is included in Exhibit 1.
- 7. Additional Information:
Engineering testing will be performed per ANSI/AAMI American National Standard for Electrosurgical Devices HF-18/1993. Test protocols are included in Exhibit 4 for the following tests: 3,000 VAC Dielectric Withstand Test; 1.5 Times Maximum Voltage Withstand Test; 18 Minute Run Test, and Resection Effectiveness Test.
Biocompatibility testing was performed on the final packaged sterilized device per ISO Standard 10993-1. A Summary of Test Results is included in Exhibit 5.
- 8. Clinical Data
Clinical data are not required.
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 9. Sterility Information:
The UltrAblator ™ Electrode will be supplied sterile, single use, and will be sterilized using Ethylene Oxide as follows:
- 1. EtO Sterilization Cycle Parameters:
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is sterilized by using 100% Ethylene Oxide (EtO). Validation of the process will be on file at Linvatec, Largo, Florida.
Sterilization of product will be processed at Cosmed, New NOTE: Jersey. Other contract sterilization facilities and/or processes may be used in the future.
- 2. Residual levels for ETO, ECH, & EG will meet the requirements per FDA Proposed Rule, page 27482, dated June 23, 1978, and ISO 10993-7-1995 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 7: Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Residuals".
- 3. Sterility Assurance Level (SAL): 10-6
- 4. Sterility Validation Method will be per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 1135-1994 Method C, Half Cycle Method.
#### 10. Packaging
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is placed into protective mounting card fabricated from .010" High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), natural color.
The electrode is then placed into a chevron style peel pouch with one layer consisting of DuPont Tyvek®, 1073B medical grade (uncoated), and the other layer consisting of .002" thick translucent coextruded film consisting of polyethylene/polymar (.0015" polyethylene and .0005" polymer). The pouch is then heat sealed to create a sterile barrier. A label will be applied to the pouch.
Kit components ("pencil" and dispersive pad) are packed along with the pouched electrode into a folding carton, reverse tuck style, consisting of .024" thick Clay-Coated Newsback (CCN) fiberboard. A label will be applied to the Kit box.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Substantial Equivalence Information: 11.
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is substantially equivalent to:
| 1. | Ablator Electrode<br>Catalog Number n |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The similarities/dissimilarities to the predicates are shown in the table on the following page.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circle with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle or bird-like figure with three horizontal lines above it, representing wings or feathers.
# FEB 1 0 2000
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Laura Seneff Manager, Regulatory Affairs Linvatec Corporation 11311 Concept Boulevard Largo, Florida 33773-4908
Re: K993885 Trade Name: UltrAblator™ Electrode Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JOS and GEI Dated: November 15, 1999 Received: November 16, 1999
Dear Ms. Seneff:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Ms. Laura Seneff
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4595. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Stipt Rhodes
James E. Dillard III Acting Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
November 15, 1999
Page 1 of 2
् ।
510(k) Number (if known): K993885
Device Name: UltrAblator™ Electrode
Indications for Use:
The UltrAblator™ Electrode is intended to be used in arthroscopic applications of resection, ablation, tissue modification, excision of soft tissue, hemostasis of blood vessels and in coagulating soft tissues. Arthroscopic surgery includes the following:
### Knee
- 1. Meniscectomy
- 2. Lateral Release
- 3. Chondroplasty
- 4. Synovectomy
- 5. ACL Debridement
- 6. Plica Removal
- 7. Meniscal Cystectomy
### Ankle
- 1. Fracture Debridement
- 2. Excision of scar tissue
- 3. Synovectomy
- 4. Chondroplasty
### Wrist
- 1. Synovectomy
- 2. Cartilage Debridement
- 3. Fracture Debridement
### Shoulder
- 1. Labral Tear Resection
- 2. Synovectomy
- 3. Excision of Scar Tissue
- 4. Acromioplasty
- 5. Bursectomy
- 6. Subacromial Decompression
- 7. Chondroplasty
{8}------------------------------------------------
Intended Use (Continued)
### Elbow
- 1. Synovectomy
- 2. Tendon Debridement
- 3. Chondroplasty
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE If NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General Restorative Devices K993885 510(k) Number .
Prescription Use_X OR Over-the-Counter Use_
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Page 2 of 2
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.