CDS LTX CONTROL LATEX PARTICLE SUSPENSION AND PRIMER
K993375 · Clinical Diagnostic Solutions, Inc. · KRX · Dec 20, 1999 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K993375
Device Name
CDS LTX CONTROL LATEX PARTICLE SUSPENSION AND PRIMER
Applicant
Clinical Diagnostic Solutions, Inc.
Product Code
KRX · Hematology
Decision Date
Dec 20, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 864.8150
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension is intended to serve as a calibration standard for the d.c. impedance, r.f. impedance and optical light scatter parameters of the VCS module of Coulter® Models STKS, MAXM and Gen.S Hematology Analyzer systems. Models STKS and MAXM analyzers equipped with 5-part differential capability only require aspiration of the CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension through the secondary mode aspiration inlet with the analyzer set to function F5S. STKS and Gen. S analyzers equipped with 5-part differential and reticulocyte capability require aspiration of the CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension through the secondary mode aspiration inlet with the analyzer set to function F57.
Device Story
CDS LTX-Control is a suspension of uniform polymer particles used to calibrate and validate Coulter hematology analyzers (STKS, MAXM, GEN.S). The device includes a priming solution (LTX-Primer) to coat fluid pathways and prevent particle adhesion. In a clinical lab setting, a technician primes the analyzer, then aspirates the control material. The analyzer measures the particles as they pass through the flow cell, generating electrical and optical signals (volume, conductivity, light scatter). The instrument automatically calculates mean values and coefficients of variation from 30 replicates. These results are compared against expected values to ensure the analyzer's fluidic and electronic systems are performing within specifications. This process ensures accurate differential and reticulocyte measurements for patient blood samples, benefiting patients by maintaining the reliability of diagnostic hematology results.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Stability and performance were validated by comparing CDS LTX-Control against NIST-traceable primary particle standards and competitive commercial controls (Latron). Testing involved repetitive analysis (31 cycles) on Coulter STKS analyzers. Acceptance criteria required calibration results to be within ±3% of the mean. Data demonstrated stability over 90 days. No human clinical trials were conducted as the device is an in vitro diagnostic calibrator.
Technological Characteristics
Aqueous, buffered suspension containing polymer beads, alkali metal salts, detergents, and antimicrobial agents. Sensing principle: d.c. impedance, r.f. impedance, and optical light scatter. Designed for use with Coulter STKS, MAXM, and GEN.S hematology analyzers. Storage: 18-30°C. Non-sterile.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a calibration standard for Coulter STKS, MAXM, and Gen.S hematology analyzers to validate volume, conductivity, and light scatter parameters. Intended for professional clinical laboratory use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A calibrator for cell indices is a device that approximates whole blood or certain blood cells and that is used to set an instrument intended to measure mean cell volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), or other cell indices. It is a suspension of particles or cells whose size, shape, concentration, and other characteristics have been precisely and accurately determined.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
Predicate Devices
Latron® Calibrator (Beckman Coulter Inc.)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
P. 003/009
K993375 Revision C 12/08/99
## Abbreviated \$10(k) CDS LTX-Control
#### Device Description 1.
Common Names: Latex Calibrator, Latron® Calibrator Class: II Classification Panel: Hematology (81)
DEC 2 0 1994
KRY Calibrator for Platelet Counting Product Codes: KSA Calibrator for Red-Cell and White-Cell Counting KRX Calibrator for Cell Indices
## Regulation Numbers:
21 CFR 864.8150 21 CFR 864.8162 21 CFR 864.8175 21 CFR 864.8185
#### II. Indication for Use Statement
Hematology (81) The CDS LTX-Control for red cell, white cell, and platelet counting is a device that resembles red cells, white cells, and platelets, and is used to validate the electronic calibration of the volume, conductivity and light scatter parameters on Coulter® MAXM®, STKS® and GEN.S® instruments intended to count red cells, whire cells, and platelets. It is a suspension of uniform particles whose shape, size, and concentration and other characteristics have been precisely and accurately determined.
#### III. Labeling
Samples of proposed labeling for CDS LTX-Primer and CDS LTX-Control are attached.
#### IV. Summary Report
- NOTE: This product will not perform properly if stored at temperatures above 30°C. Best results are obtained when the product is stored at 2 - 8°C (34 - 46°F).
- ਕ-The protocol used for stability testing includes accelerated testing at 37°C and 50°C, and real-time at ambient room temperature. Stability testing was performed at ambient room temperature, 37°C and 50°C using pilot production material that was packaged in final primary packaging for both CDS LTX-Control. This material was compared with fresh material and other commercial controls (Latron and Latron Primer, Beckman Coulter Inc.) using a calibrated Coulter® Model STKS analyzer system at daily, weekly or monthly intervals, depending on the
{1}------------------------------------------------
Abbreviated 510(k) CDS LTX-Control
Revision C 12/08/99
storage temperature. The product stability-dating interval is revised upward each month, upon successful completion of the usting. Acceptance criteria indicates calibration result must be within +3% of the previous value from the same lot of material.
b. A well-calibrated Coulter Model STKS analyzer is purged with LTX-Primer for not less than two "start up" cycles, in order to prime all fluid pathways. The LTX-Primer serves to coat all of the internal fluid surfaces, particularly plastic ones, to prevent the LTX particles from sticking inside the analyzer. The LTX-Control is aspirated and analyzed repetitively for 31 cycles, and all data is recorded. The first cycle is discarded, and the mean result is calculated for the remaining 30 replicates:
(n2 + n3 + ... ns1 ) + 30 = mean value
An alternative "running" method for assay is used for some lots. The above procedure is followed, except that the LTX-Control is analyzed once or more per day until 31 assay cycles have been reached. The mean result is calculated as above.
The analyzer system is validated by repetitive analysis of a competitive material (Latron and Latron Primer, Beckman Coulter Inc.).
- A Coulter Model STKS analyzer is calibrated using a standard C. commercial calibration material and validated by assaying at least three levels of commercial control materials for three cycles each. The three values from each level are averaged and the mean value is compared to the reference value assigned by the manufacturer. A deviation of +3% is the accepted range for results. The LTX-Primer is then used to prepare the system fluid pathways by at least two "start up" cycles, then the CDS LTX-Control material is aspirated and analyzed at least 31 times, and the replicate data is recorded. The first set of values is discarded and the remaining 30 values are statistically calculated as a normal distribution. A t-test of the mean is also performed to evaluate the distribution of results.
Experience with the CDS LTX-Control has revealed that the Light Scatter parameter requires three to five days of aging in the final solution to reach a stable value. Assay values for a given lot number of CDS LTX-Control are therefore assigned five days after manufacture and packaging (indicated by the vertical blue line on Charts 1 and 2.)
- ਹੋਂ. There is no standard reference material specifically evaluated for assignment of flowcell calibration values for the Coulter Model STKS
{2}------------------------------------------------
P. 005/009
Abbreviated 510(k) CDS LTX-Control
Revision C 12/08/99
analyzer system. Repetitive analysis of commercial competitive material from the instrument system's manufacturer is statistically compared to repetitive analysis of CDS LTX-Control as an indication of calibration parallelism with the manufacturer's intended system performance.
- Performance of the CDS LTX-Control is compared staristically with e. performance of an NIST-traceable primary particle standard made from the same chemical material and suspended in the same LTX-Primer solution. The NIST-traceable primary standard is assayed by the Coulter Model STKS 11 times, the first value is discarded and the remaining 10 values are used to calculate a mean value for each of the calibrareable channels. CDS LTX-Control assay is then compared to the primary standard. No correction is made for the stated difference in particle sizes, since both particle assays lie within the precision range stated for each particle.
- f. The assigned values for the CDS LTX-Control are compared to results obtained from normal human blood specimens; values assigned should be within +10% of the mean average of the normal sample results.
- The methodology effectively transfers the known size of the NIST ar traceable latex standard to the secondary CDS LTX-Control. This standard is then used to assure the proper positioning of the laser for the normally accepted detection of cellular elements found in human blood cells.
#### Data Summary
- 1. Data tables for two lot numbers of CDS LTX-Control, both prepared from a single lot number of polymer particles, but resuspended and diluted in different batches of LTX-Primer solution are presented as Tables I. and II.
- 2. The analysis of the NIST-traceable primary particle standard is shown in Table 100.
- These lot numbers were analyzed reperitively over a period of about ninety (90) 3. days, and both show stability over the period from Day 3 through the end of the data tables. Occasional small deviations appear in the data and are correlated to problems with the instrument system. Recalibration to the Beckman Coulter Latron® Control standard corrected the values in every case.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Abbreviated 510(k) CDS LTX-Control
Revision C 12/08/99
- The Light Scatter value (S) is the parameter that is most sensitive to changes in 4. the analyzer system, so it is used to monitor changes in the CDS LTX-Control marerial. Chart 1 shows the value trend for the Light Scatter parameter for trial lot 503. The upper and lower limit lines represent + 3% of the mean assay value and are the acceptable upper and lower limits of usage in the analyzer system. Chart 2 shows the same results for trial lot 504.
NOTE: The out-of-range point circled in red on both charts has been traced to an instrument malfunction. After servicing, the analyzer again produced values consistent with previous Light Scatter results. The Volume and Conductivity results were unaffected.
## Checklist and 510(k) References
- 1. Proprietary and Established Name:
CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension
CDS LTX-Primer Priming Solution
- Intended Use: 2.
CDS LTX-Control is used to validate the volume, conductivity and light scatter parameters on COULTER® MAXM, STKS and GEN-S instruments. CDS LTX-Primer is used only to prepare the instrument fluid pathways immediately prior to CDS LTX-Control measurements, and plays no role in the recovery of test results.
- ਜਾਂ Summary and Explanation:
Accurate differential and reticulocyte measurements on COULTER MAXM. STKS and GEN.S instruments are measured by monitoring the consistent performance of volume, conductivity and light scatter, using a particle of uniform size with appropriate light scattering characteristics. CDS LTX-Control validates the stability of electrical processing and fluidic flow rate systems used to measure volume, conductivity and light scatter channels.
- 4. Test Principle:
CDS LTX-Control is supplied as ready-to-use latex particles in a buffered suspension fluid. The particles pass through the flow cell producing characteristic electrical signals that are measured as volume,
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Abbreviated 510(k) CDS LTX-Control
#### Revision C 12/08/99
conductivity and light scatter for quality monitoring of the previously mentioned COULTER instruments.
Description of the calibrator material: રું.
> Matrix base - aqueous, buffered, bacteriostatic and fungistatic medium containing a surfactant.
Constituents - alkali metal salts, detergents, antimicrobial materials and polymer beads of known size.
Appropriate standardization/Relationship/Traceability: The beads are compared to NIST-calibrated beads of known size, under the conditions of use within the applicable hematology analyzer systems. Dual analyses of NIST-calibrated beads versus CDS LTX-Control are performed for each lot.
Warnings and Precautions: Do not store CDS LTX-Control at temperatures above 30°C. Do not freeze CDS LTX-Control. Keep bottles of CDS LTX-Control tightly capped when not in use.
Appropriate Testing of Human Source Material: Not applicable.
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
Assigned Values and Value Assignment Process:
A well-calibrated Coulter Model STKS analyzer is purged with CDS LTX-Primer for not less than two "start up" cycles, in order to prime all fluid pathways. The LTX-Primer serves to coat all of the internal fluid surfaces, particularly plastic ones, to prevent the LTX particles from sticking inside the analyzer. The LTX-Control is aspirated and analyzed repetitively for 31 cycles, and all data is recorded. The first cycle is discarded, and the mean result is calculated for the remaining 30 replicates:
(n2 + n3 + ... n31 ) + 30 = mean value
Standard deviation and percent coefficient of variation are also calculated by standard statistical means. The analyzer system is validated by reperitive analysis of a competitive material (Latron and Latron Primer, Beckman Coulter Inc.).
Storage Instructions and Stability: CDS LTX-Control and CDS LTX-Primer should be stored at 18-30°C (64-86°F). Do not store CDS LTX-Control at temperatures above 30°C. DO NOT FREEZE. Opened
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Abbreviated \$10(k) CDS LTX-Control
Revision C 12/08/99
bottles are guaranteed stable for 30 days after opening, when package directions are followed. Be certain that CDS LTX-Control is at ROOM TEMPERATURE before use. Keep bottles tightly capped when product is not being used.
Indications of Deterioration: Inability to recover CDS LTX-Control values identified in the ranges on the EXPECTED RESULTS chart may indicate product instability or deterioration due to improper storage, handling or contamination. Verify that the product has not exceeded its opened or closed bottle expiration date. If the product has been frozen or exposed to temperatures outside of the recommended temperature range, it may not recover the assigned values. Also, bottles contaminated with debris may exhibit more than one population, resulting in increased Coefficients of Variation, Should problems arise, open another bottle of CDS LTX-Control. If the problem persists, contact your Clinical Diagnostic Solutions representative, our Technical Service Department or our Customer Service Department at 800-453-3328.
Directions for Use: Consult the appropriate COULTER MAXM, STKS and GEN.S Product Manuals for the proper instrument operating instructions.
- Perform instrument startup according to the specific COULTER 1. Manual.
- Configure the instrument for daily quality control for latex 2. particle analysis according to the appropriate Product Manual.
- Prepare instrument sample line with CDS LTX-Primer according 3. to the package insert and the appropriate Product Manual. Verify that the count result is acceptable.
- 4. Gently mix a room temperature bottle of CDS LTX-Control by inverting five (5) to eight (8) times; ensure there is no foaming.
- 5. Aspirate CDS LTX-Control and remove bottle when the audible "Been" sound occurs.
- ર. If your instrument does not have a self-cleaning sample aspirating probe, wipe the probe with a dry, absorbent, lint-free tissue.
- 7. Examine the Mean Channel and Coefficient of Variation results for volume, conductivity and light scatter. Compare the results to those of the EXPECTED RESULTS chart. Record and/or plot these values in the instrument log. These functions are performed automatically for you on the STKS, MAXM and GEN.S instruments.
. Limitations: None are reported.
Bibliography/References: No specific references other than instrument Product Manuals.
{6}------------------------------------------------
P.009/009
# Abbreviated 510(k) CDS LTX-Control
Revision C 12/08/99
Name and Place of Manufacture: Clinical Diagnostic Solutions, Inc. 1660 N. W. 65th Avenue, Suite 2 Plantation, FL 33313 Date of Labeling Revision: July 1999
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol featuring three abstract human figures or profiles, represented by flowing lines. The figures are stacked vertically, creating a sense of unity and connection.
DEC 2 0 1999
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Colin Aldersley Director of Regulatory Affairs Clinical Diagnostic Solutions, Inc. 1660 NW 65th Avenue, Suite 2 Plantation, Florida 33313
Re: K993375
> Trade Name: CDS LTX Control Latex Particle Suspension and Primer™ Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KRX, KRZ, KRY, KSA Dated: October 6, 1999 Received: October 7, 1999
Dear Mr. Aldersley:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic OS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrlv/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D, M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number: K993375
Device Name: CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension
Indications for Use:
CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension is intended to serve as a calibration standard for the d.c. impedance, r.f. impedance and optical light scatter parameters of the VCS module of Coulter® Models STKS, MAXM and Gen.S Hematology Analyzer systems. Models STKS and MAXM analyzers equipped with 5-part differential capability only require aspiration of the CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension through the secondary mode aspiration inlet with the analyzer set to function F5S. STKS and Gen. S analyzers equipped with 5-part differential and reticulocyte capability require aspiration of the CDS LTX-Control Latex Particle Suspension through the secondary mode aspiration inlet with the analyzer set to function F57.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation
Peter E. Maher
al Laboratory Devices
**Prescription Use**
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.