K991064 · Medcanica, Inc. · HTY · Jun 23, 1999 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K991064
Device Name
METACARPAL FIXATION SYSTEM
Applicant
Medcanica, Inc.
Product Code
HTY · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 23, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3040
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Metacarpal Fixation System is indicated for the fixation of transverse or short oblique fractures of the diaphysis or diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction of metacarpal bones.
Device Story
Metacarpal Fixation System (MFS) is a sterile, single-use, disposable orthopedic device for metacarpal fracture fixation. System components include a cannulated awl assembly, implantable pin handle assembly, and exchange guide/bend tube. Operation: Cannulated awl creates a hole in the metacarpal bone via manual twisting; implantable pin is advanced into the intramedullary space; awl is removed; pin is cut and bent 90° to secure the fracture site. Device remains implanted for approximately six weeks before percutaneous removal. Exchange guide allows for pin replacement without losing medullary canal access. Used by surgeons in clinical settings. Benefits include stable fracture fixation and simplified removal process.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included stiffness/yield, cutting geometry comparison, and drilling tests. Materials meet ASTM F138-97, F899-95, F86-91, and F366-82 standards. No clinical data provided.
Indicated for patients with transverse or short oblique fractures of the diaphysis or diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction of metacarpal bones.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a stiff wire segment or rod made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel, and that may be smooth on the outside, fully or partially threaded, straight or U-shaped; and may be either blunt pointed, sharp pointed, or have a formed, slotted head on the end. It may be used for fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, as a guide pin for insertion of other implants, or it may be implanted through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## JUN 23 1999
# Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Metacarpal Fixation System
Submitted by
K991064
Medcanica, Inc. 8308 NW 74th Avenue Miami, FL 33166 Phone: (305) 863-1603
## Identification of a Legally Marketed Predicate Device
The Medcanica, Inc. Metacarpal Fixation System (MFS) is substantially equivalent to the K-wire implantable pin that is manufactured and marketed by MicroAire Surgical Equipment, Inc.
## Device Description
The MFS is a sterile, single use, disposable device that is delivered non-toxic. The MFS consists of the Cannulated Awl Assembly, the Implantable Pin Handle Assembly, and Exchange Guide and Bend Tube. A typical MFS is shown in Figure 1, MFS Assembled Implantable Pin Handle and Cannulated Awl Assemblies. Figure 2, Implantable pin and Awl Assemblies shows the assemblies separately.
Image /page/0/Figure/10 description: The image shows a technical drawing of a medical instrument. The instrument has two main parts: an implantable pin and a cannulated awl. The implantable pin is a thin, pointed rod, while the cannulated awl is a hollow tube with a sharp tip. The drawing also labels the implantable pin handle and the cannulated awl handle.
#### Figure 1, MFS Assembled Implantable Pin Handle and Cannulated Awl Assemblies
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Figure/2 description: This image shows two different medical tools. The tool on the left is labeled as an "Implantable Pin Handle" and an "Implantable Pin". The tool on the right is labeled as a "Cannulated Awl Handle" and a "Cannulated Awl".
Figure 2, Implantable Pin and Awl Assemblies
Prior to use the implantable pin assembly is nested in the cannulated awl assembly. The cannulated awl assembly has a trocar point. The implantable pin has a blunt point that is positioned just behind the trocar point of the cannulated awl. The sharp point of the cannulated awl assembly is passed through a small incision. A hole is drilled into the metacarpal bone by twisting the assembled handles back and forth. After gaining access to the intramedullary space, the cannulated awl handle is held stationary while the implantable pin is then advanced distally from the base of the metacarpal bone. See Figure 3, MFS Partially Deployed.
The awl handle is then withdrawn and removed for advancement of the implantable pin. The implantable pin is then cut adjacent to the pin handle. Using the bending tube end of the exchange guide and bend tube pictured in Figure 4, Exchange Guide and Bend Tube, the implantable pin is bent to 90° with the apex of the implantable pin insertion site. The pin is trimmed so that the end is below the skin. The small piece remaining will facilitate removal of the implantable pin subsequent to healing. The implantable pin will remain implanted for approximately six weeks. Upon healing of the fracture, the implantable pin is percutaneously removed.
In the event that it is desired to reform the implantable pin or implant a smaller pin, this may be accomplished without loosing access to the medullary canal. The exchange guide is advanced along the implantable pin into the medullar space. Once the medullar space is accessed, the pin is removed. Another pin may be placed into the medulla by inserting it into the groove of the exchange guide. After the pin has been inserted into the medullar space, remove the exchange guide.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Figure/2 description: The image shows a medical tool with several labeled parts. The top part is labeled as the implantable pin handle. The bottom part is labeled as the cannulated awl and cannulated awl handle.
#### Figure 3, MFS Partially Deployed
Image /page/2/Figure/4 description: The image shows a technical drawing of a tool with labels pointing to different parts. The tool has a handle with a button on it, and a tube extending from each end. One tube is labeled "Bend Tube" and the other is labeled "Exchange Guide".
Figure 4, Exchange Guide and Bend Tube
## Intended Use
The Metacarpal Fixation System is indicated for the fixation of transverse or short oblique fractures of the diaphysis or diaphyseal junction of metacarpal bones.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Summary of Technological Characteristics
The table below compares the technological characteristics of the MFS to the predicate device.
| Feature | MFS | Predicate Device |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Medcanica, Inc. | MicroAire |
| Sterile packaging | Tray, Mylar®/Tyvek® Pouch | Polymeric Pouch |
| Sterilization method | Gamma radiation | Gamma radiation |
| Shelf life | 3 years | 3 years |
| Intended use | The Metacarpal Fixation System is<br>indicated for the fixation of transverse<br>or short oblique fractures of the dia-<br>physis or diaphyseal-metaphyseal<br>junction of metacarpal bones. | Used in a variety of surgical applica-<br>tions including metacarpal fixation. |
| Implant Period | Approximately 6 weeks | Various including permanent |
| Drill geometry† | | |
| Facets | 3 | 3 |
| Edge Angle | 23.5° | 19.0° |
| Facet Angle | 13.7° | 10.4° |
| Working length* | 3.5 inches | 6.0 inches |
| Available Sizes | 0.062 | 0.062 |
| Implantable pin mate-<br>rial | 316LVM, ASTM F138-97 | 316LVM, ASTM F138-97 |
| Placement Method‡ | Cannulated Awl | Powered Drill |
<sup>+</sup> The Metacarpal Fixation System has a different drill geometry than the predicate because it is designed to be compliant with the trocar point requirements of ISO 5838-3, Implants for Surgery - Skeletal Pins and Wires - Part 3: Kirschner Skeletal Wires.
<sup>*</sup> Working length of the Metacarpal Fixation System has a shorter working than the predicate device because it is not a multi-purpose device. It needs only to accommodate the length of metacarpal bones.
<sup>*</sup> Placement of implantable pins in the metacarpal bone does not require the use of a powered drill. Because the Metacarpal Fixation System is restricted to metacarpal use it is not designed for use with a powered drill.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Summary of Performance Data
The MFS meets the requirements of the following recognized consensus standards.
- ASTM F138 97, Standard Specification for Wrought 18 Chromium-14 Nickel-. 2.5 Molybdenum Stainless Steel Bar and Wire for Surgical Implants (UNS S31673)
- ASTM F899 95, Standard Specification for Stainless Steel Billet, Bar and Wire . for Surgical Instruments
- ASTM F86 91, Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Me-. tallic Surgical Implants
- ASTM F366 82 (Reapproved 1993), Standard Specification for Fixation Pins . and Wires
The MFS is substantially equivalent to the K-wire manufactured by MicroAire Surgical Equipment, Inc. Extensive bench testing of both devices has demonstrated this. Testing includes stiffness/yield, cutting geometry comparison, and drilling test.
The tissue/bone contact materials of the device have been carefully selected for their long history of biocompatibility. The materials meet the requirements of the previously referenced recognized consensus standards.
Since the MFS meets the requirements of the stated standards and embodies technological characteristics essentially identical to the predicate device, we believe the device is safe and effective and performs as well as or better than the predicate device. The MFS was designed utilizing design controls compliant with the Ouality System Regulation. The MFS will be manufactured per specifications and good manufacturing practices that ensure the device is safe and effective for its intended use.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of an eagle with three lines representing its wings. The eagle's head is facing to the left. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES-USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN 23 1999
Mr. Matthew A. Palmer President Medcanica, Inc. 8308 NW 74th Avenue Miami, Florida 33166
K991064 Re: Metacarpal Fixation System Trade Name: Regulatory Class: II HTY Product Code: Dated: March 30, 1999 March 31, 1999 Received:
#### Dear Mr. Palmer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Requlation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Matthew A. Palmer
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Celia M. Whitton, Ph.D., M
Ph.D., M.D. -Celia M. Witten, Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): K991064
Metacarpal Fixation System Device Name:
Indications for Use:
Fixation System is indicated for The Metacarpal the fixation of transverse or short oblique fractures of the diaphysis or diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction of metacarpal bones.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE
Evaluation (ODE)
vision Sign-Off
(Divisio eral Restorative Devices Division of G 510(k) Numb
X Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.