HEP-2000 COLORZYME ANA-RO TEST SYSTEM, MODEL 4200-RO
K983924 · Immuno Concepts, Inc. · DHN · Dec 18, 1998 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K983924
Device Name
HEP-2000 COLORZYME ANA-RO TEST SYSTEM, MODEL 4200-RO
Applicant
Immuno Concepts, Inc.
Product Code
DHN · Immunology
Decision Date
Dec 18, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5100
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
This test system is for in vitro diagnostic use for the detection of antinuclear antibodies in human serum, with specific identification of autoantibodies to the SS-A/Ro antigen. This test system is to be used as an aid in the detection of antibodies associated with systemic rheumatic disease. The results from this assay can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases.
Device Story
Indirect immunoenzyme antibody test; utilizes transfected HEp-2000 cell line overexpressing SS-A/Ro autoantigen. Input: human serum samples. Process: patient serum incubated with transfected cells; presence of anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies produces distinctive staining pattern. Output: visual identification of staining patterns via microscopy. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by trained laboratory personnel. Distinctive staining pattern serves as confirmation for anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies; aids clinicians in diagnosing systemic rheumatic/autoimmune diseases. Benefits: improved sensitivity for SS-A/Ro detection compared to non-transfected HEp-2 cells; higher titer values for anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evaluated 500 healthy donors, 46 patients with SLE/Sjögren's, and 230 patients with various rheumatic/non-rheumatic diseases. Compared HEp-2000 staining patterns against non-transfected HEp-2 cells, ELISA, and Western blot. HEp-2000 showed 100% sensitivity (46/46) for anti-SS-A/Ro positive samples. In a reference lab study (n=349), distinctive staining pattern showed 99.6% concordance with positive ELISA results. Reproducibility confirmed across three lots and multiple occasions.
Technological Characteristics
Indirect immunoenzyme antibody test; substrate is transfected HEp-2000 cell line overexpressing SS-A/Ro autoantigen. Principle: immunofluorescence/immunoenzyme staining. Form factor: microscope slides. Analysis: visual microscopic observation of staining patterns. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the semi-quantitative detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in human serum and specific identification of autoantibodies to the SS-A/Ro antigen. Used as an aid in the diagnosis of systemic rheumatic and autoimmune diseases.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antinuclear antibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoimmune antibodies in serum, other body fluids, and tissues that react with cellular nuclear constituents (molecules present in the nucleus of a cell, such as ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid, or nuclear proteins). The measurements aid in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (a multisystem autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack the victim's own tissues), hepatitis (a liver disease), rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome (arthritis with inflammation of the eye, eyelid, and salivary glands), and systemic sclerosis (chronic hardening and shrinking of many body tissues).
{0}------------------------------------------------
# DEC 1 8 1998
K983924
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Immuno Concepts. The logo consists of two horizontal lines on the left, followed by the letters "IC" with a stylized infinity symbol in the middle. To the right of the "IC" is the word "immuno" stacked on top of the word "concepts".
- 510(k) SUMMARY*
Date Prepared: August 10, 1998 Contact Person: Eric S. Hoy, Ph.D. Name of Device:
- · Trade Name HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System
- · Common Name HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System
- · Classification Name Antinuclear Antibody (21 CFR 866.5100)
Legally marketed device with which this device has been shown to be equivalent: RELISA® SS-A/SS-B Antibody Test System, K955603
### Description:
This is an indirect immunoenzyme antibody test for the semi-quantitative detection of antinuclear antibody in human serum. The transfected HEP-2 cell line allows for the identification of anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies because of the unique staining pattern that these antibodies show on this cell line.
### Intended Use:
This test system is for in vitro diagnostic use for the detection of antinuclear antibodies in human serum, with specific identification of autoantibodies to the SS-A/Ro antigen. This test system is to be used as an aid in the detection of antibodies associated with systemic rheumatic disease. The results from this assay can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases.
## Summary of Technological Characteristics Compared to the Predicate Device:
This device is an indirect immunoenzyme antibody test for the detection of antinuclear antibodies. This 510(k) submission is an extension of K950979. In this new submission we have shown that the transfected HEp-2000® cell line produces a distinctive pattern that is confirmatory for the presence of antibodies to the SS-A/Ro autoantigen. We have compared the present device to an ELISA assay which is confirmatory for antibodies to the SS-A/Ro autoantigen (K955603) .
## Description of Laboratory Data That Indicate Substantial Equivalence: NORMAL SAMPLES
Sera from 500 healthy blood donors, 242 females and 258 males, none of whom had any known history of rheumatic diseases, were tested in parallel using commercially available, non-transfected HEp-2 cells and the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System. In this population, 36 samples (7.2%) showed positive antinuclear antibody tests at a 1:40 dilution of serum. Patterns of staining were identical on the two substrates for 34 of the 36 positive samples. The two samples that showed differences were both from female patients, and both were confirmed to contain anti-SS-A/Ro antibodies. One of these samples showed a weak fine speckled reaction on the non-transfected HEO-2 cells and the typical "SS-A/Ro" staining on the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System. The other sample was negative on the non-transfected HEp-2 but showed typical "SS-A/Ro" staining on the HED-2000® Colorzyme® ANA
{1}------------------------------------------------
Ro Test System. The SS-A/Ro specificity of these two samples was confirmed by ELISA testing and by Western immunoblotting. Samples which were negative on the ANA tests were also negative in the ELISA assay.
#### SERA FROM PATIENTS WITH ONLY RO/SS-A ANTIBODIES
Sera from 46 patients with SLE or Sjögren's Syndrome were tested using commercially available, non-transfected HEp-2 cells and the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System. All of these sera were confirmed to contain antibodies to the SS-A/Ro autoantigen by ELISA testing and by Western immunoblotting. No other autoantibodies were detected in any of these samples. Thirty six of these samples (78%) were positive (speckled pattern) with the non-transfected HEp-2 cells, and all 46 (100%) were positive (distinctive Ro/SS-A staining pattern) with the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System.
#### SERA FROM PATIENTS WITH AUTOANTIBODIES OTHER THAN SS-A/RO
Serum samples from 230 patients with a variety of rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases were tested in parallel using commercially available, non-transfected HEp-2 cells and the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System. A single staining pattern was seen with 120 samples, and mixed patterns were seen with 110 samples. Among the total population of 230 samples, 333 staining patterns were identical on both substrates. Twenty nine samples showed the distinctive "SS-A/Ro" staining pattern on the HEp-2000® Test System. Twenty three of these samples showed speckled patterns on the non-transfected HEp-2 cells. The six discrepant samples (positive on HEp-2000®, but negative on nontransfected HEp-2 cells) all had SS-A/Ro antibodies, as demonstrated by the distinctive "SS-A/Ro" staining pattern, ELISA tests, and Western blot confirmation.
#### TITER COMPARISONS
Because of the overexpression of the SS-A/Ro autoantigen in the HEp-2000® cells, samples that contain anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies show higher titer values on these cells than the values obtained on non-transfected HEp-2 cells. Since none of the other autoantigens in the HEp-2000® cells are affected by the transfection process, sera with other autoantibody specificities do not show significant titer differences between the transfected HEp-2000® cell line and non-transfected HEp-2 cells.
#### REPRODUCIBILITY TITER
Ten samples, chosen from CDC controls and other well characterized in-house sera, were run on three different lot numbers of HEp-2000® slides, on three different occasions. In no case did a neqative sample show positive results. All titer values were within one two-fold dilution of the established mean titer value for all samples tested.
#### CONFIRMATION SS-A/Ro ANTIBODIES OF
In a large rheumatology reference laboratory, serum samples from 349 patients with known positive ANA tests were assayed using the HEp-2000® Colorzyme® In this selected population, 239 samples showed the distinctive Test System. SS-A/Ro staining pattern. Positive ELISA tests for SS-A/Ro antibodies were obtained in 238 (99.68) of these samples. An additional 79 samples showed strong speckled and/or homogeneous patterns, but gave positive ELISA tests for SS-A/Ro antibodies.. Thus, if the distinctive SS-A/Ro pattern is seen, it is confirmatory for the presence of SS-A/Ro antibodies, but the absence of the pattern does not rule out the possible presence of SS-A/Ro antibodies.
In the studies outlined above, we have examined a total of 429 sera that contain SS-A/Ro antibodies as confirmed by ELISA testing and/or Western
{2}------------------------------------------------
Immunoblots, and which showed the distinctive SS-A/Ro staining pattern on the transfected HEp-2000® cell line. We have also seen samples which contain SS-A/Ro antibodies, but do not display the distinctive SS-A/Ro staining pattern, because high levels of other autoantibodies (usually anti-DNA antibodies or anti-Sm/RNP antibodies) mask the SS-A/Ro pattern. Thus, if the distinctive SS-A/Ro pattern is seen, it is confirmatory for the presence of SS-A/Ro antibodies, but the absence of the pattern does not rule out the possible presence of SS-A/Ro antibodies.
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92(b)(3), we conclude from these data that the present device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
DEC 1 8 1998 Eric S. Hoy, Ph.D., SI(ASCP) Chief Scientific Officer Immuno Concepts, Inc. 2280 Springlake Road, Suite 106 Dallas, Texas 75234
Re: K983924 HEP-2000® ANA-Ro Test System Trade Name: Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DHN Dated: November 3, 1998 November 4, 1998 Received:
Dear Dr. Hoy:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in assumptions. regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Reqister. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
Image /page/3/Picture/8 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. The profiles are simple and abstract, with curved lines suggesting the faces. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the image.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling requlation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Putman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure ..
{5}------------------------------------------------
| <br> | . |
|------|---|
| | |
510(k) number (if known):
Device Name: HEp-2000® Colorzyme® ANA-Ro Test System
Indications for use:
This is an indirect immunoenzyme antibody test for the semi-quantitative detection of antinuclear antibodies in human serum, with specific identification of autoantibodies to the SS-A/Ro antigen. This test system is to be used as an aid in the detection of antibodies associated with systemic rheumatic disease.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Peter E. Malm
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K983924
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109) /
Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OR
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.