Retrospective analysis of serial serum samples from 78 ovarian cancer patients to validate the assay's clinical utility in monitoring disease progression and response to therapy.
Retrospective study; Ovarian cancer monitoring; Serial serum samples; Clinical specimen banks
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective serial monitoring of ovarian cancer patients; Retrospective clinical study
78 ovarian cancer patients (Stages I-IV); Sample Size: 78; Number of Sites: 2
Not applicable for this study
Correspondence of CA 125 II assay values with clinical course of disease (progression/response)
Indications for Use
The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is an in vitro device for the quantitative measurement of OC 125 determinants associated with a high molecular weight glycoprotein in serum of women with epithelial invasive ovarian cancer. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is indicated as a one time test for use as an aid in the detection of residual or recurrent ovarian carcinoma in patients who have undergone first-line therapy and would be considered for second-look procedures. An assay value greater than 35 U/mL is predictive of residual disease provided alternative causes of an elevated CA 125II value can be excluded. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is further indicated as an aid in the management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients when used in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures. It is recommended that the Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay be used under the order of a physician trained and experienced in management of gynecological cancers. This assay is not intended for screening or diagnosis of ovarian cancer, or for use on any other system.
Device Story
In vitro diagnostic immunoassay for quantitative measurement of CA 125 antigen in human serum. Uses sandwich immunoassay principle: monoclonal antibody M11 conjugated to fluorescein and monoclonal antibody OC 125 conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. Patient sample, calibrators, or controls mixed with magnetic particles coated with anti-fluorescein antibody; incubated at 37°C. Sandwich immunocomplex forms on solid phase; unbound molecules washed away. Colorimetric substrate added; rate of conversion measured at 405 or 450 nm. Rate proportional to CA 125 concentration. Used in clinical laboratories by trained technicians. Results provided to physicians to monitor ovarian cancer patients; serial measurements (doubling of values or 50% decrease) assist in assessing disease progression or response to therapy. Benefits include objective longitudinal tracking of disease status in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective study of 78 ovarian cancer patients (Stages I-IV) at two US sites. Evaluated longitudinal trends of serum CA 125 II concentrations against clinical status. Sensitivity to clinical change was 79% (58/73 evaluable patients); positive predictive value was 96% (50/52). Bench testing (previously cleared in K964098) confirmed analytical sensitivity, specificity, imprecision (total CV 2.2-4.1%), linearity, and lack of hook effect.
Technological Characteristics
Sandwich immunoassay; monoclonal antibodies M11 and OC 125; alkaline phosphatase conjugate; magnetic particle solid phase; colorimetric detection (405/450 nm). Range 0-500 U/mL. Cubic-through-zero curve fitting algorithm. Automated system-based assay.
Indications for Use
Indicated for women with primary epithelial invasive ovarian cancer. Used as an aid in monitoring disease status and as a one-time test for detecting residual/recurrent carcinoma in post-first-line therapy patients. Not for screening or diagnosis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY FOR THE BAYER IMMUNO 1™ CA 125 II™ ASSAY
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is:
### 1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Trade Name:
Bayer Immuno 1TM CA 125 II™ Assay
Classification Name:
Tumor-Associated Antigen Immunological Test Systems
Gabriel J. Muraca, Jr.
Gabriel J. Muraca, Jr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs Bayer Corporation Business Group Diagnostics 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown, NY 10591 Phone 914-524-3494 FAX 914-524-2500
4/12/99
Date
{1}------------------------------------------------
This premarket notification is to expand the intended use of the Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay to include management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 IITM Assay received 510(k) clearance (K964098) on October 31, 1997 with the intended use as an indication for second look diagnostic procedures in ovarian cancer patients. This intended use was supported with clinical data demonstrating assay values in the target ovarian cancer population as well as expected values in healthy individuals and patients with related benign and malignant diseases. The 510(k) referenced above also reported non-clinical laboratory studies including reagent characterization, analytical sensitivity, imprecision, assay specificity and interfering substances, linear range, sample dilution, hook effect, reagent lot-to-lot variation, and method comparison to the Centocor CA 125 II™ RIA. In this current 510(k) application, the performance and clinical safety and effectiveness of the Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II TM Assay for the management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients has been established by external clinical studies in the target population of longitudinal ovarian cancer patients and by comparison to accepted diagnostic procedures in accordance with the "Guidance Document For Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications, 510(k), to the FDA." Clinical evaluations of the Bayer Immuno 1™CA 125 II™ Assay at two US clinical trial sites demonstrated clinical safety and effectiveness. These studies validated clinical performance characteristics and the comparison to accepted diagnostic procedures.
### 2. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II™ Assay is an in vitro device for the quantitative measurement of OC 125 reactive determinants associated with a high molecular weight glycoprotein in serum of women with primary epithelial invasive ovarian cancer. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II™ Assay is indicated as an aid in the management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients when used in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures. The CA 125 II™ Assay is also indicated as a one time test for use as an aid in the detection of residual ovarian carcinoma in patients who have undergone first line therapy and would be considered for diagnostic second look procedures. An assay value of greater than or equal to 35 U/mL is predictive of residual disease, provided that alternative causes of an elevated CA 125 II™ assay value can be excluded. It is recommended that the Bayer Immuno 1 CA 125 II assay be used under the order of a physician trained and experienced in management of gynecological cancers.
{2}------------------------------------------------
### 3. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II™ Assay utilizes a well-established immunoassay technology in which one monoclonal antibody (M11) is conjugated to fluorescein (R1) and a second monoclonal antibody (OC 125) is conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (R2). An Immuno 1 Magnetic Particle coated with anti-fluorescein antibody, the R1 conjugate, and patient sample, calibrator, or control are mixed simultaneously and incubated at 37℃ on the system. The R2 conjugate is then added, and binds to the immobilized CA 125 to form a sandwich immunocomplex on the solid phase. The magnetic particles complexed with the immunological sandwich are then washed to separate unbound molecules, and a colorimetric substrate is added. The rate of conversion of substrate to a compound with absorbance at 405 or 450 nm is measured rate is proportional to the concentration of CA 125 antigen in the sample. A cubic-through-zero curve fitting algorithm is used to generate standard curves.
The assay has a range of 0 to 500 UmL. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II™ Assay Calibrators consist of a set of six calibrator levels at 0, 15, 30, 80, 200, and 500 U/mL.
### 4. SUMMARY OF STUDIES
The Bayer Immuno 1TM CA125 IITM Assay received 510(k) clearance (K964098) on October 31, 1997 with the intended use as an indication for second look diagnostic procedures in ovarian cancer patients. This intended use was supported with clinical data demonstrating assay values in the target ovarian cancer population as well as expected values in healthy individuals and patients with related benign and malignant diseases. In addition, the Immuno I CA 125 II™ Assay was evaluated at three clinical sites for imprecision: Site 1 was Bayer Corporation, Tarrytown, NY, Site 2 was Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland and Site 3 was Hopital Saint-Luc, Montreal. The 510(k) referenced above also reported non-clinical laboratory studies performed at Bayer Corporation, Diagnostics Division, Tarrytown, New York. These studies included reagent characterization, analytical sensitivity, imprecision, assay specificity and interfering substances, linear range, parallelism (sample dilution), hook effect, reagent lot-to-lot variation, and method comparison to the Centocor CA 125 II RIA.
{3}------------------------------------------------
The clinical evaluation of Immuno 1 CA 125 IITM Assay as a quantitative measure of OC 125 reactive determinants in human serum for use as an adjunctive test in the management of ovarian cancer patients was conducted at two US clinical trial sites: Johns Hopkins Hospital (Site JH) and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Site MDA).
### 4.1 Imprecision
As reported in the initial 510(k) submission (K964098) which was cleared on October 31, 1997, within-run and total assay imprecision were evaluated by testing five levels of Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ assay calibrators, BioRad Tumor Marker Controls, and an internal medical decision level serum pool (approximately 28 U/mL) over a period of twenty days of assay qualification runs. Imprecision was evaluated at three clinical trial sites: Site 1 was Bayer Corporation, Tarrytown, NY, Site 2 was Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland and Site 3 was Hôpital Saint-Luc, Montreal Within-run imprecision ranged from 1.4% to 3.6% CV, and total imprecision ranged from 2.2% to 4.1% CV across products and sites. These results indicate that the recovery of Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ assay values are highly reproducible over time. Imprecision results are presented in Table 1.
| PRODUCT | MEAN | OBSERVATIONS | WITHIN-RUN | | TOTAL | |
|----------|--------|--------------|------------|-----|--------|-----|
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| | (U/mL) | (n) | (U/mL) | (%) | (U/mL) | (%) |
| BioRad 1 | 24.7 | 667 | 0.90 | 3.6 | 1.02 | 4.1 |
| MD Pool | 26.1 | 677 | 0.61 | 2.3 | 0.87 | 3.3 |
| BioRad 2 | 56.8 | 680 | 1.97 | 3.5 | 2.21 | 3.9 |
| | | | | | | |
| Cal 1 | 0.1 | 275 | 0.06 | - | 0.08 | - |
| Cal 2 | 15.1 | 456 | 0.33 | 2.2 | 0.43 | 2.8 |
| Cal 3 | 30.2 | 454 | 0.54 | 1.8 | 0.72 | 2.4 |
| Cal 4 | 80.6 | 458 | 1.43 | 1.8 | 2.04 | 2.5 |
| Cal 5 | 200.2 | 447 | 3.96 | 2.0 | 5.22 | 2.6 |
| Cal 6 | 490.7 | 245 | 6.85 | 1.4 | 10.84 | 2.2 |
## Table 1: Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay Imprecision
{4}------------------------------------------------
### 4.6 CLINICAL STUDIES
#### 4.6.1 Introduction
To assess the safety and effectiveness of the Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II Assay for monitoring ovarian cancer patients during the course of disease and therapy, clinical studies were performed at two investigational sites: Johns Hopkins Hospital (Site JH) and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Site MDA).
All patient samples were studied retrospectively. Assay values were determined for surplus serum samples which had been collected and stored (-70° C) in specimen banks prior to the study.
### Serial Monitoring - Management Value of the Immuno 1 CA 125 II ™ Assay 4.6.2 Results for Ovarian Cancer Patients
A retrospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate serial Immuno 1 CA 125 II Assay values in 78 ovarian cancer patients (Stages I - IV) during their course of disease and therapy. The study group included patients who responded to therapy, experienced disease progression, exhibited stable persistent disease, and demonstrated no clinical evidence of disease following treatment. Of the 78 patients enrolled in the study, 5 patients were not evaluable due to the lack of hard clinical data to confirm their clinical status. These patients were placed in the "Indeterminate" column in Table 2 and were not used in the analysis.
| Bayer Immuno 1 Longitudinal Patient Evaluation Results Ovarian<br>Cancer Patients Only | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------|
| Correspondence<br>(Parallels clinical course) | N | Percentage |
| Increasing CA 125 II with Progression | 24 | 33 |
| Decreasing CA 125 II with response | 19 | 26 |
| Increasing and decreasing CA 125 II with<br>progression and response | 7 | 10 |
| Stable disease or No Evidence of Disease with<br>no change in CA 125 II values | 8 | 11 |
| Total paralleling clinical course | 58 | 79 |
| No Correspondence (total)<br>(Does not parallel the clinical course) | 15 | 21 |
## Table 2: Clinical Trial Results
{5}------------------------------------------------
The correspondence of Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ assay levels with the clinical course of disease was evaluated similar to Bast et al.(16) by means of a doubling of CA 125 II values reflects disease progression and a 50% decrease in CA 125 II values reflects disease response to therapy. Using these criteria, results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that the sensitivity of longitudinal measurements using the Bayer Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ assay as compared to the changes in clinical condition was 79%. The positive predictive value of an increase in assay values ≥ 100% into or within the abnormal (> 35 UlmL) range or a decrease in assay values ≥ 50% was 96%.
## Table 3: Evaluation Of Ovarian Cancer
| | YES | NO | Indeterminate | TOTAL | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|----|---------------|-------|----|
| CA 125 II Values:<br>Increase ≥ 100% into or<br>within the abnormal range<br>(>35 U/mL) with clinical<br>progression or decrease<br>≥ 50% with clinical response | YES | 50 | 2 | 5 | 57 |
| | NO | 13 | 8 | | 21 |
| | TOTAL | 63 | 10 | 5 | 78 |
Clinical Status Change During The
Profile Period
| Sensitivity to change: | 79% (58/73) |
|----------------------------|-------------|
| Positive Predictive Value: | 96% (50/52) |
These data support the clinical utility of the Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay as an adjunctive test for use in the management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients during the course of disease and therapy.
{6}------------------------------------------------
### 4.6.3 Conclusions from the Clinical Studies
Results of the retrospective serial monitoring of patients with malignant ovarian disease confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Immuno 1 CA 125 IIT™ Assay as an aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients during the course of disease and therapy. This clinical study clearly demonstrates that the Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay is sensitive to changes in disease status of ovarian cancer patients. The longitudinal trends of serum CA 125 II concentrations agreed well with clinical status in 58 of 78 patients studied with progression accompanied by a ≥ 100% increase in assay values into or within the abnormal range (> 35 U/mL), and response reflected by a ≥ 50% decrease in assay values. Longitudinal sensitivity to change in clinical condition was 79%, and the positive predictive value of the test was 96 %.
### CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM ALL THE STUDIES ડ.
## Valid Scientific Evidence
The conclusions drawn from these studies are based upon valid scientific evidence. Data were gathered following a well-designed protocol, in a research laboratory operating under the principles of Good Clinical Practices. Clinical data were gathered during well controlled investigations conducted by qualified experts. Patient case histories were well documented. The results of this study are comparable to literature reports of experiences with CA 125 assays (1-2, 5-7, 13-16).
## Method Performance
Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ results are highly reproducible with a maximum inter-assay %CV pooled over reagent lots and clinical sites of 4.1% over the range of the assay. Other performance characteristics including analytical sensitivity and specificity, cross-reactivity, linearity, antigen excess hook effect, and parallelism were reported in the previous 510(k) for this assay (K964098) and meet the accepted specifications set for an assay of this type.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Safety and Effectiveness
These clinical studies confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay as an aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients. The correlation between Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ concentrations and the patients' clinical course of disease demonstrate that the Immuno 1 CA 125 II™ Assay may be used in conjunction with other clinical indicators to confirm disease progression and response to therapy in ovarian cancer patients.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States of America. The seal features a stylized eagle with three stripes extending from its head, symbolizing health, human services, and well-being. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
MAY 1 4 1999
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Gabriel J. Muraca, Jr. Manager Regulatory Affairs Bayer Corporation 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown, New York 10591-5097
Re: K983715
Trade Name: Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125 II™ Assay Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LTK Dated: March 11, 1999 Received: March 15, 1999
Dear Mr. Muraca:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrl/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Dutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{10}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): K983715
Device Name: Bayer Immuno 17M CA 125II Assay
Indications For Use:
The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is an in vitro device for the quantitative measurement of OC 125 determinants associated with a high molecular weight glycoprotein in serum of women with epithelial invasive ovarian cancer. The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is indicated as a one time test for use as an aid in the detection of residual or recurrent ovarian carcinoma in patients who have undergone first-line therapy and would be considered for second-look procedures. An assay value greater than 35 U/mL is predictive of residual disease provided alternative causes of an elevated CA 125II value can be excluded.
The Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay is further indicated as an aid in the management (monitoring) of ovarian cancer patients when used in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures.
It is recommended that the Bayer Immuno 1™ CA 125II Assay be used under the order of a physician trained and experienced in management of gynecological cancers. This assay is not intended for screening or diagnosis of ovarian cancer, or for use on any other system.
Peter E. Masteri
(Division Si
Division of i
510(k) Num
Kg83715
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use U (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use ------------------------------------
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.