IMMULITE AFP, MODEL LKAPI, LKAP5, IMMULITE 2000 AFP, MODEL L2KAP2
Applicant
Diagnostic Products Corp.
Product Code
LOJ · Immunology
Decision Date
Dec 7, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.6010
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
IMMULITE AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE Analyzer - for the quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum, as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. IMMULITE 2000 AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Analyzer - for the quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum, as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
Device Story
IMMULITE and IMMULITE 2000 AFP are automated in vitro diagnostic immunoassay systems. Input: human serum samples. Principle: solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Process: patient sample and buffer/matrix incubated with monoclonal anti-AFP antibody-coated polystyrene beads; unbound material removed via centrifugal wash; alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-AFP antibody added; unbound conjugate removed; chemiluminescent substrate (phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane) added. Output: light emission measured by luminometer, proportional to AFP concentration. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in assessing disease extent, monitoring therapeutic effectiveness, and detecting disease recurrence in nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluated via method comparison studies at two sites. Study 1 (n=264) and Study 2 (n=213) compared IMMULITE AFP to Abbott IMx AFP. Results showed 94.9%-95.4% relative sensitivity and 97.3% relative specificity. Agreement between assays was 96.6%-96.7%. Linear regression (n=424) yielded r=0.99. IMMULITE 2000 AFP compared to IMMULITE AFP (n=205) showed r=0.998. No clinical data on patient outcomes provided; evidence based on analytical performance equivalence to predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Solid phase: polystyrene bead coated with monoclonal anti-AFP antibody. Detection: alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-AFP antibody; chemiluminescent substrate (phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane). Energy source: automated analyzer luminometer. Connectivity: integrated with IMMULITE/IMMULITE 2000 Automated Immunoassay Analyzers. Manufacturing: ISO 9002/EN29002/BS 5750 certified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K983263
# 510 (k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Name: Address:
Telephone Number:
Contact Person:
Date of Preparation:
Catalog Number:
Device Name Trade: Common:
Classification:
Manufacturer:
Sole U. S. Importer:
Establishment Registration #:
Substantially Equivalent Predicate Device:
Diagnostic Products Corporation 5700 West 96th Street Los Angeles, California 90045
(310) 645-8200
Edward M. Levine, Ph.D.
September 16, 1998
LKAP1, LKAP5 (100, 500 tests) L2KAP2 (200 tests)
IMMULITE® and IMMULITE® 2000 AFP Reagent system for the determination of AFP antigen in serum.
LOJ, Class II device
Euro/DPC Limited Glyn Rhonwy Llanberis, Gwynedd LL55 4EL United Kingdom (Manufactured under a Quality System-ISO 9002/EN29002/BS 5750)
Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) 5700 West 96th Street Los Angeles, CA 90045-5597
Euro/DPC - Not applicable DPC Registration number is 2017183
Abbott IMx® AFP (P820060)
{1}------------------------------------------------
## Description of Device:
IMMULITE® AFP is a clinical device for use with the IMMULITE Automated Immunoassay Analyzer. IMMULITE® 2000 AFP is a clinical device for use with the IMMULITE 2000 Automated Immunoassay Analyzer.
## Intended Use of the Device:
IMMULITE AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE Analyzer - for the quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum, as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. IMMULITE 2000 AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Analyzer - for the quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in human serum, as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
## Summary and Explanation of the Test:
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a single-chain glycoprotein with a molecular mass of approximately 70,000 daltons. AFP shares considerable sequence homology with albumin, and is produced by the fetus primarily in cells of the yolk sac, gastrointestinal tract and liver. AFP appears as a major serum protein in the fetus, but its concentration decreases rapidly toward birth. The reappearance of elevated AFP concentrations in adult serum has been observed not only during pregnancy, but also in conjunction with several benign and malignant diseases.
Discovery of an embryo-specific protein, AFP, in human fetal serum was reported in 1956 by Bergstrand and Czar. In 1963, Abelev observed that transplanted mouse hepatocellular carcinomas were capable of synthesizing AFP and secreting it into the circulation. The first report of AFP as a human tumor-associated protein was made by Tatarinov in 1964, based on his observations of elevated AFP concentrations in patients with primary liver tumors. In 1968, subsequent to these discoveries, Masopust et al. reported the occurrence of elevated AFP concentrations in the serum of patients with teratocarcinomas of the testis.
Since the report by Masopust et al, elevated levels of AFP have been observed not only in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer, but also in patients with other malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, gastrointestinal cancer and pulmonary cancer. Serum AFP is frequently elevated in benign hepatic conditions such as acute viral hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis. Conditions of pregnancy, ataxia telangiectasia and hereditary tyrosinemia have also presented with elevated concentrations of AFP.
Seminomas, in pure form, do not present with elevated concentrations of AFP. However. elevated concentrations of serum AFP have been observed in patients diagnosed with seminomatous testicular cancer accompanied by nonseminomatous metastases. During
{2}------------------------------------------------
chemotherapy, patients with advanced seminoma and hepatic dysfunction have also presented with elevated serum AFP concentrations. The interpretation of elevated AFP concentrations in patients with seminoma requires special consideration and should assist the clinician in the selection of appropriate therapy.
The clinical utility of AFP measurement as an aid in the management of patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer is well documented. AFP measurement has found clinical application as an aid in assessing the extent of disease. It has been observed that the frequency of AFP elevation increases with the stage of nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
Serial measurements of serum AFP have been shown to reflect the effectiveness of therapeutic regimens in patients with nonseminomatous testicular tumors. Post-surgical determinations of AFP are particularly valuable. The presence of residual turnor is strongly suggested if post-operative AFP concentrations fail to return to normal. The accurate interpretation of post-surgical changes in AFP concentration requires consideration of its metabolic decay rate. When utilizing AFP for monitoring therapy or disease recurrence during chemotherapy, it should be noted that levels often fall rapidly during chemotherapy, reaching normal levels while tumor masses are still evident. In such instances, completion of the planned therapy has been recommended.
Following therapy or surgery, serial measurements of AFP have also proved clinically useful when monitoring for progression or recurrence of disease in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. It has been reported that AFP levels frequently rise during disease progression and fall during disease remission. Elevated AFP levels have frequently been observed to accompany tumor recurrence before progressive disease is clinically evident.
#### Performance Equivalence - Technology Comparison:
IMMULITE AFP is a solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent immunometric assay and Abbott IMx AFP is a microparticle enzvme immunoassay (MEIA). The technology in DPC's IMMULITE AFP is identical to technology used in previously cleared and commercially marketed IMMULITE products.
IMMULITE AFP is a solid-phase, two-site sequential chemiluminescent immunometric assay. The solid phase, a polystyrene bead enclosed within an IMMULITE Test Unit, is coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for AFP.
The patient sample and a buffer/serum matrix are simultaneously introduced into the Test Unit, and incubated for approximately 30 minutes at 37 ℃ with intermittent agitation. During this time, AFP in the sample binds to the monoclonal, anti-AFP antibody-coated bead. Unbound plasma is then removed by a centrifugal wash.
An alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-AFP antibody is introduced, and the Test Unit is incubated for another 30-minute cycle. The unbound enzyme conjugate is
{3}------------------------------------------------
removed by a centrifugal wash. Substrate is then added, and the Test Unit is incubated for a further 10 minutes.
The chemiluminescent substrate, a phosphate ester of adamantyl dioxetane, undergoes hydrolysis in the presence of alkaline phosphatase to yield an unstable intermediate. The continuous production of this intermediate results in the sustained emission of light, thus improving precision by providing a window for multiple readings. The bound complex and thus the photon output, as measured by the luminometer - is proportional to the concentration of AFP in the sample.
IMMULITE 2000 AFP is a solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent immunometric assay. The solid phase is a polystyrene bead coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for AFP.
The patient serum sample and a buffer/serum matrix are introduced into the Reaction Tube containing the bead and incubated for approximately 30 minutes at 37 ℃ with agitation. During this time, AFP in the sample binds to the monoclonal, anti-AFP antibody-coated bead. Unbound plasma is then removed by a centrifugal wash.
An alkaline phosphatase-labeled polyclonal anti-AFP antibody is introduced and the Reaction Tube is incubated for another 30 minute cycle. The unbound enzyme conjugate is removed by a centrifugal wash. Substrate is then added, and the Reaction Tube is incubated for a further 5 minutes.
The concentration of AFP in the sample is then measured in the same manner as that of IMMULITE AFP.
The IMx AFP assay is based on the Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay (MEIA) Technology. The IMx AFP reagents and samples are added to the reaction cell in the following sequence:
- · The probe/electrode assembly delivers the sample. Specimen Diluent and Anti-AFP Coated Microparticles to the incubation well of the reaction cell. During the incubation of this reaction mixture the AFP binds to the Anti-AFP Coated Microparticles forming an antibody-antigen complex.
- · An aliquot of the reaction mixture is transferred to the glass fiber matrix. The microparticles bind irreversibly to the glass fiber matrix.
- · The matrix is washed to remove unbound materials.
- · Anti-AFP:Alkaline Phosphatase Conjugate is dispensed onto the matrix and binds to the antibody-antigen complex.
- · The matrix is washed to remove unbound materials.
{4}------------------------------------------------
- · The substrate, 4-Methylumbelliferyl Phosphate, is added to the matrix and the fluorescent product is measured by the MEIA optical assembly.
#### Performance Equivalence - Method Comparison
#### IMMULITE AFP
The IMMULITE AFP assay was compared to Abbott's IMx AFP, a commercially available EIA, at two clinical sites. A total of 264 specimens from male patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer, malignant and nonmalignant conditions, and a few female patients, were evaluated in a clinical site in the northwestern United States. The qualitative comparison of the IMMULITE AFP and Abbott's IMx AFP values yielded the following results.
| | IMMULITE AFP | | Relative<br>Sensitivity | Relative<br>Specificity |
|-----------|--------------|----------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
| IMx AFP | Positive* | Negative | | |
| Positive* | 74 | 4 | 94.9% | 97.3% |
| Negative | 5 | 181 | | |
* IMMULITE AFP uses 5 IU/mL as the cutoff.
* IMx AFP uses 7.36 IU/mL (= 8.9 ng/mL) as the cutoff.
Agreement: 96.6%
95% Confidence Limits (by exact method) for Relative Sensitivity and Specificity, respectively:
87.4% - 98.6% and 93.8% - 99.1%
In a second study in the southern United States, a total of 213 specimens from male patients with seminomatous and nonseminomatous testicular cancer, patients with malignant conditions, plus a few females patients were tested with both IMMULITE AFP and Abbott's IMx AFP, with the following results.
| | IMMULITE AFP | | Relative<br>Sensitivity | Relative<br>Specificity |
|-----------|--------------|----------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
| IMx AFP | Positive* | Negative | | |
| Positive* | 62 | 3 | 95.4% | 97.3% |
| Negative | 4 | 144 | | |
* IMMULITE AFP uses 5 IU/mL as the cutoff.
* IMx AFP uses 7.36 IU/mL (= 8.9 ng/mL) as the cutoff.
96.7% Agreement:
95% Confidence Limits (by exact method) for Relative Sensitivity and Specificity. respectively:
87.1-99.0% and 93.2% - 99.3%
{5}------------------------------------------------
The specimens from the two clinical sites with AFP measurements within the calibration ranges of both IMMULITE AFP and IMx AFP (n = 424) were compared in a linear regression, yielding the following relationship between the two assays in IU/mL.
$$\text{IMMULITE AFP} = 0.83 \times \text{IMx AFP} - 0.17 \qquad \qquad \text{r} = 0.99 \text{ }\%$$
#### IMMULITE 2000 AFP
The assay was compared to DPC's IMMULITE AFP in a linear regression on a total of 205 samples from male patients in different clinical stages (pre and post surgery) of their nonseminomatous testicular cancer, with a concentration range of approximately 0.3 to 280 IU/mL.
(IML 2000) = 1.04 (IML) + 0.34 IU/mL
Means: 57 IU/mL (IMMULITE 2000) r = 0.998 54 IU/mL (IMMULITE)
#### Conclusion:
The conclusions drawn from the clinical and nonclinical studies demonstrate that the device is safe and effective and performs as well as, or better than, the current legally marketed device.
Edward Lewis
ward M. Levine, Ph.D. Ed Director, Clinical Affairs
9/16/98
Data
Date
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/2 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal is circular with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
7 1998 DEC
Edward M. Levine, Ph.D. Director, Clinical Affairs DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION 5700 West 96th Street Los Angeles, CA 90045
Re: K983263 Trade Name: IMMULITE® and IMMULITE® 2000 AFP Requlatory Class: II Product Code: LOJ November 16, 1998 Dated: Received: November 17, 1998
Dear Dr. Levine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in requlatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling requlation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Number (if known): Device Name: IMMULITE® AFP
Indications For Use:
IMMULITE AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE Analyzer – for the quantitative
measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in serum, as an aid in the management of patients with
nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
# Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-
96)
{9}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):_ Device Name: IMMULITE® 2006
Indications For Use:
IMMULITE 2000 AFP is for in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Analyzer – for the
quantitative measurement of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in serum, as an aid in the management of
patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer.
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K983263
4
Prescription C (Per 21 CFR 801.109
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-
96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.