The device is used to anchor suture into bone. The suture subsequently used by the surgeon to reattach the repositioned/injured soft tissue to bone. The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to obtain clearance for the Mitek Micro Anchor for the lateral canthoplasty repair/reconstruction of collateral ligaments, flexor and extension tendons at the PIP (Proximal Interphalangeal), DIP (Distal Interphalangeal), and MCP (Metacarpal Interphalangeal) joints for all digits. The intended use is the same as the predicate device, i.e., suture, when used to approximate soft tissue to bone during a period of rehabilitation.
Device Story
Mitek Micro Anchor is a bone fixation device (3.7mm length, 1.3mm diameter) used to anchor suture into bone for soft tissue reattachment. Operated by surgeons in clinical settings; device is implanted to secure collateral ligaments and tendons at finger joints. Input is manual insertion into bone; device transforms mechanical force into secure fixation via a Nitinol arc mechanism. Output is a stable suture anchor point. Clinical benefit includes facilitating soft tissue-to-bone approximation during rehabilitation. Device is used as an alternative to traditional bone tunnels.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing performed on cadaveric and porcine models. Average failure loads: 9.67 lbs (cadaver hand), 7.97 lbs (cadaver skull), 7.28 lbs (pig metacarpals), compared to 5.73 lbs for suture with bone tunnels. Clinical safety and effectiveness supported by historical data for identical surgical procedures under IDE #G880026.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Titanium 6Al 4V with Nitinol arc. Dimensions: 3.7mm length, 1.3mm diameter. Mechanical fixation principle. Sterilized. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for repair/reconstruction of collateral ligaments, flexor and extension tendons at the PIP, DIP, and MCP joints for all digits.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
USP Class I knot pull synthetic sterilized #3/0 suture
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
08/13/08 11:35 8781 461 9166
MITEK PRODUCTS
K982 420
AUG 2 4 1998
**mitek**
PRODUCTS
ETHICON.INC.
a Johnson Johnson company
Page 1 of 2
WESTWOOD = MA = 02000 HONE (781) 281-2700 - TOLL-FRET (000) 330-4835 - FAX (781) 481-9100
510 (k) Summary For 8883440
SUBMITTER
NAME ADDRESS 1'5', # CONTACT DATE
Mitek Surgical Products, Inc. 60 Glacier Drive. Westwood, MA 02090 781-251-2700 Robert Zoletti, Manager, Regulatory Affairs August 13, 1998
## NAME OF DEVICE
CLASSIFICATION NAME COMMON NAME
Staple, Fixalion, Bone Appliance for reconstruction 01 bone to soft tissue Mitek Micro Anchor
PROPRIETARY NAME
PREDICATE DEVICE
Suturc
DESCRIPTION OF DEVICE
FUNCTION
Fixation of USP #3/0 suture below bone surface. DEVICE DESIGN
The Mitek Micro Anchor is 3 7mm in length by 1.3mm in diameter. It is manufactured from Titanium 6AI 4V and uses a Nitinol arc. It is similar in design to the The same methods Mitek GII Mini Anchor. oi manufacturing and assembly are used for the Micro Anchor as those used for manufacturing all other Mitek metal anchors. The Mitek Mini anchor design was first cleared to market by US FDA in K915089 and K930892.
MATERTAT S USED
The Mitek Micro Anchor delivery system consists of a Mitek Micro Anchor, a drill bit, and an Inserter.
### INTENDED USE
The device is used to anchor suture into bone. The suture subsequently used by the surgeon to reartach the ມຸກ repositioned/injured soft tissue to bone. The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to obtain clearance for the Mitek for the lateral canthoplasty Micro -Anchor repair/reconstruction of collateral ligaments, flexor and extension tendons at the PTP (Proximal Tnterphalangeal)DTP MCB (Melacarpal (Distal Interphalangeal) , તાવે Interphalangeal) joints for all digits. The intended use is the same as the predicate device, i.e., suture, when used to approximate soft tissue to bone during a period ot rehabilitation.
{1}------------------------------------------------
---------
#### SIU(k) SUMMARY FOR K982440
Page 2 of 2
COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE
It has greater strength than IISP #3/0 suture, and is the same "design" as the Mitek Mini Anchor.
DESCRIBLITOR OF NOW CRINICAT TESTS
The Mitek Micro Anchor pull cests from cadaveric and porcine locations produced an average failure load (LBS) of:
| 1) CADAVER HAND | 9.67 | SD 1.32 |
|---------------------------|------|---------|
| 2) CADAVER SKULL | 7.97 | SD 1.92 |
| 3) FIG METACARPALS | 7.28 | SD 0.72 |
| 4) SUTURE W/ BONE TUNNELS | 5.73 | SD 0.46 |
USP Class I knot pull synthetic sterilized #3/0 suture, double strand, single knot, is 4.22 lb. Suture tissue failure for tendinous tissue is 15.75 lb., and capsular tissue is 21.00 lb. Reference: 3oft Tissue Fixation to Bone, Daniel B. Robertson, MD et al, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1986. . .
# DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL TESTS
The clinical tests were done in accordance with IDE #G880026. Safety and effectiveness was based upon the results obtained in the clinical trials and their equivalence to historical data for the identical surgical procedure.
#### CONCLUSIONS FROM TESTS
The device met the design criteria. "
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles three stylized human figures.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 24 1998
Mr. Edward F. Kent Mitek Products 60 Glacier Drive 02090 Westwood, Massachusetts
Re : K982420 Mitek Micro Anchor Trade Name: Regulatory Class: II Product Codes: JDR and HWC Dated: June 12, 1998 June 15, 1998 Received:
Dear Mr. Kent:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Druq, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions aqainst misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. ਚੋ substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set --forth in the Quality System Requlation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Mr. Edward F. Kent
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.qov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Russell Sager
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D.
Kr Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): K982420
流論となる。
MITEK HICRO ANCHOR Device Name:
Indications For Use:
11:10
US: Lo: US
REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION OF COLLATERAL LIGATENTS, FLEXIA AND EXTENSION TENDONS AT THE PIP ( PROXIMAL INTERPRADANGEAL) , DIP ( DISTAL INTERPHALANCEAL), AND MCP ( METACARPAL INTERPHALANGEAL) JOINTS FOR ALL DIGITS
图 LEE ME MENNE SA SA SE LE LE PART PART PART POST POST POST POST POST POST POST TO
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Aun Paymer for IZD
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General Restorative Devices
510(k) Number ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
X Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Ox
Over-The-Counter Use_
(Optional Format 1-2-95)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.