TRIAGE,PARASITE PANEL, TRIAGE CRYPTOSPORIDIUM AND ENTAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA, TRIAGE CRYPTOSPORIDIUM AND GIARDIA LAMBLIA
Applicant
Biosite Incorporated
Product Code
MHI · Microbiology
Decision Date
Oct 6, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3220
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Triage® Parasite Panel is an enzyme immunoassay used for the detection of antigens for Entamoeba histolyticaldispar, Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in human fecal specimens. The test will be offered as singular tests for each protein, combinations of two organisms per panel and a panel consisting of all three tests. This test is used as an aid in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic diseases.
Device Story
Triage® Parasite Panel is a membrane-based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting parasite-specific antigens in human fecal specimens; utilizes antibodies specific to at least two distinct antigenic sites on target molecules. Device provides qualitative determination of presence of E. histolytica/dispar, G. lamblia, and C. parvum. Used in clinical laboratory settings to aid diagnosis of intestinal parasitic disease; results interpreted by healthcare professionals. Device offers singular tests, combinations of two, or a full panel of three. Benefits include improved sensitivity over traditional microscopic ova and parasite (O&P) examination, which is limited by low sensitivity and reliance on visual identification of life cycle phases. Clinical utility supported by comparison to O&P and other commercial EIAs.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evaluation compared Triage® Parasite Panel against standard O&P microscopic examination using 444 stool specimens. Sensitivity/Specificity: G. lamblia (95.1%/88.4%), E. histolytica/dispar (90.5%/85.0%), C. parvum (91.4%/98.2%). Apparent false positives were further evaluated using other commercial EIAs, confirming the higher sensitivity of the Triage panel compared to microscopic examination. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in performance compared to other commercially available immunoassays.
Technological Characteristics
Membrane-based enzyme immunoassay; utilizes antibodies specific to at least two distinct antigenic sites on target molecules. Analytical sensitivity: 3 ng/mL (alpha-1-giardin), 4 ng/mL (29 kDa surface antigen), 6 ng/mL (protein disulfide isomerase). Qualitative output.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the detection of Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Giardia lamblia antigens in human fecal specimens to aid in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Entamoeba histolytica serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Entamoeba histolytica in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) used to identify Entamoeba histolytica directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of amebiasis caused by the microscopic protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by this parasite. The parasite may invade the skin, liver, intestines, lungs, and diaphragm, causing disease conditions such as indolent ulcers, an amebic hepatitis, amebic dysentery, and pulmonary lesions.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
Predicate Devices
Single Test Kits manufactured by Alexon, TechLabs, Meridian Diagnostics (enzyme immunoassay technology)
Reference Devices
Alexon (enzyme immunoassay)
Trend (enzyme immunoassay)
LMD laboratories (enzyme immunoassay)
TechLabs (enzyme immunoassay)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### OCT 6 1998
982a345
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Triage® Parasite Panel
- Name and Address of Submitter A.
- Company Name and Address: t
Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. 11030 Roselle St. San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone: (619) 455-4808 FAX: (619) 455-4815 John F. Bruni, Ph.D. 09/02/98
Contact Person Date Summary Prepared
- Device Names B.
- 1. Trade Name
Triage® Parasite Panel
- 2. Common Names
An immunoassay for the detection of the antigens for Entamoeba. histolytica, Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens.
- 3. Classification Name
Entamoeba histolytica serological reagents
- C. Legally Marketed Devices
Single Test Kits Manufactured by Alexon, TechLabs, Meridian Diagnostics for the same parasites using enzyme immunoassay technology.
- D. Device Description
The Triage® Parasite Panel is an enzyme immunoassay used to detect the presence of parasite specific antigens in human fecal specimens. It is a membrane based immunoassay that depends on the detection of the antigen using antibodies with specificities to at least two distinct antigenic sites on the molecule.
- ய் Intended Use
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Triage® Parasite Panel is an enzyme immunoassay used for the detection of antigens for Entamoeba histolytica. Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens. This test is used as an aid in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic disease.
- ய Comparison of the Methods with Predicate Devices
The Triage® Parasite Panel provides a qualitative determination of the presence of parasite specific antigens in human fecal specimens. Other tests manufactured by Alexon, Trend, LMD laboratories. TechLabs are all enzyme immunoassays that have been cleared through the 510(k) process. These tests have been shown to provide essentially the same clinical results as traditional O&P examination using microscopic visualization of various phases of the life cycle of the parasite.
- Summary of Analytical Data G.
Analytical Sensitivity
The analytical sensitivity of the Triage® Parasite Panel is 3 ng of alpha-1giardin (G. lamblia), 4 ng of 29 kDa surface antigen (E. histolytica/dispar) and 6 ng of protein disulfide isomerase (C. parvum) per milliliter of fecal specimen.
Reproducibility
The precision and reproducibility of this product has been demonstrated to be comparable to other products of this nature.
- H. Summary of Clinical Data
The performance of the Triage® Parasite Panel was evaluated using both positive and negative stool specimens. All specimens were examined using standard ova and parasite examination using Modified Acid Fast Staining and Trichrome Staining procedures. The results of the Triage® Parasite Panel were compared to standard ova and parasite examination for the presence of G. lamblia, E. histolytica/dispar, and C. parvum. The clinical sensitivity and specificity, the positive and negative predictive value, the 95% confidence intervals and the prevalence of the disease in the population tested are presented.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Triage G. lamblia
| O & P Evaluation | | | |
|------------------|-----|-----|-------|
| | + | - | Total |
| + | 135 | 35 | 170 |
| - | 7 | 267 | 274 |
| Total | 142 | 302 | 444 |
| Sensitivity | | 95.1% | |
|-----------------------------------|--|----------------|----------------|
| Specificity | | 88.4% | |
| | | LOWER<br>LIMIT | UPPER<br>LIMIT |
| 95% Confidence Limits Sensitivity | | 91.5% | 98.6% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Specificity | | 84.8% | 92.0% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Agreement | | 87.8% | 93.3% |
| Positive Predictive Value | | 79.4% | |
| Negative Predictive Value | | 97.4% | |
| Prevalence | | 32.0% | |
36
{3}------------------------------------------------
### Triage E. + histolytica/ dispar
| O & P Evaluation | | |
|------------------|-----|-------|
| + | - | Total |
| 38 | 60 | 98 |
| 4 | 341 | 345 |
| 42 | 401 | 443 |
| Sensitivity | 90.5% | |
|-----------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
| Specificity | 85.0% | |
| | LOWER<br>LIMIT | UPPER<br>LIMIT |
| 95% Confidence Limits Sensitivity | 81.6% | 99.4% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Specificity | 81.5% | 88.5% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Agreement | 82.3% | 88.8% |
| Positive Predictive Value | 38.8% | |
| Negative Predictive Value | 98.8% | |
| Prevalence | 9.5% | |
Total
The large number of "apparent false positive results" using the Triage® Parasite Panel is primarily attributed the overall lack of sensitivity of microscopic examination as compared to culture. The sensitivity of microscopic examination has been reported to be 62% as compared to culture techniques.
37
{4}------------------------------------------------
## O & P Examination
### Triage C. parvum
| + | - | Total |
|----|-----|-------|
| 53 | 7 | 60 |
| 5 | 379 | 384 |
| 58 | 386 | 444 |
Total
+
에
| Sensitivity | 91.4% | | |
|-----------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------------|
| Specificity | 98.2% | | |
| | | LOWER LIMIT | UPPER LIMIT |
| 95% Confidence Limits Sensitivity | | 84.2% | 98.6% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Specificity | | 96.9% | 99.5% |
| 95% Confidence Limits Agreement | | 95.8% | 98.8% |
| Positive Predictive Value | | 88.3% | |
| Negative Predictive Value | | 98.7% | |
| Prevalence | | 13.1% | |
ి ప్రాం . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ا
:
{5}------------------------------------------------
All specimens were tested using commercially available immunoassays. Those specimens that produced a positive result were evaluated using the "gold standard" of microscopic examination. - Statistical analysis of the data showed that the sensitivity of the three tests contained in the Triage® Parasite Panel was not statistically different from those of commercially available immunoassays for Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar. and Cryptosporidium parvum that have reported sensitivities of 96%. 87% and 95% when compared to microscopic techniques. Additionally, there was not a statistical difference in the specificity of the Triage® G. lamblia or the C. parvum tests when compared to commercially available tests, each having a reported specificity of 98% for both organisms. The specificity of the Triage® E. histolytica test was significantly greater than a commercially available immunoassay having a reported specificity of 99%.
Conventional microscopic examination of fecal specimens has been demonstrated to be less sensitive than other scientifically valid techniques for the identification of the presence of parasites, including immunoassays and the detection of parasite-specific nucleic acid. In addition, the presence of disease as determined by collection and analysis of multiple specimens from the same patient provides evidence for the lack of clinical sensitivity of conventional microscopic examination . Inasmuch as the "gold standard" is not ideal for the detection of the organisms, the likelihood of observing false positive results using a comparative method is increased. Therefore, those specimens producing apparent false positive results in the Triage® Parasite Panel were evaluated using other commercially available enzyme immunoassays. Twenty-eight of the 35 apparent false positive results for G. lamblia, 57 of the 60 apparent false positive results for the E. histolytica/dispar and, 6 of the 7 apparent false positive results for the C. parvum test also were positive using other commercial immunoassays for these same organisms. These results support the studies stating that the sensitivity of conventional microscopic examination is less than desired.
#### 1. Conclusion
The Triage® Parasite Panel is an enzyme immunoassay used for the detection of antigens for Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens. This test is used as an aid in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic disease. The summarized data provided demonstrate that the Triage® Parasite Panel produces essentially the same results as the recognized standard methods for the identification of parasites in stool specimens. Additionally, the Triage® Parasite Panel produces essentially the same results as other commercially available products.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/2 description: The image shows a partial view of a document or logo. On the left side, there's a distorted text that appears to be vertically oriented, with only the letters 'DEPARTM' visible. Above the text, there are three curved lines or strokes, resembling a stylized wave or abstract design. The rest of the image is mostly blank, with a few indistinct shapes or marks on the right side.
OCT 6 1998
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
John F. Bruni. Ph.D. Director, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Biosite Diagnostics 11030 Roselle Street San Diego, CA 92121
Re: K982245
> Trade Name: Triage® Parasite Panel, Triage Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Entamoeba
Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MHI: MHJ: GMO Dated: September 2, 1998 Received: September 8, 1998
Dear Dr. Bruni:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours.
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
5 IO(k) Number if known) K982245
Jevice Name: Triage® Parasite Panel
Indications for Use:
The Triage® Parasite Panel is an enzyme immunoassay used for the detection of antigens for Entamoeba histolyticaldispar, Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in human fecal specimens. The test will be offered as singular tests for each protein, combinations of two organisms per panel and a panel consisting of all three tests. This test is used as an aid in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic diseases.
### (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Woody Dubois
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K982245
Prescription Use X
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.