BINAX NOW LEGIONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN TEST MODEL 852-020 AND BINAX NOW LEG IONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN CONTROL KIT MODEL 8522
K982238 · Binax, Inc. · MJH · Aug 21, 1998 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K982238
Device Name
BINAX NOW LEGIONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN TEST MODEL 852-020 AND BINAX NOW LEG IONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN CONTROL KIT MODEL 8522
Applicant
Binax, Inc.
Product Code
MJH · Microbiology
Decision Date
Aug 21, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test is a rapid immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen (L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen) in human urine as an adjunct to culture for the presumptive diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use.
Device Story
Device is a rapid, book-shaped, hinged immunochromatographic test for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in human urine. Input: dacron swab dipped in urine sample, inserted into test well with added reagent. Principle: soluble antigen binds to gold-conjugated anti-Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antibodies on a membrane solid phase. Output: visual presence or absence of two pink-to-purple colored lines on the test strip. Used in clinical settings; results available in 15 minutes. No transfer steps required; sample contained within device. Healthcare providers interpret results visually to aid in the presumptive diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease, facilitating timely clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and clinical performance evaluation conducted. Sensitivity and specificity determined using 300 characterized frozen urine specimens compared to clinical diagnosis (culture, RIA, DFA, or IFA). NOW™ sensitivity 97% (vs 95% predicate); specificity 98% (vs 94% predicate). Cross-reactivity evaluated with 200 urine specimens positive for other bacterial/fungal infections; 196/200 tested negative (98% specificity). Reproducibility study at 3 sites with 360 samples showed 100% correct interpretation. Quality control study confirmed device ability to indicate invalid results.
Technological Characteristics
Immunochromatographic membrane assay. Materials: dacron swab, cardboard hinged test device, colloidal gold conjugate, polyclonal rabbit antibodies. Sensing principle: lateral flow immunoassay. Energy source: none (manual). Form factor: book-shaped hinged device. Connectivity: none. Sterilization: not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in human urine as an adjunct to culture for presumptive diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Haemophilus spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera, including antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye, that are used in serological tests to identify Haemophilus spp. directly from clinical specimens or tissue culture isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Haemophilus and provides epidemiological information on diseases cause by these microorganisms. Diseases most often caused by Haemophilus spp. include pneumonia, pharyngitis, sinusitis, vaginitis, chancroid venereal disease, and a contagious form of conjunctivitis (inflammation of eyelid membranes).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
AUG 21 1998
Binax, Inc. Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test 510(k) Notification
Vital Information ... NOWTM
## 510 (k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
Submitter:
Binax, Inc. 217 Read Street Portland, Maine 04103
Pamela S. Angell Attention: (207) 772-3988 Office (207) 871-5751 FAX
Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test Trade Name:
Common Name: Legionella ICT
Haemophilus spp. serological reagents (per Classification Name: 21 CFR 8660.3300)
Binax Legionella Urinary Antigen EIA, 510(k) Predicate Device: number K934965/S1
The Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Device Description: Test is an immunochromatographic membrane detect Legionella pneumophila assay to serogroup 1 antigen in human urine. A test gold-conjugated and strip, containing anti-Legionella pneumophila immobilized serogroup 1 antibodies, and a swab well are mounted on opposite sides of a cardboard, book-shaped hinged test device. A dacron swab is dipped into the urine to be tested and then inserted into the swab well. A single reagent is added to the swab well from a dropper bottle before closing the Soluble antigen captured by test device. anti-Legionella pneumophila immobilized bind the serogroup 1 antibody reacts to visualizing gold-conjugate. There are no transferring steps, the sample is contained, and results are available within 15 minutes.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Binax, Inc. Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test 510(k) Notification
# 510 (k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS (Continued)
NOWTMLegionella Urinary Antigen Intended Use: Binax The Test is intended for in vitro diagnostic use qualitatively detect the presence of to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 soluble antigen in human urine. The indication statements are the same as those made for the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics : Both the Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary and the Binax Legionella Urinary Antigen Antigen EIA tests use a solid phase coated with polyclonal rabbit antibody to detect Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen samples. However, in human urine the predicate device is an enzyme immunoassay a horseradish peroxidase employing (EIA) conjugate and a microtiter well solid phase, Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary while the Test is an immunochromatographic Antigen assay utilizing a colloidal gold conjugate and a membrane solid phase. Furthermore, the predicate device is a multi-step assay requiring calculation of a ratio for result interpretation while the NOW™ membrane test simple and rapid test interpreted is a visually by the presence or absence of two pink-to-purple colored lines.
Performance Summary: The Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine is substantially equivalent predicate device, Binax Legionella to the Antigen EIA (K934965/S1) . The Urinary performance of the Binax NOW™ Legionella Test was verified by Antigen Urinary specificity, and sensitivity, reproducibility studies using well characterized frozen urine specimens and Refer to attached volunteer urine donors. CHARACTERISTICS. PERFORMANCE
Signed J.
Date 2/6/98
J. Georges Nitis, Ph.D., MBA
Director, Regulatory Affairs
{2}------------------------------------------------
Binax. Inc. Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test 510(k) Notification
## 510 (k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS (Continued)
## PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
## BINAX NOW™ LEGIONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN TEST
#### Sensitivity and Specificity:
Because of the low rate of positivity of Legionella pneumonia, test sensitivity and specificity were determined by testing 300 well characterized frozen urine specimens in both the Binax NOW™ Legionella (NOW™) and in the Binax Legionella Urinary Antigen EIA The University of Indiana conducted all testing. (EIA) Tests. EIA and NOW™ test sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on performance versus Clinical Diagnosis. Specimens were considered true positives when the presence of infection was confirmed by culture, RIA, DFA or IFA.
NOW™ test sensitivity is 97% compared to 95% for the predicate device. Now™ test specificity is 98% compared to 94% for the predicate device.
### Cross-Reactivity :
for Legionella pneumophila The 200 urines presumed negative serogroup 1 were positive for other bacterial or fungal pneumonia or urinary tract infections, allowing a comparison of the NOW™ and predicate device cross-reactivities. One hundred ninety six (196) of the 200 patient specimens produced negative results in the NOW™ test for a specificity of 98%.
further demonstrate Binax test specificity, 106 presumed To negative urine specimens were tested in the Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test. All specimens tested negative.
#### Reproducibility:
A blind study of the NOW™ test was conducted at 3 separate sites panel of coded specimens containing negative, low using a positive, moderate positive and high positive swabs. Individuals diverse educational backgrounds performed testing on ਤੇ of different days. One hundred percent (100%) of the 360 samples tested were correctly interpreted.
### Quality Control:
The ability of the Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test control to indicate test failure was evaluated when 3 operators each ran 20 kit controls in a panel of 20 devices, 9 of which had been rendered inoperative. The number of defective devices and the defect itself were not apparent to the operator. All ୧୦ devices were correctly interpreted as positive, negative, or invalid.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Binax, Inc. Binax, Inc.
Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test 510(k) Notification
# 510 (k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS (Continued)
# PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
# BINAX NOW™ LEGIONELLA URINARY ANTIGEN TEST
## Preliminary Stability:
Preliminary stability studies of the Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test are ongoing.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image is a seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is a stylized image of three faces in profile, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
# AUG 21 1998
Pamela S. Angell Program Manager Binax, Inc. 217 Read Street Portland, Maine 04103
K982238 Re:
> Trade Name: Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MJH Dated: August 12, 1998 Received: August 13, 1998
Dear Ms. Angell:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours.
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Binax, Inc. Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test 510(k) Notification
#### APPENDIX B
### INDICATIONS FOR USE FORM
510 (k) Number (if known) :
K 98 2238
Device Name:
Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test
Indications For Use:
The Binax NOW™ Legionella Urinary Antigen Test is a rapid immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen (L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen) in human urine as an adjunct to culture for the presumptive diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Woody Dubois
(Division Sign Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K982738
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109
Over-The-Counter Use OR
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.