K981998 · Visualization Technology, Inc. · LLZ · Aug 21, 1998 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K981998
Device Name
PEDIATRIC INSTATRAK SYSTEM
Applicant
Visualization Technology, Inc.
Product Code
LLZ · Radiology
Decision Date
Aug 21, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Pediatric InstaTrak System is intended for image guided assistance during nasal surgery in pediatric patients. It is intended to be used during the treatment of acute and chronic sinusitis, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, optic nerve and orbital decompression, the removal of polyps, the biopsy and removal of tumors, and the repair of CSF leaks, pituitary disorder and encephalocele.
Device Story
Pediatric InstaTrak System is an electromagnetic image-guided surgical navigation system for pediatric nasal surgery. Device inputs include pre-operative CT image data. System utilizes a disposable acetal plastic headset worn by the patient during CT scanning and surgery; headset anchors an electromagnetic transmitter to maintain registration despite patient head motion. Surgeon uses a tracked probe to navigate anatomy; system displays real-time position of probe relative to patient's CT images on a monitor. System provides intraoperative visualization to assist in surgical decision-making, potentially improving accuracy and safety during complex nasal procedures. Operated by surgeons in clinical/OR settings.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical testing included a reproducibility study on 61 pediatric patients using various headset sizes and ear inserts; spherical inserts provided acceptable results. Accuracy data from the predicate Adult InstaTrak System (applied to the pediatric version due to identical technology) showed a mean accuracy of 2.28 mm (95% CI: 0.78 mm), which compares favorably to the ISG Viewing Wand (mean accuracy 1.8 mm to 4.8 mm; 95% CI: 1.1 mm to 1.6 mm).
Technological Characteristics
Electromagnetic image-guided navigation system. Components: acetal plastic headset, electromagnetic transmitter, computer, monitor, hard disk storage. Sensing principle: electromagnetic tracking of surgical instruments relative to pre-operative CT images. Connectivity: standalone workstation. Sterilization: disposable headset. Software: image registration and display.
Indications for Use
Indicated for pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic nasal surgery for treatment of acute/chronic sinusitis, dacryocystorhinostomy, optic nerve/orbital decompression, polyp removal, tumor biopsy/removal, and repair of CSF leaks, pituitary disorders, and encephalocele.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K981998
AUG 21 1998
# 510(k) Summary for Visualization Technology, Inc. Pediatric InstaTrak System
### SPONSOR/APPLICANT NAME, ADDRESS 1.
Visualization Technology, Inc. 39G Sixth Road Woburn, MA 01801
## Contact Person:
Robert Murfitt, Ph.D. Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance (781) 938-8920 Telephone:
## DATE OF SUMMARY PREPARATION:
June 5, 1998
### DEVICE NAME 2.
Pediatric InstaTrak System Proprietary Name: Interactive CT Image Guided Surgical System Common/Usual Name: Computed Tomography X-Ray System Classification Name:
### IDENTIFICATION OF THE PREDICATE OR LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE(S) TO 3. WHICH EQUIVALENCE IS BEING CLAIMED
Adult InstaTrak System, subject of K960330 and the Viewing Wand manufactured by ISG Technologies, Inc., subject of K911783.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION 4.
The InstaTrak System intended for pediatrics is identical to the InstaTrak System intended for adults with the exception of a slight modification to the head set component. The headset assembly, verification pad, and aspirator components have been modified for the Pediatric InstaTrak System. The dimensions of these components of the InstaTrak System have been modified to accommodate the smaller head size of pediatric patients. As described in the original submission, the headset is a single use disposable device made of acetal plastic. The headset is held in place on the patient by spring tension at the three points of contact, the external ear canals, and the bridge of the nose. The headset serves as a foundation for anchoring the electromagnetic transmitter in a fixed location with respect to the patients head to compensate for patient motion during the surgical procedure. The transmitter is attached to the headset prior to surgery by a rotating toggle that is inserted through a slot in the middle of the rectangular section. The headset allow s the device to maintain its registration therefore avoiding the need for re-registration during the surgical procedure. It also continues to perform accurately even while the patient's head is moving during the surgical procedure.
The only change between the Pediatric InstaTrak System and the Adult InstaTrak System is a minor change in dimensions of the headset, straight aspirator and verification pad to accommodate the smaller head size of pediatric patients. This is an insignificant modification not affecting safety or effectiveness of the device.
The headset is first worn by the patient during the CT scan and is removed immediately after the scan. Prior to surgery, the transmitter is attached to the headset and the headset is again placed on the patient. This avoids the problem of adhesive based fiducials which requires the CT scan do be done very near the time of surgery to avoid displacement or loss of the markets.
The modifications to the headset dimensions do not affect safety or effectiveness of the device since the intended use and placement are identical to that summarized above and described in more detail in K960330.
#### 5. INTENDED USE
The Pediatric InstaTrak System is an image guided device for use during endoscopic nasal surgery. It is intended to be used during the treatment of acute
{2}------------------------------------------------
and chronic sinusitis, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, optic nerve and orbital decompression, the removal of polyps, the biopsy and removal of tumors, and the repair of CSF leaks, pituitary disorder and encephalocele.
A STATEMENT OF HOW THE TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEVICE 6. COMPARE TO PREDICATE OR LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE(S) CITED
The Pediatric InstaTrak System is identical in technological characteristics to the Adult InstaTrak System except for the size of the headset. The Pediatric InstaTrak System and the Viewing Wand are similar in that they both use an articulated mechanical arm. The proposed Pediatric InstaTrak System and the predicate devices are similar in intended use in that they are all intraoperative imageguidance systems. The Viewing Wand links a positioning probe to an image display with a patients CT or MRI image data. The Pediatric InstaTrak System, the Adult InstaTrak System and the Viewing Wand all use a computer, monitor and hard disk storage system. Both the pediatric and adult InstaTrak Systems have fewer indications/features, using only CT images and fewer screen image displays than the predicate Viewing Wand. The Viewing Wand does not limit the intended population whereas the Pediatric InstaTrak is intended for pediatric patients only and the Adult InstaTrak is intended for Adult patients only.
### FOR 510(k)S WHERE DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENCE IS BASED ON 7. PERFORMANCE DATA
# Pediatric Headset Reproducibility Clinical Testing
Testing was performed to determine the clinical pediatric headset reproducibility on a total of 61 pediatric patients. One large and one small headset was equipped with spherical ear inserts and one large and one small headset was equipped with conical ear inserts. The small headset was to be used for patients with a head circumference ≤520 mm and the large for patients with a head circumference > 520 mm. The testing showed acceptable results for both size headsets with spherical ear inserts only.
Clinical Testing was also performed using the Adult InstaTrak System at four clinical sites. Although this testing was performed on the InstaTrak System intended for adults, it applies to the proposed Pediatric System since the two systems are essentially identical except for minor dimension changes. Results of
{3}------------------------------------------------
this study indicated the mean accuracy of the device to be 2.28 mm with a 95% confidence interval of the mean of 0.78 mm. This compares to values of 1.8 mm to 4.8 mm for the mean accuracy of the ISG Viewing Wand while using various operating modalities and registration techniques. Under these conditions, the 95% confidence interval of the mean for the predicate device varied from 1.1 mm to 1.6 mm.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with the profiles overlapping each other.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 21 1998
Visualization Technology, Inc. Mary McNamara-Cullinane c/o Medical Device Consultants, Inc. 49 Plain Street North Attleboro, MA 02760
Re:
K981998 Pediatric InstaTrak System Dated: June 5, 1998 Received: June 8, 1998 Regulatory class: II 21 CFR 892.1750/Procode: 90 LLZ
Dear Ms. McNamara-Cullinane:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (OS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic OS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmaldsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Kilian Yin
Lillian Yin, Ph.D. Director, Division of Reproductive Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): 11981998
Device Name: Visualization Technology, Inc. Pediatric InstaTrak System
Indications For Use:
The Pediatric InstaTrak System is intended for image guided assistance during nasal surgery in pediatric patients. It is intended to be used during the treatment of acute and chronic sinusitis, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, optic nerve and orbital decompression, the removal of polyps, the biopsy and removal of tumors, and the repair of CSF leaks, pituitary disorder and encephalocele.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NECESSARY)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Schmidt A. Seigman
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT, and Radiological Devic
Radiological Devices
510(k) Number K981998
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Visualization Technology, Inc. 510(k) Pediatric InstaTrak System
6/2/98
CONFIDENTIAL
Page v
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.