Retrospective serum samples were used to evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the EBV-VCA IgG ELISA kit by comparing results against established serological status.
Retrospective study using characterized patient sera
175 patients (102 convalescent, 34 seronegative, 39 current infection); Sample Size: 175; Number of Sites: 1
Commercially available kits for VCA IgG, VCA IgM, EBNA IgG and heterophile antibodies
Clinical sensitivity and specificity
Indications for Use
For the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus (recombinant) Viral Capsid Antigen (EBV-VCA IgG) in human serum by indirect enzyme immunoassay. The Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit may be used in combination with other Epstein-Barr serologies (Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) IgM , Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen-1 (EBNA-1) IgG and IgM, Early Antigen-Diffuse (EA-D) IgG and IgM and heterophile antibody as an aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM). The evaluation of paired sera, to determine a significant increase in VCA IgG antibody titer, can also aid in the diagnosis of acute infection. These reagents can be used either manually or in conjunction with the MAGO® Plus Automated Processor.
Device Story
The EBV VCA IgG ELISA Kit is an in vitro diagnostic assay for detecting IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen in human serum. The device uses recombinant VCA antigen bound to microwells; patient serum is added to allow anti-VCA IgG to bind. After washing, a horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG conjugate is added, followed by a TMB substrate. The resulting color change is measured spectrophotometrically at 450/600 nm. The assay can be performed manually or using the MAGO Plus Automated Processor. Results are calculated as an index value (sample absorbance/cut-off absorbance) to determine if the sample is negative, equivocal, or positive for VCA IgG. Clinicians use these results alongside other serological markers to diagnose infectious mononucleosis or acute infection.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evaluation used 175 retrospective serum samples characterized by existing commercial kits. The device showed 95.7% overall agreement with established EBV serological status. Precision studies (intra-assay and inter-assay) were conducted at three sites, with CVs generally ranging from 1.56% to 12.03%. Cross-reactivity testing against VZV, CMV, and HSV showed no interference. Manual and MAGO Plus automated procedures showed high correlation (r=0.986).
Technological Characteristics
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using recombinant VCA antigen bound to microwells. Employs horseradish peroxidase conjugate and TMB substrate. Read spectrophotometrically at 450/600 nm. Compatible with manual processing or MAGO Plus Automated Processor. Requires 1:21 serum dilution. Storage at 2-8°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies to EBV-VCA in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM) and acute infection. Used in conjunction with other EBV serologies.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these viruses. Epstein-Barr viruses are thought to cause infectious mononucleosis and have been associated with Burkitt's lymphoma (a tumor of the jaw in African children and young adults) and postnasal carcinoma (cancer).
Predicate Devices
Wampole VCA IgG ELISA
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
3/4/99
K98/812
## 510k Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the quirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K981812
#### Applicant Information
| Date Prepared: | May 18, 1998 |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Name: | Columbia Bioscience, Inc. |
| Address: | 8775 M Centre Park Drive, #559<br>Columbia, MD 21045 |
| Contact Person: | Norman Jenkins |
|-----------------|----------------|
| PhoneNumber. | 410-995-1278 |
| Fax Number. | 410-995-0508 |
්යා
#### Device Information:
| Trade Name: | EBV VCA IgG ELISA Kit |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | EBV Viral Capsid Antigen FIA Test |
| Classification Name: | Epstein Barr Virus Serological Reagent |
#### Equivalent Device Description:
Wampole VCA IgG ELISA
Wampole VCA IgG ELISA kit contains instructions and materials for the qualitative and semi-quantitative tection of IgG antibodies to EBV-VCA IgG in human serum by indirect ELISA
The EBV-VCA IgG ELISA Kit is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of IgG to Epstein Barr viral capsid antigen in human serum.
Intended Use: For the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus (recombinant) Viral Capsid Antigen (EBV-VCA IgG) in human serum by indirect enzyme immunoassay. The Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit may be used in combination with other Epstein-Barr serologies (Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) IgM , Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen-1 (EBNA-1) IgG and IgM, Early Antigen-Diffuse (EA-D) IgG and IgM and heterophile antibody as an aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM). The evaluation of pared sera, to determine a significant increase in VCA IgG antibody titer, can also aid in the diagnosis of acute infection. These reagents can be used either manually or in conjunction with the MAGO® Plus Automated Processor.
#### Principle of Procedure:
Recombinant VCA antigen is bound to microwells. Diluted patient sera. Cut-Off Calibrator and controls are placed in the microwells and incubated. Anti-VCA IgG antibodes, if present, will bind to the antigen forming, antigen-antibody complexes. Residual sample is eliminated by aspirating and washing. Conjugate (horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG) is added and will bind to these complexes. Unbound conjugate is removed by aspiration and washing. Substrate is then added and incubated. In the presence of bound enzyme the substrate is converted to an end product. The absorbance of this end product can be read spectrophotometrically at 450
{1}------------------------------------------------
nm (reference 600-630 nm) and is directly proportional to the concentration of IgG antibodies to VCA present m the sample
ie Is-EBV-VCA IgG ELISA kit and the Wampole VCA IgG ELISA are substantially equivalent in that.
- Both are in vitro immunologic methods. 1.
- 2 Both are intended for use in the detection of IgG antibody to EBV-VCA in human serum
- 3 Both are based on the formation of a complex between VCA antigens and antibody
- 4 Both use antigen coated microtiter plates.
- 5. Both are qualitative/semi-quantitative assays.
- రు. Both use goat anti-human IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase.
- 7. Both use TMB as the enzyme substrate
A detailed comparison between the proposed devise and the predicate device is shown in Table 1
Conclusions: The Diamedix Is-EBV-VCA IgG is substantially equivalent to the Wampole VCA ELISA for the detection of IgG antibodies to EBV-VCA in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis The device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed device described.
{2}------------------------------------------------
1883678
#### PREDICATE DEVICE
POOls FRV-VC A løG FI ...
| | Table 1 | |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | PROPOSED DEVICE<br>Diamedix Is-EBV-VCA IgG ELISA Kit | PREDICATE DEVICE<br>Wampole EBV-VCA IgG ELISA |
| Ended Use | For the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of<br>IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus Viral Capsid<br>Antigen (EBV-VCA IgG) in human serum by indirect<br>enzyme immunoassay. The Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit<br>may be used in combination with other Epstein-Barr<br>serologies (Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) IgM, Epstein-<br>Barr Nuclear Antigen-1 (EBNA-1) IgM, Early Antigen-<br>Diffuse (EA-D) IgG and IgM and heterophile antibody as<br>an aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM).<br>The evaluation of paired sera, to determine a significant<br>increase in VCA IgG antibody titer, can also aid in the<br>diagnosis of acute infection. These reagents can be used<br>either manually or in conjunction with the MAGO® Plus<br>Automated Processor. | The Wampole Laboratories (Wampole) Epstein-Barr<br>Virus-Viral Capsid IgG Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent<br>Assay (ELISA) is intended for the qualitative and semi-<br>quantitative determination of IgG antibody in human<br>serum to Epstein-Barr virus in human sera. A single<br>serum specimen may be used to indicate previous<br>infection or immune status with the Epstein-Barr virus<br>Paired sera, acute and convalescent, may be used to<br>demonstrate seroconversion or a significant rise in<br>antibody level as an aid in the diagnosis of a recent or<br>current infection, or reactivation; and as an aid in the<br>diagnosis of Infections Mononucleosis (IM). |
| Methodology | Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) | Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) |
| Specifications | For in vitro diagnostic use.<br>For use with fresh or frozen human serum.<br>Avoid lipemic, hemolyzed, contaminated, or icteric sera.<br>Assay performed on 1:21 dilution of serum at 18-30°C.<br>Store at 2-8°C. | For in vitro diagnostic use. For use with fresh or frozen<br>human serum. Assay performed on 1:21 dilution of<br>serum at 21-25°C. Store at 2-8°C. |
| Design | Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit. 96 determinations. Un-<br>diluted Calibrator, Positive, and Negative controls. | VCA IgG ELISA. 96 determinations. Undiluted<br>Calibrator, High positive, Low positive, and Negative<br>controls. |
| Principles of<br>Operation | Purified, recombinant VCA antigen is bound to<br>microwells (solid phase). Diluted human serum is added<br>to the microwell which binds human anti-VCA IgG, if<br>present. Solid phase is washed and exposed to anti-<br>human IgG conjugate. Solid phase is washed and<br>exposed to enzyme substrate to develop color. Strong<br>acid is added to stop reaction. The color is read at<br>450/600 nm on an EIA reader. | Diluted patient serum is incubated with purified, VCA<br>antigen bound to the solid surface of a microtiter well. If<br>IgG antibodies against EBV-VCA are present in the<br>serum, antigen-antibody complexes are formed. These<br>complexes bind with HRP-labeled anti-human IgG which<br>react with the addition of chromogen, resulting in a color<br>development. The absorbance is measured at 450/630<br>nm. |
| Performance<br>Characteristics | Relative Sensitivity: 100%<br>Relative Sensitivity (Current Infection): 84.8% Relative<br>Specificity (Seronegative): 93.8%<br>Agreement: 95.7%<br>Intra-assay Precision (Positive samples, all sites)<br>Overall Manual- 1.56-9.30 MAGO Plus- 2.48-12.03<br>Interassay Precision (Positive samples, all sites)<br>Overall Manual- 4.28-10.50 MAGO Plus- 6.99-9.21<br>No Cross-reactivity | Relative Sensitivity: 100%<br>Relative Specificity: 100%<br>Agreement: 100%<br>Inter-Site Precision (Positive samples, all sites)<br>Overall: 1.9-9.6%<br>No Cross-reactivity |
| Enzyme Used | Horseradish Peroxidase | Horseradish Peroxidase |
| Substrate | TMB | TMB |
| Specimen | Serum | Serum |
| Calculation of Results | Sample Absorbance/Cut-off Absorbance = Index Value | Sample Absorbance/Cut-off Absorbance = ISR |
| Interpretation | <0.90 Negative for VCA IgG<br>0.90-1.09 Equivocal for VCA IgG<br>> 1.10 Positive for VCA IgG | <0.90 Negative for VCA IgG<br>0.91-1.09 Equivocal for VCA IgG<br>> 1.10 Positive for VCA IgG |
| Materials | 96 microwells in 12x8 strips, Wash concentrate, Sample<br>Diluent, Conjugate, Calibrator, Controls, Substrate, Stop<br>Solution | 96 microwells in 12x8 strips, Wash Buffer, Serum<br>Diluent, HRP Conjugate, Calibrator, Controls.<br>Chromogen, Stop Solution |
Table 1
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Performance Characteristics
Is-IEBV-VCA I
## A. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity Using Characterized Sera
Frozen retrospective sera from one hundred and seventy-five patients were characterized using commercially available kits for VCA IgG, VCA IgM, EBNA IgG and heterophile antibodies, Based on the results of this testing, the patient sera were characterized as follows :
- · 102 sera were characterized as convalescent (past infection). These were positive for VCA IgG and or EBNA IgG antibodies and negative for VCA IgM and heterophile antibody.
- · 34 sera were characterized as seronegative. These were negative for VCA IgG. VCA IgM, EBNA IgG and heterophile antibody.
- · 39 sera were characterized as having a current (recent) intection. These were positive for VCA IgM and/or heterophile antibody and were negative for EBNA IgG.
All 175 sera were then tested by an independent clinical commercial laboratory using the Is-I:IBV-VCA IgG Test Kit. The results obtained are shown in Table 2:
| | TABLE 2 | Convalescent | Current Infection | Seronegative |
|-----|-----------|--------------|-------------------|--------------|
| IgG | POSITIVE | 99 | 28 | 2 |
| | NEGATIVE | 0 | 5 | 30 |
| | EQUIVOCAL | 3 | 6 | 2 |
EBV Serological Status
- · Of the 102 past infection sera tested, 99 were positive for anti-VCA 1gG, none were negative, and 3 were equivocal.
- · Of the thirty-seven current (recent) infection samples lested, twenty-eight were positive, five were negative, and 6 were equivocal
- · Of the thirty-four seronegative sera tested, thirty were negative, two were possitive, and two were equivocal.
- · The overall agreement of the Is-VCA IgG Test Kit compared to EBV serological status was 157/164 = 95.7%:
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### B. Precision
To determine the precision of the Is-FINV-VCA IgG Test Kit, four positive and two negative sera were assayed ten times each in three different runs at three different sites included: the manufacturer, a research & development laboratory, and a clinical commercial laboratory. The intrassay precision obtained at each site is shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
| SERUM | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 1 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 2 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 3 | | INTERASSAY | |
|---------|-------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|---------------|-------|
| | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% |
| A (POS) | 1.74 | 3.19 | 1.98 | 6.84 | 1.64 | 7.16 | 1.79 | 10.13 |
| B (POS) | 2.05 | 5.34 | 2.42 | 4.11 | 1.98 | 6.56 | 2.15 | 10.50 |
| C (POS) | 1.42 | 4.56 | 1.55 | 9.30 | 1.48 | 9.05 | 1.48 | 8.63 |
| D (POS) | 3.12 | 4.38 | 3.31 | 4.49 | 3.07 | 4.17 | 3.17 | 5.40 |
| E (NEG) | 0.54 | 16.22 | 0.58 | 11.87 | 0.54 | 11.17 | 0.55 | 13.30 |
| F (NEG) | 0.21 | 16.31 | 0.25 | 21.86 | 0.21 | 12.12 | 0.22 | 19.06 |
| | | | | | | CAL | 1.04 | 13.48 |
| | | | | | | PC | 1.75 | 15.91 |
| | | | | | | NC | 0.12 | 0.00 |
TABLE 3 : Site #1 - Intra-Assay and Interassay Precision
| | TABLE 4 : Site #2- Intra-Assay and Interassay Precision | | | |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
|--|---------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
| SERUM | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 1 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 2 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 3 | | INTERASSAY | |
|---------|-------------------|------|-------------------|------|-------------------|------|---------------|-------|
| | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% | MEAN<br>INDEX | CV% |
| A (POS) | 1.59 | 4.45 | 1.52 | 3.20 | 1.67 | 3.23 | 1.60 | 5.31 |
| B (POS) | 1.96 | 3.41 | 1.87 | 2.14 | 2.04 | 3.45 | 1.96 | 4.71 |
| C (POS) | 1.54 | 3.86 | 1.33 | 3.43 | 1.52 | 1.56 | 1.46 | 7.10 |
| D (POS) | 3.27 | 2.40 | 2.90 | 1.86 | 3.23 | 2.74 | 3.13 | 5.91 |
| E (NEG) | 0.55 | 5.11 | 0.55 | 2.29 | 0.64 | 3.76 | 0.58 | 8.22 |
| F (NEG) | 0.231 | 3.36 | 0.25 | 4.86 | 0.28 | 9.96 | 0.25 | 10.66 |
| | | | | | | CAL | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| | | | | | | PC | 1.47 | 4.24 |
| | | | | | | NC | 0.16 | 6.13 |
TABLE 5 : Site #3 - Intra-assay and Interassay Precision
| SERUM | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 1 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 2 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 3 | | INTERASSAY | |
|---------|-------------------|------|-------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|------------|-------|
| | MEAN | CV% | MEAN | CV% | MEAN | CV% | MEAN | CV% |
| | INDEX | | INDEX | | INDEX | | INDEX | |
| A (POS) | 1.59 | 3.51 | 1.56 | 5.21 | 1.52 | 3.00 | 1.55 | 4.37 |
| B (POS) | 1.91 | 4.17 | 1.89 | 4.58 | 1.85 | 6.07 | 1.88 | 5.04 |
| C (POS) | 1.44 | 4.60 | 1.36 | 3.53 | 1.37 | 3.26 | 1.39 | 4.61 |
| D (POS) | 3.05 | 4.38 | 3.02 | 3.43 | 2.91 | 3.88 | 2.99 | 4.28 |
| E (NEG) | 0.55 | 6.77 | 0.60 | 7.37 | 0.54 | 5.08 | 0.56 | 8.25 |
| F (NEG) | 0.28 | 8.78 | 0.36 | 64.52 | 0.27 | 15.22 | 0.30 | 46.46 |
| | | | | | | CAL | 1.00 | 3.87 |
| | | | | | | PC | 1.33 | 16.45 |
| | | | | | | NC | 0.20 | 28.00 |
#### C. Specificity with Potentially Cross-Reactive Sera
Sixtcen sera, non-reactive (negative) for IeG antibodies to VCA in the Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit, were ested by HA for IgG antibody to varicella zoster, cylomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus. 15/15 anti-VZV IgG positive sera were non-reactive for anti-YCA IgG; 3/3 mi-CMV IgG possible sera were non-reactive for anti-VCA IgG and 3/3 anti-HSV positive sera were non-reactive for anti-VCA IgG. This suggests that no specific cross-reactivity should by expected with the Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit from these analytes.
#### D. Correlation of Manual and MAGO Plus Results
The Is-FINV-VCA IgG Test Kit has been developed for automated as well as manual use. To demonstrate the equivalence of the manual and MAGO Plus procedures, the results of 196 serum samples tested by both methods were plotted. A scattergram and regression line of the results obtained with 95% confidence intervals is shown in Figure 3 The data indicate good correlation with a Pearson Correlation Cocfficient of 0.986.
{5}------------------------------------------------
JUN
Image /page/5/Figure/3 description: This image is a scatter plot that shows the relationship between manual index values and MAGO plus index values. The x-axis represents the manual index values, and the y-axis represents the MAGO plus index values. The plot includes a regression line with the equation Y = -0.1151 + 1.2556X, and the correlation coefficient (r) is 0.9860, indicating a strong positive correlation between the two variables.
#### FIGURE 3 : Manual and MAGO Plus Result Correlation
## D. MAGO Plus Precision
The precision of the assay when performed on the MAGO Plus Automated E1A Processor was determined by assaying six sera ten times cach in three different runs. Table 6 shows the intra-and interassay precision obtained using the MAGO Plus.
| TABLE 6 : Site #2- Intra-Assay and Interassay Precision - MAGO Plus |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SERUM | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 1 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 2 | | INTRA-ASSAY RUN 3 | | INTERASSAY | |
|---------|-------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|-------------------|-------|------------|-------|
| | MEAN INDEX | CV% | MEAN INDEX | CV% | MEAN INDEX | CV% | MEAN INDEX | CV% |
| A (POS) | 1.68 | 3.76 | 1.52 | 4.16 | 1.67 | 7.50 | 1.62 | 6.99 |
| B (POS) | 2.15 | 5.48 | 1.89 | 4.63 | 2.07 | 4.58 | 2.04 | 7.23 |
| C (POS) | 1.63 | 2.96 | 1.44 | 5.86 | 1.49 | 12.03 | 1.52 | 9.21 |
| D (POS) | 3.57 | 3.75 | 3.06 | 3.51 | 3.18 | 2.48 | 3.27 | 7.50 |
| E (NEG) | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 8.11 | 0.51 | 11.13 | 0.54 | 10.46 |
| F (NEG) | 0.30 | 15.71 | 0.25 | 21.08 | 0.21 | 15.06 | 0.25 | 22.55 |
| | | | | | | CAL | 1.00 | 5.54 |
| | | | | | | PC | 1.43 | 4.03 |
| | | | | | | NC | 0.20 | 0.00 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features the department's name in a circular arrangement around an emblem. The emblem is a stylized image of an eagle or bird-like figure with three overlapping wing-like shapes.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
MAR - 4 1999
Diamedix Corp. c/o Norman Jenkins President Columbia Bioscience, Inc. 8775 M Centre Park Drive, #559 Columbia, MD 21045
Re: K981812
Trade Name: EBV-VCA IgG ELISA Test System Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LSE Dated: December 8, 1998 Received: December 9, 1998
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number: K981812
## Device Name: EBV- VCA IgG ELISA
Indications For Use: For the qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus (recombinant) Viral Capsid Antigen (EBV-VCA IgG) in human serum by indirect enzyme immunoassay. The Is-EBV-VCA IgG Test Kit may be used in combination with other Epstein-Barr serologies (Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) IgM , Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen-1 (EBNA-1) IgG and IgM, Early Antigen-Diffuse (EA-D) IgG and IgM and heterophile antibody as an aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM). The evaluation of paired sera, to determine a significant increase in VCA IgG antibody titer, can also aid in the diagnosis of acute infection. These reagents can be used either manually or in conjunction with the MAGO® Plus Automated Processor.
## PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OR
Over-The Counter Use (Optional Format 1-2-96)
Woodley Dubois
() Number
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.