Retrospective clinical sera samples were used to evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test kit against established clinical diagnoses.
Patients with reno-pulmonary syndromes (WG, MP, GP) and control groups (SLE, RA, blood donors); Sample Size: 326
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity and specificity
Retrospective comparative analysis
Patients with reno-pulmonary syndromes; Sample Size: 216 (PR-3/MPO) and 169 (anti-GBM)
Alternative semi-quantitative ELISA
Relative sensitivity and specificity
Indications for Use
The Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit is an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the qualitative detection of antibodies to glomerular basement membrane (GBM), Proteinase-3 (PR-3) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) in human sera. The assay is used to detect antibodies in a single serum specimen. The results of the assay are to be used as an aid to the diagnosis of reno-pulmonary syndromes and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, especially Goodpasture syndrome (GP), Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and microcopic polyangiitis (MP). The assay is intended for use in patients with signs and symptoms consistent with GP, WG, and MP. It is not intended for screening a healthy population. A positive result should always be confirmed by a semi-quantitative assay.
Device Story
Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit is an ELISA for qualitative detection of antibodies to GBM, PR-3, and MPO in human serum. Microtiter wells are coated with purified antigens; patient serum is added; specific antibodies bind to antigens. Unbound components are washed away; alkaline phosphatase-labeled anti-human IgG conjugate is added. After further washing, substrate is added; color intensity (optical density) correlates to bound antibody concentration. Results are calculated as a ratio to negative control. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel to aid diagnosis of reno-pulmonary syndromes and glomerulonephritis. Output is a qualitative result (negative, equivocal, positive) used by physicians to guide clinical decision-making; positive results require semi-quantitative confirmation. Benefits include rapid screening for specific autoimmune conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence based on 326 frozen retrospective sera. Sensitivity: PR-3 (WG 92.9%, MP 51.2%), MPO (WG 9.8%, MP 46.5%), anti-GBM (GP 100%). Specificity: PR-3 (100% across all groups), MPO (SLE 82.8%, RA 100%, NS 100%), anti-GBM (100% across all groups). Relative sensitivity/specificity compared to semi-quantitative ELISA also reported (e.g., PR-3 relative sensitivity 98.3%).
Technological Characteristics
ELISA-based immunoassay. Microtiter strips coated with purified human neutrophil-derived PR-3, MPO, and bovine-derived GBM antigens. Detection via alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-human IgG conjugate and substrate solution. Measurement via optical density (OD) ratio. Standalone manual or automated plate reader format.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of anti-GBM, PR-3, and MPO antibodies in human sera to aid diagnosis of reno-pulmonary syndromes and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (Goodpasture syndrome, Wegener's granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis) in symptomatic patients. Not for healthy population screening. Positive results require semi-quantitative confirmation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multiple autoantibodies immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of multiple autoantibodies aids in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (disease produced when the body's own tissues are injured by autoantibodies).
Predicate Devices
Wielisa PR-3 ANCA ELISA Kit
Wielisa MPO ANCA ELISA Kit
Wielisa anti-GBM ELISA Kit
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
L
K981750
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information GBM, ANCA Screening ELISA Test Kit
Wieslab AB Ideon Research Park S-223 70 Lund Sweden Contact person: Dr. Jorgen Wieslander Telephone: 46-46-182840 Date of preparation: May 1, 1998
Description of Device: The Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit is an II. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the qualitative detection of antibodies to glomerular basement membrane (GBM), Proteinase-3 (PR-3) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) in human sera. The assay is used to detect antibodies in a single serum specimen. The results of the assay are to be used as an aid to the diagnosis of reno-pulmonary syndromes and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, especially Goodpasture syndrome (GP). Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and microcopic polyangiitis (MP). The assay is intended for use in patients with signs and symptoms consistent with GP, WG, and MP. It is not intended for screening a healthy population. A positive result should always be confirmed by a semi-quantitative assay.
The wells of the microtiter strips are coated with purified proteinase 3 (Human Neutrophil source). MPO (Human Neutrophil source) and GBM (Bovine source) antigen. During the first incubation, specific antibodies in diluted serum, will bind to the antigen coating.
The wells are then washed to remove unbound antibodies and other components. A coniugate of alkaline phosphatase-labeled (Goat) antibodies to human IgG binds to the antibodies in the wells in this second incubation.
After a further washing step, detection of specific antibodies is obtained by incubation with substrate solution. The amount of bound antibodies correlates to the color intensity and is measured in terms of absorbance (optical density (OD)). The absorbance is then calculated and the results are given as a ratio to the negative control.
#### III. Predicate Device
The GBM, ANCA Screening test is substantially equivalent to the Wielisa PR-3 ANCA ELISA Kit , the Wielisa MPO ANCA ELISA Kit and the Wielisa anti-GBM ELISA Kit. Equivalence is demonstrated by the following comparative results:
{1}------------------------------------------------
| Control and<br>Disease groups | Total | Negative <3 | | | Equivocal 3-4 | | | Positive >4 | | |
|-------------------------------|-------|-------------|-----|-----|---------------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|-----|
| | | GBM | PR3 | MPO | GBM | PR3 | MPO | GBM | PR3 | MPO |
| Blood donors: (NS) | 131 | 128 | 131 | 127 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WG: | 42 | - | 3 | 37 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 39 | 4 |
| MP: | 43 | - | 20 | 23 | - | 2 | 0 | - | 21 | 20 |
| SLE: | 31 | 31 | 31 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5* |
| RA: | 41 | 41 | 41 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GP: | 38 | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | - | 38 | - | - |
Table 1. Clinical sensitivity and specificity. A total of 326 frozen retrospective sera with clinical characterisation were assayed. The following table summarises the results
MP = microscopic polyangiitis RA = rheumatoid arthritis WG = Wegener's granulomatosis,
SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus GP = Goodpasture syndrome
* All samples were positive in semi-quantitative MPO-ELISA.
#### Clinical sensitivity (Equivocal samples are not included in the calculation)
| PR3-ANCA: | WG = 39/42 = 92.9 % | 95% CI = 84.9 – 100% |
|-----------|---------------------|----------------------|
| | MP = 21/41 = 51.2 % | 95% CI = 35.6-66.8% |
| MPO-ANCA: | WG = 4/41 = 9.8 % | 95% CI = 4.9 – 19.0% |
| | MP = 20/43 = 46.5 % | 95% CI = 31.3-61.7% |
| Anti-GBM: | GP = 38/38 = 100 % | 95% CI = 92.2 – 100% |
#### Clinical specificity (Equivocal samples are not included in the calculation)
| PR3-ANCA: | SLE = 31/31 = 100 %<br>RA = 41/41 = 100 %<br>NS = 131/131 = 100 % | 95% CI = 90.4 – 100%<br>95% CI = 92.7 - 100%<br>95% CI = 97.7 - 100% |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| MPO-ANCA: | SLE = 24/29 = 82.8 %<br>RA = 40/40 = 100 %<br>NS = 127/127 = 100 % | 95% CI = 68.7 - 96.8%<br>95% CI = 92.6 - 100%<br>95% CI = 97.6 - 100% |
| Anti-GBM: | SLE = 31/31 = 100 %<br>RA = 41/41 = 100 %<br>NS = 128/128 = 100 % | 95% CI = 90.4 -100%<br>95% CI = 92.7 - 100%<br>95% CI = 97.6 – 100% |
{2}------------------------------------------------
Table 2. Relative sensitivity and specificity of the Wielisa anti-GBM, ANCA screen kit compared to an alternative semi-quantitative ELISA. A total of 216 frozen retrospective sera were assayed on the Wielisa anti-GBM, ANCA screen kit and a semi-quantitative ELISA for PR-3 and MPO. Also, a total of 169 frozen retrospective sera were assayed on the Wielisa anti-GBM, ANCA screen kit and an semiquantitative ELISA for anti-GBM. The following table summarises the results.
| Semi-quantitative<br>ELISA | Negative <3 | | | Equivocal | | | Positive >4 | | | |
|----------------------------|-------------|-----|-----|-----------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|-----|----|
| | GBM | PR3 | MPO | GBM | PR3 | MPO | GBM | PR3 | MPO | |
| MPO-ANCA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| PR3-ANCA | Positive | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 |
| Anti-GBM | Positive | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | - | 37 | - | - |
| | Negative | 128 | 152 | 182 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | Equivocal | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| | Total | 128 | 154 | 187 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 38 | 60 | 24 |
Relative sensitivity (Equivocal samples are not included in the calculation)
Relative sensitivity PR3-ANCA = 59/60 = 98.3% 95% CI = 95.0 - 100% Relative sensitivity MPO-ANCA = 23/24 = 95.8% 95% CI = 87.7 - 100% Relative sensitivity anti-GBM = 37/37 = 100 % 95% CI = 92.0 - 100%
#### Relative specificity (Equivocal samples are not included in the calculation)
Relative specificity PR3-ANCA = 152/152 = 100 % 95% CI = 98.0 - 100% Relative specificity MPO-ANCA= 182/182 = 100 % 95% CI = 98.4 - 100% Relative specificity anti-GBM = 128/128 = 100 % 95% CI = 97,7 - 100%
{3}------------------------------------------------
Table 3. Batch to batch variation was determined by testing three different samples. Results were obtained for 4 different batches.
| PR3 | OD ratio | | Sample Mean SD CV% Sample Mean SD CV% Sample Mean SD CV%<br>MPO | OD ratio | | GBM | OD ratio | all and the controlled on the consideration of the comments of the comments of the comments of the comments of the many of the many of the many of the many of the many of the |
|-----|----------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--|--------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2 | | | 37.5 × 3.8 × 10 × 10 × 3 × 3 × 16.8 × × 2.2 × 13 × 13 × × 1 × 1 × × | | | | 21.8 | |
| | | | 24.3 23.6 3.6 15 15 15 6 1 | | | 31.5 1.5 1.9 1.9 6 6 2 4 4 29.0 29.0 2.2 2.2 4 4 | | |
| 8 | | | 35.5 % 2.4 % 777 % % 9 % 28.3 % % 1.5 % % 5 % % 7 % % 33.8 % % 2.4 % 7 % | | | | | |
Table 4. Inter-assay precision was determined by testing one sample. Results were obtained for six different runs.
| Sample | Mean<br>OD ratio | SD | CV % | Sample<br>MPO | Mean<br>OD ratio | SD | CV % | Sample<br>GBM | Mean<br>OD ratio | SD | CV % |
|--------|------------------|-----|------|---------------|------------------|------|------|---------------|------------------|------|------|
| PK | 27.3 | 2.9 | 11 | PK | 17.3 | 3.8 | 21 | PK | 16.5 | 1.1 | 6 |
| K5 | 12.1 | 1.2 | 10 | K6 | 16.5 | 0.84 | 5 | K4 | 3.6 | 0.25 | 7 |
Table 5. Intra-assay precision was determined by testing one sample in 22 wells.
| Sample<br>PR3 | Mean<br>OD | SD | CV % | Sample<br>MPO | Mean<br>OD | SD | CV % | Sample<br>GBM | Mean<br>OD | SD | CV% |
|---------------|------------|------|------|---------------|------------|------|------|---------------|------------|------|-----|
| PK | 1.3 | 0.07 | 6 | PK | 1.8 | 0.06 | 3 | PK | 1.2 | 0.19 | 16 |
| K5 | 1.3 | 0.06 | 5 | K6 | 1.46 | 0.07 | 5 | K4 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 6 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized abstract symbol resembling an eagle or bird in flight. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol. The text is in all capital letters and is evenly spaced around the circle.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
## JUL 22 1998
Weislab AB c/o William L. Boteler, Jr. IMMUNO PROBE, INC. 1306 Bailes Lane, Suite F Frederick, MD 21701
Re: K981750 Trade Name: Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DBL, MOB Dated: May 3, 1998 Received: May 18, 1998
Dear Mr. Boteler:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval) , it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal Laws or Requlations.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CDIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
# 510(k) Number: Not known K98) 750
Device Name: Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit
Indications For Use: The Wielisa Anti-GBM, ANCA Screening Test Kit is an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the qualitative detection of antibodies to glomerular basement membrane (GBM), Proteinase-3 (PR-3) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) in human sera. The assay is used to detect antibodies in a single serum specimen. The results of the assay are to be used as an aid to the diagnosis of reno-pulmonary syndromes and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, especially Goodpasture syndrome (GP), Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and microcopic polyangiitis (MP). The assay is intended for use in patients with signs and symptoms consistent with GP, WG, and MP. It is not intended for screening a healthy population. A positive result should always be confirmed by a semi-quantitative assay.
### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use V (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OR
Over-The Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices K981,750
510(k) Number
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.