K981517 · Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems · JTN · Jun 9, 1998 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K981517
Device Name
CEFDINIR, 5 UG, SENSI-DISC
Applicant
Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems
Product Code
JTN · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jun 9, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1620
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by standardized agar diffusion test procedures. Cefdinir Sensi-Discs® are intended for use in determining the susceptibility to Cefdinir of a wide range of bacteria, as described under Indications For Use below. Zone sizes used for interpretation of tests, including control organism limits, were determined by the antimicrobic manufacturer, Parke-Davis, a Division of Warner-Lambert Co., and received FDA approval under NDA Nos. 50-739 and 50-749.
Device Story
Device consists of high-quality paper discs impregnated with specific concentrations of Cefdinir; used in clinical microbiology laboratories for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing. Discs are placed on inoculated Mueller Hinton Agar (or specialized media for specific organisms); after incubation, zones of inhibition are measured. Healthcare providers compare zone sizes against established NCCLS standards to classify bacteria as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to Cefdinir. This information guides antimicrobial therapy selection, helping clinicians choose effective treatments for bacterial infections.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Performance is based on established in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing methods and zone size interpretations determined by the antimicrobic manufacturer (Parke-Davis) and validated against NCCLS standards (M2-A6, M100-S8).
Technological Characteristics
High-quality paper discs impregnated with Cefdinir; 5 µg content. Utilizes standardized agar diffusion (Bauer-Kirby method). Requires Mueller Hinton Agar or specialized media (Haemophilus Test Medium, Mueller Hinton with 5% Sheep Blood). Manual measurement of inhibition zones. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing to determine bacterial susceptibility to Cefdinir. Active against aerobic Gram-positive (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, Viridans group streptococci) and Gram-negative (H. influenzae, H. parainfluenzae, M. catarrhalis, C. diversus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis) microorganisms.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antimicrobial susceptibility test disc is a device that consists of antimicrobic-impregnated paper discs used to measure by a disc-agar diffusion technique or a disc-broth elution technique the in vitro susceptibility of most clinically important bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial agents. In the disc-agar diffusion technique, bacterial susceptibility is ascertained by directly measuring the magnitude of a zone of bacterial inhibition around the disc on an agar surface. The disc-broth elution technique is associated with an automated rapid susceptibility test system and employs a fluid medium in which susceptibility is ascertained by photometrically measuring changes in bacterial growth resulting when antimicrobial material is eluted from the disc into the fluid medium. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
Predicate Devices
Other BBL® Sensi-Discs® such as Ciprofloxacin, 5 mcg, Sensi-Disc®
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
JUN - 9 1998
K981517
Date April 27, 1998
## SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
### SUBMITTED BY:
Virginia C. Weinknecht Regulatory Affairs Specialist Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems 7 Loveton Circle Sparks, MD 21152-0999
NAME OF DEVICE:
| Trade Name: | Cefdinir, 5 µg, Sensi-Discs<br>Catalog Numbers 4331713 and 4331714 |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name/Description: | Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs |
| Classification Name: | Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs |
| PREDICATE DEVICE: | Other BBL® Sensi-Discs® such as<br>Ciprofloxacin, 5 mcg, Sensi-Disc® |
DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
## INTENDED USE:
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs are used for semi-quantitative in vitro susceptibility testing by standardized agar diffusion test procedures. Cefdinir Sensi-Discs® are intended for use in determining the susceptibility to Cefdinir of a wide range of bacteria, as described under Indications For Use below. Zone sizes used for interpretation of tests, including control organism limits, were determined by the antimicrobic manufacturer, Parke-Davis, a Division of Warner-Lambert Co., and received FDA approval under NDA Nos. 50-739 and 50-749.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE:
Use of BBL® Cefdinir Sensi-Discs® for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing is indicated when there is a need to determine the susceptibility of bacteria to Cefdinir. Cefdinir has been shown to be active against most
{1}------------------------------------------------
strains of microorganisms listed below, as described in the Parke-Davis package insert for this antimicrobic.
## Active In Vitro and In Clinical Infections Against:
Aerobic Gram-Positive Microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus (including ß-lactamase producing strains, but excluding methicillin-resistant staphylococci) Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-susceptible strains only) Streptococcus pvogenes
#### Aerobic Gram-Neqative Microorganisms
Haemophilus influenzae (including ß-lactamase producing strains) Haemophilus parainfluenzae (including ß-lactamase producing strains) Moraxella catarrhalis (including ß-lactamase producing strains)
## Active In Vitro Only Against:
Aerobic Gram-Positive Microorganisms Staphylococcus epidermidis (methicillin-susceptible strains only) Streptococcus agalactiae Viridans group streptococci Aerobic Gram Negative Microorganisms Citrobacter diversus Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus mirabilis
#### PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
Cefdinir Susceptibility Test Discs are prepared by impregnating high quality paper with accurately determined amounts of Cefdinir supplied by the manufacturer. Parke-Davis. Each Cefdinir disc is clearly marked on both sides with the agent and content. Cefdinir discs are furnished in cartridges of 50 discs each. Cefdinir cartridges are packed as either a single cartridge in a single box, or in a package containing ten cartridges.
Agar diffusion methods employing dried filter paper discs impregnated with specific concentrations of antimicrobial agents were developed in the 1940's. In order to eliminate or minimize variability in the testing, Bauer et al developed a standardized procedure in which Mueller Hinton Agar was selected as the test medium.
Various regulatory agencies and standards-writing organizations subsequently published standardized reference procedures based on the Bauer-Kirby method. Among the earliest and most widely accepted of these standardized
B-2
{2}------------------------------------------------
procedures were those published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The procedure was adopted as a consensus standard by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and is periodically updated. The latest NCCLS documents are M2-A6 (1/97) and M100-S8 (1/98).
Discs containing a wide variety of antimicrobial agents are applied to the surface of Mueller Hinton Agar plates [or Haemophilus Test Medium Agar for Haemophilus influenzae or Mueller Hinton Agar with 5% Sheep Blood for Streptococcus pneumoniae] inoculated with pure cultures of clinical isolates. Following incubation, the plates are examined and the zones of inhibition surrounding the discs are measured and compared with established zone size ranges for individual antimicrobial agents in order to determine the agent(s) most suitable for use in antimicrobial therapy. The determination as to whether the organism in question is susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) to an antimicrobial agent is made by comparing zone sizes to those found in the respective organism tables of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) Document M2-A6 ("Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests - Sixth Edition, Approved Standard", 1/97) and of NCCLS Document M100-S8 ("Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing", Eighth Informational Supplement, 1/98).
#### PERFORMANCE DATA:
See attached Parke-Davis product insert section on Susceptibility Tests - Diffusion Techniques for Omnicef® capsules and Omnicef® for Oral Suspension.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
# JUN - 9 1998
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Virginia C. Weinknecht Regulatory Affairs Specialist Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems 7 Loveton Circle Sparks, Maryland 21152-0999
K981517 Re: Trade Name: Cefdinir, 5ug, Sensi-Disc Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JTN Dated: April 27, 1998 Received: April 28, 1998
Dear Ms. Weinknecht:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1 510(k) Number (if known): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Device Name: Cefdinir, 5 ug, Sensi-Disc®
#### Indications For Use:
Use of BBL Cefdinir Sensi-Discs® for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing is indicated when there is a need to determine the susceptibility of bacteria to Cefdinir. Cefdinir has been shown to be active In Vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed below, as described in the Parke-Davis package insert for this antimicrobic.
#### Active In Vitro Against:
#### Aerobic Gram-Positive Microorganisms
Staphylococus aureus (including B-lactamase producing stains, but excluding methicillinresistant staphylococci) Staphylococcus epidermidis (methicillin-susceptible strains only)
### Aerobic Gram-Negative Microorganisms
Haemophilus influenzae (including (3-lactamase producing strains) Haemophilus parainfluenzae (including ß-lactamase producing strains) Moraxella catarrhalis (including ß-lactamase producing stains) Escherichia coli Kiebsiella pneumoniae Proteus mirabilis
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
| Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) | |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| (Division Sign-Off) | Woodly Dubois |
| Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | K981517 |
Prescription Use Per 21 CFR 801.109 OR
Over-The-Counter Use _ Optional Format 1-2-96
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.