PAGEWRITER 200I INTERPRETIVE CARDIOGRAPH MODEL M1770A WITH ACUTE CARDIAC ISCHEMIA TIME INSENSITIVE PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENA
K981265 · Hewlett-Packard Co. · LOS · Jun 23, 1998 · CV
Device Facts
Record ID
K981265
Device Name
PAGEWRITER 200I INTERPRETIVE CARDIOGRAPH MODEL M1770A WITH ACUTE CARDIAC ISCHEMIA TIME INSENSITIVE PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENA
Applicant
Hewlett-Packard Co.
Product Code
LOS · CV
Decision Date
Jun 23, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Acute cardiac ischemia probability index
Regression formula
—
—
—
—
—
—
Indications for Use
The Page Writer 2001 Model 1770A is intended to provide acquisition, digitization and recording of couventional diagnostic 12 simultaneous lead ECG wavelorms and ECG Data, The Page Writer 200i Model M1770A also displays ECC waveforms and records patient information entered through the alphanimeric keyboard. Additionally, it measures and provides interpretation. The Page Writer 200i Model M1770A interpreted FCC7 with measurements and diagnostic statements is offered to the physician un an advisory basis only, and the physician is asked to overread and validate (or change) the ECG interpretation. In addition, the PageWriter 2001 Model M.1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A is intended to provide the cardiologist with an additional tool to aid in assessment of acute cardiac ischemia.
Device Story
PageWriter 200i M1770A is an interpretive cardiograph; acquires/digitizes 12-lead ECG waveforms. ACI-TIPI M1791A is an optional software application; combines patient demographics (age, sex), chest pain status, and ECG measurements via regression formula. Output is a probability index (0-100%) of acute cardiac ischemia. Used in clinical settings by physicians; provides advisory diagnostic support. Physician must overread/validate all interpretations. Index serves as supplemental data; not for use in isolation or as a replacement for clinical judgment. Benefits include providing an additional tool for assessing acute cardiac ischemia.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing and system validation performed to verify that the integration of the ACI-TIPI software application did not adversely affect the host cardiograph's interpretive functions.
Technological Characteristics
Interpretive cardiograph; 12-lead ECG acquisition; alphanumeric keyboard input. Software application (ACI-TIPI) uses regression formula for probability calculation. Connectivity via standard ECG recording techniques. System is a host cardiograph with optional software module.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring 12-lead ECG acquisition, recording, and interpretation. ACI-TIPI application is indicated for use by cardiologists as an aid in the assessment of acute cardiac ischemia by correlating patient demographics (age, sex), symptoms (chest pain status), and ECG measurements.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains a sequence of handwritten digits and a letter. The sequence starts with the letter 'K', followed by the numbers 9, 8, 1, 2, 6, and 5. The numbers are written in a connected manner, with some overlap between them. The handwriting style is casual and slightly uneven.
# 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS FOR HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
# PAGEWRITER 200i INTERPRETIVE CARDIOGRAPH MODEL M1770A with ACUTE CARDIAC ISCHEMIA TIME INSENSITIVE PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENT APPLICATION
### MODEL M1791A
- DATE SUMMARY PREPARED 1.
April 2, 1998
。
#### SUBMITTER'S NAME AND ADDRESS 2.
Hewlett-Packard Company 3000 Minuteman Road Andover, MA 01810-1099
#### CONTACT PERSON 3.
Mr. George Diller Engineering Product Manager (978) 659-4971 Telephone: (978) 659-3168 Facsimile:
#### 4. DEVICE NAME
PageWriter 200i Model M1770A Interpretive Cardiograph Proprietary Name: with Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) Model M1791A Application. Common Name: Cardiograph Classification Name: Electrocardiograph
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### PREDICATE DEVICES 5.
The legally marketed devices to which equivalence is being claimed are listed below.
| Manufacturer | Predicate Device | Model | 510(k) Number |
|-----------------|------------------|-----------------------|---------------|
| Hewlett-Packard | PageWriter XLi | M1700A<br>with M1791A | K951978 |
| Hewlett-Packard | PageWriter 200i | M1770A | K935772 |
The interpretative cardiographic functions of the PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A are identical to the predicate PageWriter 200i Model M1770A (K935772). The optional software application, acute cardiac ischemia time insensitive instrument (ACI-TIPI) Model M1791A, is identical to the ACI-TIPI application that is commercially available for use with the predicate PageWriter XLi Model M1700A (K951978).
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION 6.
The ACI-TIPI Model M1791A is an optional software application for the commercially available predicate PageWriter 200i M1770A interpretive · cardiograph. This optional software application is used to provide the cardiologist with an additional tool to aid in the assessment of acute cardiac ischemia. The ACI-TIPI application regression formula for ACI combines patient data (age, sex, and chest pain status) with measurements from the ECG. The computation yields a probability index of acute cardiac ischemia in the range of 0-100%. This index is intended to be used with the currently established data in evaluation of the subject patient population. As an index, the physician can correlate values with their current diagnostic results and then use the index to support their diagnosis, or to initiate further action. For example, the physician can use the index as part of the diagnostic data set used to assess a patient. This index is never used alone or in place of other pertinent information normally used in acute ischemia determinations.
#### 7. INTENDED USE
The intended use of the PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A is similar to the intended use of the predicate PageWriter 200i Model
{2}------------------------------------------------
They are both intended to be used for acquisition, digitization, M1770A. recording of conventional diagnostic 12 simultaneous lead ECG waveforms and ECG data, and measuring and interpreting ECGs. In addition, the PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A has the same intended use as the predicate PageWriter XLi Model M1700A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A. Specifically, they both are intended to provide a tool to aid in assessment of acute cardiac ischemia by correlation of the patient demographics, symptoms and ECG measurements.
#### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 8.
The PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A has the same interpretive cardiograph characteristics as the predicate PageWriter 200i Model M1770A. For example, they both contain the same ECG measurements, adult and pediatric analysis programs, ECG basic controls, conventional 12 simultaneous lead ECGs and both have the same recording techniques. The PageWriter 2001 Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A has the same predictive algorithm characteristics as the predicate PageWriter XLi Model M1700A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A. In fact, the exact same ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application is used with both interpretive cardiographs. In addition, the same parameters are entered by the user (patient ID, name, age, gender, height, weight and presence of chest pain) and the same input parameters are needed for the predictive algorithm (ACI-TIPI).
#### NONCLINICAL TESTS USED IN DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE 9.
The safety of the PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791 A is already proven because the interpretive cardiograph which will host the ACI-TIPI algorithm is commercially available for market worldwide. In addition, the ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application is also commercially available on another Hewlett-Packard interpretive cardiograph. The ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application has been validated and system testing was performed to verify that the addition of the ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application did not adversely alter the functionality of the PageWriter 200i Model M1770A interpretive cardiograph.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### CONCLUSIONS FROM NONCLINICAL TESTING 10.
The addition of the ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application to the predicate PageWriter 200i Model M1770A interpretive cardiograph has been successfully completed and passed validation testing. In addition, system testing verified that the addition of the ACI-TIPI Model M1791A application does not affect the interpretive cardiograph functionalities of the host PageWriter 200i Model M1770A.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three tail feathers, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans and provide essential human services. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the eagle in a circular fashion. The logo is black and white.
### Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
### JUN 23 1998
Ms. Renee J. Thibeault Associate Consultant Medical Device Consultants, Inc. 49 Plain Street North Attleboro, MA 02760
Re: K981265 Hwelett-Packard Page Writer 200I Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A Regulatory Class: III (three) Product Code: LOS Dated: April 2, 1998 Received: April 7, 1998
Dear Ms. Thibeault:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{5}------------------------------------------------
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.qov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callahan, Ph.D.
Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neuroloqical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): K981265
## Device Name: Howlett-Packard Page Writer 200i Model M 1770A Interpretive Cardioeranh with Acute Cardiac Techemia Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument Application (ACI-TIPI) Model M1791A.
Indications For Use:
The Page Writer 2001 Model 1770A is intended to provide acquisition, digitization and recording of couventional diagnostic 12 simultaneous lead ECG wavelorms and ECG Data, The Page Writer 200i Model M1770A also displays ECC waveforms and records patient information entered through the alphanimeric keyboard. Additionally, it measures and provides interpretation. The Page Writer 200i Model M1770A interpreted FCC7 with measurements and diagnostic statements is offered to the physician un an advisory basis only, and the physician is asked to overread and validate (or change) the ECG interpretation.
In addition, the PageWriter 2001 Model M.1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A is intended to provide the cardiologist with an additional tool to aid in assessment of acute cardiac ischemia.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NECESSARY)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
N. Qullh Tille
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices 510(k) Number
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109) X
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
4/2/98 Hewlett-Packard Company 510(k) CONFIDENTIAL PageWriter 200i Model M1770A with ACI-TIPI Model M1791A Page vi
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.