All components of the Osteonics® Total Elbow System are intended to help restore the normal center of rotation and to duplicate the functional movement of the elbow. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System is comprised of total elbow replacement components which are intended to have maximum contact in the epicondylar regions of the humerus where the highest quality bone is present. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System components are single-use devices. The humeral and ulnar components achieve fixation to the prepared humerus and ulna through the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System has been specifically designed to address cases involving rheumatic arthritic conditions, as well as ankylosis involving the elbow.
Device Story
Semi-constrained total elbow prosthesis; replaces elbow joint components to restore rotation and movement. System includes humeral and ulnar components, polyethylene bearings/bushings, and titanium alloy axle pin. Components fixed to bone using PMMA cement. Surgeon-operated in clinical/surgical settings. Axle pin threads into humeral component to prevent dislocation. Design improvements over predicate include threaded axle pin (vs. snap-fit), additional size (medium), and longer humeral component option. Device restores joint function for patients with severe arthritis, fractures, or failed prior replacements.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence based on design similarities, material standards, and pre-clinical data incorporated by reference to prior submissions.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: ASTM F-136-96 titanium alloy (Ti6Al-4V ELI) for humeral/ulnar components and axle pin; ASTM F-648-96 UHMWPE for bearings/bushings. Semi-constrained, linked design. Fixation via PMMA bone cement. Satin finish on metal components. Threaded axle pin mechanism. Single-use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with painful, disabling elbow joint disease (degenerative, rheumatoid, or post-traumatic arthritis), distal humeral fracture/dislocation, or revision of previous unsuccessful elbow procedures. Also indicated for clinical management where arthrodesis or alternative reconstruction is less likely to succeed. Cemented use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An elbow joint metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace an elbow joint. It is made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, or of these alloys and of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bushing. The device prevents dislocation in more than one anatomic plane and consists of two components that are linked together. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,”
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-Aluminum 4-Vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,”
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(viii) ISO 14630:1997 “Non-active Surgical Implants—General Requirements,”
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 981-93 “Practice for Assessment of Compatibility of Biomaterials (Nonporous) for Surgical Implant with Respect to Effect of Material on Muscle and Bone,”
(v) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(vi) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vii) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal Coatings, ” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”
Predicate Devices
Osteonics® Linked Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Premarket Notification Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Osteonics® Total Elbow System
5 1098 MAY
# Submission Information
Name and Address of the Sponsor of the 510(k) Submission:
Contact Person:
Date of Summary Preparation:
Allendale, NJ 074 Kate Sutton Regulatory Affairs S 000/0991
February 6, 1998
Osteonics Corpora
59 Route 17
## Device Identification
Proprietary Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name and Reference:
Osteonics® Total Elbow System
Total Elbow
Elbow Joint Metal/Polymer Semi-Constrained Prosthesis 21 CFR §878.3150
## Predicate Device Identification
The Osteonics® Total Elbow System is substantially equivalent to the following competitive and/or Osteonics devices, which have previously been determined substantially equivalent by FDA:
- Osteonics® Linked Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis ●
## Device Description
The Osteonics® Total Elbow System, available in right and left versions, is a semi-constrained elbow system that is linked across the joint and achieves fixation to the prepared humerus and ulna through the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. The humeral and ulnar components, which are satin finished, function together through the use of a polyethylene bearing and bushing between the two component surfaces. The axle pin, which is threaded on the lower 3mm to 5mm (depending in implant size chosen) portion of the shaft, fits through the lateral aspect of the humeral component with a polyethylene sleeve (bushing). The axle pin is used to prevent dislocation.
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Osteonics® Total Elbow System components are characterized by the following features:
- · A satin finish on the titanium alloy humeral and ulnar components.
- · Bearings and bushings manufactured from ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.
- A titanium alloy axle pin which screws directly into the humeral component.
The Osteonics® Total Elbow System differs from the predicate Osteonics® Linked Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis in that it features: a) a threaded axle pin that screws directly into the humeral component instead of using a "snap-fit" to lock into a retaining ring; b) it offers a medium size not offered by the predicate, and; c) it offers a longer humeral component, if desired. In all other aspects, the subject device is virtually identical in design and function to the predicate device.
#### Intended Use:
All components of the Osteonics® Total Elbow System are intended to help restore the normal center of rotation and to duplicate the functional movement of the elbow. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System is comprised of total elbow replacement components which are intended to have maximum contact in the epicondylar regions of the humerus where the highest quality bone is present. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System components are single-use devices. The humeral and ulnar components achieve fixation to the prepared humerus and ulna through the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. The Osteonics® Total Elbow System has been specifically designed to address cases involving rheumatic arthritic conditions, as well as ankylosis involving the elbow.
#### Indications:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the elbow resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid . arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- Distal humeral fracture and/or dislocation.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful total elbow replacement, resurfacing, or other procedure. .
- Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are . less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
#### Statement of Technological Comparison:
The substantial equivalence of the Osteonics® Total Elbow System to the predicate device identified above-in terms of intended use, materials, and design features-is based on the following.
#### Intended Uses:
The intended uses of the subject Osteonics® Total Elbow System are identical to those of the predicate device.
#### Materials:
Both subject and predicate devices use the identical materials: ASTM F-136-96 titanium alloy (Ti6Al-4V ELI) for the humeral and ulnar components, and the axle pin, and ASTM F-648-96 UHMWPE for the bearings and bushings.
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Design:
The design of the Osteonics® Total Elbow System is consistent with that of the predicate Osteonics® Linked Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis and differs only in the following:
- The subject device has an axle pin that screw locks into the humeral component instead of employing the snap-fit lock into a retaining ring employed by the predicate device.
- The subject device offers small, medium, and large sizes, whereas the predicate device offers only small and large sizes.
- The subject device offers a total elbow with the option of a longer humeral component.
None of these design differences raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
## Summary
Based on the similarities presented above, the supporting testing summary, the pre-clinical data incorporated by reference to a prior submission, and the fact that the Osteonics® Total Elbow System components employ standard sterilization and packaging methods, the substantial equivalence of the Osteonics® Total Elbow System to the legally marketed Osteonics® Linked Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis is demonstrated.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three lines forming its body and head. The eagle is facing right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
2 1098 MAY
Ms. Kate Sutton Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Osteonics Corporation 59 Route 17 Allendale, New Jersey 17401-1677
Re: K980502 Osteonics® Total Elbow System Trade Name: Requlatory Class: İII Product Code: JDC Dated: February 6, 1998 February 9, 1998 Received:
Dear Ms. Sutton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major requlations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. ਜੋ substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, Devices: through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory In addition, FDA may publish further announcements action. concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 - Ms. Kate Sutton
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA asborizon in postantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note one origine on compitied, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general. information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
E. Gulia M. Witter, Ph. D.
Ph.D., M.D. Celia M. Witten, Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
# 510(k) Number (if known): K 9 8 Φ 5 Φ 2
Device Name: Osteonics® Total Elbow System
Indications For Use:
The indications for the Osteonics® Total Elbow System, in keeping with the legally marketed Osteonics® Linked Constrained Total Elbow Prosthesis, are as follows:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the elbow resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- Distal humeral fracture and/or dislocation.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful total elbow replacement, resurfacing, or other procedure.
- Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.
- The Osteonics® Total Elbow System is indicated for cemented use only.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF . NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | X |
|---------------------------------------|---|
|---------------------------------------|---|
| (Division Sign-Off) | |
|-----------------------------------------|---------|
| Division of General Restorative Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | K980502 |
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.