K974551 · Sealite Sciences, Inc. · CEC · Dec 22, 1997 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K974551
Device Name
SEALITE SCIENCES, INC. AQUALITE FREE T, ASSAY
Applicant
Sealite Sciences, Inc.
Product Code
CEC · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 22, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1695
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The AquaLite® FT4 Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® FT4 Assay) is an in vitro diagnostic product intended for use in the quantitative measurement of FT4 in human serum in clinical laboratories. Free thyroxine measurements are used to diagnosis and treat diseases of the thyroid.
Device Story
AquaLite® Free T4 Assay is a single-site, competitive inhibition bioluminescent immunoassay (BIA) kit. Input: 50 uL human serum sample, calibrators, or controls. Process: Sample pipetted into polystyrene tubes pre-coated with T4 carrier complex; mouse monoclonal anti-T4 antibody linked to AquaLite® added; 90-minute incubation on orbital shaker; wash step removes unbound conjugate. Detection: Luminometer triggers flash-type reaction via calcium buffer injection; AquaLite® oxidizes luciferin to produce light. Output: Light intensity (RLU) measured; signal inhibition inversely proportional to free T4 concentration. Calculation: Cubic spline curve fit applied to log-log transformation of RLU vs. concentration. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians/lab personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing and managing thyroid disease.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via sensitivity (0.007 ng/dL), intra-assay precision (2.9-10.1% CV), and inter-assay precision (3.4-13.0% CV). Method comparison (n=127) against a commercial chemiluminescence assay showed a correlation coefficient of 0.92, slope 1.1, and y-intercept -0.2. Interference testing confirmed no significant impact from hemoglobin, albumin, oleic acid, bilirubin, salicylate, or phenylbutazone at tested levels. Kinetics studies confirmed 90-minute incubation as optimal.
Technological Characteristics
Competitive inhibition bioluminescent immunoassay. Solid phase: polystyrene tubes pre-coated with T4 carrier complex. Conjugate: mouse monoclonal anti-T4 antibody linked to AquaLite®. Detection: luminometer-based flash-type reaction triggered by calcium buffer. Software: cubic spline curve fit algorithm. Sample type: serum/plasma. Sterilization: not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of free thyroxine (FT4) in human serum to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid diseases in clinical laboratory settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A free thyroxine test system is a device intended to measure free (not protein bound) thyroxine (thyroid hormone) in serum or plasma. Levels of free thyroxine in plasma are thought to reflect the amount of thyroxine hormone available to the cells and may therefore determine the clinical metabolic status of thyroxine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid diseases.
Predicate Devices
Nichols Institute Free T4 Assay
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K974551
DEC 2 2 1997
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
# 510(k) SUMMARY
#### I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Trade or proprietary name - SeaLite Sciences, Inc. AquaLite® Free T, Assay
Common or usual name - Bioluminescent immunoassay (BIA)
Classification name - FDA has classified Free To test systems intended for the measurement of free thyroxine in serum or plasma to diagnose and treat diseases of the thyroid as Class II devices. (21 C.F.R. § 862.1695)
| Submitter's Name | Cathryn N. Cambria, Director |
|------------------|------------------------------------------|
| and Address: | Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance |
| | SeaLite Sciences, Inc. |
| | 3000 Northwoods Parkway |
| | Suite 200 |
| | Norcross, GA 30071 |
| | (800) 874-4471, ext. 227 |
| Submission Date: | December 3, 1997 |
Legally Marketed Device To Which Claim Substantial Equivalence:
Nichols Institute Free T4 Assay
### II. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The AquaLite® Free T Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® Free T . Assay) is an in vitro diagnostic product intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of human free T4 in serum.
{1}------------------------------------------------
## III. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The AquaLite® Free T. Assay is a single-site, competitive inhibition bioluminescent immunoassay kit. A T carrier complex is immobilized on polystyrene tubes (solid phase). Serum samples, appropriate calibrators or controls, are pipetted (50 uL) into the pre-coated tubes. A mouse monoclonal anti-T antibody covalently linked to AquaLite® (100 uL) is then added to the tubes. Free T. in the sample competes with immobilized T for the available T binding sites of the anti-T antibody conjugate. Complex formation is complete after a 90-minute incubation period at room temperature on a standard orbital shaker. The tubes are then washed to remove unbound conjugate.
The washed tubes are placed in a luminometer that is capable of reading a triggered, flash-type reaction in 12 x 75 mm tubes. Injection of the calcium trigger buffer causes AquaLite® to oxide its self-contained luciferin molecule, producing a flash of light, which is measured by the luminometer. The presence of Ta in the sample or calibrator reduces the binding of the conjugate to the immobilized T . pre-coated on the tubes. The amount of signal inhibition is indirectly proportional to the Free T concentration. To calculate results, the luminometer uses a cubic spline curve fit applied to a log-log transformation of the light intensity (in relative light units, RLU) of the Free T calibrators versus Free T, concentration (in ng/dL).
## SUMMARY OF STUDIES AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IV.
Studies on the AquaLite® Free T. Assay were conducted at SeaLite Sciences. The results are summarized below:
# Performance Characteristics
### 1. Sensitivity
The sensitivity or detection limit of the AquaLite® Free T. Assay is 0.007 ng/dL. Sensitivity is calculated by determining the Free Ta concentration that corresponds to the 95% confidence level of twenty replicates of the A Calibrator (0 ng/dL).
### 2. Specificity and Cross Reactivity
Cross reactivity of the AquaLite® Free T Assay was determined by spiking Calibrator A containing Free Ta (0 ng/dL) with the following compounds.
{2}------------------------------------------------
| Compound | Concentration | % Cross Reactivity |
|-------------------------|---------------|--------------------|
| Triiodo-L-thyronine | 20 µg/dL | undetectable |
| Triiodothyroacetic acid | 20 µg/dL | undetectable |
| Monoiodotyrosine | 20 µg/dL | undetectable |
| Diiodo-L-tyrosine | 20 µg/dL | undetectable |
| Methimazole | 0.4 mg/mL | undetectable |
| 6-n-Propyl-2-thiouracil | 0.4 mg/mL | undetectable |
## 3. Drift
Two patient samples were run (5 duplicates each) and assayed for reagent addition drift. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T. Assay does not exhibit "end of run" effect with 100 tubes.
| | (All measurements, in ng/dL) | | |
|--------|------------------------------|-------|--------|
| | Tubes | Tubes | Tubes |
| Sample | 20-30 | 50-60 | 90-100 |
| 1 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| 2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
### Precision and Reproducibility 4.
- Intra-assay precision. Three serum controls containing Free T4 at the a. following concentrations were assayed to determine intra-assay precision (n=20 per concentration level).
| Free T4 Level (ng/dL) | % CV |
|-----------------------|------|
| 0.75 | 10.1 |
| 2.6 | 4.1 |
| 4.4 | 2.9 |
- Inter-assay precision. Three serum controls containing Free T4 at the b. following concentrations were assayed in duplicate in 20 assays. A new standard curve was generated for each assay (n = 2 x 20 = 40). Inter-assay precision observed over a 2 week period for the solutions is as follows:
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Free T4 Level (ng/dL) | % CV |
|-----------------------|------|
| 0.6 | 13.0 |
| 2.6 | 5.0 |
| 4.2 | 3.4 |
#### 5. Method Comparison
Free Tg ranging from 0.27 to 3.67 ng/dL in serum samples (n = 127) was measured using the AquaLite® Free T Assay and a commercially available chemiluminescence immunometric assay kit for Free T4. Correlation by linear regression analysis gave a slope of 1.1 with a y intercept of -0.2. The correlation coefficient was 0.92.
# 6. Kinetics
Three human serum samples were assayed in parallel at 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes to demonstrate the effect of incubation times. Results indicate a 90 minute incubation is optimal.
| Standard<br>ng/dL | 1 Hour<br>%B/Bo | 1.5 Hours<br>%B/Bo | 2 Hours<br>%B/Bo |
|-------------------|-----------------|--------------------|------------------|
| 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 0.4 | 85.9 | 84.0 | 82.6 |
| 0.9 | 68.8 | 68.1 | 68.8 |
| 2 | 38.0 | 38.4 | 41.2 |
| 4 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 10.7 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Sample<br>ng/dL | Free T4<br>ng/dL | Free T4<br>ng/dL | Free T4<br>ng/dL |
|-----------------|------------------|------------------|------------------|
| 1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| 3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
# 7. Recovery in Serum and Plasma
Blood samples from 7 normal subjects were prepared as sera (standard technique and SST tubes) as well as heparin and EDTA plasmas. Free T, was quantified using the AquaLite® Free T , Assay . Recovered Free T , was compared with the Free T , recovered in serum (standard technique). The data demonstrates that there are no significant differences between standard serum or serum separator tubes, nor heparin and EDTA plasmas when using the AquaLite® Free T4 Assay.
| Sample | Serum | Heparin | EDTA | SST |
|--------|-------|---------|------|-----|
| 1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 4 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| 6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| 7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
# 8. Effect of Hemolysis
Three patient samples were spiked with preparations of hemoglobin and assayed to demonstrate effect of mild, moderate and severely hemolyzed serum. The data demonstrates that the AquaLite® Free T. Assay is not significantly affected by hemoglobin.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Sample | Neat | Mild | Moderate | Severe |
|--------|------|------|----------|--------|
| 1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
### 9. Effect of TBG
This experiment tested for the possible interference of the immobilized Free T with purified TBG. If TBG bound to the immobilized Free T., there would be a reduction of binding of the anti-T. AquaLite® Free T. conjugate. This would be reflected in an apparent increase in Free T concentration. At a normal TBG level (15-34 mg/L)18 there was no interference of the AquaLite® Free T4 Assay. There was slight inhibition of the %B/Bo at 200 and 300 mg/L of TBG (5.9 and 8.8 times normal physiologic level).
| TBG Added | %B/Bo |
|-----------|-------|
| 0 | 100% |
| 50 mg/L | 100 % |
| 75 mg/L | 100% |
| 100 mg/L | 104% |
| 200 mg/L | 91% |
| 300 mg/L | 93% |
| 600 mg/L | 73% |
### 10. Effect of Albumin
Three patient samples were spiked with 15, 25 and 75 mg/mL of albumin and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T4 Assay is not significantly affected by albumin.
| Sample | Neat | Albumin | | |
|--------|------|----------|----------|----------|
| | | 15 mg/mL | 25 mg/mL | 75 mg/mL |
| 1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| 2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
### 11. Effect of Nonesterified Fatty Acids
Three patient samples were spiked with 2.5, 5 and 10 mmol/L oleic acid and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free F4 Assay is not significantly affected by oleic acid at the levels tested.
| Sample | Neat | 2.5 mmol/L | 5 mmol/L | 10 mmol/L |
|--------|------|------------|----------|-----------|
| 1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
### 12. Effect of Bilirubin
Three patient samples were spiked with 10 and 20 mg/dL bilirubin and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T Assay is not significantly affected by bilirubin at the levels tested.
| Sample | Neat | Bilirubin | |
|--------|------|-----------|----------|
| 1 | 1.1 | 10 mg/dL | 20 mg/dL |
| 1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| 2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
### 13. Effect of Salicylate
Three patient samples were spiked with 1, 5, 10 and 25 mg/dL salicylate and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T Assay is not significantly affected by salicylate at the levels tested.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | | Salicylate | | | |
|--------|------|------------|---------|----------|----------|
| Sample | Neat | 1 mg/dL | 5 mg/dL | 10 mg/dL | 25 mg/dL |
| 1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| 2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| 3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
### 14. Effect of Phenytoin
Two patient samples were spiked with 1, 5, 10 and 25 µg/mL phenytoin and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T. Assay is not significantly affected by phenytoin at the I to 11 1100ay is needing to patients falling
Should be interpreted with courtion.
| | Phenytoin | | | | |
|--------|-----------|--------|--------|---------|---------|
| Sample | Neat | 1µg/mL | 5µg/mL | 10µg/mL | 25µg/mL |
| 1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
#### 15. Effect of Phenylbutazone
Three patient samples were spiked with 1, 5 and 10 ug/mL phenylbutazone and assayed. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Free T. Assay is not significantly affected by phenylbutazone at the levels tested.
| Sample | Neat | 1 µg/mL | 5 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL |
|--------|------|---------|---------|----------|
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| 3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
{8}------------------------------------------------
### POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THE DEVICE ON HEALTH V.
Use Universal Precautions. No known test method can offer complete Caution: assurance that products derived from human serum are pathogen-free; therefore, handle all materials of human origin as though they were potentially infectious.
Sodium azide is used as a preservative. This preservative may react with metallic plumbing to from explosive metal azides. Flush with large volumes of water when disposing of materials containing sodium azide.
As an in vitro diagnostic test, there are not direct adverse effects on the health of a patient from the use of this product. However, failure of the device to perform as indicated, the contamination of reagents, the use of reagents past the labeled expiration dates, the use of improper specimens, or human error during the performance of the test may lead to erroneous results and possible improper patient management.
### VI. CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM STUDIES !
The data from the studies conducted demonstrate that the performance of SeaLite Sciences, Inc. AquaLite® Free T Assay is similar and substantially equivalent to that of other commercially available assays for Free T4.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the bird symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
DEC 22 1997
Cathryn Cambria · Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance SeaLite Sciences, Inc. 3000 Northwoods Parkway, Suite 200 Norcross, Georgia 30071
Re : K974551 AquaLite® Free T4 Assay r Requlatory Class: II Product Code: CEC December 3, 1997 Dated: Received: December 4, 1997
Dear Ms. Cambria:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the market is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note:
this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations.
{10}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as The FDA described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to
premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Litman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{11}------------------------------------------------
Page _ 1 of _1
510(k) Number (if known): K974551
Device Name: AquaLite® FT4 Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® FT4 92284
Indications for Use:
The AquaLite® FT4 Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® F14 Assay) is an in vitro diagnostic product intended for use in the quantitative measurement of FT4 in human serum in clinical laboratories. Free thyroxine measurements are used to diagnosis and treat diseases of the thyroid.
V. Michell Charles for Abe Montgomery
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Levices
510(k) Number 6974501
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use _
OR
Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.