ROCHE AMPLICOR CT/NG TEST FOR NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE
K974503 · Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. · LSL · Dec 1, 1999 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K974503
Device Name
ROCHE AMPLICOR CT/NG TEST FOR NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE
Applicant
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Product Code
LSL · Microbiology
Decision Date
Dec 1, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3390
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The AMPLICOR® CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a qualitative in vitro test for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical specimens. The test utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the multiplex nucleic acid amplification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in endocervical and male urethral swab specimens and in male and female urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, and target-specific probe hybridization capture for the detection of the amplified Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA.
Device Story
AMPLICOR CT/NG Test is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic assay for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis DNA. Input: endocervical swabs, male urethral swabs, or urine specimens. Process: PCR-based nucleic acid amplification using Perkin Elmer 2400 or 9600 thermal cyclers; target-specific probe hybridization capture; colorimetric detection via microwell plate reader. Includes Internal Control to identify PCR inhibitors. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Output: absorbance measurement (A450) indicating presence of target DNA. Healthcare providers use results to diagnose N. gonorrhoeae infections, guiding clinical management and treatment decisions. Benefits include rapid, sensitive molecular detection compared to traditional culture methods.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 5,374 specimens across six sites comparing AMPLICOR results to culture. Sensitivity ranged from 72.7% to 98.6% depending on specimen type and symptoms; specificity ranged from 95.8% to 99.4%. 33 specimens were repeatedly inhibitory. Discrepant results were analyzed using an alternate 16S rRNA primer PCR test. Analytical sensitivity is 5 CFU/test. Analytical specificity tested against 150+ organisms; cross-reactivity observed with some Neisseria subflava and Neisseria cinerea isolates.
Technological Characteristics
Multiplex PCR assay; targets 201-nucleotide sequence in M-NgoPII putative cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene. Uses Perkin Elmer 2400/9600 thermal cyclers. Detection via colorimetric absorbance (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine oxidation by hydrogen peroxide/horseradish peroxidase). Includes Internal Control for PCR inhibition. Standard laboratory equipment required (microwell plate washer/reader).
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA in endocervical swabs, male urethral swabs, and male/female urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Neisseria spp. direct serological test reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify Neisseria spp. from cultured isolates. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of Neisseria spp. antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) which may be used to detect the presence of Neisseria spp. directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Neisseria, such as epidemic cerebrospinal meningitis, meningococcal disease, and gonorrhea, and also provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms. The device does not include products for the detection of gonorrhea in humans by indirect methods, such as detection of antibodies or of oxidase produced by gonococcal organisms.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
DEC - 1 1999
K974503
P
Diagnostics
# 510(k) Summary
## Roche AMPLICOR® CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K974503
## Intended Use:
The AMPLICOR® CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* is a qualitative *in vitro* test for the detection of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* in clinical specimens. The test utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the multiplex nucleic acid amplification of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* and *Chlamydia trachomatis* DNA in endocervical and male urethral swab specimens and in male and female urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, and target-specific probe hybridization capture for the detection of the amplified *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* DNA.
## Description of the Device:
The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* is a multiplex *in vitro* diagnostic test that enables the simultaneous amplification of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*, *Chlamydia trachomatis* and an Internal Control sequence in a sample. The Test is designed for use with the Perkin Elmer 2400 or the Perkin Elmer 9600 thermal cycler for nucleic acid amplification of target DNA by polymerase chain reaction, and colorimetric detection using a conventional microwell plate washer and reader. The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test also incorporates an Internal Control for the identification of specimens that contain inhibitory substances to the PCR amplification reaction.
## Similarities and Differences to Predicate Device:
The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* is substantially equivalent to other commercially available *in vitro* diagnostic devices for the detection of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* in urogenital swab and urine specimens. These methods include biochemical and immunologic assays for specific identification of *N. gonorrhoeae* on selective culture medium, and tests for specific nucleic acid in patient specimens. Isolation of *N. gonorrhoeae* on selective culture medium with confirmation by acid production from carbohydrates, rapid enzyme tests, serologic assays, and tests for
November 23, 1999
Roche Molecular Systems
P.O. Box 9002
Pleasanton CA 94566-0900
Contact:
James F. Kelly
Tel. 925-730-8180
FAX 925-730-8128
1 of 5
{1}
specific nucleic acid are generally considered to be the international gold standard methods for detection. A commonality among all of these devices is that the unique biochemical properties of the target organism are all encoded in the DNA of the organism, essentially reducing each device to a test for genetic (i.e., phenotypic or genotypic) characteristics of the organism.
The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae detects a conserved sequence of 201 nucleotides within the M-NgoPII putative cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene of the N. gonorrhoeae bacterial chromosome while culture-based methods identify isolated organisms according to their biochemical or immunologic properties. The clinical performance of the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae has been shown to be substantially equivalent to culture methods.
The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae allows the automated multiplex amplification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and an Internal Control that is used to detect the presence of PCR inhibitors. All of these tests use similar detection reactions that are based on the absorbance measurement of a chromophore that is produced by the oxidation of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethybenzidine by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of horseradish peroxidase.
## Non-Clinical Performance:
The analytical sensitivity (limit of detection) of the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is 5 colony forming units (CFU) per test for each of 15 isolates tested for CTM and urine specimens. The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae gave positive results for all strains tested at 20, 10, and 5 CFU/test. At 1 CFU/test, the test gave positive results for at least one replicate for all 15 strains, and positive results for all three replicates for 14 of the 15 strains at 2 CFU/test.
The analytical specificity of the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae was tested against 132 bacteria, 6 fungi, 1 protozoan and 11 virus isolates that are commonly isolated from the urogenital tract. Isolates were added to CTM and normal human urine at approximately $10^{4}$ copies of genomic DNA per test. CTM and urine samples were processed and tested using the standard AMPLICOR CT/NG Test procedure. Multiple isolates of Neisseria subflava and Neisseria cinerea obtained from the American Type Culture Collection were tested. Four of the Neisseria subflava and one Neisseria cinerea isolate gave false positive test results. All of the remaining organisms gave negative results with the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
The precision of the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae was determined for a panel of culture transport media specimens containing 0, 12.5, 37.5 and 62.5 Neisseria gonorrhoeae CFU/test; and urine specimens containing 0, 10, 30 and 50 Neisseria gonorrhoeae CFU/test. Three independent operators at three different geographical sites tested the panel in duplicate once a day for three days. The results of this study are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
2 of 5
{2}
3 of 5
# Table 1
AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
CTM Reproducibility Study Results
| | N. gonorrhoeae Spiked CTM (CFU/test) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0 | 12.5 | 37.5 | 62.5 |
| Number of Replicates | 72 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| No. Correct Results (%)* | 72 (100) | 36 (100) | 36 (100) | 33 (100) |
| No. Equivocal A_{450} 0.2-1.999 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| No. Equivocal A_{450} 2.0-3.499 | 0 | 14 | 16 | 16 |
| Median A_{450} | 0.056 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 2.889 |
| Minimum A_{450} | 0.044 | 2.208 | 2.054 | 1.634 |
| Maximum A_{450} | 0.177 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
* Specimens with initial equivocal results 0.2-1.999 were considered non-reportable, and were excluded from the calculations of % correct results. Specimens with equivocal results 2.0-3.499 were considered positive in the calculations.
# Table 2
AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Urine Reproducibility Study Results
| | N. gonorrhoeae Spiked Urine (CFU/test) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0 | 10 | 30 | 50 |
| Number of Replicates | 72 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| No. Correct Results (%)* | (100) | 27 (90.0)† | (100) | (100) |
| No. Equivocal A_{450} 0.2-1.999 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| No. Equivocal A_{450} 2.0-3.499 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 |
| Median A_{450} | 0.055 | 2.754 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
| Minimum A_{450} | 0.047 | 1.097§ | 1.535 | 1.395 |
| Maximum A_{450} | 0.106 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
* Specimens with initial equivocal results 0.2-1.999 were considered non-reportable, and were excluded from the calculations of % correct results. Specimens with equivocal results 2.0-3.499 were considered positive in the calculations.
† One sample gave negative results in three of six initial replicates at one site. The sample was repeat tested in duplicate at the site and correct results were obtained for all replicates. % Correct results based on 27 correct results out of 30 tests.
§ Minimum absorbance excluding the three initial negative tests.
{3}
4 of 5
# Clinical Performance
The AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* was evaluated in a clinical study conducted at six geographically diverse sites. The clinical performance of the test was evaluated by comparing the results of the 5374 swab and urine specimens to the *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* culture results. Specimens with discrepant results were also tested by an alternate primer (16S rRNA) PCR test. Analyses were also performed including and excluding the use of the Internal Control result. The alternate primer PCR test results were not used to calculate the clinical performance characteristics of the test and are reported for information purposes only.
When the Internal Control result was used in the analysis, specimens with repeatedly negative Internal Control test results were excluded because the results were not interpretable. Of the 5374 specimens collected and tested in the AMPLICOR CT/NG Test clinical study, 33 were repeatedly inhibitory. Therefore, a total of 5341 specimens were used in the analyses when the Internal Control result was used. Table 3 shows the results from the clinical study.
{4}
Table 3
Clinical Performance of AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Including and Excluding the Internal Control¹
| Sex | Specimen | Symptom | TP | TN | FP | FN | No. Inhib. | % Repeatedly Inhibitory | Total | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | 16S+/FP² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Female | CTM | Asymptomatic | 49
(49) | 1032
(1038) | 12
(12) | 1
(1) | 6 | 0.58% | 1100
(1100) | 98.0%
(89.3–99.9)
(98.0%)
(89.3–99.9) | 98.9%
(98.2–99.5)
(98.9%)
(98.2–99.5) | 4/12
(4/12) |
| | | Symptomatic | 69
(68) | 1034
(1048) | 16
(16) | 4
(6) | 15 | 1.42% | 1138
(1138) | 94.5%
(86.6–98.5)
(91.9%)
(85.7–98.1) | 98.5%
(97.7–99.2)
(98.5%)
(97.8–99.2) | 10/16
(10/16) |
| Total for Females | | | 118
(117) | 2066
(2086) | 28
(28) | 5
(7) | 21 | 1.00% | 2238
(2238) | 95.9%
(90.8–98.7)
(94.4%)
(90.3–98.4) | 98.7%
(98.2–99.2)
(98.7%)
(98.2–99.2) | 14/28
(14/28) |
| Male | CTM | Symptomatic | 340
(340) | 858
(860) | 38
(38) | 5
(5) | 2 | 0.23% | 1243
(1243) | 98.6%
(96.6–99.5)
(98.6%)
(96.6–99.5) | 95.8%³
(94.4–97.1)
(95.8%)
(94.5–97.1) | 21/38
(21/38) |
| | URINE | Asymptomatic | 8
(8) | 672
(674) | 4
(4) | 3
(3) | 2 | 0.30% | 689
(689) | 72.7%
(39.0–94.0)
(72.7%)
(39.0–94.0) | 99.4%
(98.5–99.8)
(99.4%)
(98.5–99.8) | 2/4
(2/4) |
| | | Symptomatic | 308
(296) | 847
(848) | 25
(24) | 16
(36) | 8 | 0.92% | 1204
(1204) | 95.1%⁴
(92.7–97.4)
(89.2%)
(85.8–92.5) | 97.1%
(96.0–98.2)
(97.2%)
(96.2–98.3) | 15/25
(14/24) |
| Total for Males | | | 656
(644) | 2377
(2382) | 67
(66) | 24
(44) | 12 | 0.50% | 3136
(3136) | 96.5%
(95.1–97.9)
(93.6%)
(91.8–95.4) | 97.3%
(96.6–97.9)
(97.3%)
(96.7–97.9) | 38/67
(37/66) |
¹ Numbers in parenthesis show the performance results when the Internal Control was not used
² Number of apparent false positive AMPLICOR test results that were positive by alternate primer pair PCR/Total number of apparent AMPLICOR false positive results.
³ For site #6, specificity was 89.5% (95% CI 86.0 – 93.0) for CTM specimens. CTM specimens (n = 412) at this site were frozen prior to AMPLICOR CT/NG testing. At all other sites for specimens not frozen prior to AMPLICOR CT/NG testing (n = 733) specificity was 99.1% (95% CI 97.9 – 99.7).
⁴ For site #6 sensitivity was 79.6% (95% CI 68.3 – 90.9) for AMPLICOR CT/NG testing frozen urine specimens (n = 161) and 96.2% (95% CI 87.0 – 99.5) for AMPLICOR testing fresh urine specimens (n = 209). At all other sites sensitivity was 98.1% (95% CI 95.1 – 99.5) for both fresh (n = 778) or frozen (n = 56) specimens.
5 of 5
{5}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
DEC - 1 1999
Food and Drug Administration
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville MD 20850
James F. Kelly, Ph.D.
Regulatory Affairs Manager
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
4300 Hacienda Drive
Pleasanton, California 94566-0900
Re: K974503
Trade Name: AMPLICOR® CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: LSL
Dated: September 23, 1999
Received: September 27, 1999
Dear Dr. Kelly:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A.
Director
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): K974503
Device Name: AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Indications For Use:
The AMPLICOR® CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a qualitative *in vitro* test for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical specimens. The test utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the multiplex nucleic acid amplification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in endocervical and male urethral swab specimens and in male and female urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, and target-specific probe hybridization capture for the detection of the amplified Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K974503
Prescription Use ☑ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use ☐
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.