The ECG Holter evaluation software, MT-200, is an analysis software used for the analysis and evaluation of Holter ECG recordings. The Holter recordings are used for the diagnostics of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmias, i.e. bradycardia, tachycardia, diagnostic of arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease, in patients after reanimation, in patients with different diseases such as cardiomyopathy, high blood pressure, long QT syndrome. A Holter ECG recording is also used for clarifying palpitations or syncopes and attacks of dizziness or for controlling medical therapies, or after operative treatments such as bypass operations or PTCA. The ST segment analysis of a Holter ECG is used for the detection of symptomatic or asymptomatic ischemias.
Device Story
MT-200 is ECG analysis software for Holter recordings; processes data from solid-state recorders to detect arrhythmias and ischemic episodes. Operates on Windows 95 PC; used by clinicians to evaluate symptomatic/asymptomatic patients. Transforms raw ECG signals into diagnostic reports; performs ST-segment analysis. Output assists physicians in diagnosing cardiac conditions, clarifying symptoms like syncope/palpitations, and monitoring therapy efficacy or post-surgical recovery. Benefits include automated detection of cardiac events, facilitating clinical decision-making for patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated using standard AHA and MIT arrhythmia databases; classifications compared against database annotations. ST-T analysis validated using ESC ST-T database; ST-segment deviations compared against two independent observers. Results showed absolute difference between paired values < 0.1 mV, with differences > 0.1 mV occurring in ≤ 2% of measurements. All tests passed.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based ECG analyzer; runs on IBM-compatible PC (486, 66 MHz, 16 MB RAM, 100 MB HDD). Compatible with Windows 95. Inputs from solid-state Holter recorders. Performs arrhythmia detection and ST-segment analysis. Connectivity via standard PC peripherals (VGA monitor, laser printer).
Indications for Use
Indicated for analysis of Holter ECG recordings in patients of all ages, genders, and races to diagnose symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmias (bradycardia, tachycardia) and ischemic episodes. Used for patients with coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, high blood pressure, long QT syndrome, or post-reanimation; also for clarifying palpitations, syncope, dizziness, monitoring medical therapies, or post-operative follow-up (bypass/PTCA).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K973751
AUG 25 1998
# 510 K Summary
accordina to 21 CFR 807,92
#### A1 Address
SCHILLER America, Inc. 3002 Dow Avenue, #138 Tustin, CA 92780 Contact Name; Tel: Date:
Mr. Markus Martz 1619) 635 6023 22" September 1997
#### A2 Device Name
| 1. Trade Name: | Microvtt MT-200 |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 2. Common Names: | Holter System, Holter Analyzer |
| 3. Classification Name: | Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable |
Panel Code: DEK ICV 74 Classification Class:
# Computer Diagnostic Programmable Class 2
## A3 Legally Marketed Device
Legally Marketed Device to which this submitted device is compared: Brentwood Rhythmscan Precision CS-6000 (K914577)
### Description of Submitted Device A4
The ECG Holter evoluation software, MT-200, is an analysis software used for the analysis and evaluation of Holter EOG recordings. The Holter iscoralings are used for the diagnostics of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythings, i.e. bradyeardia, tachycardia, diagnastic of arthythinias in pattents with coraniary artery disease, in cardiomopathy, high blood pressure, long QT syndrome,
A Holter ECG recording is also used for clarifying palpitations or syncopes and attacks of aliziniess or for controlling medical theraples, or after operative treatments such as bypass operations or PTCA. The ST segment analysis of a Holter ECG is used for the detection of symptomatic or asymptomatic Ischemics.
The software runs on Windows™ 95.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# ITZEHL
# A5 Intended Use
The ECG Holter Analyzer MT-200, Is a ECG analyzing software for the diagnostics of symptomatic and asymptomatic artnythmias and of Ischernic episodes.
hurnan beings without restrictions of age, sex or race. 1. Patient Population:
2. Difference to the Predicate Device: no differences.
#### Table of Comparison A6
Predicate device: Brentwood Rhytmsoan Precision CS-6000 (K914577)
| | Precision CS-6000 | MT-200 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Recording Medium | Tape cassette and Solid<br>state recorder DL, 700 | Solid state recorder<br>MT-200 |
| Channels | 2 or 3 | 2 |
| System requirements | | |
| CPU | IBM compatible PC<br>386, 33 MHz<br>8 Mbytes RAM<br>80 Mbytes Hard-drive<br>Windows™ 3.11 or 95 | IBM compatible PC<br>486, 66 MHz<br>16 Mbytes RAM<br>100 Mbytes Hard-drive<br>Windows™ 95 |
| Monitor | VGA Color Monitor | SAME |
| Printer | HP Laser Jet Series | SAME |
#### Non-Clinical Tests B1
# Data related to software quality
SCHILLER has reviewed the MT-200 Analyzer Software development process following the quideline "reviewer quidance for computer controlled medical devices undergoing 510 (k) review".
All tests are passed.
#### B2 Clinical Tests
To evaluate the performance of arthythmia detection of the MT-200 program, the AHA and MIT data bases were used and the annotations in the databases compared with the automatic analysis carried out by the MI-200 program.
# Method
A normal analysis of the AHA and MIT records was carried out by the MT-200. The classifications given by the MT-200 were then compared with the annotated classifications of the data bases.
The results of the comparison were alven in tabular form. The procedure and limits described In ANSVAAMI EC 38-1994 were used.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# SCHILLER ITZERLAND
For the evaluation of the ST-T analysis the ESC ST.T. database was used. The STsegment deviations measured by the MT-200 were compared to the deviations measured by two independent observers.
The limits set up for test were not violated.
The absolute difference between paired values (reader MT-200) is less than 0.1 mV. The total number of differences greater than 0.1 mW Is less than or equal to 2% of the total number of measurements.
All tests are passed
#### ВЗ Conclusions from Tests
The fulfillment of the above standards ensures the safely and effectiveness of the submitted device. We consider the submitted device to be as safe and effective as the Predicate Brentwood Rhytmscan Precision CS-6000 (K914577) Device.
All tests are passed.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features the department's name encircling an emblem. The emblem consists of a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The text reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA".
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 25 1998
Mr. Markus Maritz Schiller America, Inc. 3002 Dow Avenue, Suite 138 Tustin, CA 92780
Re: K973751 Microvit MT-200 Requlatory Class: II (two) Product Code: 74 DQK Dated: May 29, 1998 Received: June 2, 1998
Dear Mr. Maritz:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Requlation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 - Mr. Markus Maritz
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callahan
Thomas J. Callahan, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
WELCH ALLYN 07 : 31 : 98 14:58 07/31/98 13:04 FAX
ID:619-621-6610 201 143 3101
AUG 04, 98 FD3-051 DECS
Page I of I
610(k) Number (if known):_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Device Name:Holter Evaluation Software MT-200
## Indications For Use:
The ECG Holter evaluation software, MT-200, is an analysis software used for the analysis and evaluation of Holter ECG recordings. The Holter recordings are used for the diagnostics of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmias, i.e. bradycardia, tachycardia, diagnostic of arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease, in patients after reanimation, in patients with different diseases such as cardiomyopathy, high blood pressure, long QT syndrome.
A Holter ECG recording is also used for clarifying palpitations or syncopes and attacks of dizziness or for controlling medical therapies, or after operative treatments such as bypass operations or PTCA. The ST segment analysis of a Holter ECG is used for the detection of symptomatic or asymptomatic ischemias.
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
| Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------|
Dalla Tilla
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory,
and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K97375/
**Prescription Use**
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use_
(Optional Pormat 1-2-90)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.