K972975 · Light Diagnostics · GOI · Dec 22, 1998 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K972975
Device Name
LIGHT DIAGNOSTICS RABIES DFA REAGENT
Applicant
Light Diagnostics
Product Code
GOI · Microbiology
Decision Date
Dec 22, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3460
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is intended for in vitro diagnostic use for the detection of rabies antigens in culture and in acetone-fixed brain and submaxillary tissues of infected animals. Thus the assay could be used as an aid in the indirect diagnosis of human rabies virus infection. All specimens that are negative or indeterminate by DFA testing should be further tested by cell culture or animal inoculation methods.
Device Story
Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is an in vitro diagnostic tool for detecting rabies virus in animal tissue. Input: acetone-fixed brain (medulla, cerebellum, hippocampus) or submaxillary salivary gland tissue. Operation: user incubates tissue with fluorescein-labeled (FITC) monoclonal antibodies specific to rabies nucleocapsid protein; unbound antibody is washed away. Output: visualization via fluorescence microscopy; positive results appear as apple-green cytoplasmic inclusions or 'dusting'. Used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. The device aids clinicians in diagnosing potential human rabies exposure by identifying viral presence in animal specimens. Monoclonal antibody formulation provides increased specificity and reduced background interference compared to polyclonal alternatives.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evaluation compared the subject device against BBL and Centocor reagents across two U.S. sites using 1,490 total specimens from 23-25 animal species. Results showed 100% relative sensitivity (83/83 positive samples) and 100% relative specificity (1,394/1,394 negative samples) compared to predicate methods. 95% confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity were consistently high (lower bounds >0.90).
Technological Characteristics
Direct immunofluorescence assay using fluorescein-labeled (FITC) monoclonal antibodies specific to rabies nucleocapsid protein. Form factor: liquid reagent for slide staining. Requires fluorescence microscopy for visualization. No electronic components or software algorithms.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the detection of rabies antigens in acetone-fixed tissues (brain and submaxillary salivary glands) of infected animals as an aid in the indirect diagnosis of human rabies virus infection. Negative or indeterminate results require further testing via cell culture or animal inoculation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Rabiesvirus immunofluorescent reagents are devices that consist of rabiesvirus antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify rabiesvirus in specimens taken from suspected rabid animals. The identification aids in the diagnosis of rabies in patients exposed by animal bites and provides epidemiological information on rabies. Rabies is an acute infectious disease of the central nervous system which, if undiagnosed, may be fatal. The disease is commonly transmitted to humans by a bite from a rabid animal.
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEC 2 2 1998
## 510(k) Summary
Submitter:
Light Diagnostics 28835 Single Oak Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: 909/676-8080 Fax: 909/676-9209
Contact Person: Cindy Penny
## Product Name:
Trade Name: Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent Common Name: Immunofluorescent Reagent Classification Name: Antiserum, Fluorescent, Rabies Virus Classification Number: 83GOI
#### Intended Use:
The Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is intended for the detection of rabies antigens in culture and in acetone-fixed brain and submaxillary tissues of infected animals. Thus the assay could be used as an aid in the indirect diagnosis of human rabies virus infection. All specimens that are negative or indeterminate by DFA testing should be further tested by cell culture or animal inoculation methods.
#### Predicate Devices:
1) BECTON DICKINSON BBL® Anti-Rabies Globulin, Fluorescein Labeled (Catalog No. 40844)
Direct fluorescent antibody for qualitative detection of rabies antigens in tissue (brain and submaxillary salivary glands).
2) CENTOCOR, Inc., Centocor FITC Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Globulin.
Direct fluorescent antibody for detection of rabies in brains and submaxillary glands.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Device description:
Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent uses fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against the rabies nucleocapsid protein to detect the virus in infected tissue. The direct immunofluorescence assay requires incubation of a user-determined dilution of the reagent with suspected rabies-infected tissue such as brain (medulla, cerebellum, and hippocampus) and submaxillary salivary glands. If virus is present, the FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies will bind to the nucleocapsid protein. Unbound antibody is removed by washing. The antigen-antibody complex is visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Positive reactions in infected tissue will appear as bright apple-green cytoplasmic inclusions or "dusting".
A blend of monoclonal antibodies are used in the Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA reagent. These monoclonal antibodies are specific for the rabies virus nucleocapsid protein. The use of monoclonal antibodies ensures increased specificity of the reagent and reduces the risk of non-specific background or interference.
#### Intended Use:
The Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is intended for in vitro diagnostic use for the detection of rabies antigens in culture and in acetone-fixed brain and submaxillary tissues of infected animals. Thus the assay could be used as an aid in the indirect diagnosis of human rabies virus infection. All specimens that are negative or indeterminate by DFA testing should be further tested by cell culture or animal inoculation methods.
#### Technological Comparison of Methods:
The Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is substantially equivalent to BECTON DICKINSON BBL® Anti-Rabies Globulin, Fluorescein Labeled and Centocor FITC Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Globulin in that:
- A. All three methods are intended for use in the detection of rabies antigens in tissue.
- B. All three methods are in vitro test methods.
- C. All three methods use a direct immunofluorescence assay procedure for staining of slides prepared with brain tissue.
The methods differ in that:
{2}------------------------------------------------
BECTON DICKINSON reagent incorporates polyclonal (equine or bovine) immune globulin into FITC conjugates that serve as the detector antibodies.
#### Performance Data for Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent
- 1. Non-clinical evaluation:
The coniugated monoclonal antibodies used in the reagent were tested against twenty (20) variants of rabies virus, specifically raccoon, North Central skunk, African dog, mongoose, Arctic fox, Myotis bat, Eptesicus II bat, EBLV II, EBLV I, red bat, Poland raccoon dog, red fox, Tadarida b.m. bat, Eptesicus I bat, vampire bat, silver-haired bat, hoary bat, ERA Vaccine, urban dog, and South Central skunk. These variants have been differentiated using panels of monoclonal antibodies, and represent all of the epidemiologically significant street rabies variants. The conjugated antibodies, tested as in the reagent formulation, have a strong affinity for all of the variants.
- 2. Clinical evaluation:
The Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent was compared in clinical evaluation to the BECTON DICKINSON BBL® Anti-Rabies Globulin, Fluorescein Labeled and Centocor FITC Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Globulin for detection of rabies virus in brain tissue. Studies were performed at two sites in the United States. Site 1 was on the west coast and Site 2 was in the south central part of the country. Four hundred and fifty four (454) specimens from 23 animal species were submitted for testing at Site 1 and 1036 specimens from 25 animal species were submitted for testing at Site 2.
The prevalence of positive specimens differed between the sites. At Site 1, 8.2% of the specimens were positive for rabies antigens, with foxes (25%), cows (25%), and bats (19.7%) having the highest positivity rate. Rabies antigen was also identified in raccoons (14.3%), skunks (3.8%) and cats (0.9%). Laboratory inoculation of mice with samples from other animals resulted in a positivity rate of 66.7%.
Site 2 had a prevalence of 4.5%, with bats (31.4%), skunks (13.3%), and cows (9.1%) having the highest positivity rate. Rabies antigen was also identified in cats (1.0%).
Complete aqreement was seen between the commercially available in vitro diagnostic reagents and the Working Dilution of the FITC-conjugate
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Notification for Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent
monoclonal reagent. All 83 specimens that were positive with the BBL and Centocor reagents were also positive with the Working Dilution of the reagent. The performance characteristics demonstrated at each of the sites are summarized below.
| | BBL and<br>Centocor<br>Positive | BBL and<br>Centocor<br>Negative | Total |
|---------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|-------|
| Test Positive | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Test Negative | 0 | 405 | 405 |
| Total | 36 | 405 | |
## Performance Characteristics - Site 1
Relative sensitivity = 100% (36/36) [95% confidence interval = 0.903 to 1.001
Relative specificity = 100% (405/405) [95% confidence interval = 0.991 to 1.001
#### Performance Characteristics - Site 2
| | BBL or<br>Centocor<br>Positive | BBL or<br>Centocor<br>Negative | Total |
|---------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------|
| Test Positive | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Test Negative | 0 | 989 | 989 |
| Total | 47 | 989 | |
Relative sensitivity = 100% (47/47) 195% confidence interval = 0.925 to 1.001
Relative specificity = 100% (989/989) [95% confidence interval = 0.996 to 1.001
# 3. Conclusions drawn from evaluations:
Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent uses a standard direct immunofluorescence assay procedure for the detection of rabies virus in tissue. The monoclonal antibodies used in the reagent have been characterized so as to ensure specificity and reliability of the product. In clinical evaluations, the performance characteristics of the reagent was shown to be substantially equivalent to those of BECTON DICKINSON
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Notification for Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent
BBL® Anti-Rabies Globulin, Fluorescein Labeled and Centocor FITC Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Globulin.
The characterization and clinical evaluation of the Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of this product when used as intended, as described in the product insert.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/2 description: The image shows a logo for the Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized human figure with three overlapping profiles, representing the department's focus on health and well-being. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES" is arranged in a circular pattern around the figure.
DEC 22 1998
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Cindy D. Penny Quality Assurance Manager Chemicon International, Inc. 28835 Single Oak Drive Temecula, CA 92590
Re: K972975 Trade Name: Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GOI Dated: November 6, 1998 Received: November 6, 1998
Dear Ms. Penny:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours.
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): K972975
Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent Device Name:
Indications For Use:
Light Diagnostics Rabies DFA Reagent is intended for the detection of rabies antigens in acetone-fixed tissues. Thus the assay could be used as an aid in the indirect diagnosis of human rabies virus infection. All specimens that are negative or indeterminate by DFA testing should be further tested by cell culture or animal inoculation methods.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use_ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter-Use
Woody Dubois
(Optional Format 1-2~96)
K972975
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.