K972804 · Mgs Research, Inc. · IYE · Oct 23, 1997 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K972804
Device Name
BANG POLYMER GEL DOSIMETER, BANG 533
Applicant
Mgs Research, Inc.
Product Code
IYE · Radiology
Decision Date
Oct 23, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Polymer-gel dosimeters may be used for quality assurance procedures for radiotherapy treatments whenever three dimensional dose distributions are required. They can be used for routine measurements of radiation dose distributions produced by irradiation devices delivering doses in the range 0-30 Gy.
Device Story
BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter consists of monomers in gelatin matrix; monomers polymerize upon exposure to ionizing radiation. Extent of polymerization proportional to absorbed dose; changes NMR and optical properties of gel. Used for 3D radiation dose distribution mapping in radiotherapy quality assurance. Gel contained in oxygen-free glass or Barex plastic vessels; irradiated to simulate anatomy. Post-irradiation, gel imaged via MRI; MRI generates proton relaxation rate map; map converted to dose map using calibration curve. Provides 3D dose distribution data for treatment planning benchmarks. Used by medical physicists/technicians in clinical settings. Benefits include high-resolution 3D dosimetry and ability to simulate complex anatomical structures, including bone/air cavities.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparison of dose response curves and central-axis depth-dose curves for high-energy x-ray and electron beams between the BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter and the Wellhofer automated water-tank scanner. Data published in Medical Physics, 23, 699-705.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Monomers, gelatin, water, glass or Barex plastic vessels. Sensing principle: Radiation-induced polymerization of monomers changing NMR relaxation rates. Form factor: 0.5L to 2L vessels. Connectivity: Standalone (requires external MRI for imaging). Sterilization: N/A (vessels shipped in nitrogen-filled aluminum/Saran/polyethylene foil).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quality assurance in radiotherapy, specifically for measuring 3D radiation dose distributions (0-30 Gy) produced by irradiation devices.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K972804
## MGS RESEARCH, INC.
OCT 2 3 1997
## 1 Orchard park Road, unit 13, madison, ct 06443, USA
## TEL (203) 453 6078 FAX (203) 453 8679 EMAIL mgsinc@connix.com
## 510(k) Summary
07/01/97 Date: MGS Research, Inc., 1, Orchard Park Road, Madison, CT 06443 Applicant: Marek J. Maryanski, President Contact: Telephone: 203 453-6078 203 453-8679 FAX:
Trade Name: BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter.
Common Name: Gel dosimeter for recording radiation dose distributions in three dimensions.
Classification Name: Therapeutic X-Ray System (Accessory).
Substantial Equivalence: The BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter is substantially equivalent to the automated water-tank scanner produced by the Wellhofer Corp. (approved as K945321).
Description of Device: Polymer-Gel Dosimeters consist of various monomers dispersed in a gelatin matrix. These monomers are polymerized by the free radicals produced by ionizing radiations, and the extent of polymerization is proportional to the absorbed dose. Both the NMR and optical properties of the irradiated gel are thus changed, and dose distributions may be imaged and quantitated using magneticresonance imaging (MRI) or computerized optical tomographic scanning (currently under development by MGS). The polymerization converts the original solution of monomers into a suspension of microparticles that are each much smaller than one micron, and which are fixed in space by the gel, and so the resolution of polymer-gel dosimeters is limited mainly by the imaging device employed. Using a standard head coil and a clinical MRI, pixel sizes on the order of 1 mm are obtained when imaging 2-4 liter gels. For the higher resolution that may be required for brachytherapy sources, gels of about 0.5 liters can be imaged in small-bore, higher-frequency MRI's and pixel sizes of fractions of a millimeter obtained.
Polymer-Gel Dosimeters contain only organic molecules and water, and so their average and effective atomic numbers, and mass densities are, depending upon the specific formulation, very nearly the same as that for muscle tissue. Also, their dose
{1}------------------------------------------------
response curves exhibit little or no radiation-quality dependence over the range of xand gamma-ray energies employed in radiation therapy, nor do they show any doserate dependence for dose rates in the range 0.06-16 Gy/min. Of equally great importance is that polymer gels take the shape of their containers which could simulate various parts of the anatomy, and even contain bone and air cavities. This latter feature will provide data not obtainable by any other practical means, and which can provide a benchmarks for treatment-planning-computer algorithms.
As polymerization of the monomers in polymer-gel dosimeters is inhibited by oxygen, it is essential that the vessel that contains the gel be oxygen-free when it is filled and impermeable to oxygen during the period of irradiation and for one hour post-irradiation during which time polymerization goes to completion. This requirement places severe constraints upon the techniques employed for gel preparation, and upon the materials and methods of fabrication of the gel vessels. At the present time, MGS provides polymer gels in 2-liter, spherical glass vessels for confirmation of stereotactic radiosurgery, and 1.0-liter glass bottles for brachytherapy-source dosimetry. These vessels are shipped in nitrogen-filled pouches made from a unique aluminum/Saran/polyethylene foil. The fabrication of vessels made from Barex plastic, a product of the BP Chemicals Corp., and which is impermeable to oxygen, is also possible.
The images recorded by polymer-gel dosimeters are permanent thus permitting comparisons between, for example, the dose distributions for a particular x-ray beam which were made even years apart.
Technological Comparison: In the automated water-tank scanner the water provides . the near-tissue-equivalent absorbing and scattering medium, and a small detector (ionization chamber or silicon diode) makes point-by-point measurements of dose in a matrix of points contained in a single plane. Isodose curves are obtained using computer programs which interpolate between the measured points so as to locate a new series of points, each of which represents a dose that is a specified fraction of the maximum dose. These isodose points are then connected smoothly to yield isodose curves. Should a full three-dimensional dose distribution be required, a number of planes parallel to the plane containing the central axis of the beam would be scanned, and the isodose curves from these planes connected by a similar interpolation process.
By comparison, the Polymer-Gel Dosimeter comprises both the absorbing and scattering medium and the radiation detector, the doses to all points in the gel medium being recorded, i. e., polymerization of monomers, simultaneously during the course of irradiation. Isodose curves in one or more arbitrarily specified planes are obtained using magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) the first step of which is to generate a map of the proton relaxation rate where each pixel in this map has a relaxation rate which is proportional to the dose delivered to that pixel. Next, this relaxation map is converted to a dose map by application of the dose-response curve (R2 vs Gv) that is appropriate to the polymer gel employed. This curve is obtained from measurements
{2}------------------------------------------------
of a calibration kit of identical gel irradiated to known doses. Isodose curves are now generated using an algorithm that is similar to the one employed with the water-tank scanner. Should a full three-dimensional dose distribution be required, dose maps would be generated for a series of closely-spaced parallel image planes, and the isodose curves from these planes connected by a similar interpolation process. Due to the small voxel size, 1 X 1 X 3 mm, obtained by MRI, the resolution achievable with polymer-gel dosimeters is generally higher than that achievable with water-tank scanners.
Non-Clinical Performance Data: Dose response curves and central-axis depth-dose curves determined for high-energy x-ray and electron beams using the Wellhofer automated water-tank scanner and the Polymer-Gel Dosimeter are shown in the accompanying reprint "Radiation therapy dosimetry using MRI of polymer gels" published in Medical Physics, 23, 699-705, figures 3 - 5 (see Exhbit 5 in Appendix A, attached).
Conclusion: The close proximity of the above data sets obtained using the Wellhofer system and the Polymer-Gel Dosimeter is well within the experimental uncertainty limits of these devices, and it is the conclusion of MGS Research that the Polymer-Gel Dosimeter is substantially equivalent to the Wellhofer automated water-tank scanner for the determination of dose distributions produced by x-ray, gamma-ray and electron beams.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo for the Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized abstract symbol resembling a human figure with three curved lines representing the head, body, and legs. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HC" is arranged vertically along the left side of the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
OCT 2 3 1997
Marek J. Maryanski President MGS Research, Inc. 1 Orchard Park Road, Unit 13 Madison, CT 06443
Re: K972804
BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter Dated: July 1, 1997 Received: July 28, 1997 Regulatory Class: II 21 CFR 892.5050/Procode: 90 IYE
Dear Ms. Maryanski:
We have reviewed your Section 510/k) notification of intent to market the device and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing and problibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (OS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
hLiliau Yu
Lillian Yin, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health ----
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
| 510(k) Number (if known): | K972804 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|
| Device Name: | BANG Polymer-Gel Dosimeter |
Indications For Use:
t
Polymer-gel dosimeters may be used for quality assurance procedures for radiotherapy treatments whenever three dimensional dose distributions are required. They can be used for routine measurements of radiation dose distributions produced by irradiation devices delivering doses in the range 0-30 Gy.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Varis L. Segerson
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, EN and Radiological De 510(k) Number
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.