K972617 · Helax AB · IYE · Oct 1, 1997 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K972617
Device Name
HELAX-VISIR
Applicant
Helax AB
Product Code
IYE · Radiology
Decision Date
Oct 1, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Helax-VISIR is designed to be a tool for supporting the process of scheduling, preparing, setting up, delivering and recording radiation therapy. It will help administrating patient sessions through the booking functionality and activity reports. It will fetch data from dose planning systems and simulators automatically or by manual input. At each individual treatment Helax-VISIR will present setup data to the operator and also to the linac through a specific interface. Actual setup will be verified. During treatment Helax-VISIR can monitor the progress of both monitor values and optional in vivo dosimetry. All data relevant for the given treatment can be recorded. Helax-VISIR is intended to be operated by physiciats, physicians and radiographers skilled in radiation therapy and trained in using the system. Thus the functionality of VISIR is to a large extent based on warnings instead of inhibiting actions. Absolute inhibition is used in situations where e.g. inconsistencies could be introduced. The overall philosophy is not to take control but to help the staff detecting unintentional actions.
Device Story
Helax-VISIR is a radiotherapy verification and information system; manages scheduling, setup, delivery, and recording of radiation therapy. Inputs include data from dose planning systems and simulators (manual or automatic). System presents setup data to operators and linear accelerators (linacs) via interface; verifies actual setup against plan; monitors treatment progress (monitor values and in vivo dosimetry). Operated by physicians and radiographers in clinical settings. Philosophy emphasizes warnings over inhibiting actions, except where inconsistencies pose risks. Assists staff in detecting unintentional actions; improves treatment management and quality assurance.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance tests confirmed the system consistently performed within design parameters and equivalently to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Radiotherapy verification and information system. Complies with IEC 601-1 (safety), IEC 601-1-4 (programmable electrical medical systems), IEC 1217 (coordinates/movements), and IEC 878 (graphical symbols). Quality system certified to ISO 9001 and EN 46001. Software development follows FDA Reviewer Guidance for Computer Controlled Medical Devices (1991).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing radiation treatment according to a prescribed treatment plan.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Date: 1997-07-04
Helax AB
510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness
Image /page/0/Picture/3 description: The image shows the word "helax" in a bold, sans-serif font. Above the word "helax" is a symbol that looks like a square root symbol. The background of the image is black, while the text and symbol are white.
K972617
# Submitter's information 1.
Helax AB PO Box 1704 S-751 47 Uppsala Sweden
Contact person Jan Törnqvist, Vice President RA/QM int 46 18 565017 Phone: int 46 18 565017 Fax: jan.tornqvist@helax.se E-mail
Submission dated: 1997-07-04
#### 2. Device Name
Common or Usual name:
Verification and Information System in Radiotherapy (VISIR)
Proprietary Name:
Helax-VISIR
Classification Names:
Medical Linear Accelerator 21 CFR & 892,5050 Class II Product Code: RA IYE
## Predicate Device 3.
# Philips Veriflex
Verification and record system in Radiotherapy K902849 Philips Medical Systems, Inc. Currently owned by Nucletron Corporation
# Description of the Device 4.
The Helax-VISIR system is a modern product for improved treatment management and quality assurance in Radiotherapy. The increasing complexity of treatment techniques and equipment requires a flexible and vendor-independent system for the booking, set-up, verification and documentation of the radiotherapy process.
# Statement of Intended Use 5.
Helax-VISIR is designed to be a tool for supporting the process of scheduling, preparing, setting up, delivering and recording radiation therapy. It will help administrating patient sessions through the booking functionality and activity reports. It will fetch data from dose planning systems and simulators automatically or by manual
OCT ========================================================================================================================================================================== 1997
{1}------------------------------------------------
input. At each individual treatment Helax-VISIR will present setup data to the operator and also to the linac through a specific interface. Actual setup will be verified. During treatment Helax-VISIR can monitor the progress of both monitor values and optional in vivo dosimetry. All data relevant for the given treatment can be recorded.
Helax-VISIR is intended to be operated by physiciats, physicians and radiographers skilled in radiation therapy and trained in using the system. Thus the functionality of VISIR is to a large extent based on warnings instead of inhibiting actions. Absolute inhibition is used in situations where e.g. inconsistencies could be introduced. The overall philosophy is not to take control but to help the staff detecting unintentional actions.
The intended use is the same as the predicate devices.
## Statement of Technological Characteristics 6.
The predicate device is presently in commercial distribution in the United States. The Helax-VISIR has the same technological characteristics and is similar in design, function, and application to the predicate device.
The Technological Characteristics are the same as the predicate device.
### Differences 7.
M
There are no differences between the technology of the predicate device and the Helax-VISIR and only minor differences in configuration and specifications as noted in the predicate device comparison chart in Section X of Attachment E. These differences do not alter the intended use or affect the safety and effectiveness of the Helax-VISIR system when used as labelled.
## Special controls 8.
Although there are no performance standard established by the FDA for these devices the Helax-VISIR is designed, and manufactured to meet, the following standards:
- Electrical medical equipment General requirements for safety · IEC 601-1
- · IEC 601-1-4 Electrical medical equipment -Part 1 : General requirements for safety - 4. Collateral Standard: Programmable electrical medical sys-
tems.
- IEC 1217 Radiotherapy equipment - Coordinates, movements and scales .
- · IEC 878 Graphical symbols for electrical equipment in medical practice
Helax AB is certified according to European EG Medical Device Directive, Annex II Section 3.2 - Full Quality Assurance System, per 1997-01-08, The scove of the certification is: Design, development, production, installation and servicing of based systems in oncology in class IIb. This implies that Helax AB Quality System fulfils the requirements in ISO 9001 and EN 46001.
{2}------------------------------------------------
A large part of the development, verification and validation of the Helax-VISIR medical device was performed by Helax-VISIR A/S in Oslo, Norway, a fully owned subsidiary to Helax AB. The development was performed according to Helax AB Quality System and controlled by Helax AB.
The device and its development process also comply with the FDA, CDRH, ODE, August 23, 1991, Reviewer Guidance for Computer Controlled Medical Devices Undergoing 510(k) Review
Performance tests were conducted and the results indicated that the system consistently performed within the design parameters and equivalently to the predicate device.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle with its wings spread.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
> OCT - I 1997
Jan Tornavist Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Management Helax AB Klostergatan 12 Uppsala, Sweden
Re:
K972617 Helax-VISIR (Verification and Information System in Radiotherapy) Dated: July 4, 1997 Received: July 9, 1997 Regulatory class: II 21 CFR 892.5050/Procode: 90 IYE
Dear Mr. Tornqvist:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the intentions for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marked predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in ying diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours.
W.J. Liao Yin
Lillian Yin, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page
510(k) Number (if known):_K972617
Helax-VISIR Device Name:_
Indications For Use:
4:
radiation treatment Patients undergoing according to prescribed treatment plan.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT,
and Radiological Devices
510(k) Number K972617
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.