K972230 · Quickie Designs, Inc. · ITI · Dec 2, 1997 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K972230
Device Name
QUICKIE P90 SERIES
Applicant
Quickie Designs, Inc.
Product Code
ITI · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Dec 2, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.3860
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
Quickie powered wheelchairs empower physically challenged persons by providing a means of mobility. This includes conditions in all ages such as : Arthritis Amputee Paraplegic Cerebral Palsy Hemiplegic Tetraplegic Quadriplegic Spina Bifida Head Injury or Trauma Muscular Dystrophy Multiple Sclerosis Polio Geriatric conditions And other immobilizing or debilitating condition
Device Story
Quickie P90 Power Wheelchair provides mobility for physically challenged users. Device inputs include user commands via joystick or equivalent controller. System utilizes 24V DC permanent magnet motors powered by rechargeable deep-cycle batteries; programmable controller manages drive functions. Components include frame (steel/aluminum), seat, backrest, armrests, footrests, and casters. Used in indoor or light outdoor environments; operated by the patient. Output is physical locomotion. Healthcare providers use the device to improve patient mobility and independence. Benefits include restored mobility for individuals with various immobilizing conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials performed. Evidence consists of bench testing to ISO 7176 and ANSI/RESNA standards (stability, braking, energy consumption, dimensions, speed, acceleration, fatigue, climatic, obstacle climbing, and EMC). Safety analysis included a review of complaints, MDRs, and recalls for wheelchairs in general, demonstrating performance comparable to market peers.
Technological Characteristics
Frame: steel and aluminum. Power: 24V DC permanent magnet motors, rechargeable deep-cycle batteries. Control: programmable controller with joystick interface. Standards: ISO 7176, ANSI/RESNA wheelchair standards, and EMC requirements (ISO 7176-14).
Indications for Use
Indicated for physically challenged persons of all ages requiring mobility assistance due to conditions including arthritis, amputation, paraplegia, cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, tetraplegia/quadriplegia, spina bifida, head injury/trauma, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, polio, geriatric conditions, or other immobilizing/debilitating conditions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A powered wheelchair is a battery-operated device with wheels that is intended for medical purposes to provide mobility to persons restricted to a sitting position.
Predicate Devices
Metro power by Everest & Jennings
Action Power 9000 by Invacare Corporation
Action Power 9000 Storm Series by Invacare Corporation
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY 13.0
DEC - 2 1997
Quickie Designs, Inc. Submitter: 2842 Business Park Ave. Fresno, CA 93727 Phone (209) 292-2171 Fax (209) 292-2741
(972230
Rebecca Andersen June 9, 1997 Date:
Name(s) of the device(s):
P90 Power Wheelchair Series
Identification of predicate device(s):
- 1) Metro power by Everest & Jennings
- 2) Action Power 9000 by Invacare Corporation
- 3) Action Power 9000 Storm Series by Invacare Corporation
### Description of the device:
Quickie P90 Power Wheelchairs consists of typical components found on most wheelchairs, such as push handles, armrests, backrest, seat frame, cushion, footrest and casters. Accessories include items such as positioning belts, backpacks, seat pouches, oxygen tank holders, IV poles, etc. As motorized wheelchairs, they also contain controllers, joysticks, motors, brakes, drive wheels and batteries. Many of these components are available in a range of sizes, shapes, angles, forms, materials or coverings. These variations allow the chairs to be configured to meet the specific desires and needs of the user. Refer to section 7 for a component diagram of a Quickie P90 chair figure 1; for nominal dimensions see figure 2.
#### Intended use:
Quickie powered wheelchairs empower physically challenged persons by providing a means of mobility. This includes conditions in all ages such as :
- Arthritis Amputee Paraplegic Cerebral Palsy Hemiplegic
Tetraplegic Quadriplegic Spina Bifida Head Injury or Trauma Muscular Dystrophy
Multiple Sclerosis Polio Geriatric conditions And other immobilizing or debilitating condition
{1}------------------------------------------------
# Comparison of device characteristics to predicate(s):
This device has similar technological characteristics as the predicated devices. They all use steel and aluminum in their frame and components, and standard foams and covers for the slings and backs. Microprocessors are typically used with a programmable controller, and the rider controls the chair using a joystick or other equivalent command mode. Motors use permanent magnets, employing 24 volt D.C., with rechargeable deep cycle batteries for an energy source. The operating speeds and maneuverability are equivalent, and recommended for indoor or light outdoor use. The standard accessories and components are common to all power wheel chair lines.
# Testing:
This device has been tested to both ISO7176 and ANSI/RESNA Wheelchair Standards. They include: Static Stability Dynamic Stability Effectiveness of Brakes Energy consumption Overall Dimensions Maximum Speed acceleration and retardation Static Impact Fatigue Strength Climatic Test Obstacle Climbing Ability Testing of Power and Control System EMC Testing
We have also tested to the Proposed :
Addition to ANSI/RESNA W/C 14 Electromagnetic Compatibility Requirements for powered Wheelchairs and Motorized Scooters Version 1.5 Dated 1/11/94
ISO EMC Draft Standard 7176-14 Rifled Draft ISO EMC Group Proposal Electromagnetic Compatibility Addition Dated 4/3/95 Regarding Electromagnetic Compatibility Requirements for Powered Wheelchairs and Motorized Scooters.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Safety:
An analysis of complaints against Quickie power chairs was completed and charted. This analysis was supported by a literature search which was conducted by a third party to determine the number of complaints, MDR's and recalls that have been reported to the FDA concerning wheelchairs in general. This information was summarized, and presented in a Management Review report dated 2/20/97. The data and charts are included as Attachment 13 - A. The analysis demonstrated common issues across all manufacturers product lines, and varying levels approximately comparable to relative market share. Quickie has concluded that there are no use issues exclusive to Quickie chairs at this time.
## Efficacy
Articles are being provided on the use and efficacy of power wheelchairs.
- 1) "A Question of Power", Team Rehab Report, by Robbie B. Leonard, MS, PT, pp. 22-23, May 1992
- 2) "Preventing occupied wheelchairs from falling down stars", Journal of Rehabilitation Research, by R. Lee Kirby, MD. And Angus D. MCLean, Dip Eng Bsc., PP 27 - 32, Vol. 27 No. 1. Winter 1990.
- 3) "Powered Mobility and Its Implications", JRRD Clinical Supplement, by C. Gerald Warren, pp. 74 - 85, Technical Paper.
510(k) number:
Not assigned at the writing of this summary
# Conclusion:
The Ouickie P90 Power Wheelchair is substantially equivalent to the predicated devices listed in this 510(k) and the technology and construction of the P90 does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. In the center of the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or other bird with outstretched wings.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Rebecca Andersen ·Vice President, Quality and Regulatory Affairs Sunrise Medical Mobility Products Division 7477 A East Dry Creek Parkway 80503 Longmont, Colorado
DEC - 2 1997
K972230 Re: P120 Series Requlatory Class: II Product Code: ITI Dated: September 4, 1997 Received: September 9, 1997
Dear Ms. Andersen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Rebecca Andersen
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D.
Director Division of General and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Page | | Ol | |
|------|---|----|--------------------|
| | 1 | 1 | Annual Property of |
| 510(k) Number (if known): | K972230 |
|---------------------------|------------------------------|
| Device Name: | Quickie P90 (New Home P-120) |
Indications For Use:
Please amend Section 12.2, Indications for Use as found on Page 58 to read:
Quickie powered wheelchairs empower physically challenged persons by providing a means of mobility. This included conditions in all ages such as:
Arthritis Amputee Paraplegic Cerebral Palsy Hemiplegic Tetaplegic (Quadraplegic) Spina Bifida
Head Injury or Trauma Muscular Dystrophy Multiple Scierosis Polio Geriatric Conditions And other immobilizing or debilitating conditions
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE: BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) of General Restora 510(k) Number
Prascription Use (Per 21 CFR 801. 109) CA
Over-The-Counter Use__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
. "
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.