INDX DIP-S-TICKS SCRUB TYPHUS TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF IGG AND IGM ANTIBODIES TO ORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHI (SCRUB TYPHUS)
K971591 · David C. Bishop, Ph.D. · LSQ · Mar 13, 1998 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K971591
Device Name
INDX DIP-S-TICKS SCRUB TYPHUS TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF IGG AND IGM ANTIBODIES TO ORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHI (SCRUB TYPHUS)
Applicant
David C. Bishop, Ph.D.
Product Code
LSQ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Mar 13, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3500
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K971591 · Mar 13, 1998
INDX DIP-S-TICKS SCRUB TYPHUS TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF IGG AND IGM ANTIBODIES TO ORIENTIA TSUTSUGAMUSHI (SCRUB TYPHUS)
David C. Bishop, Ph.D.
Retrospective clinical samples from medical reference laboratories; Hospital-based clinical records of febrile patients
Retrospective clinical samples were used to compare the performance (sensitivity, specificity, agreement) of the INDX DIP-S-TICKS test against established predicate methods (IFA/IIP) in diagnosing scrub typhus.
Comparison of Methods On 91 Febrile Sera from NorthCentral Malaysia; Retrospective comparison study
56 clinical cases of febrile patients; Sample Size: 91 samples; Number of Sites: 1 (U.S. medical reference laboratory)
Indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) method
Sensitivity, Specificity, Agreement
Comparison of Methods On Sera From 60 Febrile Patients from Northern Thailand; Prospective clinical comparison
Febrile patients; Sample Size: 60 samples; Number of Sites: 1 (Chiangrai Hospital, Thailand)
Immunoperoxidase (IIP) method
Sensitivity, Specificity, Agreement
Comparison of Methods On Sera From 83 Febrile Patients from North-East Thailand; Prospective clinical comparison; Follow-up/Duration: 14 days; Study Period: November 1995 - January 1996
Febrile patients; Sample Size: 83 samples; Number of Sites: 1 (Mahara Hospital, Thailand)
Immunoperoxidase (IIP) method
Sensitivity, Specificity, Agreement
Comparison of Methods On 28 Paired Acute and Convalescent Sera from NorthCentral Malaysia; Retrospective/Observational comparison; Follow-up/Duration: 2 weeks
Febrile patients; Sample Size: 28 paired samples; Number of Sites: 1
Indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) method
Sensitivity, Specificity, Agreement
Indications for Use
The INDX" Dip-S-Ticks scrub typhus test is an enzyme immunoassay for use as an aid in the diagnosis of scrub typhus, and detects total IgG and IgM antibodies to Orientia tsursugamushi. The Dip-S-Ticks test is qualitative when used to test a single specimen; when using paired specimens to detect sero-conversion the test may be semi-quantitative. The test is intended for use in serum as well as heparinized plasma, whole blood and finger-stick capillary blood and is intended to be performed by trained medical personnel only.
Device Story
INDX Dip-S-Ticks is an ELISA dot-blot immunoassay for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi. Antigen is dispensed as discrete dots on a solid membrane strip. Process: specimen added to reaction vessel; strip inserted; patient antibodies bind to antigen; non-specific materials removed; alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies added; strip transferred to enzyme substrate reagent. Output: distinct, visible spots on the strip. Used in clinical settings by trained medical technologists. Provides semi-quantitative results when using paired specimens to detect sero-conversion or qualitative results for single specimens. Assists clinicians in serological confirmation of scrub typhus in febrile patients.
Clinical Evidence
Four clinical studies evaluated 262 febrile sera samples comparing DIP-S-TICKS to IFA or IIP methods. Results: Mean sensitivity 91.4%, mean specificity 89.1%, mean agreement 89.5%. Study 1 (n=91): 90.4% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity. Study 2 (n=60): 100% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity. Study 3 (n=83): 86.7% sensitivity, 94.3% specificity. Study 4 (n=28 paired sera): 88.5% sensitivity, 100% specificity. Data confirmed semi-quantitative relationship between dot intensity and IFA titers.
Technological Characteristics
EIA dot-blot immunoassay. Solid membrane support with dispensed O. tsutsugamushi antigen (Kato/Gilliam and Karp strains). Detection via alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies and enzyme substrate. Semi-quantitative readout based on number of visible dots. Manual test format. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for aid in diagnosis of scrub typhus by detecting total IgG and IgM antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi in serum, heparinized plasma, whole blood, or finger-stick capillary blood. Intended for use by trained medical personnel.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Rickettsia serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to rickettsia in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of rickettsial antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) used to identify rickettsia directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by virus-like bacteria belonging to the genus Rickettsiae and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Rickettsia are generally transmitted by arthropods (e.g., ticks and mosquitoes) and produce infections in humans characterized by rash and fever (e.g., typhus fever, spotted fever, Q fever, and trench fever).
Predicate Devices
INDX Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA) Slide Test for the Detection of Antibodies to Rickettsial Species (O. tsutsugamushi)
Reference Devices
Indirect Immunoperoxidase (IIP) method
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Integrated Diagnostics, Inc. The logo features the letters "IDx" stacked on top of each other in a stylized font. The letters are made up of horizontal lines that get progressively shorter as they move away from the letters. The company name, "INTEGRATED DIAGNOSTICS, INC.", is printed in bold, all-caps letters below the logo.
MAR 13 1998
- 海 . .
# 510(K) SUMMARY SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA
INDX® DIP-S-TICKSR Scrub Typhus Test For the Detection of IgG and IgM Antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi (scrub typhus)
# NAME AND LOCATION OF MANUFACTURER:
Integrated Diagnostics, Inc. (INDX) 1756 Sulphur Spring Road Baltimore, MD 21227 Phone (410) 737-8500 FAX (410) 536-1212
## NAME OF CONTACT PERSON:
Helene Paxton, M.A., M.T. (ASCP) President Integrated Diagnostics, Inc.
## DATE OF PREPARATION OF SUMMARY:
April 30, 1997
{1}------------------------------------------------
### TRADE NAME OF THE DEVICE:
INDX® DIP-S-TICKS* Scrub Typhus Test For the Detection of IgG and IgM Antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi (scrub typhus)
### COMMON NAME:
DIP-S-TICKS& Scrub Typhus Test
### CLASSIFICATION NAME:
Rickettsia serological reagents, 21 CFR 866.3500
# LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICE (PREDICATE DEVICE) TO WHICH THE MANUFACTURER IS CLAIMING SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
INDX Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA) Slide Test for the Detection of Antibodies to Rickettsial Species (O. tsutsugamushi). In this notification, comparisons were also made to the Indirect Immunoperoxidase (IIP) method, which is identical to the IFA test, except for the use of a fluorescence rather than an enzyme-conjugated substrate on a prepared slide. The IIP method enables the use of a light microscope for antibody detection rather than a fluorescence microscope.
### DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
The INDX® DIP-S-TICKS® Scrub Typhus Test For the Detection of IgG and IgM Antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi (scrub typhus) utilizes an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) dotblot technique for the detection of IgM as well as total (IgM and IgG) dengue antibodies. The antigen is dispensed as discrete dots onto a solid membrane. After adding specimen to a reaction vessel, an assay strip is inserted, allowing patient antibodies reactive with the test antigen to bind to the strip's solid support membrane. In the second stage, the reaction is enhanced by removal of non-specifically bound materials. During the third stage, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies are allowed to react with bound patient antibodies. Finally, the strip is transferred to enzyme substrate reagent, which reacts with bound alkaline phosphatase to produce an easily seen, distinct spot.
### INTENDED USE OF THE DEVICE:
The INDX DIP-S-TICKS® Scrub Typhus Test For the Detection of IgG and IgM Antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi (scrub typhus) is a semi-quantitative enzyme immunoassay for the detection of total IgG and IgM antibodies to Orientia tsutsugamushi, for the serological confirmation of scrub typhus in samples of serum, plasma or heparinized whole blood. This test is intended to be performed by trained medical technologists only.
{2}------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF THE TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE COMPARED TO THE PREDICATE DEVICE:
| No. | Item<br>Comparison | INDX Device | Reference Device(s) | Comparison |
|-----|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 1. | Intended Use | Detection of scrub<br>typhus antibody | Detection of scrub<br>typhus antibody | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 2. | Agent Measured | O. tsutsugamushi | O. tsutsugamushi | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 3. | Disease and phase<br>of disease | Scrub typhus, acute<br>and convalescent<br>phases | Scrub typhus, acute<br>and convalescent<br>phases | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 4. | Specificity | IgG and IgM<br>Antibody to<br>Agent | IgG and IgM<br>Antibody to<br>Agent | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 5. | Format | EIA dot-blot | Indirect<br>Immunofluorescence (IFA)<br>or Immunoperoxidase (IIP) | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 6. | Endpoint detection<br>method | Enzyme-substrate<br>and conjugate in a<br>solid phase | Enzyme-substrate<br>or fluorescent substrate<br>on a prepared slide | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 7. | Use of results | Semi-quantitative | Semi-quantitative | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 8. | Sample prep.<br>methods | heparinized serum<br>plasma or<br>whole blood | serum | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 9. | Positive and<br>Negative Controls | Required and<br>Included | Required and<br>Included | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| 10. | Summary of<br>Comparisons | Average Sensitivity for Comparisons of 91.4%<br>Average Specificity for Comparisons of 89.1%<br>Average Agreement for Comparisons of 89.5% | | Substantially<br>equivalent |
# COMPARISONS OF INDX DIP-S-TICKS AND REFERENCE METHODS
{3}------------------------------------------------
# NON-CLINICAL TESTS SUPPORTING A DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
### Expected Values
The number of antibody positive subjects in a population depends on two factors: disease prevalence and clinical criteria used to select the tested population. Because very few positives should be seen in a randomly screened population in a non-endemic area, most serology tests are not specific enough to screen non-endemic populations. Even in an endemic region, serology screening often yields many false positives if used to randomly screen patients. Serology tests are useful to test patients in an endemic region with signs and symptoms consistent with the disease.
Antibody levels are generally low or absent during very early infection. Symptomatic patients may have no antibody during the first 1-2 weeks after exposure and the antibody titer will rise with time.
### Normal Population
Sera obtained from a total of ten (10) asymptomatic normal donors were evaluated with the DIP-S-TICKS method in this study. All sera had a negative IFA result for scrub typhus and were subsequently evaluated by the dot-blot method. All of 10 sera were negative or non-reactive to the dot-blot method.
Negative Patient Control Sera: (Presumptive Negatives)
The following table summarizes the results of the study, and indicates the types of nonrickettsial diseases, number of sera evaluated for each disease, and results of the DIP-S-TICKS dot-blot test for scrub typhus. In this study, the DIP-S-TICKS test showed a negative result in 49 of 51 sera that were confirmed not to have scrub typhus, and was positive in 2 of the 51 sera. Only one of the positive samples (malaria) is a tropical disease that might be encountered in the same geographic environment as scrub typhus.
| DISEASE | NUMBER OF<br>SERA TESTED | DIP-S-TICKS<br>NEGATIVE | DIP-S-TICK<br>POSITIVE |
|----------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|
| Rheumatoid Factor | 10 | 9 | 1 |
| Antinuclear Antibody | 11 | 11 | 0 |
| Malaria | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Bartonellosis | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| Leptospirosis | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| Typhoid | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Cholera | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 51 | 49 | 2 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Precision Study:
The Kato/Gilliam antigen is included in the DIP-S-TICKS test strip at a screening dilution and is scored as either positive. In precision studies, reactions were graded as 0 dot (negative), 0.5 dots (equivocal) and 1 dot (positive). Replicate tests conducted within the same day using standard non-immune sera consistently resulted in 0 dot (negative) reaction. The following data are representative of studies of replicate test strips conducted within the same day with the indicated Kato/Gilliam positive human immune sera. Sera listed more than once represent the evaluation of strips on separate days.
| Sera No. | Mean<br>Response<br>(No. of dots) | S.D. | Range | n |
|----------|-----------------------------------|-----------|---------|----|
| S0023 | 0.6 | $\pm$ 0.2 | 0.5-1.0 | 11 |
| S0023 | 0.6 | $\pm$ 0.2 | 0.5-1.0 | 11 |
| S0024 | 0.8 | $\pm$ 0.2 | 0.5-1.0 | 11 |
| S0024 | 1.0 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 1.0-1.0 | 9 |
| S0025 | 1.0 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 1.0-1.0 | 15 |
| HAS | 1.0 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 1.0-1.0 | 15 |
The Karp antigen is included in the DIP-S-TICKS test strip at 3 dilutions in the range of 1:400 to 1:6400 or greater. This range of Karo antigen is intended to permit an assessment of the relative O. tsutsugamushi antibody strength to which the Karp antigen reacts. The antibody strength is indicated by the number of positive Karp antigen dots observed. In precision studies, replicate tests conducted within the same day using standard non-immune sera consistently resulted in 0 dot (negative) reaction. The following data are representative of studies of replicate test strips conducted within the same day with the indicated Karp positive human immune sera. Sera listed more than once represent the evaluation of strips on separate days.
| Sera No. | Mean<br>Response<br>(No. of dots) | S.D. | Range | n |
|----------|-----------------------------------|-----------|---------|----|
| S0023 | 2.5 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 2.5-2.5 | 11 |
| S0023 | 2.6 | $\pm$ 0.2 | 2.5-3.0 | 11 |
| S0023 | 3.0 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 3.0-3.0 | 9 |
| S0024 | 2.5 | $\pm$ 0.0 | 2.5-2.5 | 9 |
| S0024 | 2.3 | $\pm$ 0.2 | 2.0-2.5 | 11 |
| HAS | 2.5 | $\pm$ 0.1 | 2.0-2.5 | 15 |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# CLINICAL TESTS SUPPORTING A DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:
### Comparison Studies
Study No. 1 Comparison of Methods On 91 Febrile Sera from NorthCentral Malaysia
A group of 91 presumptive positive samples were tested. All samples were obtained from a U.S. medical reference laboratory for rickettsial diseases. The samples were acquired retrospectively from 56 clinical cases of febrile patients in North Central peninsular Malaysia.
The 91 presumptive positive samples were analyzed for the presence of scrub typhus antibodies by the DIP-S-TICKS Dot-Blot and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) methods. Both methods detect the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies.
Performance Characteristics for 91 febrile samples:
SENSITIVITY = 90.4% SPECIFICITY = 66.7% AGREEMENT = 80.2%
Results of Semi-Quantitative Comparisons for 91 febrile samples:
The semi-quantitative relationship between the number of positive Karp strain O. tsutsugamushi DIP-S-TICKS dots and the inverse of geometric means of IFA titers was determined for the group of 91 febrile sera. For the IFA method, the IgG and IzM scrub typhus titers are reported separately. The DIP-S-TICKS method detected total (IgG and IgM) scrub typhus antibodies. These data are shown in the following table. As the table indicates, the inverse of geometric mean titers for IgM and for IgG consistently increased as the number of positive dots increased. However, the range of IFA IgG titers is much larger than the range of IFA IgM titers and better discrimination between IgG titers is possible when comparing to the corresponding number of DIP-S-TICKS dots. The differences shown were statistically significant between 0, 1 and 2 or 3 dots for IgG. The differences shown were statistically significant between 0 and 3 dots for IgM.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Geometric means of inverse indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) titers for each level of DIP-S-TICKS response using the Karp strain of O. tsutsugamushi antigen in tests of 91 clinical sera
| No. of Positive<br>dots on the | Inverse of Geometric Mean IFA Titer | |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| DIP-S-TICKS | IgG | IgM |
| 0 | 6.1 † | 2.3 † |
| 1 | 26.5 † | 3.5 †‡ |
| 2 | 183.8 ‡ | 4.1 †‡ |
| 3 | 98.0 ‡ | 9.7 ‡ |
Means in a column not followed by the same symbol were significantly different (P<0.05) in Duncan's multiple range test. Analysis of variance of IgG means: F = 22.5, degrees of freedom (df) = 3/86, P < 0.001. Analysis of variance of IgM means: F = 0.17, df = 3/86, P = 0.18. Inverse titers were transformed to logs and analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's test performed to test whether the titers corresponding to 1, 2 or 3 positive dots were significantly different.
These data demonstrated the semi-quantitative relationship between the number of DIP-S-TICKS dots observed and the inverse geometric mean IFA titers for the detection of IgG and IgM scrub typhus antibodies.
Study No. 2: Comparison of Methods On Sera From 60 Febrile Patients from Northern Thailand
This study was based on the comparison of the DIP-S-TICKS dot-blot and immunoperoxidase (IIP) methods for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to O. tsutsugamushi. Samples of 60 sera from febrile patients were obtained prospectively from the Chiangrai Hospital in Thailand. Previous studies at this institution with the IIP method indicated that IgG antibody titers of 1:1600 or greater, or IgM titers of 1:1400 or greater in a single serum specimen were indicative of active scrub typhus.
Performance Characteristics of the DIP-S-TICKS test for 60 febrile samples:
SENSITIVITY = 100.0% SPECIFICITY = 95.5% AGREEMENT = 96.7%
- Comparison of Methods On Sera From 83 Febrile Patients from North-East Study No. 3: Thailand
This study was based on the comparison of the DIP-S-TICKS dot-blot and immunoperoxidase (IIP) methods for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to O. tsutsugamushi. Sera samples from 83 febrile patients were obtained were obtained at the Mahara Hospital in Nakhon Ratchasima province of North-East Thailand.
{7}------------------------------------------------
This prospective study was conducted between November, 1995 and January, 1996. Patients were admitted to the hospital based on symptoms including fever of unknown origin. Blood was drawn from each patient on the first symptomatic day (day 0). Convalescent sera were also obtained during a followup two weeks from day 0 (day 14). Patients were evaluated on a daily basis. Day 0 and convalescent sera from each donor were stored at -70°C when drawn, and were thawed immediately prior to simultaneous testing by the DIP-S-TICKS and IIP methods.
Performance Characteristics of the DIP-S-TICKS test for 83 febrile samples:
| SENSITIVITY | 86.7% |
|-------------|-------|
| SPECIFICITY | 94.3% |
| AGREEMENT | 91.6% |
- Comparison of Methods On 28 Paired Acute and Convalescent Sera from Study No. 4: NorthCentral Malaysia
Twenty eight (28) pairs of acute and convalescent sera were obtained and evaluated as an extension of the study described in Study No. 1, of febrile patients in NorthCentral Malaysia. These samples from febrile patients were used to compare the DIP-S-TICKS and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) methods. The acute sample was obtained as soon as possible after the appearance of fever, and the convalescent sample was obtained approximately 2 weeks thereafter. Samples were immediately frozen at -20℃, and acute and convalescent samples were evaluated simultaneously.
The diagnosis of active disease requires a 4-fold rise in antibody titer, when acute and convalescent samples are compared, for a positive DIP-S-TICKS or IFA test. In the IFA test, a 4-fold rise in titer to or greater than 1:64 is indicative of a positive response. to rule out the detection of antibody remaining from a prior scrub typhus infection. An increase in the number of positive dots in the DIP-S-TICKS test from 1-2, 2-3 or > 3 dots denotes a 4-fold increase, since the O. tsutsugamushi antigen is diluted 4 fold for each antigen dot.
Performance Characteristics of the DIP-S-TICKS test compared to the IFA test for 28 paired sera samples:
| SENSITIVITY = | 88.5% |
|---------------|--------|
| SPECIFICITY = | 100.0% |
| AGREEMENT = | 89.3% |
In summary, four independent studies of the comparison of the DIP-S-TICKS and either the IFA or IIP predicate methods were conducted on a total of 262 sera samples from febrile patients. In these studies, either single samples (3 studies and 234 sera) or paired acute and convalescent samples (1 study and 28 sera) formed the basis for comparison. The overall comparison of methods was as follows:
{8}------------------------------------------------
| STUDY | SENSITIVITY | SPECIFICITY | AGREEMENT<br>BETWEEN<br>METHODS | n |
|----------|-------------|-------------|---------------------------------|----|
| No. 1 | 90.4 | 66.7 | 80.2 | 91 |
| No. 2 | 100.0 | 95.5 | 96.7 | 60 |
| No. 3 | 86.7 | 94.3 | 91.6 | 83 |
| No. 4 | 88.5 | 100.0 | 89.3 | 28 |
| Mean | 91.4 | 89.1 | 89.5 | |
| ± 1 S.D. | 5.9 | 15.2 | 6.9 | |
#### BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Elisberg, BL and FM Bozeman, The Rickettsiae. in Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and 1. Chlamydial Infections, 5th Ed. Eds. EH Lennetts & NJ Schmidt, pp 1061-1099, 1979.
- Centers for Disease Control, 1981. Rickettsial Surveillance Report No. 2. Summary: 1979. U.S. 2. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
- Fiset, P. "Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis of Rickettsial Disease of Man" in Handbook of Clinical Laboratory 3. Science, Vol. 1, Part 2, Hsuing, G.D. and Green, R.H. Eds., CRC Press, West Palm Beach, Florida, p361-366, 1978.
- Centers for Disease Control/National Institutes of Health Manual Biosafety in Microbiological and 4. Biomedical Laboratories, 1984.
- Brown G.W., Scrub typhus: pathogenesis and clinical syndrome, In Walker D.H., (ed), Biology of રું છે. Rickettsial Diseases, Vol. 1, p. 93-100, CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, 1988.
- Strickman D., Serology of scrub typhus: New directions for an old disease, Clin. Immunol. Newsletter 6. 14:(5)62-65, 1994.
- 7. Strickman D., Tanskul P., Eamsila C. et al, Prevalence of antibodies to rickettsiae in the human population of suburban Bangkok, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51:149-153, 1994.
- 8. Brown G.W., Shirai A., Rogers C. et al, Diagnostic criteria for scrub typhus: Probability values for immunofluorescent antibody and Proteus OXK agglutinin titers, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 32(5):1101-1107, 1983.
- Weddle J.R., Chan T.C., Thompson K. et al, Effectiveness of a dot-blot immunoassay of anni-Rickettsia 9. tsutsugamushi antibodies for serological analysis of scrub typhus, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53(1):43-46, 1995.
- 10. Chouriyagune C., Watt G., Strickman D., Jinasen R., The Weil-Felix test for the diagnosis of scrub typhus in Thailand. Intern. Med. 8:29-32. 1992.
- 11. Kelly D.J., Serologic diagnosis of rickettsial diseases, Clin. Immunol. Newsletter 14:57-61, 1994.
- Kelly D.J., Wong P.W., Gan E. et al. Multi-laboratory evaluation of a scrub typhus diagnostic kit. Am. 12. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 43:301-307. 1990.
- McDade J.E., Fishbein D.B., Rickettsiaceae: the rickettsiae, In E.H. Lennette, P. Halonen, F.A. Murphy 13. (Eds.), Laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases, Principles and practice, Vol II, p. 864-890, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1988.
- Wisseman C.L., Scrub typhus, In Strickland, G.T. (ed.) Hunter's Tropical Medicine (6th Edition), p. 221-14. 223, Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1991.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wing. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
MAR 1 3 1998
Integrated Diagnostics, Inc. c/o David C. Bishop, Ph.D. Consultant to INDX 605 Dilworth Road Downingtown, PA 19335
Re: K971591 Trade Name: INDX Dip-S-Ticks Scrub Typhus Test Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LSO Dated: December 22, 1997 Received: December 24, 1997
Dear Dr. Bishop:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the - Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements: as set forth in the Ouality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{10}------------------------------------------------
### Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours.
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{11}------------------------------------------------
| Page | |
|------|--|
| of | |
| 510(k) Number (if known): | K971591 |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Device Name: | INDX Dip-S-Ticks Scrub Typhus TEST |
| Indications For Use: | |
### INDICATIONS FOR USE:
The INDX" Dip-S-Ticks scrub typhus test is an enzyme immunoassay for use as an aid in the diagnosis of scrub typhus, and detects total IgG and IgM antibodies to Orientia tsursugamushi. The Dip-S-Ticks test is qualitative when used to test a single specimen; when using paired specimens to detect sero-conversion the test may be semi-quantitative. The test is intended for use in serum as well as heparinized plasma, whole blood and finger-stick capillary blood and is intended to be performed by trained medical personnel only.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Aloen
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number. K97/54/
Prescription Use_ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The Counter Use__
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.