CAMBRIDGE BIOTECH HUMAN LYME IGM WESTERN BLOT (90112)
Applicant
Cambridge Biotech Corp.
Product Code
LSR · Microbiology
Decision Date
Feb 17, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3830
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is an in vitro test system for the qualitative detection of human Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in human serum. The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is intended for use in testing human serum samples which have demonstrated positive or equivocal responses using EIA or IFA test procedures to provide supportive evidence of infection with Borrelia burgdorferi. The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot can be used during the acute phase (0-4 weeks of symptoms onset) of B. burgdorferi infection. After this period, infected patients are usually found to be Western Blot positive for IgG. A positive IgM test alone is not recommended for use in determining active disease in persons with illness of longer than one month.
Device Story
Western Blot assay for qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi; utilizes nitrocellulose strips containing fractionated B. burgdorferi antigens. Input: human serum samples previously tested via EIA or IFA. Process: serum incubated with antigen strips; bound IgM detected via anti-human IgM conjugated with alkaline phosphatase; chemical substrate cleavage produces colored, insoluble bands. Output: visual comparison of bands against Band Identifying and Band Intensity Controls. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results provide supportive evidence of Lyme disease infection; aids clinicians in diagnosis during acute phase (0-4 weeks).
Clinical Evidence
Clinical trial evaluated 1062 samples for specificity and 296 characterized Lyme disease specimens for sensitivity. Specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 96.6-98.5%). Sensitivity varied by draw time: <1 month (57%), 1-2 months (64%), and 2-12 months (39%). Precision testing across three sites showed 100% agreement for control disposition and diagnostic bands. Reproducibility testing using the CDC 47-member panel showed 100% agreement for IgM disposition and 94% overall agreement for band scoring across four sites.
Technological Characteristics
Western Blot assay; nitrocellulose membrane strips with fractionated Borrelia burgdorferi antigens. Detection via alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgM and chemical substrate. Qualitative visual readout. Manual procedure.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of human IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in human serum. Intended for patients with positive/equivocal EIA or IFA results to provide supportive evidence of B. burgdorferi infection. Recommended for use during the acute phase (0-4 weeks post-symptom onset). Not recommended for determining active disease in patients with illness duration >1 month.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents are devices that consist of the antigens, antisera and all control reagents (standardized reagents with which test results are compared) which are derived from treponemal sources and that are used in the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS), the Treponema pallidum immobilization test (T.P.I.), and other treponemal tests used to identify antibodies to Treponema pallidum directly from infecting treponemal organisms in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of syphilis caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Treponema and provides epidemiological information on syphilis.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
K971170
Section 12 510(k) SUMMARY
Submitted By:
Cambridge Biotech Corporation
1500 East Gude Drive
Rockville, Maryland 20850-5307
(301) 251-0800, extension 145
(301) 762-1327 (fax)
Contact Person:
Rebecca Leaper, Vice President - Operations, Responsible Head
(301) 251-0800, extension 105
Date of Preparation:
19 March 1997 Revised on 4 February 1998
Product Name and Information
1. Name and Address of Owner/Operator, and Manufacturer
Owner/Operator:
Cambridge Biotech Corporation
A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of bioMérieux Vitek, Inc.
1500 East Gude Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-5307
Manufacturer:
Cambridge Biotech Corporation
A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of bioMérieux Vitek, Inc.
1500 East Gude Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-5307
FEB 17 1998
{1}
2. Product Name
Trade Name: Cambridge Biotech Borrelia burgdorferi Human Lyme IgM Western Blot kit
Common Name: Lyme IgM Western Blot kit
Classification Name: Reagent, Borrelia Serological Reagent
3. Claim of Substantial Equivalence
The characterized samples used for the establishment of Substantial Equivalence have a clinical diagnosis of Lyme Disease based on the probability of exposure/infection (tick bite and/or patient presence in potential tick habitats in an endemic region within 30 days prior to the onset of EM (erythema migrans)), Borrelia isolation by culture (where possible), or, for non-EM patients, the presentation of Late Lyme clinical manifestations (e.g., cardiac, joint-involvement, or neurological symptoms).
Each of the clinical trial sites provided specimens that were well-characterized by the site using Lyme-specific serological analyses, including EIA and Western Blot testing.
Substantial equivalence of this device is based on the assessment of performance of the device in these clinical trials in which the well-characterized, archived Lyme Disease specimens, the Centers for Disease Control Lyme Disease Serum Panel, normal donor specimens (from endemic and non-endemic regions), and samples from diverse disease conditions were analyzed.
4. Description
The device is a Western Blot assay. Proteins and other antigenic components of the Borrelia spirochete are fractionated by Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis in the presence of Sodium Dodecylsulfate. The separated proteins are electrophoretically transferred from the gel to nitrocellulose membranes, which are subsequently blocked to minimize non-specific binding and cut into strips. These nitrocellulose strips with Borrelia burgdorferi antigens are then reacted with diluted serum and controls (positive and negative sera of defined reactivity) during an incubation period.
{2}
During the incubation period, human antibodies specific to the B. burgdorferi antigens, if present in the sample or control, will bind to the antigen to which they have affinity. Unbound serum and non-specific antibodies are washed from the strip. Detection of bound IgM antibodies is accomplished by reacting and incubating the strips with a solution containing anti-human IgM antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. Unbound conjugate antibodies are removed by washing. The qualitative assessment of the detected IgM antibodies is then accomplished by the reaction of the alkaline phosphatase with a chemical substrate, which is cleaved into a colored, insoluble product that can be visualized. The determination of the reactivity of each unknown specimen is accomplished by comparison of the identified, visualized bands to the Band Identifying and Band Intensity Controls.
## 5. Intended Use
The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is an in vitro test system for the qualitative detection of human Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in human serum. The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is intended for use in testing human serum samples which have demonstrated positive or equivocal responses using EIA or IFA test procedures to provide supportive evidence of infection with Borrelia burgdorferi.
The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot can be used during the acute phase (0-4 weeks of symptoms onset) of B. burgdorferi infection. After this period, infected patients are usually found to be Western Blot positive for IgG. A positive IgM test alone is not recommended for use in determining active disease in persons with illness of longer than one month.
## 6. Performance Summary
The report of the complete clinical trial for the Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme IgM kit is contained in this section. Data for IgG and IgM have not been interpreted together, but separately, as will be required in clinical settings.
{3}
From a summary of the clinical trial data, the following performance characteristics are described:
## Specificity
Specificity of the device was determined from analysis of testing results of normal donor (from endemic and non-endemic regions) and disease specimens (1062 total samples) and was shown to be 97.5%, with 95% confidence intervals of 96.6% to 98.5%.
## Sensitivity
Sensitivity of the device was determined from analysis of test results of characterized Lyme disease specimens (296 total samples) that were drawn at different times after onset of disease:
## Sensitivity of the Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot Relative to Lyme Disease Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment including Results by Draw Time
| Disease Presentation | Draw Time (months) | Total Number of Specimens | Number By Draw Time | Number of Specimens Positive | Specimens Positive By Draw Time | Sensitivity | 95% CL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Before Treatment | <1 | 102 | 100 | 58 | 56 | 57% | 47.3-66.5% |
| | 1-2 | | 2 | | 2 | | |
| | 2-12 | | 0 | | 0 | | |
| After Treatment | <1 | 131 | 40 | 84 | 27 | 64% | 55.9-72.3% |
| | 1-2 | | 51 | | 35 | | |
| | 2-12 | | 40 | | 22 | | |
| Lyme Late | <1 | 64 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 39% | 27.1-51.0% |
| | 1-2 | | 0 | | 0 | | |
| | 2-12 | | 64 | | 25 | | |
The Draw Time is the time from disease onset to specimen collection. The specimens were taken from 169 individual patients. Second draws were done on 92 of the 169 patients, third draws were done on 36 of those patients. The specimens from patients under antibiotic treatment may interfere with positive results.
## Precision
Six IgM Controls were tested in duplicate on each of three days at three test sites, totaling 18 replicates per control for all sites. All three sites were in 100% agreement for the disposition of the six IgM Controls. Additionally, all three sites were in 100% agreement for the three diagnostic bands (p41, p39, and p23) for all six controls on every day of testing.
{4}
Reproducibility
Ten positive and negative specimens from the CDC 47-member panel were tested at four sites. There was 100% agreement for the IgM disposition scores with the 20 specimens at all four sites. Eighty six point seven percent (86.7%) of the three diagnostic bands of all 20 specimens were scored identically at all four test sites. In addition, a 94% overall agreement was shown between the scoring of positive IgM bands by the sites and the expected IgM band score results.
## Agreement with Expected Results Across Four Sites
| Site | Number of Correct Bands | Percentage of Correct Bands | Correct Number of Interpretations | Percent (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site 1 | 25/27 | 93% | 20/20 | 100 |
| Site 2 | 25/27 | 93% | 20/20 | 100 |
| Site 3 | 26/27 | 96% | 20/20 | 100 |
| Site 4 | 25/27 | 93% | 20/20 | 100 |
| Total | 101/108 | 94% | 80/80 | 100 |
## 7. Determination of Threshold Intensity
The threshold determination was originally performed by analysis of IgM sensitivity and specificity panels. The intensity of weakly reactive Lyme antibody-positive samples (n = 3) were compared to the intensities of highly reactive Lyme antibody-negative samples (n = 10) in preclinical testing to demonstrate that the threshold appropriately differentiated positive and negative specimens. The negative specimens included both normal donors and samples from patients with potentially cross-reactive conditions or infections. The p41 band was chosen as the intensity indicator for all bands except p23. The p23 band is used to score p23 bands, due to its diffuse nature. Subsequent lots of the Control have been approved based on continued demonstration of this characteristic.
## 8. Conclusions
Based on the clinical performance, this device has been shown to be safe and effective for the intended use in the qualitative detection of human Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in serum or plasma to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens, and as a supplemental, more specific, test to aid in the diagnosis of infection or exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease.
{5}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Wole Edwin
Director of Quality Assurance
and Regulatory Affairs
Cambridge Biotech
1500 East Gude Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-5307
FEB 17 1998
Re: K971170
Trade Name: Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme Borrelia burgdorferi IgM Western Blot Kit
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: LSR
Dated: December 3, 1997
Received: December 3, 1997
Dear Mr. Edwin:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A.
Director
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}
# Section 8 Statement of Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K971170
Device Name: Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme Borrelia burdorferi IgM Western Blot Kit
Indications For Use:
The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is an *in vitro* test system for the qualitative detection of human Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* antigens in human serum. The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot is intended for use in testing human serum samples which have demonstrated positive or equivocal responses using EIA or IFA test procedures to provide supportive evidence of infection with *Borrelia burgdorferi*.
The Cambridge Biotech Human Lyme B. burgdorferi IgM Western Blot can be used during the acute phase (0-4 weeks of symptoms onset) of *B. burgdorferi* infection. After this period, infected patients are usually found to be Western Blot positive for IgG. A positive IgM test alone is not recommended for use in determining active disease in persons with illness of longer than one month.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use ☑ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use ☐
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clin. Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number _______________
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.