K970726 · Cottrell, Ltd. · MED · May 18, 1998 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K970726
Device Name
VAPOCIDE
Applicant
Cottrell, Ltd.
Product Code
MED · General Hospital
Decision Date
May 18, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.6885
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Vapocide™ is a sterilant solution intended to be used in the Harvey Chemiclave Sterilizer to sterilize medical and dental surgical instruments and equipment.
Device Story
Vapocide™ is a liquid chemical sterilant solution composed of formaldehyde and ethanol. It is designed exclusively for use within Harvey Chemiclave unsaturated chemical vapor sterilizers. The system operates by heating the solution under pressure to create a chemical vapor that sterilizes medical and dental instruments. The device is used in clinical or dental settings by trained personnel. The vapor penetrates sterilization pouches to kill spores on instruments, including dental handpieces. The process provides sterilization without damaging metal surfaces. Clinical benefits include effective sterilization of heat-stable instruments and equipment. The device is a direct substitute for the Vapo-Steril solution.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Modified AOAC Sporicidal Test Protocol using Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium sporogenes confirmed sporicidal efficacy. Simulated use testing with Bacillus stearothermophilus spores in dental handpieces confirmed sterilization in worst-case loads. Material compatibility testing (orthopedic pliers, hand instruments, carbon steel burrs, plastic resin cassettes) via scanning electron microscopy showed no corrosion, pitting, or cracking. Toxicity testing (skin/ocular irritation, sensitization, mutagenicity, acute dermal toxicity) in rabbits and guinea pigs demonstrated safety; ocular irritation was transient and resolved within 14 days.
Technological Characteristics
Liquid chemical sterilant; 0.23% formaldehyde and ethanol. Operates via unsaturated chemical vapor sterilization in Harvey Chemiclave units at 132°C and 20-40 psi. Compatible with specific polymers (polysulfone, phenolic, epoxy, etc.). No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for sterilization of medical and dental surgical instruments and equipment in Harvey Chemiclave Sterilizer models E, 4000, 5000, 5500, 6000, 7000, 8000, and EM series. Compatible with specific plastics (polysulfone, phenolic, epoxy, polyphenylene, oxide, polyester, polypropylene). Contraindicated for linen, textiles, fabrics, liquids, agars, tightly woven packs/wraps, plastics intolerant to 132°C, and nylon tubing/bags. Not for flash sterilization.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A liquid chemical sterilant/high level disinfectant is a germicide that is intended for use as the terminal step in processing critical and semicritical medical devices prior to patient use. Critical devices make contact with normally sterile tissue or body spaces during use. Semicritical devices make contact during use with mucous membranes or nonintact skin.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Guidance on the Content and Format of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions for Liquid Chemical Sterilants/High Level Disinfectants, and user information and training.
{0}
K970726
ATTACHMENT 7
510(k) Summary
Cottrell, Ltd.
JUN 16 1998
Vapocide™ Liquid Chemical Sterilant
1. Sponsor/Applicant Name
Cottrell, Ltd.
7399 South Tucson Way
Englewood, CO 80112
Telephone: (303) 799-9401
Facsimile: (303) 799-9408
Contact Person
Mr. John Scoville
Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
Date of Summary Preparation
February 27, 1997
2. Device Name
Proprietary Name: Vapocide™
Common/Usual Name: Liquid Chemical Sterilant
Classification Name: Liquid Chemical Sterilant
3. Identification of the predicate or legally marketed device(s) to which equivalence is being claimed
The Cottrell, Ltd. Vapocide™ is substantially equivalent to Vapo-Steril which is manufactured by MDT Biologic Company. The Vapo-Steril solution has been in commercial distribution for as long as the Harvey Chemiclave sterilizer. They are preamendments devices and also are covered under several 510(k) premarket notifications such as K924380 -MDT-Harvey Model 7000 and 8000CHE, and K943654- Harvey Chemiclave EC 5000, 5500, and 6000 MDT Biologic.
Cottrell, Ltd. Vapocide™ 510(k)
2/27/97
Page D
{1}
4. Device Description
Vapocide™ is a liquid sterilant solution designed for use in Harvey Chemiclave sterilizers only. Vapocide™ and the Harvey Chemiclave function as a system to sterilize medical and dental surgical instruments and equipment. Vapocide™ is a sterilant solution intended to be used in the Harvey Chemiclave which is an unsaturated chemical vapor sterilizer. Unsaturated chemical vapor sterilizers function by using heat, water, and chemical synergism to sterilize medical and dental equipment. Vapocide™ is made of formaldehyde and ethanol. This formulation when heated under pressure, results in a relatively unsaturated and totally effective sterilization vapor which does not have deleterious effects on metal surfaces.
5. Intended Use
Vapocide™ is a sterilant solution intended to be used in the Harvey Chemiclave Sterilizer to sterilize medical and dental surgical instruments and equipment.
6. A statement of how the technological characteristics of the device compare to those of the predicate or legally marketed device(s) cited
Vapocide™ and the predicate Vapo-Steril liquid chemical sterilants are similar with respect to shelf-life, appearance, and viscosity in that they both have a 2 year shelf life and are clear, colorless liquids. Vapocide™ and predicate Vapo-Steril liquid chemical sterilants are similar in chemical properties in that the primary active ingredient in both solution is formaldehyde with ethanol acting synergistically to achieve sterilization. The concentration of formaldehyde in both solutions is 0.23%. Vapocide™ and the predicate Vapo-Steril solutions are similar in microbiology claims in that they are sterilants and therefore sporicidal.
7. Performance Testing
Performance Testing
Testing was performed to determine the effectiveness of Vapocide™ when used as a liquid chemical sterilant in the Harvey Chemiclave Sterilizer. The tests and results are summarized below:
8. Conclusion. Based upon all testing summarized above, Vapocide™ is substantially equivalent to Vapo-Steril, which was on the market prior to May, 1976, for use in all Chemiclave models.
{2}
Comparative testing using Vapocide™ and Vapo-Steril:
Comparison Testing was performed on Vapocide™ and Vapo-Steril using a modified AOAC Sporicidal Test Protocol.
Sporicidal Testing:
AOAC Sporicidal testing was performed by Sterilization Technical Services. This testing used *Bacillus subtilis* and *Clostridium sporogenes* to determine the sporicidal effectiveness of Vapocide™.
Simulated Use Testing:
Simulated use testing was performed using inoculated dental Handpieces packaged in sterilization pouches processed in the Harvey Chemiclave 8000 sterilizer. The objective of this study was to determine if *Bacillus stearothermophilus* spores placed on the turbines inside of dental Handpieces in a worse case load are killed using the Harvey Chemiclave and Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant.
Comparison Test for Effectiveness of Vapocide™ and Vapo-Steril:
The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of Vapocide™ under typical use conditions, i.e. instruments, packaging, loading, sterilization process conditions, etc. as well as under half cycle conditions.
Material Compatibility of Vapocide™:
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate material compatibility of Vapocide™ under repeated processing of various medical and dental instruments, i.e., orthopedic pliers, hand instruments, carbon steel burrs, high speed Handpieces, plastic resin cassettes. Each of the processed instruments were processed repeatedly using the Harvey Chemiclave and Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant and inspected for corrosion, pitting, razing, and cracking using the scanning electron microscope and steriomicroscopic equipment.
Cottrell, Ltd. Vapocide™ 510(k)
2/27/97
Page D-3
{3}
Biological Indicator Evaluation:
The purpose of this study was to confirm that the biological indicators currently indicated for use with the Harvey Chemicals sterilizer can be used with the Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant solution.
Residue Testing:
The objective of this testing was to determine if formaldehyde residues remained on instruments processed in the Harvey Chemicals Sterilizer using Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant solution.
Packaging Evaluation for Sterilant Penetration:
The objective of this testing was to determine the penetration ability of unsaturated chemical vapors produced from Vapocide™ through and into typical sterilization packaging during the Harvey Chemicals process.
Toxicity Testing
Toxicity testing was performed on the Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant solution to determine toxicity. The following is a summary of the toxicity testing:
Skin Irritation:
This study was performed to determine if exposure to Vapocide™ produces skin irritation. This testing was performed by Gibraltar Laboratories using Vapocide™ and albino rabbits according to 40 CFR 158.135 and 158.70, Paragraph C, Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision F: Hazard Evaluation Human and Domestic Animals, Series 81-5. The results of this testing showed that the Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant is not a primary dermal irritant.
Ocular Irritation:
This study was performed to determine the ocular irritation potential of Vapocide™ following instillation in the eyes in rabbits. This testing was performed by Gibraltar Laboratories using Vapocide™ and albino rabbits according to 40 CFR
Cottrell, Ltd. Vapocide™ 510(k)
2/27/97
Page D-4
{4}
158.135 and 158.70, Paragraph C, Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision F: Hazard Evaluation Human and Domestic Animals, Series 81-4. The results of this testing showed that the Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant produced transient irritation in the eyes of six rabbits. This was resolved by 14 days after exposure to Vapocide™.
## Sensitization:
This testing was performed to determine the sensitization potential of Vapocide™ to cause allergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs. This testing was performed by Gibraltar Laboratories according to 40 CFR 158.135 and 158.70, Paragraph C, Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision F: Hazard Evaluation Human and Domestic Animals, Series 81-6, pages 59-62. The results of this testing showed that Vapocide™ did not produce allergenic contact dermatitis following the challenge in guinea pigs.
## Mutagenicity:
This testing was performed to determine if Vapocide™ liquid chemical sterilant is mutagenic at the histidine locus in the *Salmonella typhimurium* strains of Ames. This testing was performed by Gibraltar Laboratories according to the Ames technique. The results of this testing showed that a 1% solution of Vapocide™ did not produce a mutagenic effect in the Ames Spot test employing five tester strains of auxotrophic *Salmonella typhimurium*.
## Acute Dermal Toxicity:
This testing was performed to determine the acute dermal toxicity of Vapocide™ in rabbits at the dose of two grams per kilogram of body weight. This testing was performed by Gibraltar Laboratories according to 40 CFR 158.135 and 158.70, Paragraph C, Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision F: Hazard Evaluation Human and Domestic Animals, Series 81-2. The results of this testing showed that the dermal $\mathsf{LD}_{50}$ of Vapocide™ in rabbits was considered to be greater than two grams per kilogram.
Cottrell, Ltd. Vapocide™ 510(k)
2/27/97
Page D-5
{5}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
9200 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville MD 20856
JUN 16 1998
Cottrell, Ltd.
C/O Mr. Mark Brown
King & Spaulding
1730 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006-4706
Re: K970726
Vapocide™
Regulatory Class: Unclassified
Product Code: MED
Dated: February 23, 1998
Received: February 23, 1998
Dear Mr. Brown:
This letter is written in response to your letter of June 5, 1998. We have reviewed your appeal of our May 18, 1998 letter and have determined that the above referenced device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}
Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4618. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,

Philip J. Phillips
Deputy Director
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}
ATTACHMENT E
510(k) Number (if known): K970726
Device Name: VAPOCIDE™
Indications For Use:
Vapocide™ is a sterilant solution intended to be used only in the Harvey Chemiclave Sterilizer to sterilize medical and dental surgical instruments and equipment. Vapocide is intended to be a direct substitute for Vapo-Steril. Vapocide is recommended for use in the following Chemiclave models: Model E, 4000, 5000, 5500, 6000, 7000, 8000, and EM series sterilizers.
Vapocide is compatible with Chemiclave cycle parameters as follows:
Model E, 4000, 5000, 5500, 6000, EM 5000, EM 5500, EM 6000
- Operating pressure: 20-40 psi (1.41-2.82 kg/cm²)
- Operating Temperature: 132±2°C (270 ± 5°F)
- Maximum load: 3.3 pounds (1.5 kg) for models with 8 and 10 in. diameter chambers
Model 7000 and 8000
- Operating pressure: approximately 25 psi
- Operating Temperature: 132 + 6, -0°C
- Maximum load: 3.3 pounds (1.5 kg)
Vapocide is compatible with but not limited to the following instruments and material types:
- Surgical and cutting instruments, handpieces, and similar items
- Plastic materials recommended are: Polysulfone, Phenolic, Epoxy, Polyphenylene, Oxide, Polyester, Polypropylene
Note: Polycarbonate is not chemically compatible
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Division Sign Off)
Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital Devices
510(k) Number K970726
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
{8}
510(k) Number (if known): K970726
Device Name: VAPOCIDE™
Indications For Use:
Vapocide™ is not compatible with the following materials:
- Linen, textiles or fabrics
- Liquids and agars
- Items contained in tightly woven packs or wraps
- Plastics that cannot tolerate temperature in excess of 132°C (270°F)
- Nylon tubing & bags - inhibit penetration of chemical vapors
Vapocide is not recommended for use for "flash" sterilization cycles.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH. Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Division Sign Off)
Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital Devices
510(k) Number K970726
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.