K970612 · Sealite Sciences, Inc. · DBF · Jun 24, 1997 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K970612
Device Name
SEALITE SCIENCES, INC. AQUALITE FERRITIN ASSAY
Applicant
Sealite Sciences, Inc.
Product Code
DBF · Immunology
Decision Date
Jun 24, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5340
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The AquaLite® Ferritin Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or AquaLite® Ferritin Assay) is an in vitro diagnostic product intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative measurement of ferritin in human serum and plasma. Ferritin measurements are used in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism.
Device Story
The AquaLite® Ferritin Assay is a bioluminescent immunoassay (BIA) for quantitative ferritin measurement in human serum or plasma. The device uses mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibodies pre-coated on polystyrene tubes and a secondary antibody conjugated to AquaLite®. Samples are pipetted into tubes; ferritin forms a sandwich complex with the antibodies. After incubation and washing, a calcium trigger buffer is injected, causing the AquaLite® conjugate to oxidize its self-contained luciferin, emitting a flash of light. A luminometer measures the light intensity (RLU), which is directly proportional to ferritin concentration. Results are calculated via a calibration curve plotting RLU against known ferritin concentrations. The assay is performed in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. It aids clinicians in diagnosing iron metabolism disorders, including iron overload and iron deficiency anemia. High-dose samples require dilution. The device provides a diagnostic tool for assessing iron status.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance characteristics established: sensitivity (0.03 ng/mL), intra-assay precision (3.6-8.6% CV), inter-assay precision (3.7-9.3% CV), and linearity. Method comparison with a commercial chemiluminometric immunoassay (N=99) showed a correlation coefficient of 0.98. Interference testing confirmed no significant impact from hemoglobin (500 mg/dL), bilirubin (20 mg/dL), or triglycerides (3000 mg/dL). No high-dose hook effect observed below 10,000 ng/mL.
Technological Characteristics
Bioluminescent immunoassay (BIA) using mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibodies. Solid phase: polystyrene tubes. Detection: flash-type bioluminescence triggered by calcium buffer oxidation of self-contained luciferin. Measured via luminometer. Sample volume: 25 µL. Incubation: 60 minutes at room temperature. Preservative: sodium azide.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of ferritin in human serum and plasma in clinical laboratory settings to aid in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism, such as hemochromatosis and iron deficiency anemia.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A ferritin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the ferritin (an iron-storing protein) in serum and other body fluids. Measurements of ferritin aid in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism, such as hemochromatosis (iron overload) and iron deficiency amemia.
Predicate Devices
Chiron Diagnostics ACS:180 Ferritin Assay
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
K970612
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
JUN 24 1997
# 510(k) SUMMARY
## I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Trade or proprietary name - SeaLite Sciences, Inc. AquaLite® Ferritin Assay
Common or usual name - Bioluminescent immunoassay (BIA)
Classification name - FDA has classified ferritin test systems intended for the measurement of ferritin in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism, such as hemochromatosis (iron overload) and iron deficiency anemia as Class II devices. (21 C.F.R. § 866.5340)
Submitter’s Name and Address:
Cathryn C. Cambria
Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
3000 Northwoods Parkway
Suite 200
Norcross, GA 30071
(800) 874-4471, ext. 227
Submission Date:
February 14, 1997
Legally Marketed Device To Which Claim Substantial Equivalence:
Chiron Diagnostics ACS:180 Ferritin Assay
## II. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The AquaLite® Ferritin Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay) is an *in vitro* diagnostic product intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of human ferritin in serum and plasma. Ferritin measurements are used in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism.
368184.1
{1}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
## III. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The AquaLite® Ferritin Bioluminescent Immunoassay Kit uses a mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibody that is pre-coated onto polystyrene tubes (solid phase). Samples (serum or plasma), or appropriate calibrators or controls, are pipetted (25 µL) into the pre-coated tubes. A mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibody covalently linked to AquaLite® (150 µL) is then added to the tubes. Ferritin in the sample simultaneously combines with the antibody on the solid phase and conjugate antibody to form an immune complex or "sandwich" bound to the solid phase. Complex formation is complete after a 60-minute incubation period at room temperature on a standard orbital shaker. The tubes are then washed to remove unbound conjugate.
The washed tubes are placed in a luminometer that is capable of reading a triggered, flash-type reaction in 12 x 75 mm tubes. Injection of the calcium trigger buffer causes AquaLite® to oxide its self-contained luciferin molecule, producing a flash of light, which is measured by the luminometer. The intensity of the light emitted from antibody bound to the tubes is directly proportional to the concentration of the ferritin in the sample. To calculate results, the light intensity (in relative light units, RLU) of the ferritin calibrators is plotted against ferritin concentration (in ng per mL) to yield a calibration curve. This curve is used to relate the light intensity generated from the samples and controls to ferritin concentration in ng/mL.
Note: Samples that generate signals greater than the signal from the highest calibrator are off-scale. These samples must be diluted and re-assayed. Remember to multiply the results from diluted samples by the dilution factor used.
## IV. SUMMARY OF STUDIES AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Studies on the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay were conducted at SeaLite Sciences. The results are summarized below:
### Performance Characteristics
#### 1. Sensitivity
The sensitivity or detection limit of the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay is 0.03 ng/mL. Sensitivity is determined by adding the mean signal of 20 replicates of the zero level calibrator plus two (2) standard deviations above this mean. The ferritin concentration (ng/mL) associated with this calculated signal is defined as the sensitivity of the assay.
368184.1
{2}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
## 2. Specificity
The AquaLite® Ferritin Assay measures intact ferritin. Cross reactivity of the AquaLite® Ferritin assay was determined by measuring the concentration of ferritin in 2 human serum samples spiked with 300 ng/mL liver ferritin. Percent cross-reactivity (%) is reported below:
| Endogenous Ferritin (ng/mL) | Ferritin Expected (ng/mL) | Ferritin Observed (ng/mL) | Cross-Reactivity (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 79 | 379 | 323 | 85 |
| 139 | 439 | 451 | 103 |
## 3. High Dose Hook Effect
No high dose hook effect occurs prior to 10,000 ng/mL ferritin.
## 4. Precision
(a) Intra-assay precision. Two serum commercial controls containing ferritin at the following concentrations were assayed to determine intra-assay precision. (Total N = 20 per concentration level.)
| Ferritin Level (ng/mL) | % CV |
| --- | --- |
| 368.4 | 8.6 |
| 123.9 | 3.6 |
| 40.5 | 5.4 |
368184.1
{3}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
(b) Inter-assay precision. Commercial controls containing ferritin at the following concentrations were assayed in duplicate repetitively. Ten (10) assays were performed and a new standard curve was generated for each assay. The inter-assay precision observed for the solutions (Total n = 2 x 10 = 20) are shown below.
| Ferritin Level (ng/mL) | % CV |
| --- | --- |
| 50.9 | 4.5% |
| 121.6 | 3.7% |
| 363.2 | 9.3% |
## 5. Method Comparison
The AquaLite® Ferritin Assay was used to assay patient samples (N=99) that were previously assayed by a commercially available chemiluminometric immunoassay. A slope of 0.72 with a y-intercept of 15.9 was obtained. The correlation coefficient was 0.98.
## 6. Linearity and Nonparallelism
Three human serum samples containing the levels of endogenous ferritin shown below were diluted as indicated using Calibrator A (0 ng/mL) and assayed in duplicate. All concentrations are in ng/mL.
368184.1
{4}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
| SAMPLE ID | DILUTION FACTOR | OBSERVED (ng/mL) | FERRITIN EXPECTED (ng/mL) | RECOVERY (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A | Undiluted | 160.1 | --- | --- |
| | 1:2 | 77.3 | 80 | 96.6 |
| | 1:4 | 47.4 | 40 | 118.5 |
| | 1:8 | 23.9 | 20 | 119.5 |
| B | Undiluted | 294.1 | --- | --- |
| | 1:2 | 160.9 | 147 | 109.5 |
| | 1:4 | 84.4 | 74 | 114.1 |
| | 1:8 | 45.1 | 27 | 121.9 |
| C | Undiluted | 878 | --- | --- |
| | 1:2 | 383.0 | 439 | 87.2 |
| | 1:4 | 189.6 | 219.5 | 86.4 |
| | 1:8 | 101.4 | 109.8 | 92.3 |
## 7. Spike and Recovery
Three normal human serum samples were diluted with 120 ng/mL human spleen ferritin (WHO 2nd IS 80/578). The spiked samples were assayed using the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay. All values are in ng/mL.
| Sample | Unspiked (ng/mL) | Spike Recovered (ng/mL) | Spiked Expected (ng/mL) | % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1260 | 595 | 690 | 86 |
| 2 | 58 | 90 | 90 | 100 |
| 3 | 406 | 221 | 263 | 84 |
## 8. Recovery in Serum and Plasma
Blood samples from 6 normal subjects were prepared as sera (standard tubes) as well as EDTA plasma. Ferritin was quantified using the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay. Recovered ferritin was compared with the ferritin recovered in serum (standard technique). The data demonstrate that there are no significant differences among serum and EDTA plasma when using the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay.
368184.1
{5}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
| Sample | Serum (ng/mL) | EDTA (ng/ml) | % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 63.9 | 62.0 | 97 |
| 2 | 44.1 | 38.7 | 88 |
| 3 | 62.8 | 53.6 | 85 |
| 4 | 109.6 | 110.9 | 101 |
| 5 | 105.2 | 108.8 | 103 |
| 6 | 63.3 | 62.6 | 99 |
## 9. Effect of Common Interferents
Pooled normal human serum was spiked with preparations of hemoglobin, bilirubin, and triglycerides to the levels shown below. Ferritin was quantified using the AquaLite® Ferritin assay. Recovered ferritin was compared to the ferritin recovered in normal serum. The data demonstrate that the AquaLite® Ferritin assay is not significantly affected by hemoglobin, bilirubin, or triglycerides at the levels tested.
| Analyte | Observed | Expected | % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hgb at 500 mg/dL | 113.3 | 115.6 | 98 |
| Bilirbn at 20 mg/dL | 114.2 | 115.6 | 90 |
| Trig at 3000 mg/dL | 116.2 | 128.9 | 99 |
## V. POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THE DEVICE ON HEALTH
Caution: Use Universal Precautions. No known test method can offer complete assurance that products derived from human serum are pathogen-free; therefore, handle all materials of human origin as though they were potentially infectious.
Sodium azide is used as a preservative. This preservative may react with metallic plumbing to from explosive metal azides. Flush with large volumes of water when disposing of materials containing sodium azide.
368184.1
{6}
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
As an *in vitro* diagnostic test, there are not direct adverse effects on the health of a patient from the use of this product. However, failure of the device to perform as indicated, the contamination of reagents, the use of reagents past the labeled expiration dates, the use of improper specimens, or human error during the performance of the test may lead to erroneous results and possible improper patient management.
## VI. CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM STUDIES
The data from the studies conducted demonstrate that the performance of SeaLite Sciences, Inc. AquaLite® Ferritin Assay is similar and substantially equivalent to that of other commercially available assays for ferritin.
368184.1
D-7
{7}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville MD 20850
Cathryn C. Cambria
Director, Regulatory Affairs & Quality Assurance
SeaLite Sciences, Inc.
3000 Northwoods Parkway
Suite 200
Norcross, GA 30071
JUN 24 1997
Re: K970612/S001
Trade Name: SeaLite Sciences, Inc. AquaLite® Ferritin Assay
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: DBF
Dated: May 08, 1997
Received: May 12, 1997
Dear Ms. Cambria:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practice for Medical Devices: General (GMP) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal Laws or Regulations.
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
{8}
Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A.
Director
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): ___________
Device Name: AquaLite® Ferritin Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or the AquaLite® Ferritin Assay)
Indications for Use:
The AquaLite® Ferritin Bioluminescent Immunoassay (BIA) Kit (or AquaLite® Ferritin Assay) is an *in vitro* diagnostic product intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative measurement of ferritin in human serum and plasma. Ferritin measurements are used in the diagnosis of diseases affecting iron metabolism.

(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number ___________
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use ☑ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use ☐ (Optional Format 1-2-96)
368184.1
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.