A1-A,ABP,B,MBP, LEAD CONNECTORS; PEH ADAPTER SLEEVE
K970388 · Biotronik, Inc. · DTD · Aug 14, 1997 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K970388
Device Name
A1-A,ABP,B,MBP, LEAD CONNECTORS; PEH ADAPTER SLEEVE
Applicant
Biotronik, Inc.
Product Code
DTD · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Aug 14, 1997
Decision
PT
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.3620
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K970388 · Aug 14, 1997
A1-A,ABP,B,MBP, LEAD CONNECTORS; PEH ADAPTER SLEEVE
Biotronik, Inc.
Published clinical literature; Postmarket adverse event reports
A literature search was conducted to identify adverse safety and effectiveness data for lead adapters. The findings were used to characterize the safety profile of the device class and compare it against the sponsor's design.
Literature review; Adverse events; Safety profile
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Literature search for adverse safety and effectiveness data; Literature review
Patients implanted with lead adapters; Number of Sites: Not applicable
Not applicable for this study
Adverse safety and effectiveness data, device recalls, and failure modes (e.g., loose connections, wire/insulator breakage, erosion)
Indications for Use
Lead adapters, including silicone adapter sleeves, when used in conjunction with their accessories, provide a means of securely connecting pace/sense leads with otherwise mechanically incompatible pacemaker devices.
Device Story
A1 Series Lead Adapters and PEH Adapter Sleeves are chronically implantable accessories used to bridge mechanical incompatibility between cardiac leads and pacemaker devices. The device set consists of lead connector receptacles and sleeves that physically interface with lead connectors and pacemaker ports. Operation involves manual connection of leads into the adapter, which is then secured to the pacemaker; the adapter ensures electrical continuity and mechanical stability. Used in clinical settings by physicians during pacemaker implantation or lead revision procedures. Benefits include enabling the use of existing leads with new or different pacemaker models, avoiding unnecessary lead extraction. The device is passive, relying on material biocompatibility and mechanical design to maintain connection integrity.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included IS-1 connector seal integrity, lead receptacle seal integrity, 500-hour and 2000-hour in-vitro tests, insertion/extraction forces, connector port stop force, flex testing, set screw clamp-down deformation, tensile strength of welded connections, destructive pressure testing of silicone tubing, and ligature binding tests. No clinical trial data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Titanium alloy (Ti4) set screws, Silopren LSR-4070 silicone, NuSil MED 1137 adhesive, PETG packaging. Passive mechanical interface. Dimensions vary by model (e.g., 3.2mm, 5mm, 6mm connectors). Sterilization: Validated process. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring connection of pace/sense leads to mechanically incompatible pacemaker devices.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A pacemaker lead adaptor is a device used to adapt a pacemaker lead so that it can be connected to a pacemaker pulse generator produced by a different manufacturer.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance for the Submission of Research and Marketing Applications for Permanent Pacemaker Leads and for Pacemaker Lead Adaptor 510(k) Submissions.”
{0}
AUG 14 1997
K970388
A1 Series Lead Adapters - 510(k)
## 1.2 Safety and Effectiveness Summary
BIOTRONIK A1 Series Lead Adapters and the PEH Adapter Sleeve are designed to be chronically implantable, safe and effective through design functionality, simplicity and material biocompatibility. Both devices were cleared for distribution pursuant to FDA review of the 1990 510(k).
For A1 Series Lead Adapters, the following changes are proposed:
- a titanium alloy (Ti4) will be used for the manufacture of the device set screw;
- the silicone of the lead connector receptacles and connectors will change from DOW Corning HTV silicones to Silopren LSR-4070;
- NuSil MED 1137 will be used as a silicone tube adhesive;
- slight design improvements and modifications related to the above described silicone material changes;
- blister packaging material will change from XT Polymer to PETG;
- the catalog number will change.
For the PEH Adapter Sleeve, the following changes are proposed:
- the main silicone-based MOC will change from DOW Corning HTV silicones to Silopren LSR-4070;
- the catalog number will change.
The proposed changes in PEH Adapter Sleeves and A1 Series Lead Adapters as described above will not adversely affect the overall safety and effectiveness of these devices.
Lead adapters undergo extensive testing and repeated inspections during device manufacturing, packaging and sterilization procedures.
A1 Series Lead Adapters are tested for
- IS-1 connector seal integrity testing,
- lead receptacle seal integrity testing,
- 500-hour and 2000-hour in-vitro tests,
- insertion/extraction forces of the IS-1 connector
- insertion/extraction forces of the lead connector(s) within the adapter’s receptacle(s),
- connector port stop force,
- flex testing of the receptacle connection,
- device handling,
- deformation testing of the IS-1 connector upon set screw clamp-down,
- strength of the connector/receptacle connection,
- abrasion testing,
- tensile strength and micrographic examination of welded connections,
- destructive pressure testing of silicone tubing,
BIOTRONIK, January 31, 1997
{1}
A1 Series Lead Adapters - 510(k)
- ability of lead receptacle to withstand binding by ligature,
- ability of device to withstand temperature change during shipping, and
- various dimensional and visual inspections during device manufacture.
PEH Adapter Sleeves are tested for
- seal integrity testing,
- device handling,
- 500-hour and 2000-hour in-vitro tests,
- ability of device to withstand temperature change during shipping, and
- various dimensional and visual inspections during device manufacture.
Packaging and transportation durability as well as sterilization validation have been performed to ensure the quality and sterility of the delivered product. No changes to PEH packaging are proposed within the present 510(k) submittal. A1 packaging will change in that the material from which the packaging blisters are manufactured will change.
All production and biocompatibility test results were within specifications; therefore, when the currently proposed A1 Series Lead Connectors and PEH Adapter Sleeves are in use, the patient will be exposed to no risks in excess of those experienced by patients using comparable competitor adapters manufactured and distributed in the United States, or previous model BIOTRONIK adapters.
Possible side effects of lead adapter implantation include, but are not limited to, body rejection phenomena, thrombosis, muscle and nerve stimulation, infection and erosion through skin. BIOTRONIK is not aware of any other adverse safety and effectiveness data on these accessories.
In accordance with the Safe Medical Device Act of 1990, a thorough literature search for adverse safety and effectiveness data on lead adapters and adapter sleeves was performed. The search yielded several articles related to the safety of lead adapters, as well as information on device recalls. Lead adapters are safe and effective devices, when used in a manner consistent with manufacturer recommendations. The majority of adapter failures presented in the literature resulted from a loose device/adapter or adapter/lead connection. Some cases of wire or insulator breakage were reported, as were some instances where the adapter set screw, even when used in a manner consistent with manufacturer instructions, protruded from the side of the adapter, abrading and eroding the silicone insulation of both the adapter and the pacemaker device.
BIOTRONIK lead adapters are designed in a manner which avoids many of the aforementioned problems. Worldwide, there have been no voluntary or required recalls of the A1 Series Lead Adapters or PEH Adapter Sleeve. The only adverse event related to use of A1 Series Lead Adapters or PEH Adapter Sleeves worldwide occurred in September, 1996, and was related to the use of an A1-A lead adapter within the United States. In this instance a gradual deterioration in unipolar impedance following adapter implant was reported; this was remedied by removal of the adapter. An insulation break involving the adapter was suspected, but the observed impedance changes also could have resulted from the adapter set screw not being covered with medical adhesive at time of initial adapter implant. No record of a detailed structural examination of the
BIOTRONIK, January 31, 1997
9
{2}
A1 Series Lead Adapters - 510(k)
explanted device was provided to BIOTRONIK, nor was BIOTRONIK provided the opportunity to examine the explanted device.
## 1.3 Previous 510(k) Submittals
In a letter dated August 23, 1990 (#K902889), FDA provided notification it had determined the A1 Series Lead Adapters and PEH Adapter Sleeves were Class III devices substantially equivalent to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976.
The following devices were submitted within the 1990 510(k):
A1-A: adapts one 5 mm unipolar connector to fit IS-1 connector receptacle
A1-B: adapts one 6 mm unipolar connector to fit IS-1 connector receptacle
A1-ABP: adapts two 5 mm unipolar connectors to fit IS-1 connector receptacle
A1-MBP: adapts one 3.2 mm “in line” bipolar connector to fit IS-1 connector receptacle; or, adapts one 3.2 mm unipolar connector to fit IS-1 connector receptacle.
A1-Z: adapts one unipolar connector without a connector to fit IS-1 connector receptacle
A6-A: adapts one unipolar connector without a connector to fit 5 mm unipolar connector receptacle
A6-B: adapts one unipolar connector without a connector to fit 6 mm unipolar connector receptacle
PEH Sleeve: adapts one unipolar lead with 5 mm connector to fit 6 mm connector receptacle.
**Note: the A1-Z, A6-A and A6-B adapters are no longer distributed by BIOTRONIK within the United States.
BIOTRONIK, January 31, 1997
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
9200 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville MD 20856
Mr. Kenneth Jensen
Regulatory Affairs
Biotronik, Inc.
6024 Jean Road
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035-5369
Re: K970388
A1-A, A1-B, A1-ABP, A1-MBP Adapters and PEH Adapter Sleeve
Regulatory Class: III (three)
Product Code: 74 DTD
Dated: May 29, 1997
Received: June 2, 1997
Dear Mr. Jensen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (act). The general controls provisions of the act include requirements for registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practices, and labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval) it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, FDA will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may publish further announcements
{4}
Page 2 - Mr. Kenneth Jensen
concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under section 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulation.
Under Section 522(a) of the act, manufacturers of certain types of devices identified by the Act or designated by FDA are required to conduct postmarket surveillance studies. FDA has identified under Section 522(a)(1)(A) the device cleared for marketing by this letter as requiring postmarket surveillance.
Within thirty (30) days of first introduction or delivery for introduction of this device into interstate commerce you are required to submit to FDA certification of the date of introduction into interstate commerce, a detailed protocol which describes the postmarket surveillance study, and a detailed profile of the study's principal investigator that clearly establishes the qualifications and experience of the individual to conduct the proposed study. For your information, general guidance on preparing a protocol for a postmarket surveillance study is attached.
Submit five (5) copies to:
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Postmarket Surveillance Studies Document Center
Room 3083 (HFZ-544)
1350 Piccard Drive
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Within sixty (60) days of receipt of your protocol, FDA will either approve or disapprove it and notify you of the Agency's action in writing. You should not begin your postmarket surveillance study of this device until the protocol has been approved. Data generated under an unapproved protocol may not satisfy your obligation under section 522. Please note that you must continue to collect and report data needed to maintain compliance with Medical Device Reporting regulations (21 CFR 803).
Failure to certify accurately the date of initial introduction of your device into interstate commerce, to submit timely an acceptable protocol, or to undertake and complete and FDA approved postmarket surveillance study consistent with the protocol will be considered violations of section 522. In accordance with the Medical Device
{5}
Page 3 - Mr. Kenneth Jensen
Amendments of 1992, failure of a manufacturer to meet its obligations under section 522 is a prohibited act under section 301(q)(1)(C) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 331 (q)(1)(C)). Further, under section 502(t)(3) of the act (21 U.S.C. 352(t)(3)), a device is misbranded if there is a failure or refusal to comply with any requirement under section 522 of the act. Violations of sections 301 or 502 may lead to regulatory actions including seizure of your product, injunction, prosecution, or civil money penalties.
If you have questions specifically concerning postmarket surveillance study requirements, contact the Postmarket Surveillance Studies Branch at (301) 594-0639.
In addition, on August 16, 1993, the Final Rule for Device Tracking was published in the Federal Register, pages 43442-43455 (copy enclosed). Be advised that under Section 519(e) of the Act as amended by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, FDA has identified the above device as a device which requires tracking. Because the device is subject to tracking, you are required to adopt a method of tracking that follows the devices through the distribution chain and then identifies and follows the patients who receive them. The specific requirement of the regulation are found in 21 CFR 821 as described in the August 16, 1993 Federal Register beginning on page 43447.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its
{6}
Page 4 - Mr. Kenneth Jensen
toll free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,

Thomas J. Callahan, Ph.D.
Director
Division of Cardiovascular,
Respiratory, and Neurological Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Enclosures
{7}
A1 Series Lead Adapters - 510(k)
## 1.1.1 INDICATIONS FOR USE
Lead adapters, including silicone adapter sleeves, when used in conjunction with their accessories, provide a means of securely connecting pace/sense leads with otherwise mechanically incompatible pacemaker devices.
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K970355
BIOTRONIK, January 31, 1997 5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.