K970302 · Perimmune, Inc. · DFC · Nov 10, 1997 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K970302
Device Name
APO-TEK LP(A)
Applicant
Perimmune, Inc.
Product Code
DFC · Immunology
Decision Date
Nov 10, 1997
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5600
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K970302 · Nov 10, 1997
APO-TEK LP(A)
Perimmune, Inc.
Clinical evaluations (retrospective); Cross-sectional cohort study of a U.S. population
The sponsor used retrospective clinical evaluations and a cross-sectional cohort study to demonstrate that elevated Lp(a) levels, measured by the device, are associated with increased odds of myocardial infarction, coronary artery stenosis, and cerebrovascular disease, supporting the device's clinical utility.
Clinical evaluations of Apo-Tek Lp(a); Retrospective clinical evaluations
Patients assessed for cardiovascular disease
Not applicable for this study
Odds of myocardial infarction, coronary artery stenosis, and cerebrovascular disease based on Lp(a) levels
U.S. cross-sectional cohort study; Cross-sectional cohort study
Well characterized U.S. population
Not applicable for this study
Odds of carotid artery disease and coronary heart disease based on Lp(a) levels
Indications for Use
Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is an Apo(a) isoform independent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the quantitative determination of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in human serum and plasma. The measurement of Lp(a), in conjunction with other lipoprotein tests, is of diagnostic significance when assessing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in specific populations.
Device Story
Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is an in vitro diagnostic ELISA for quantitative measurement of Lp(a) in human serum or plasma. Device utilizes sandwich ELISA format: Lp(a) particles captured by anti-Apo(a) monoclonal antibody on solid phase; detected via peroxidase-conjugated anti-Apo B polyclonal antibody. Assay is Apo(a) isoform independent, preventing underestimation of Lp(a) in patients with low molecular weight isoforms. Used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Output is quantitative Lp(a) concentration. Clinicians use results alongside other lipid markers (Apo B, LDL cholesterol) to assess risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease and carotid artery stenosis. Elevated Lp(a) levels correlate with increased odds of myocardial infarction and arterial stenosis; combined use with other lipid markers enhances diagnostic significance.
Clinical Evidence
Evidence includes prospective and retrospective studies, plus a cross-sectional cohort study of a U.S. population. Studies demonstrate elevated Lp(a) (>20 mg/dL) independently increases odds of myocardial infarction (2.88-fold), coronary artery stenosis (2.88-fold), cerebrovascular disease (20.3-fold), and carotid artery stenosis (27.6-fold). Combined measurement with Apo B or LDL cholesterol further increases odds ratios for these conditions. Assay performance: total CV 6.4%–12.8%; sensitivity/linearity confirmed across five phenotypes (r ≥ 0.997); no cross-reactivity with plasminogen, LDL, or VLDL.
Technological Characteristics
Sandwich ELISA format; solid-phase capture with anti-Apo(a) monoclonal antibody; detection with peroxidase-conjugated anti-Apo B polyclonal antibody. Quantitative measurement of Lp(a) in human serum/plasma. Isoform independent. Performance metrics: minimum detectable level 0.3 mg/dL. No cross-reactivity with plasminogen, LDL, or VLDL. Reproducibility per NCCLS EP5-T2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in human serum and plasma to aid in the assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in conjunction with other lipoprotein tests.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A low-density lipoprotein immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the low-density lipoprotein in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of low-density lipoprotein in serum may aid in the diagnosis of disorders of lipid (fat) metabolism and help to identify young persons at risk from cardiovascular diseases.
Atlantic Antibodies SPQ™ Test System for Apolipoprotein B (K870564)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
PerImmune, Inc.
NOV 10 1997
# 510(k) Summary
## 1. General Information
Date Prepared: January 24, 1997
*K970302*
Submittor: PerImmune, Inc.
1330 Piccard Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-4396
FDA Establishment Registration Number: 1119752
Contact Person: Peter Manilla, MSc.
Regulatory Affairs Administrator
PerImmune, Inc.
1330 Piccard Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-4396
301-258-5200, extension 1088
301-977-3229 (fax)
## 2. Device Name
Classification Name: Lipoprotein Immunological Test System
Common or Usual Name: Lipoprotein(a) ELISA
Trade or Proprietary Name: Apo-Tek Lp(a)™
## 3. Identification of Predicate or Legally Marketed Device(s)
Devices similar to Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ for the determination of lipoproteins have been classified into class II under Section 513(b) of the FD & C Act and under Title 21 of the Federal Code of Regulations, Part 866.5600 (21 CFR 866.5600). Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is similar in design and function to the Roche Reagent for Apolipoprotein B manufactured by Roche Diagnostics, which was the subject of a Premarket Notification #K910552, and the SPQ™ Test System for Apolipoprotein B manufactured by Atlantic Antibodies, which was the subject of Premarket Notification #K870564
1330 Piccard Drive • Rockville, MD 20850-4396 • Tel. (301) 258-5200 • Fax (301) 840-2161
{1}
2
# 4. Summary
Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is an apolipoprotein(a) [Apo(a)] isoform independent *in vitro* diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) intended for the quantitative assessment of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in human serum or plasma. The measurement of Lp(a) in conjunction with other diagnostic tests for atherosclerosis is of diagnostic significance when assessing cardiovascular disease. This test utilizes a sandwich ELISA format in which the Lp(a) particle is captured with a specific anti-Apo(a) monoclonal antibody and, after washing away nonbound serum or plasma components, is detected with a peroxidase conjugated anti-apolipoprotein B [Apo B] polyclonal antibody. This format is designed such that plasma or serum Lp(a) concentrations are accurately quantified regardless of Apo(a) isoform. Apo(a) isoform independence is an important consideration when measuring Lp(a) levels because Apo(a) isoform dependent assays tend to underestimate concentrations of individuals with low molecular weight isoforms who have elevated Lp(a) concentrations. These false negative results lead to potential misclassification of individuals at increased risk of atherosclerotic disease.
A number of clinical methods and *in vitro* diagnostic products for the determination of Apo B containing lipoprotein particles are currently in use to diagnose cardiovascular disease. Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ determines Lp(a) concentrations, a subset of Apo B containing lipoprotein particles, by capturing Lp(a) on a solid phase through its Apo(a) moiety and quantifying its Apo B moiety. Both the Roche Reagent for Apolipoprotein B and the Atlantic Antibodies SPQ™ Test System for Apolipoprotein B determine concentrations of all Apo B containing lipoproteins including Lp(a). Substantial equivalence was shown to these lipoprotein test systems (21 CFR 866.5600) for the measurement of Apo B containing lipoproteins in human serum or plasma. Specifically, Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ has equivalent clinical utility to Roche’s Reagent for Apolipoprotein B in identifying individuals with cardiovascular disease. The relationship between Lp(a) measurement and measurement of all Apo B-containing lipoprotein particles was confirmed using the Atlantic Antibodies SPQ™ Test System for Apolipoprotein B.
Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ shows no cross-reactivity with plasminogen up to 1 g/L, a protein structurally similar to Apo(a). This assay also shows no cross-reactivity with the Apo B-containing lipoprotein particles, low density lipoproteins (LDL) up to 10 g/L LDL protein or very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) up to 2 g/L VLDL protein. Triglycerides up to 8.9 g/L, hemoglobin up to 5 g/L, and bilirubin up to 0.05 g/L do not interfere with the test. The minimum Lp(a) level distinguishable from the 0 mg/dL (0 nmol/L) Calibrator is 0.3 mg/dL (0.72 nmol/L). Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is highly reproducible with total (combined intra- and interassay) coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 6.4% to 12.8% for samples ranging from 8.8 to 34.8 mg/dL (as determined by NCCLS document EP5-T2). Apo(a) phenotype heterogeneity does not affect assay linearity as indicated by a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.997 or better obtained for five different phenotypes
{2}
(spanning the entire range of molecular weights) tested.
Numerous prospective and retrospective studies have shown the strong association of elevated Lp(a) levels with atherosclerosis as manifested by cardiovascular disease (i.e., coronary heart disease and carotid artery disease). Two clinical evaluations of Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ have shown that Lp(a) levels >20 mg/dL independently increased the odds to have had: a myocardial infarction by 2.88-fold, >50% stenosis of at least one coronary artery by 2.88-fold, cerebrovascular disease by 20.3-fold, and carotid artery stenosis (≥20%) by 27.6-fold. These findings were confirmed in a cross-sectional cohort study of a well characterized U.S. population. Specifically, a 1.55-fold increased odds to have had carotid artery disease (≥50% stenosis) and a 1.5-fold increased odds to have had coronary heart disease were observed in the latter study when Lp(a) levels exceeded 20 mg/dL.
These studies also showed that odds ratios increased when Lp(a) measurement was used in conjunction with the measurement of Apo B or LDL cholesterol. Specifically, at elevated Lp(a) and Apo B levels (>20 mg/dL and >178 mg/dL, respectively), the odds of having had a myocardial infarction increased from 2.88 to 3.86 while the odds of having had >50% stenosis of at least one coronary artery increased from 2.88 to 3.52. When both Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol levels were elevated (defined as >20 mg/dL and >130 mg/dL, respectively), the odds of having had ischemic cerebrovascular disease increased from 20.3 to 21.9. These findings were confirmed in a U.S. study, which showed that when both Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol levels were elevated, the odds increased from 1.5 to 1.61 to have had coronary heart disease and from 1.65 to 2.29 to have had carotid artery stenosis (≥50%). Therefore, Lp(a) measurement, in conjunction with measurement of Apo B or LDL cholesterol, is of even greater diagnostic significance when assessing cardiovascular disease (i.e., coronary heart disease or carotid artery stenosis) than any single lipid analyte, thus supporting the indications for the use of this device.
In summary, Lp(a) is an important, independent marker of atherosclerosis, a systemic disease, manifested by cardiovascular disease (which includes coronary heart disease and carotid artery stenosis). Measurement of Lp(a) plasma or serum levels by Apo-Tek Lp(a)™, an Apo(a) isoform independent ELISA, provides the clinician with a valuable aid in assessing atherosclerotic disease and its manifestations when used in conjunction with other diagnostic tests for this disease.
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
2098 Gaither Road
Rockville MD 20850
NOV 10 1997
Peter Manilla, MSc.
Regulatory Affairs Administrator
PerImmune, Inc.
1330 Piccard Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-4396
Re: K970302
Trade Name: Apo-Tek Lp(a)™
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: DFC
Dated: July 22, 1997
Received: August 20, 1997
Dear Mr. Manilla:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal Laws or Regulations.
{4}
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for *in vitro* diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A.
Director
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}
000007
Page 1 of 1
K970302
510(k) Number (if known): Apo-Tek Lp(a)™
Device Name:
## Indications For Use:
Apo-Tek Lp(a)™ is an Apo(a) isoform independent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the quantitative determination of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in human serum and plasma. The measurement of Lp(a), in conjunction with other lipoprotein tests, is of diagnostic significance when assessing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in specific populations.

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use ☑ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use ☐ (Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.