MUELLER HINTON II BROTH (CATION-ADJUSTED) WITH LYSED HORSE BLOOD
K963036 · Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems · JTZ · Oct 7, 1996 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K963036
Device Name
MUELLER HINTON II BROTH (CATION-ADJUSTED) WITH LYSED HORSE BLOOD
Applicant
Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems
Product Code
JTZ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Oct 7, 1996
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1700
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood (MHLHB) is intended for use in broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with 11 antimicrobial agents; i.e., cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin, according to the protocol described in the Approved Standard M7-A3, "Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically - Third Edition", dated 12/93, published by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).
Device Story
Device is a specialized culture medium (Mueller Hinton II Broth with lysed horse blood) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of fastidious Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clinical laboratory technicians perform broth dilution AST by inoculating serial dilutions of antimicrobial agents in the medium. Following incubation, technicians observe turbidity or pellets to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Quantitative MIC results allow clinicians to correlate in vitro drug inhibition with achievable patient drug concentrations in blood, urine, CSF, or bile, aiding in effective antimicrobial therapy selection. The medium supports growth of S. pneumoniae, which otherwise fails in standard cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Quality control testing using S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (n=220) showed 100% of MICs within expected NCCLS ranges. Reproducibility studies at two field sites using 10 strains (ATCC 49619 plus 9 well-characterized isolates) demonstrated 100% essential agreement for 9/11 antimicrobics, 99% for tetracycline, and 98% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole compared to NCCLS reference methods.
Technological Characteristics
Cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth supplemented with 2-5% lysed horse blood. Liquid medium form factor. Designed for use in standard broth dilution AST protocols (macrodilution or microtiter trays).
Indications for Use
Indicated for clinical laboratory use to determine susceptibility, intermediate, or resistance of pure culture Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates to 11 specific antimicrobial agents (cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin) using broth dilution methods.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A culture medium for antimicrobial susceptibility tests is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of any medium capable of supporting the growth of many of the bacterial pathogens that are subject to antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The medium should be free of components known to be antagonistic to the common agents for which susceptibility tests are performed in the treatment of disease.
Predicate Devices
AB Biodisk Etest® for Susceptibility Testing of Pneumococci (K913459)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
August 2, 1996
# SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
SUBMITTED BY:
Virginia C. Weinknecht
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems
250 Schilling Circle
Cockeysville, MD 21030-0243
K963036
OCT - 7 1996
## NAME OF DEVICE:
Trade Name: Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood
Catalog Number 4320500
Common Name/Description: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Culture Medium
Classification Name: Culture Medium for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests
## PREDICATE DEVICE:
AB Biodisk Etest® for Susceptibility Testing of Pneumococci (K913459)
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
**INTENDED USE:** Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood (MHLHB) is intended for use in broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing of *Streptococcus pneumoniae* with 11 antimicrobial agents; i.e., cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin, according to the protocol described in the Approved Standard M7-A3, "Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically - Third Edition", dated 12/93, published by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).
**INDICATIONS FOR USE:** Use of BBL® Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood is indicated when *Streptococcus pneumoniae* has been isolated in pure culture in the clinical laboratory, and a
C-1
{1}
determination is desired as to whether the organism is susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to selected antimicrobial agents. In cases such as these, broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing may be performed on BBL® Mueller Hinton II Broth (Cation-Adjusted) with Lysed Horse Blood, using cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftrixone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin.
## PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
The development of laboratory tests to determine the activity of antimicrobial agents has paralleled the development of these agents. Fleming used a serial dilution technique to measure the lowest concentration of penicillin that prevented growth of a test organisms in broth. Ericsson and Sherris have published an excellent review of the various methods for susceptibility testing and the relationship of dilution and diffusion methods.
Broth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) are performed by inoculating serial dilutions (usually 2-fold) of the drug in a suitable liquid medium. The test may be performed in tubes (macrodilution), usually in 1.0 ml volumes, or in microtiter trays in volumes of 0.05 to 0.1 ml. Following incubation, the tubes or wells are examined for the presence of growth (turbidity or pellet). The lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent at which no visible growth occurs is defined as the minimal inhibitory concentration, or MIC.
The rationale for an MIC susceptibility test rather than the disc diffusion test is that it gives quantitative information. It allows the clinician to correlate the amount of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the growth of an organism in vitro and the achievable concentrations in the blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid or bile. Effective antimicrobial therapy, however, also depends on other factors.
Broth dilution ASTs are usually performed in cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB). However, this medium is not satisfactory for fastidious organisms such as S. pneumoniae. CAMHB supplemented with 2 to 5% lysed horse blood is the medium recommended for susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae.
Interpretive criteria for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae are provided in the NCCLS Standard, M7-A3. This document and NCCLS Informational Supplement M100-S6 should be consulted for further details.
C-2
{2}
C-3
# PERFORMANCE DATA:
Antimicrobial broth dilution susceptibility testing using the quality control strain recommended by NCCLS Document M7-A3, *Streptococcus pneumoniae* ATCC 49619, was performed in-house with cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Following the test procedures described in M7-A3, twenty tests with the quality control strain and microtitre panels containing the eleven antimicrobics were performed over a period of ten test days. For all eleven antimicrobics, 100% (220/220) of the MIC’s fell within the expected MIC ranges published in Table 3C of NCCLS Supplement M100-S6. The standard deviation for all antimicrobics was less than 1 µg/ml.
Reproducibility studies (3x/day for 3 days) were done at two field sites with the antimicrobics listed above against *S. pneumoniae* ATCC 49619 and nine (9) additional well-characterized *S. pneumoniae* strains. MIC interpretive standards from Table 2C of NCCLS Supplement M100-S6 were followed for each antimicrobic. Testing with cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, imipenem, penicillin, and vancomycin resulted in 100% Essential Agreement with the NCCLS reference method. Testing with tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resulted in 99% and 98% Essential Agreement respectively with the reference method.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.