MBI FIBEROPTIC ENDO-ILLUMINATOR

K961036 · M.B. Industries, Inc. · MPA · Jul 15, 1996 · Gastroenterology, Urology

Device Facts

Record IDK961036
Device NameMBI FIBEROPTIC ENDO-ILLUMINATOR
ApplicantM.B. Industries, Inc.
Product CodeMPA · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision DateJul 15, 1996
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 876.1500
Device ClassClass 2

Indications for Use

illumination of the operating field during ophthalmic surgery

Device Story

MBI Fiberoptic Endo-Illuminator; single-use, sterile fiber-optic device for ophthalmic surgery. Input: light from external source. Operation: light transmitted through plastic fiber-optic filament enclosed in 20 ga. stainless steel tube; distal end emits light to illuminate surgical field. Used in OR by ophthalmic surgeons. Output: localized illumination of eye interior. Benefits: provides necessary visibility for surgeon during intraocular procedures. Device is identical to predicate; manufacturing processes and materials unchanged.

Clinical Evidence

Bench testing only. Sterility assurance level 10^-6 confirmed via ethylene oxide gas sterilization process; residual levels (EO 250 PPM, ECH 250 PPM, EG 5000 PPM) verified. Sterility confirmed by culturing spore strips.

Technological Characteristics

20 ga. stainless steel tube; plastic fiber-optic filament; proximal end plug, sheathing, and grasping point made of plastic with white colorant (non-patient contact). Sterilization: ethylene oxide gas; packaging: Tyvek/plastic envelope. Standalone device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for illumination of the operating field during ophthalmic surgery for patients undergoing such procedures.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An endoscope and accessories is a device used to provide access, illumination, and allow observation or manipulation of body cavities, hollow organs, and canals. The device consists of various rigid or flexible instruments that are inserted into body spaces and may include an optical system for conveying an image to the user's eye and their accessories may assist in gaining access or increase the versatility and augment the capabilities of the devices. Examples of devices that are within this generic type of device include cleaning accessories for endoscopes, photographic accessories for endoscopes, nonpowered anoscopes, binolcular attachments for endoscopes, pocket battery boxes, flexible or rigid choledochoscopes, colonoscopes, diagnostic cystoscopes, cystourethroscopes, enteroscopes, esophagogastroduodenoscopes, rigid esophagoscopes, fiberoptic illuminators for endoscopes, incandescent endoscope lamps, biliary pancreatoscopes, proctoscopes, resectoscopes, nephroscopes, sigmoidoscopes, ureteroscopes, urethroscopes, endomagnetic retrievers, cytology brushes for endoscopes, and lubricating jelly for transurethral surgical instruments. This section does not apply to endoscopes that have specialized uses in other medical specialty areas and that are covered by classification regulations in other parts of the device classification regulations.

Special Controls

*Classification* —(1)*Class II (special controls).* The device, when it is an endoscope disinfectant basin, which consists solely of a container that holds disinfectant and endoscopes and accessories; an endoscopic magnetic retriever intended for single use; sterile scissors for cystoscope intended for single use; a disposable, non-powered endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument intended for single use; a diagnostic incandescent light source; a fiberoptic photographic light source; a routine fiberoptic light source; an endoscopic sponge carrier; a xenon arc endoscope light source; an endoscope transformer; an LED light source; or a gastroenterology-urology endoscopic guidewire, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I for the photographic accessories for endoscope, miscellaneous bulb adapter for endoscope, binocular attachment for endoscope, eyepiece attachment for prescription lens, teaching attachment, inflation bulb, measuring device for panendoscope, photographic equipment for physiologic function monitor, special lens instrument for endoscope, smoke removal tube, rechargeable battery box, pocket battery box, bite block for endoscope, and cleaning brush for endoscope. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 876.9.

In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the integrated operating table-electromechanical surgical system is subject to the following special controls: 1. (1) Premarket clinical performance testing, or a combination of premarket clinical performance testing and postmarket surveillance (in accordance with special control (2)), must include the following: 1. (i) Objective performance measures (e.g., rate and number of conversions to other surgical modalities, rate of device related adverse events (including tissue injury, hematoma, and increased blood loss), and their severity, cause, and outcomes) must be reported with relevant descriptive comparator performance measures. 2. (ii) The data must demonstrate the performance of the device for providing accurate and precise control of attached surgical instruments in range of clinical conditions relevant to the device's intended use. 3. (iii) The test dataset must include data collected from a patient population representative of the intended patient population under anticipated conditions of use. 2. (2) Data obtained from postmarket surveillance must demonstrate, in consideration of the premarket data obtained in accordance with special control (1), that the device performs in accordance with special control (1), unless FDA determines, based on the totality of the premarket data, that data from postmarket surveillance is not required to demonstrate that the device performs as intended. Such postmarket surveillance must be conducted per a protocol determined appropriate by FDA to demonstrate that the device performs as intended (in consideration of the premarket data obtained in accordance with special control (1)), and must include initiation, enrollment, and reporting requirements to ensure timely periodic updates to FDA on post-market surveillance progress and outcomes. 3. (3) Animal performance testing must evaluate the extent of port site trauma due to repositioning of table during surgical procedures when utilizing robotic minimally invasive and laparoscopic approaches 4. (4) The device manufacturer must develop, and update as necessary, a device-specific use training program that ensures proper device setup/use/shutdown, accurate control of instruments to perform the intended surgical procedures, troubleshooting and handling during unexpected events or emergencies, and safe practices to mitigate use error. 5. (5) The device manufacturer may only distribute the device to facilities that implement and maintain the device-specific use training program and ensure that users of the device have completed the device-specific use training program. (6) Human factors assessment must demonstrate that the user can correctly use the device system across all intended use environments with the provided instructions and training materials, including patient access during normal operating conditions and emergency situations, and effects arising from the integrated nature of the operating table and robotic surgical arms. (7) Labeling must include: (i) A detailed summary of clinical performance testing conducted with the device, including study population, results, adverse events, and comparisons to any comparator groups identified; (ii) A statement in the labeling that the safety and effectiveness for the representative specific procedures was based on evaluation of the device as a surgical tool and did not include evaluation of outcomes related to the treatment of the patient's underlying disease or condition, unless FDA determines that it can be removed or modified based on clinical performance data submitted to FDA; (iii) Identification of compatible devices; (iv) The list of surgical procedures for which the device has been determined to be safe with clinical justification; (v) Reprocessing instructions for reusable components; (vi) A shelf life for any sterile components; (vii) A description of the device-specific use training program; (viii) A statement that the device is only for distribution to facilities that implement and maintain the device-specific use training program and ensure that users of the device have completed the device-specific use training program; and (ix) A summary of any completed postmarket surveillance data collected as required by special control (2), including updated labeling to accurately reflect outcomes observed in postmarket surveillance. (8) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and must include: (i) Device motion accuracy and repeatability; (ii) System testing; (iii) Instrument reliability; (iv) Crosstalk; (v) Table motion control; (vi) Thermal effects on tissue; (vii) User-device interface performance; (viii) Workspace access testing; and (ix) Performance testing with compatible devices. (9) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. (10) Electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, thermal, and mechanical safety testing must be performed. (11) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of all patient-contacting device components. (12) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device components provided sterile by demonstrating continued sterility and package integrity over the labeled shelf life. (13) Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions for the reusable components of the device. (14) Performance data must demonstrate that all patient-contacting components of the device are biocompatible. (15) Performance data must demonstrate that all patient-contacting components of the device are non-pyrogenic. (16) The device manufacturer must submit a report to the FDA annually on the anniversary of initial marketing authorization for the device, until such time as FDA may terminate such reporting, which comprises the following information: (i) Cumulative summary, by year, of complaints and adverse events since date of initial marketing authorization; and (ii) Identification and rationale for changes made to the device, labeling, or device specific use training program, which did not require submission of a premarket notification during the reporting period.

Predicate Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} MBI INC. JUL 15 1996 Innovators In Medical Device Design K961036 HOME OFFICE MANUFACTURING CO. William J. Buttermore President 14240 Reelfoot Lake Drive Chesterfield, MO 63017 (314) 576-5005 FAX (314) 576-5006 1707 Madison Avenue Granite City, IL 62040 (618) 451-2992 Document Mail Center (HFZ-401) March 8, 1996 Center for Devices and Radiological Health 510(k) Summary Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and CFR 807.92. The trade name of the device for which the determination of substantial equivalence is being sought is "MBI Fiberoptic Endo-Illuminator". The classification name of the device is Illuminator, Fiberoptic, Surgical Field. It is classified as Illuminator, Fiberoptic, Surgical Field - HBI Reg 878.4580. There are no standards applying to it. The device is identical to the Storz, MVS Disposable Fiberoptic Lightpipe marketed as a class II post-amendment device by Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. under 510(k) marketing clearance issued by FDA as document control number K854587. The MBI device has the same intended use (illumination of the operating field during ophthalmic surgery) and the same technological characteristics (materials used and methods of manufacture). The applicant has been functioning as a captive manufacturing site producing the predicate device for Storz and now intends to produce and sell to other customers the same device it has been manufacturing for Storz. Performance is identical to that of the predicate device. When in use during ophthalmic surgery, part of the device will come into contact with the eye of the patient. The distal end that will contact the patient is a 20 ga. stainless steel tube enclosing a plastic fiber-optic filament whose flat end surface will give off the light needed by the surgeon. All materials are identical to those used in the predicate device. Just as in the predicate device, except for three plastic constituents which have white color added, all components are natural with no colorants added. Those constituents having white color added are the proximal end plug that is inserted into the light source device which is away from the patient, the sheathing for the fiber-optic filament, and the surgeon's grasping point that holds the distal tube that is inserted into the patient's eye during surgery. The colorant is in the plastic material of which the components are made. No constituent to which colorant is added will come into contact with the patient. There are no changes from the color additives used in the predicate device. The device will be marketed as a single-use, sterile device. As with the predicate device, sterility will be obtained by packaging the device in a clean, sealed envelope having a clear plastic window as one side and gas-permeable non-woven plastic fabric (Tyvek) as the other side. In a process identical to that used for the predicate device, sealed envelopes containing the device will be sterilized by ethylene oxide gas which will penetrate the gas-permeable non-woven plastic fabric killing all pathogens on the device. Maximum residual levels of ethylene oxide, ethylene chlorohydrin, and ethylene glycol on the device are 250 PPM, 250 PPM, and 5000 PPM respectively. Successful sterilization will be confirmed by culturing spoor strips embedded in the lot to be sterilized. The device will meet sterility assurance level $10^{6}$. The constituents of the envelope are impenetrable by pathogens ensuring that sterility is maintained as long as package integrity is not compromised. The device is not considered non-pyrogenic. Wayne C. Mosher Chief Executive Officer
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...