TINTED OCU-FLEX 53 (OCCUFILCON B) SOFT HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS
K960291 · Ocu-Ease Optical Products, Inc. · LPL · Mar 25, 1996 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K960291
Device Name
TINTED OCU-FLEX 53 (OCCUFILCON B) SOFT HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS
Applicant
Ocu-Ease Optical Products, Inc.
Product Code
LPL · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
Mar 25, 1996
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.5925
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens is indicated for use as a daily wear soft contact lens. Lens configurations include spherical, toric and aspherical for non-diseased eyes.
Device Story
Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) is a soft hydrophilic contact lens for daily wear; available in spherical, toric, and aspherical configurations. This submission introduces a tinted version of the lens using Reactive Blue 21 dye. The device is intended for vision correction in non-diseased eyes. The tinting process does not alter the physical or optical properties of the lens, including refractive index, water content, linear swell, or oxygen permeability. The device is prescribed and fitted by eye care professionals. Patients wear the lenses daily to correct refractive errors. The tinted version provides cosmetic or handling benefits without compromising the established safety and performance profile of the predicate untinted lens.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparative analysis of physical and optical properties between tinted and untinted lenses (n=10 per group). Metrics included refractive index (1.4052 vs 1.4041), water content (53.11% vs 52.93%), linear swell (34.8 vs 34.41), and oxygen transmissibility (DK/L 7.7 vs 7.6). Results demonstrate no statistically significant adverse impact on lens performance due to the addition of Reactive Blue 21 dye.
Technological Characteristics
Material: ocufilcon B (poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) copolymer). Tinting agent: Reactive Blue 21. Properties: refractive index ~1.405, water content ~53%, oxygen permeability (DK) ~16.8 x 10^-11. Configurations: spherical, toric, aspherical. Sterilization: FDA-approved procedures. Connectivity: N/A.
Indications for Use
Indicated for daily wear of soft contact lenses in patients with non-diseased eyes requiring spherical, toric, or aspherical vision correction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A soft (hydrophilic) contact lens is a device intended to be worn directly against the cornea and adjacent limbal and scleral areas of the eye to correct vision conditions or act as a therapeutic bandage. The device is made of various polymer materials the main polymer molecules of which absorb or attract a certain volume (percentage) of water.
Predicate Devices
Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens (untinted)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
Ocu-Ease Optical Products, Inc.
629 Tennent Avenue
Pinole, CA 94564
(510) 724-0384
MAR 25 1996
K960291
# SUMMARY of SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
The name of the device, Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens is classified as a Class II device. It has been F.D.A. approved, see PMA P820051 an Amendments since March 7, 1984, and is indicated for use as a daily wear soft contact lens. Lens configurations include spherical, toric and aspherical for non-diseased eyes. The tinted version of the Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens is substantially equivalent to that of the untinted version as demonstrated in this submission. Manufacturing and sterilization procedures have not been changed from the F.D.A. approved procedures already in place. The dye used in the tinted version, Reactive Blue 21, is F.D.A. approved for use with poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) copolymers. No technological differences between the predicate device, Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens (untinted) and the Ocu-Flex-53 (ocufilcon B) Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens (tinted) were found. For example, all of the physical properties, such as refractive index, light transmission, water content, linear swell and oxygen permeability, are virtually identical for the untinted lens and the tinted version of the predicate device. As shown in the supporting attachments, there are no adverse effects on the physical or optical parameters of the Ocu-Flex-53 tinted lenses.
Overall, all of the performance data verify the substantial equivalence for the tinted and untinted version of the same lens.
Signed Charles R. Vermette, President
Date 2/6/96
{1}
Attachment
# Physical and Optical Properties of Tinted Versus Untinted Lenses
## Introduction
All physical, chemical and optical properties were determined at $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 1^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ except for oxygen transmissibility, which was measured at $35^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 2^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
## Color and Light Transmission
Color Index Code: Reactive Blue 21. Light transmittance was measured at various wavelengths in the visible region, i.e., from 350 to $700~\mu\mathrm{m}$. The minimum tint, or Visitint, showed a maximum transmittance of $97.2\%$ and a minimum transmission of $82.59\%$. The same untinted lens showed a maximum transmission of $96.9\%$ and a minimum transmission of $82.5\%$. Ocu-Flex-53 Lenses, tinted with the maximum intensity of dye showed a maximum transmission of light of $91.2\%$ and a minimum of $1.75\%$. See STS Final Report, Study No. GLP-1995-605, of 09/11/95 and STS Final Report, Study No. GLP-1995-324 of 06/08/95 for original data (Attachment 2).
These data suggest that low concentrations of Reactive Blue Dye 21, such as would be used in cosmetic tints, would have no adverse effect on light transmissibility but that the maximum intensity of dye should be avoided.
## Refractive Index
The refractive index of Ocu-Flex-53 Tinted Lenses (maximum intensity) is 1.4052 with a standard deviation 0.0009. The untinted version of the same lens has a refractive index of 1.4041, which is within the reproducibility of the measurement. Consequently tinting of Ocu-Flex-53 Contact Lenses with Reactive Blue 21, even at the maximum intensity does not affect the refractive index, see Attachment 3.
## Water Content
The average water content of ten (10) Ocu-Flex-53 Contact Lenses, Lot IR, is $52.93\%$ w. After tinting with maximum concentration of dye the average water content of the same 10 lenses is $53.11\%$ w. The increase of $0.34\%$ is well within the tolerance specifications of $\pm 1.0\%$ w. See Attachment 4.
## Linear Swell
The average linear swell of ten (10) Ocu-Flex-53 Contact Lenses, Lot IR, is 34.41. After tinting the same 10 lenses showed a linear swell of 34.8 or an increase of about $1.0\%$, which is well within the tolerance specification. See Attachment 4.
{2}
# Optical Properties
The optical properties of ten (10) untinted Ocu-Flex-53 lenses, lot IR, are considered to be excellent, except for Lens no. 1 which was rated only fair. After tinting the same ten (10) lenses were still rated excellent, except for lens #1, which was rated only fair before tinting. See Attachment 4. These results indicate the tinting with Reactive Dye 21 does not affect the excellent optical parameters of Ocu-Flex-53 Contact Lenses listed in Figure 3.
# Oxygen Permeability at 35°C
Oxygen Permeabilities at 35°C were calculated from their respective transmissibilities that, in turn, were measured with the aid of a Rehder Development Polarographic Cell and a Schema Versatae Polarographic Amplifier. To minimize the number of uncontrolled variables the permeability of the untinted lenses first was established. The lenses were then tinted and the permeabilities determined again on the same lenses.
Attachment 5 illustrates quite clearly that tinting does not detract from the excellent transmissibility of Ocu-Flex-53 Lenses. For example the untinted Ocu-Flex-53 Lens showed an average transmissibility (DK/L), at 35°C, of 7.6, with a standard deviation of 0.69. After tinting the average transmissibility (DK/L), at 35°C, was 7.7 with a standard deviation of 0.74. Similarly the average permeability of the untinted lenses at 35°C was calculated to be 16.7, with a standard deviation of 2.19 while the same lenses after tinting had an average permeability (DK × 10⁻¹¹) at 35°C, of 16.8 with a standard deviation of 2.00.
# Optical Parameters of Ocu-Flex-53 Tinted Lenses Figure 3
The optical parameters of Ocu-Flex-53 Tinted Lenses and their tolerances are the same as those specified for Ocu-Flex-53 untinted lenses, namely:
Refractive Power: +10.00 diopters to -10.00 diopters with a tolerance of ±0.25 diopters. For powers with more than ±10.00 diopters the tolerance is ±0.50 diopters.
Cylinder Power: for less than 2.00 diopters the tolerance is ±0.25 diopters. For more than 2.00 diopters the tolerance is ±0.5 diopters.
Cylinder Axis: tolerance of ±5° as stated on label.
Base Curve: measured in dry state, tolerance ±0.02mm.
{3}
Diameter: within ±0.15mm of stated value on label.
Center Thickness: within ±0.10mm of thickness stated on label.
Physical Appearance: attractive.
Color: very light turquoise (visitint) to darker turquoise.
Surface Quality: there must be no defects such as scratches, chips or gouges.
Edges: free of defects.
Optical Quality: lenses must contain no bubbles, waves or foreign bodies, when viewed under 10X magnification, or greater, with an illuminated background.
In summary, tinting of Ocu-Flex-53 Contact Lenses with Reactive Blue 21 Dye has no adverse effects on either the physical or optical properties, even at relatively high intensities of color. It is noted, however, that at the maximum tint level, 181 µg per lens, light transmittance is greatly reduced at the longer and shorter wavelengths of the visible region. At low, or Visitint levels, however, there is essentially no reduction in light transmittance.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.