K955380 · International Biophysics Corp. · DRY · May 14, 1996 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K955380
Device Name
IBC QUICK CELL COMPONENT (1/2, 3/8, 1/4)
Applicant
International Biophysics Corp.
Product Code
DRY · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
May 14, 1996
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.4330
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IBC Quick Cell component was developed for use with the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System manufactured by 3M. The IBC Quick Cell Component may be substituted for the CDI Kwik Cell Component in the construction of Extracorporeal Custom Tubing Packs either by the manufacturer of such packs or by the end user to modify his or her pack as needed.
Device Story
IBC Quick Cell is a blood gas flow-through connector used within the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System. It acts as a housing for photochemical sensors that measure pO2, pCO2, pH, and temperature in extracorporeal circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass. The device consists of a plastic housing, elastomer seals, and a semi-opaque membrane. It is integrated into tubing packs by manufacturers or clinicians. The system uses photochemical sensors to generate signals processed by the CDI Model 400 monitor. The monitor calculates O2 saturation and Base Excess/[HCO3] using internal algorithms and user-calibrated hemoglobin values. The device provides real-time data to perfusionists or surgeons to monitor patient blood gas status during surgery, aiding clinical decision-making regarding oxygenation and acid-base balance.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Functional evaluation compared IBC and CDI cells using a heart-lung console circuit with human blood. 100 data points were collected for pO2, pCO2, and pH. Results showed no significant difference between IBC and CDI components. Hemolysis testing (6-hour recirculation at 6 L/min) showed no detectable free hemoglobin. Assembly integrity and leak testing confirmed structural soundness. Materials met USP Plastic Class 6 requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polycarbonate housing, elastomer seals, semi-opaque microporous membrane (0.2 micron). Sensing: Photochemical sensors for pO2, pCO2, pH; thermo-electronic sensor for temperature. Connectivity: Flow-through connector for integration into extracorporeal tubing circuits. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide. Software: Embedded calculation programs in the CDI Model 400 monitor for O2 saturation and Base Excess/[HCO3].
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in extracorporeal circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures to facilitate on-line blood gas monitoring (pO2, pCO2, pH, and temperature) when used with the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cardiopulmonary bypass on-line blood gas monitor is a device used in conjunction with a blood gas sensor to measure the level of gases in the blood.
{0}
MAY 14 1996
K955380
510 (K) SUMMARY
International Biophysics Corporation
4020 So. Industrial Drive, Suite 160
Austin, Texas 78744
(512) 326-3244, (512) 326-3299 fax
Attn: H. David Shockley, jr., President
November 20, 1995
Trade Name: IBC Quick Cell Component (Catalog Numbers 4000, 4010 & 4020)
Common Name: Blood Gas Flow Through Connectors
Classification Name: Sensor, Monitor, Blood-Gas, On-Line, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Product Code: (74DRY)
C.F.R. Section: 870.4410
Equivalent Device: CDI Kwik Cell Component (Catalog Numbers 6720, 6730 & 6740)
## Introduction
The IBC Quick Cell component was developed for use with the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System manufactured by 3M. The final geometry of the IBC Quick Cell component is identical to the final geometry of the 3M Kwik Cell component, and both are fabricated from the same *plastic materials*. Performance of the IBC Quick Cell component within the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System is identical to the CDI Kwik Cell component. The materials were evaluated for toxicity and sterilization compatibility requirements as well as for function.
The CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System employs three photochemical sensors to measure pO₂, pCO₂ and pH. Additionally, there is a thermo-electronic sensor for the direct measurement of temperature. The Electronics also contain calculation programs which use the measured parameters to determine O₂ Saturation (Venous side only) and Base Excess/[HCO3] (Arterial side only). To complete the necessary calculations for these approximations, the Hemoglobin content is also required. This value is internally set at a Hematocrit of 25%. This value is corrected by the user during the initial and any subsequent on line recalibrations. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the equivalence of the IBC Quick Cell component, as a substitute for the CDI Kwik Cell component. The assumptions in the calculated values and any error which may be present as a result of the electronics, transducer or sensors is not to be evaluated. Consequently, only the measured parameters will be used in the functional analysis. The calculated values were recorded for general interest only.
The functional properties of the Quick Cells are determined by the final assembly geometry and the materials employed in construction, especially the membrane material. The final geometry of the IBC and CDI components are identical. Using chemical analysis, electron microscopy and information in the public domain, the membrane was sourced from the same supplier used by 3M.
INTERNATIONAL BIOPHYSICS CORPORATION • 4020 S. INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, SUITE 160 • AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 • 512 326-3244 • FAX 512 326-3299
{1}
Materials, Methods and Results
I. Functional Evaluation.
A. Assembly of Test Samples.
1. Twenty each frame /retainer assemblies were made using Standard Operating Procedures.
2. These assemblies were assembled to the 3/8" flow through body.
3. The membrane guard was snapped into place and the assembly was leak tested.
4. Samples were subjected to the IBC standard sterilization cycle and placed in quarantine for 14 days.
5. Control samples of CDI manufactured products were purchased from commercial sources.
B. Test Equipment.
1. Instrumentation Laboratories Model 1420 Blood Gas Analyzer.
2. Instrumentation Laboratories Model 482 Co-Oximeter.
3. CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitor System (Monitor display, light head transducer, disposable photo-chemical sensors, and sensor calibrator).
4. IBC Model 1200 VenOsat Monitor.
5. Gambro Cardiovascular Heart-Lung Console Roller Pump.
2
{2}
6. Cincinnati Sub Zero Model 400 Heater/Cooler.
7. Cobe CML Oxygenators.
8. Heart Lung Tubing and connectors.
C. Test Circuit and Set up.
1. Assemble the circuit as shown in Test Assembly schematic drawing.
2. Using the ¼" spike, prime the integral hard shell reservoir on the Cobe CML with Human Blood which has been typed and cross matched and preserved with Acid Citrate Dextrose A U.S.P.. Fill to a level which is approximately 1" above the Heat Exchanger (Approximately four units).
3. Using the Roller Pump Head, prime the oxygenator circuit with a clamp at point B. After the oxygenator is fully primed, move the clamp to Point A and continue to prime the oxygenator bypass line. Recirculate at 2 liters per minute.
4. Calibrate the CDI Kwik Cell Sensors per the operating instructions.
5. Draw a test sample for the Blood Gas Analyzer and CO-Oximeter.
6. Using the oxygenator and Gas Blender adjust the blood to physiological conditions. Using 5% Sodium Bicarbonate in Normal Saline, adjust the pH to physiological levels.
D. Test Procedure.
1. Stop Pump Head to discontinue the recirculation.
{3}

TEST ASSEMBLY
{4}
2. Remove the membrane guard from the two CDI Kwik Cells and snap the calibrated sensors in place and attach the light head transducers.
3. Resume the operation of the Pump Head, setting a flow rate of 3.5 Liters per Minute.
4. Observe the readings in the CDI Monitor Display and the IBC VenOsat Monitor Display. If the readings are suitable and stable, Take a sample from the sample port and run it through the IL Blood Gas Analyzer and the IL Co-Oximeter. Simultaneously document the readings from both on-line monitors and press the recalibration button on the CDI Model 400 Monitor.
5. Recalibrate the monitor using the values obtained from the IL Co-Oximeter and Blood Gas Analyzer.
6. Move the clamp from Point A to Point B and, using the Gas Blender, alter the blood gases. Move the clamp from Point B back to Point A and wait for the on line readings to stabilize (3 minutes).
7. After the three minute period, draw another blood sample for the IL analyzers and document the readings on the CDI monitor. Repeat this procedure (steps 6. and 7.) until ten different readings are obtained.
8. Stop the Pump Head.
9. Calibrate two fresh Kwik Cell Sensors and snap them into the IBC flow through cells
10. Resume operation of the Roller Pump at a flow rate of 3.5 Liters per Minute.
{5}
11. Repeat steps 4., 5., 6. and 7. and then stop the pump and change the circuit using fresh disposables and blood for the next test samples.
12. Repeat the test using IBC manufactured components first and CDI manufactured components second.
13. Follow this alternating procedure for ten runs (until five pairs of cells have been tested from both manufacturers).
## E. Data Collection and Treatment.
1. Record each CDI reading along with the appropriate IL readings.
2. Calculate the mean variance and mean per cent variance for each test sample and tabulate at the bottom of the log sheets.
3. Tabulate the mean error and % error from each of the ten runs on the Gas Stat Test Data Analysis Log.
4. Calculate the average error for all 100 data points for all measured and calculated parameters. Record these calculations on the Analysis log
5. Construct a graph for comparison of all 100 pairs of readings for the measured parameters, pO₂, pCO₂ and pH, obtained from testing components of both manufacturers.
6. The following pages contain summary of the findings.
{6}
IBC QUICK CELL AND CDI KWII-CELL TEST DATA ANALYSIS
| SAMPLE | pO2 | pCO2 | pH | [HCO3] | BE | SAT |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IBC #1 ERROR | 5 | 0 | 0.01 | 1 | 1.7 | 3 |
| IBC #1 % ERR | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2% | -189% | 3% |
| IBC #2 ERROR | -8 | -1 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 1.0 | -2 |
| IBC #2 % ERR | -6% | -3% | 0% | 1% | -42% | -2% |
| IBC #3 ERROR | 2 | -1 | 0.00 | 0 | -0.7 | 2 |
| IBC #3 % ERR | 1% | -2% | 0% | 2% | 13% | 2% |
| IBC #4 ERROR | 1 | 1 | -0.02 | 0 | -0.2 | -3 |
| IBC #4 % ERR | 0% | 2% | 0% | -2% | 7% | -3% |
| IBC #5 ERROR | -1 | 0 | 0.00 | -1 | 0.2 | -2 |
| IBC #5 % ERR | -1% | -1% | 0% | -3% | -5% | -2% |
| AVERAGE IBC ERROR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IBC AVG % ERROR | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | -22% | 0% |
| CDI #1 ERROR | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 1 | 1.5 | 3 |
| CDI #1 % ERR | 8% | 4% | 0% | 3% | -170% | 4% |
| CDI #2 ERROR | 2 | -1.75 | -0.01 | -1 | 0.0 | -3 |
| CDI #2 % ERR | 1% | -4% | 0% | -3% | 0% | -3% |
| CDI #3 ERROR | 3 | 2 | -0.02 | 1 | -0.6 | -4 |
| CDI #3 % ERR | 3% | 4% | 0% | 3% | 11% | -5% |
| CDI #4 ERROR | -6 | 1 | -0.01 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0 |
| CDI #4 % ERR | -5% | 3% | 0% | 0% | -14% | 0% |
| CDI #5 ERROR | -7 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 1.21 | -6 |
| CDI #5 % ERR | -6% | 1% | 0% | 6% | -35% | -6% |
| AVERAGE CDI ERROR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| CDI AVG % ERROR | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% | -21% | -1% |
{7}

GRAPH 1
p02 COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING IBC CELLS
)
8
{8}

GRAPH 2
pO2 COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING CDI CELLS
{9}

GRAPH 3
pCO2 COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING IBC CELLS
{10}

GRAPH 4
pCO2 COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING CDI CELLS
{11}

GRAPH 5
pH COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING IBC CELLS
12
{12}

GRAFH 6
pH COMPARISON BETWEEN INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORIES AND CDI USING CDI CELLS
13
{13}
## II Assembly Integrity.
### A. Assembly Leak Test.
1. Assemble sixty IBC Quick Cell Components using Standard Operating Procedure, using the semi-opaque membrane as designed.
2. Subject the assemblies to the IBC standard sterilization procedure and allow a fourteen day degassing period.
3. Store twenty of the assemblies 24 hrs at 4°C, 25°C and 60°C.
4. Place the assemblies to fit loosely in a drum type container. Shake the container in a paint mixer for 5 minutes.
5. Package the assemblies per Standard Operating Procedure and drop from a height of fifteen feet ten times.
6. Pressurize the assemblies at 10 P.S.I. under water and check for leaks with the membrane support in place.
7. Remove the membrane support clip from the assemblies, fully wet the semi-opaque membrane to establish the bubble point and check for leaks at 10 P.S.I. under water.
8. No leaks were detected.
### B. Clinical Simulation Leak Test.
1. Remove the sixty samples from the Assembly leak test section and allow them to dry for use in this section.
{14}

LEAK TEST ASSEMBLY
{15}
2. Assemble the components in series using a Cobe CML Membrane Oxygenator and extracorporeal tubing and connectors as shown in Leak Test Assembly schematic drawing.
3. Prime the circuit with Bovine Blood which has been freshly collected and preserved in ACD A U.S.P. for less than twenty four hours.
4. Recirculate at 6 Liters per Minute flow rate for one hour at 37°C, for four hours at 25°C and for one hour at 37°C.
5. Stop the pump, remove the Membrane Support Guards and observe for leaks. There should be a straw colored plasma present on top of the membrane but no cellular (Red) components.
6. No leaks were detected.
C. Sensor Seal Integrity.
1. Select ten samples from the Assembly leak test section.
2. Remove the membranes completely using a scalpel.
3. Insert the used sensors from the functional test section.
4. Pressurize under water at 10 P.S.I. and observe for leaks.
5. No leaks were detected.
III. Toxicity Testing.
A. U.S.P. Plastic Class 6 Testing.
1. Prepare plastic samples of the clear plastic housing
16
{16}
material, the elastomer seal material and the semi-opaque white membrane as needed.
2. Subject the samples to the IBC standard ethylene oxide sterilization cycle.
3. Allow 14 days for aeration.
4. Provide samples to an independent laboratory for U.S.P. Testing per current GLP's.
5. The samples were found to meet U.S.P. Plastic Class 6.
## B. Hemolysis.
1. Assemble and sterilize 10 IBC Quick Cell components and allow 14 days for aeration.
2. Place all ten connectors in series using a Cobe CML Membrane Oxygenator and extracorporeal tubing and connectors as shown in the Hemolysis schematic diaphragm.
3. Prime the circuit with fresh Bovine blood that is preserved in ACD A U.S.P. and stored for less than 24 hours.
4. Recirculate at 6 Liters per minute for 6 Hours at 37°C.
5. Repeat the test with 10 CDI Kwik Cell components.
6. Centrifuge a representative sample from each test run and from the uncirculated blood.
7. Observe the plasma fraction for signs of free hemoglobin. It should be straw colored if free of hemolysis induced plasma hemoglobin. Plasma hemoglobin will give the plasma a distinct pink to red tint.
17
{17}

HEMOLYSIS TEST ASSEMBLY
{18}
8. The samples were found to be Non-Hemolytic.
## IV. Bioburden and Sterilization Evaluation.
A. Bioburden. Per C.G. Laboratories standard methods and GLP's, the samples were found to contain an average bioburden of 20 colony forming units per assembly.
B. Ethylene Oxide Residues. Per C. G. Laboratories standard methods and GLP's, the following Ethylene Oxide Residue levels were noted.
| Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Glycol | Ethylene Chlorhydrin |
| --- | --- | --- |
| <25 ppm | <250 ppm | <25 ppm |
C. Pyrogenicity. Per the United States Pharmacopeia, the samples were found to be Non-Pyrogenic, U.S.P.
## Discussion
Functionally, the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System is reasonably accurate when used in accordance with the Operator's Manual. The primary variations seen during the testing were attributed to variations from sensor to sensor. The calibration of the sensor using calibration gases and the buffer solution would in most cases yield reasonable results. The device became exceedingly accurate after one on line recalibration. The largest variations as seen on the graphs are generally attributable to the first readings taken after going on-line.
The oxygen sensor is located on one semi-opaque membrane window. This membrane is porous and less susceptible to error than the 300 series. This was particularly noticeable at high $\mathrm{pO}_2$ levels. This is probably attributable to the lack of porosity with the 300 series window. This sensor, however does require the clarity of the membrane to function properly. The Model 400 employs a porous membrane which is clear when wetted. The apparent superiority of the IBC cells relative to the CDI cells is a result of a greater number of high readings with CDI. The products actually showed no significant difference relative to the $\mathrm{pO}_2$ readings.
The remainder of the sensors are located on the second semi-opaque membrane. This
{19}
membrane is microporous (0.2 u) and allows a free flow of ions and gases through it while maintaining a sterile barrier. The free flow of Hydrogen ions to the sensor provides the stimulus that allows the transducer to measure pH. On the arterial channel, this pH measurement is factored into the equation for Bicarbonate and Base Excess calculations. The pH measurements are comparably accurate when one compares the IBC and CDI flow through cells.
The pCO₂ sensor is likewise located on the second semi-opaque membrane. Dissolved CO₂, carried in the bicarbonate buffer system of the plasma fraction, provides the stimulus to the pCO₂ sensor which allows the transducer to measure pCO₂. The pCO₂ measurement on the arterial channel is another of the factors that is fed into the Bicarbonate and Base Excess calculations. The pCO₂ measurements are comparably accurate when one compares the IBC and CDI flow through cells.
The Oxygen Saturation Percent is far less accurate when compared to the IL Co-Oximeter as opposed to the IL Blood Gas Analyzer. For the purpose of this evaluation, the Co-Oximeter values were used since those values are generally used by perfusionists. The IL Blood Gas Values are calculated just as the CDI values are and they were found to be in very close agreement. Perhaps the generally accepted formulae that these companies employed for their calculated values should be reviewed. In any case, these values were not used in comparing the IBC and CDI flow through cells. The two cells seemed to perform comparably relative to % Oxygen Saturation.
The only measured parameter that is not mentioned in the data section is temperature. The temperature was maintained throughout the functional testing phase at 37°C by using the Cincinnati Sub Zero Heater/Cooler in association with the Cobe CML integral heat exchanger. The reading on the CDI Monitor remained at 37°C throughout the experiments regardless of whether the monitor was reading the Arterial or Venous channel (Only one channel can be read at a time). The thermo electronic sensor is held in intimate contact with a hemispherical shaped shell of stainless steel molded into the body of the sensor. This shell is in turn held in intimate contact with the semi-opaque membrane. The mass of the materials is minimal and capable of rapidly transferring heat adequately to yield accurate temperature readings. There was no difference noted between the IBC flow through cells and the CDI flow through cells.
The response time of the CDI Monitor seemed to be two to three minutes depending on the size of the incremental change in the measured parameters. A large swing, e.g.,
{20}
pO₂ 60 mmHg to 180 mmHg and pCO₂ 60 mmHg to 40 mmHg and pH 7.20 to 7.40, required a full three minutes to stabilize. Regardless of the amount of change in parameters, the full three minutes was used throughout the data gathering.
The assemblies of IBC product were found to be sound and free of leaks. The assembly methods yield bond strengths far in excess of the requirements that might be encountered in a clinical setting. The bond between the membrane and the support frame was evaluated very closely. The semi-opaque membrane is porous and easily bonded to the polycarbonate with the UV adhesive we selected, but the membrane is made of a material that is inherently fragile when bonded with most adhesives.
The materials, three in all, used to fabricate the IBC Quick Cell Component all meet U.S.P. Plastic Class 6 Testing. The materials are non toxic after Ethylene Oxide Sterilization and meet the FDA recognized standards for ethylene oxide residues after 14 day aeration. The fabrication methods result in low bioburden assuring adequate margins of safety in normally validated ethylene oxide sterilization cycles.
The hemolysis testing was designed to be five times more stringent than the exposure the blood would get in the most severe clinical instance. In spite of this extreme protocol, there was no detectable free hemoglobin in the plasma fraction. The use of the IBC product in place of the CDI product will result in no differences relative to trauma to the blood. While hemolysis is not the only form of damage that the blood might encounter in the extracorporeal setting, it is generally recognized as representative of the level of trauma the blood is experiencing.
## Conclusion
1. The IBC Quick Cell Component was tested in comparison with the CDI Kwik Cell Component within the CDI Model 400 Blood Gas Monitoring System. The two products were identical relative to performance and function.
2. The IBC Quick Cell component was tested for its integrity and found to be sound and free of leaks and assembly weaknesses. The product is safe for its intended use in extracorporeal circuits.
3. The IBC Quick component was evaluated for Toxicity and found to be nontoxic. It is suitable for use in the intended extracorporeal applications.
{21}
4. The IBC Quick component was evaluated for its compatibility with Ethylene Oxide Sterilization. The IBC component may be safely used in tubing packs which are gas sterilized and may be sold after gas sterilization for insertion into the appropriate tubing line by the Cardiovascular surgical team.
5. The IBC Quick component is not hemolytic when used in the extracorporeal circuit in accordance with normal clinical practice.
6. The membrane used in the IBC Quick Cell Component is identical to that used in the CDI product.
7. The IBC Quick Cell Component may be substituted for the CDI Kwik Cell Component in the construction of Extracorporeal Custom Tubing Packs either by the manufacturer of such packs or by the end user to modify his or her pack as needed.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.