K952945 · Sherwood Medical Co. · NAE · Aug 23, 1995 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K952945
Device Name
AQUAFLO HYDROGEL WOUND DRESSING & PACKER
Applicant
Sherwood Medical Co.
Product Code
NAE · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Aug 23, 1995
Decision
SN
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4022
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Therapeutic
Device Story
AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing and Packer is a sterile, polyurethane-based hydrophilic hydrogel supported on a polyethylene scrim. Device provides moist environment for wound healing; protects against bacterial contamination and dehydration; absorbs exudate; provides cooling and pain relief. Wound packer version maintains passageway in cavities. Supplied in various dressing sizes and 12-inch rope form. Packaged in polyethylene strips and heat-sealed foil pouches. Used in clinical settings for wound management. Healthcare providers apply dressing to wound surface or pack into cavities. Benefits include maintenance of moist environment and physical protection of wound site.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparative testing performed against four predicate devices (Clearsite, Nu-Gel, Elasto-gel, Vigilon) measuring hydrogel hydration (percent weight and length increase in deionized water and 1% saline) and dehydration (percent weight remaining). Results indicated performance equal or superior to predicates.
Technological Characteristics
Sterile, polyurethane-based hydrophilic hydrogel; supported on polyethylene scrim. Supplied in various dressing dimensions (2x2 to 8x8 inches) and 12-inch rope. Sterilized via heat-sealed foil packaging. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a hydrogel wound dressing and wound packer to provide a moist wound environment, protect against bacterial contamination and dehydration, and provide a cooling, pain-relieving covering. The wound packer is indicated to help maintain a passageway in cavities when support of overlying tissues and protection of underlying tissues is needed. Contraindicated for use on third-degree burns.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hydrogel wound dressing is a sterile or non-sterile device intended to cover a wound, to absorb wound exudate, to control bleeding or fluid loss, and to protect against abrasion, friction, desiccation, and contamination. It consists of a nonresorbable matrix made of hydrophilic polymers or other material in combination with water (at least 50 percent) and capable of absorbing exudate. This classification does not include a hydrogel wound dressing that contains added drugs such as antimicrobial agents, added biologics such as growth factors, or is composed of materials derived from animal sources.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
February 25, 2025
Sherwood Medical Company
Frank J. Fucile
Director of Regulatory Affairs
1915 Olive Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103-1625
Re: K952945
Trade/Device Name: AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing and
AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Packer
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4022
Regulation Name: Hydrogel wound dressing and burn dressing
Regulatory Class: Class I
Product Code: NAE
Dear Frank J. Fucile:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change related to your previous substantial equivalence (SE) determination letter dated August 23, 1995.
Specifically, FDA is updating this SE Letter because FDA has better categorized your device technology under product code NAE.
Please note that the 510(k) submission was not re-reviewed. For questions regarding this letter please contact
Yu-Chieh Chiu, OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices, 301-796-6196, Yu-
Chieh.Chiu@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
# Yu-chieh Chiu -S
Yu-Chieh Chiu, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4B: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
[LOGO]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
AUG 23 1995
Food and Drug Administration
9200 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville MD 20856
Mr. Frank J. Fucile
Director of Regulatory Affairs
Sherwood Medical Company
1915 Olive Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Re: K952945
AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing and
AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Packer
Regulatory Class: Unclassified
Product Code: MGQ
Dated: July 26, 1995
Received: July 31, 1995
Dear Mr. Fucile:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the devices referenced above and we have determined the devices are substantially equivalent to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. You may, therefore, market your devices subject to the general controls provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) and the following limitations:
1. These devices may not be labeled for use on third degree burns.
2. These devices may not be labeled as having any accelerating effect on the rate of wound healing or epithelization.
3. These devices may not be labeled as a long-term, permanent, or no-change dressing, or as an artificial (synthetic) skin.
4. These devices may not be labeled as a treatment or a cure for any type of wound.
The labeling claims listed above would be considered a major modification in the intended use of the devices and would require a premarket notification submission (21 CFR 807.81).
The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practices, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
{2}
Page 2 - Mr. Frank J. Fucile
If your devices are classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval) they may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your devices can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for Medical Devices: General GMP regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic GMP inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your devices in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter immediately will allow you to begin marketing your devices as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. An FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your devices to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your devices and permits your devices to proceed to the market, but it does not mean that FDA approves your devices. Therefore, you may not promote or in any way represent your devices or their labeling as being approved by FDA. If you desire specific advice regarding labeling for your devices in accordance with 21 CFR Part 801, promotion, or advertising please contact the Office of Compliance, Promotion and Advertising Policy Staff (HFZ-302) at (301) 594-4639. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at their toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597.
Sincerely yours,
Ann C. Forner Jr
Kimber C. Richter, M.D.
Acting Director
Division of General and
Restorative Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
2
{3}
ATTACHMENT #1
K950945
THIS SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION IS BEING SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SMDA 1990
510(k) Summary of Safety & Effectiveness
AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer
Submitted By Sherwood Medical Co., 1915 Olive St.,
St. Louis, MO 63103, (314) 241-5700
Contact: Frank J. Fucile, Director of Regulatory Affairs
Date Prepared: June 22, 1995
AUG 23 1995
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer is a non-classified, hydrogel wound dressing, Panel 79, Procode MGQ.
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer is a sterile, polyurethane-based hydrophilic hydrogel. The gel is supported, prior to use, on a polyethylene scrim.
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer provides a moist wound environment which is conducive for optimal wound healing. The dressings protect against bacterial contamination and dehydration of the wound. They readily conform to any wound configuration, absorb wound exudate and provide a cooling, pain relieving covering. The wound packer may be used to help maintain a passageway in cavities, when support of overlying tissues and protection of underlying tissues is needed.
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer will be supplied in the following sizes: Dressings - 2" x 2", 4" x 4", 6" x 6", and 8" x 8"; Wound Packer - 12 inch rope. The dressings on their supporting scrim will be individually packaged between strips of polyethylene and heat sealed in foil pouches. 2" x 2" and 4" x 4" dressings will be packed 5 per intermediate carton and ten intermediates per case. 6" x 6" and 8" x 8" dressings will be packed 5 per intermediate carton and 6 intermediates per case. The Wound Packer will also be packaged between strips of polyethylene and heat sealed in foil pouches. Wound Packers will be packed 5 per intermediate carton and 6 intermediates per case.
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing is substantially equivalent to four currently marketed hydrogel dressings: Clearsite Hydrogel Dressing (NDM, K914207), Nu-Gel Hydrogel Dressing (Johnson & Johnson, K932336), Elasto-gel Hydrogel Dressing (Southwest Technologies, K872165), and Vigilon Hydrogel Dressing (Bard, K820134).
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer and the NDM, J&J, Southwest, and Bard dressings have undergone the following comparative testing: a) hydrogel hydration testing (measured as percent weight increase and percent increase in length) in: 1) deionized water, 2) 1% saline solution; and b) hydrogel dehydration (measured as percent weight remaining). The results of this testing indicate that the AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer performed equally or superior compared to the NDM, J&J, Southwest and Bard products, and raise no new issues relating to safety or efficacy.
The AquaFlo™ Hydrogel Wound Dressing/Packer will be manufactured per specifications and good manufacturing practices that ensure the device is safe and effective for its intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.