Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1
K261677 · Aramis Global AI Consultancies, LLC · QIH · Sep 15, 2026 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K261677
Device Name
Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1
Applicant
Aramis Global AI Consultancies, LLC
Product Code
QIH · Radiology
Decision Date
Sep 15, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
AI/ML, Software as a Medical Device, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K261677 · Sep 15, 2026
Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1
Aramis Global AI Consultancies, LLC
Retrospective clinical CT images from 3 US sites
Retrospective clinical CT cases were used to evaluate the performance (Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance) of the AIRA software in segmenting and measuring renal parenchymal volume.
Adult patients requiring volumetric measurement of the kidneys; Sample Size: 119 cases (113 analyzed); Number of Sites: 3 US sites
Not applicable for this study
Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) between AIRA and ground truth segmentation
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Renal parenchymal volume
Deep learning algorithm
—
Dice Similarity Coefficient: 0.9092 (Right), 0.9114 (Left); Hausdorff Distance: 9.9743 mm (Right), 9.9395 mm (Left)
—
—
AIRA Standalone Study: 113 CT cases
2 (radiologists)
Indications for Use
Non-invasive processing of CT kidney images using automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures utilizing artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms.The system automatically calculates the renal parenchymal volume.AIRA is intended for adult patients who require volumetric measurement of the kidneys for further clinical assessment.
Device Story
AIRA (Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment) processes CT scan inputs to estimate renal parenchymal volume; utilizes deep learning algorithms for automatic image segmentation; outputs include NumPy arrays, NIfTI files, and PDF reports containing volume measurements and superimposed masks on DICOM images; used by radiologists, nephrologists, and urologists in clinical settings; includes optional editor tool for manual output modification; assists clinicians in detecting kidney swelling or volume loss by comparing current measurements to baseline; supports clinical decision-making regarding renal health.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective standalone study of 113 CT cases from 3 US sites. Ground truth established by 2 radiologists. Performance metrics: Mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) 0.9092 (Right) and 0.9114 (Left). Mean Hausdorff Distance (HD) 9.9743 mm (Right) and 9.9395 mm (Left). Mean 95th percentile HDs were 3.7734 mm (Right) and 3.9151 mm (Left).
Technological Characteristics
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) for CT image processing. Utilizes non-adaptive deep learning algorithms for segmentation. Compatible with DICOM standard CT images. Operates on Windows/Linux via web browser (Google Chrome).
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients (22+ years) requiring non-invasive volumetric measurement of kidneys via CT imaging for clinical assessment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}
**FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
September 15, 2026
Aramis Global AI Consultancies, LLC
% John DeLucia
Consultant
John Delucia Consulting
34 Laurel Rd.
Guilford, Connecticut 06437
Re: K261677
Trade/Device Name: Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050
Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QIH
Dated: August 15, 2026
Received: August 17, 2026
Dear John DeLucia:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261677 - John DeLucia
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the
{2}
K261677 - John DeLucia
Page 3
Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jessica Lamb
Assistant Director
DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging
Devices and Electronic Products
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K261677 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1 | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| Non-invasive processing of CT kidney images using automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures utilizing artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms.The system automatically calculates the renal parenchymal volume.AIRA is intended for adult patients who require volumetric measurement of the kidneys for further clinical assessment. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
| Please select the age group(s) for which the device(s) is to be used. | Neonates/Newborns (Birth to < 29 days old)Infants (29 days old to < 2 years old)Children (2 years old to < 12 years old)Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old)Adults (22 years old and greater) | ? |
{4}
K261677
# 510(K) Summary
**Date Prepared:**
August 8, 2026
**Submitter**
Aramis Global AI Consultancies LLC
Rahet Albal Business Centre
Court Tower Building, Office #39
Dubai, UAE
+91 9288045050
**Contact Person**
John DeLucia
John DeLucia Consulting
34Laurel Rd.
Guilford, CT 06437
Email: johndelucia@comcast.net
Phone: (603) 566-0146
**Submission Date:**
May 21, 2026
**Trade Name:**
Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) Version 1
**Common Name:**
Medical Imaging Software
**Classification Name/Regulation**
21 CFR 892.2050 Medical image management and processing system
**Product Code**
QIH
{5}
## Device Classification
Class II
### Legally Marketed Devices to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed
Artificial Intelligence Renal Assessment (AIRA) is substantially equivalent to the following legally marketed predicate device.
| Device Name | Manufacturer | 510(k) # | Decision Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ceevra Reveal 3 | Ceevra Inc. | K222676 | 04/25/2023 |
### Device Description
AIRA operates by using medical imaging data (CT scans) to analyze the size and shape of the kidney. It utilizes a deep learning algorithm to accurately estimate the renal parenchymal volume of the kidney.
The output of the algorithm is a NumPy array that is used to generate a NIfTI file format, which is then used to calculate the kidney volumes. These values are then compiled into a PDF report that can be easily downloaded from our AIRA tool.
The report provides the user with detailed information about their kidney size. Specifically, the report includes the volume of the left and right kidneys. In addition, volume masks are produced, that can be superimposed on the original DICOM gray scale image. An editor tool is also available, which can be used to modify the outputs where necessary and recalculate the volumes (this is optional).
This information is compared to baseline measurements to detect any changes that may indicate early kidney swelling or volume loss. The tool is intended for use by medical professionals, such as radiologists, nephrologists, and urologists, who are trained in the interpretation of medical imaging data.
### Indications for Use
Non-invasive processing of CT kidney images using automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures utilizing artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms. The system automatically calculates the renal parenchymal volume.
{6}
AIRA is intended for adult patients who require volumetric measurement of the kidneys for further clinical assessment.
## Summary of Indications for Use
AIRA and the predicate device have the same indication for use. Both devices are intended for non-invasive processing of images using automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures utilizing artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms.
AIRA is intended for adult patients who require volumetric measurement of the kidneys for further clinical assessment.
## Summary of Technological Characteristic
AIRA and the predicate device have similar technological characteristics. Both utilize artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms to perform automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures. AIRA is different from the predicate in that it uses images from CT and MRI while the subject device utilizes CT images only.
## General Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
The device labeling contains instructions for use and any necessary cautions and warnings to provide for safe and effective use of this device. Risk management is ensured via a risk analysis which is used to identify and mitigate potential hazards. Any potential hazards are controlled via software development, verification and validation testing. In addition, general controls of the FD&C Act, and special controls established for medical image management and processing system per 21 CFR 892.2050 are in place to further mitigate any safety and or effectiveness risks.
## Assessment of Non-Clinical Performance Data
The AIRA Standalone Study was a retrospective study conducted to assess the performance of AIRA. A total of 119 computed tomography (CT) cases were retrospectively collected for use in this standalone study under the approved Aramis Protocol 66017 Data Collection Protocol. The cases were collected from 3 US sites at distinct geographic locations.
The study analyses included 113 cases. The sample was enriched to have at least 25% of cases with atrophied kidneys. Ground truth volume and segmentation were established by 2 radiologists; no adjudication was required. AIRA: Version 1.0 was used to process all cases and provide segmentation and RPV for each kidney. Accuracy of AIRA was measured by the Dice
{7}
similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance between AIRA and ground truth segmentation.
The mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between the AIRA mask and the larger Ground Truther mask was 0.9092 for the Right kidney (95% CI: 0.9032, 0.9148) and 0.9114 for the Left kidney (95% CI: 0.9035, 0.9179). The mean Hausdorff Distance (HD) between the AIRA mask and the larger Ground Truther mask was 9.9743 mm for the Right kidney (95% CI: 8.4073, 12.5967) and 9.9395 mm for the Left kidney (95% CI: 7.8926, 13.6073). Mean 95th Percentile HDs (HD95s) were 3.7734 mm (95% CI: 3.5544, 4.0104) and 3.9151 mm (95% CI: 3.4522, 4.6661) for the Right and Left kidneys, respectively.
### **Conclusion:**
Based upon the information presented in this submission, it is concluded that AIRA is substantially equivalent to the named predicate device.
The Summary of Substantial Equivalence Table below details the similarities and differences between the subject device and the predicate device Ceevra Reveal 3 (K222676 -Ceevra Inc.).
{8}
Table: Substantial Equivalence Table
| Characteristics | Subject Device | Predicate | Similarities / Differences |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sponsor | Aramis LLP | Ceevra Inc. | |
| Device Name | AIRA Renal Assessment | Ceevra Reveal 3 | NA |
| 510(k) | K261677 | K222676 | NA |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Regulation Description | Medical image management and processing system | Medical image management and processing system | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Product Code | QIH | QIH | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Indications for Use | Non-invasive processing of CT kidney images using automatic image segmentation and measurement of anatomical structures utilizing artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms. The system automatically calculates the renal parenchymal volume. AIRA is intended for adult patients who require volumetric measurement of the kidneys for further clinical assessment. | Ceevra Reveal 3 is intended as a medical imaging system that allows the processing, review, analysis, communication and media interchange of multi-dimensional digital images acquired from CT or MR imaging devices and that such processing may include the generation of preliminary segmentations of normal anatomy using software that employs machine learning and other computer vision algorithms. It is also intended as software for preoperative surgical planning, and as software for the intraoperative display of the multi- dimensional digital images. Ceevra Reveal 3 is designed for use by health | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
{9}
| | Subject Device | Predicate | Similarities / Differences |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Characteristics** | Aramis LLP | Ceevra Inc. | |
| | | care professionals and is intended to assist the clinician who is responsible for making all final patient management decisions. The machine learning algorithms in use by Ceevra Reveal 3 are only for adult patients (22 and over). Three- dimensional images for patients under the age of 22 or of unknown age will be generated without the use of any machine learning algorithms | |
| **Anatomical Site** | Kidney | Prostate, bladder neurovascular bundles, kidney, vein, arteries | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
{10}
| | Subject Device | Predicate | Similarities / Differences |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sponsor | Aramis LLP | Ceevra Inc. | |
| Image Type and input | Computed Tomography / Complies with DICOM Standard CT Image | Computed Tomography / Ultrasound / Complies with DICOM Standard CT or MR Images | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Principle of Operation/ Technology | CT image processing software application implementing artificial intelligence including non-adaptive machine learning algorithms trained with clinical and/or artificial data intended for non-invasive segmentation and measurements of CT data. | CT or MR medical imaging system that allows for generation of preliminary segmentations of normal anatomy using software that employs machine learning and other computer vision algorithms. | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Medical Device Type | Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) | Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Operating System | Windows / Linux | Windows / MacOS /iOS/ Android | Subject device is Similar to Predicate. |
{11}
| | Subject Device | Predicate | Similarities / Differences |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sponsor | Aramis LLP | Ceevra, Inc. | |
| Image analysis features | Interactive manipulation and 2D visualization | Interactive manipulation and 3D visualization | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Quantitative analysis | Kidney Volume | Kidney Volume | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Operating System | Web browser (Google Chrome) | Web browser (Google Chrome) and Android | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Patient Population | Adults | Adults | Subject Device Same as Predicate |
| Performance Testing* (Software measurement vs. Ground Truth) | **DCS:** Right kidney 0.9092 Left kidney 0.9114 | Kidney (from CT abdomen imaging) 0.89 DSC Kidney (from MR abdomen imaging) 0.87 DSC (Copied from 510k summary of K222676.) | Subject Device Similar as Predicate |
* The subject device's performance testing dataset was different than the predicate's performance testing dataset.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.