The Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A, NLF2NTA, and TNA2A Infusion Filters are intended for use within the healthcare environment such as hospitals, healthcare facilities or clinical settings for infusion line filtering. The Lipipor Infusion Filters are indicated for the removal of inadvertent particulate debris and microbial contaminants larger than 1.2 μm and entrained air which may be found in intravenous solutions, parenteral nutrition admixtures, and injectable lipid emulsions. They are also indicated for the removal of inadvertent enlarged lipid droplets from parenteral nutrition admixtures and injectable lipid emulsions.
Device Story
Disposable infusion line filters; used in hospitals/clinical settings. Input: IV solutions, parenteral nutrition, or lipid emulsions. Operation: size exclusion/direct interception via 1.2 μm hydrophilic polyethersulfone (Supor) membrane; hydrophobic PTFE/polyester membrane for air elimination. Output: filtered solution delivered to patient. Components: filter housing, female luer input, male luer output, optional microbore tubing, and tubing clamp. Healthcare providers connect filter to infusion line; device removes contaminants/air/lipid droplets before reaching patient. Benefits: reduced risk of infusion-related complications from particulates, microbes, or air emboli.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Testing included sterilization validation (ISO 11137), biocompatibility (ISO 10993), and performance testing (hold-up volume, bubble point, burst pressure, water flow rate, lipid handling, microbial retention, leakage, air venting, tensile strength, particulate contamination, chemical requirements, and lipid droplet size).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polyethersulfone (Supor) hydrophilic membrane (1.2 μm), PTFE/polyester hydrophobic air elimination membrane (0.03 μm). Dimensions: Vary by model (effective filtration area 1.65–18 cm²). Max operating pressure: 30 psi/2 bar/1500 mmHg. Sterilization: ISO 11137-1/2/3. Connectivity: Luer-lock connectors. Standalone mechanical device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for removal of particulate debris, microbial contaminants (>1.2 μm), entrained air, and enlarged lipid droplets from IV solutions, parenteral nutrition, and injectable lipid emulsions in clinical settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular administration set is a device used to administer fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system through a needle or catheter inserted into a vein. The device may include the needle or catheter, tubing, a flow regulator, a drip chamber, an infusion line filter, an I.V. set stopcock, fluid delivery tubing, connectors between parts of the set, a side tube with a cap to serve as an injection site, and a hollow spike to penetrate and connect the tubing to an I.V. bag or other infusion fluid container.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for pharmacy compounding systems within this classification is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Pharmacy Compounding Systems; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.” Pharmacy compounding systems classified within the intravascular administration set are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of this part and subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
August 31, 2026
Global Life Sciences Solutions USA, LLC
Brian Goetz
Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist – Medical
100 Results Way
Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752
Re: K261403
Trade/Device Name: Lipipor NLF1A Infusion Filter, Lipipor NLF2A & NLF2NTA Infusion Filters,
Lipipor TNA2A Infusion Filter
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5440
Regulation Name: Intravascular administration set
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FPB
Dated: July 30, 2026
Received: July 30, 2026
Dear Brian Goetz:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261403 - Brian Goetz
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K261403 - Brian Goetz
Page 3
Sincerely,
DAVID WOLLOSCHECK - S
David Wolloscheck, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and
General Hospital Devices, and
Human Factors
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration **Indications for Use** | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 *See PRA Statement below.* |
| --- | --- |
510(k) Number (if known)
K261403
Device Name
Lipipor NLF1A Infusion Filter
Lipipor NLF2A & NLF2NTA Infusion Filters
Lipipor TNA2A Infusion Filter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A, NLF2NTA, and TNA2A Infusion Filters are intended for use within the healthcare environment such as hospitals, healthcare facilities or clinical settings for infusion line filtering.
The Lipipor Infusion Filters are indicated for the removal of inadvertent particulate debris and microbial contaminants larger than 1.2 μm and entrained air which may be found in intravenous solutions, parenteral nutrition admixtures, and injectable lipid emulsions. They are also indicated for the removal of inadvertent enlarged lipid droplets from parenteral nutrition admixtures and injectable lipid emulsions.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
{4}
K261403_510K Summary
# K261403 - 510(k) SUMMARY
# Global Life Sciences Solutions USA LLC
# Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A, NLF2NTA and TNA2A Infusion Filters
Submitter:
Address :
Global Life Sciences Solutions USA LLC
100 Results Way
Marlborough, MA 01752
Primary Contact:
Nicky Wheatly
Director, Medical Regulatory Affairs
Global Life Sciences Solutions Operations UK Ltd
5 Harbourgate Business Park, Southampton Road
Portsmouth PO6 4BQ
United Kingdom of Great Britain
Telephone Number: +442392338481
Email: nicky.wheatley@cytiva.com
Date Prepared:
31 Aug 2026
Trade Names:
Lipipor NLF1A Infusion Filter
Lipipor NLF2A & NLF2NTA Infusion Filters
Lipipor TNA2A Infusion Filter
Common Name:
Filter, Infusion Line
Classification Regulation:
21 C.F.R. § 880.5440, Intravascular administration set
Regulatory Class:
Class II
FDA Product Code:
FPB
Predicate Device:
Pall Corporation 3N1 Filter (K905794)
# Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A, NLF2NTA, and TNA2A Infusion Filters are intended for use within the healthcare environment such as hospitals, healthcare facilities or clinical settings for infusion line filtering.
The Lipipor Infusion Filters are indicated for the removal of inadvertent particulate debris and microbial contaminants larger than 1.2 μm and entrained air which may be found in intravenous solutions, parenteral nutrition admixtures, and injectable lipid emulsions. They are also indicated for the removal of inadvertent enlarged lipid droplets from parenteral nutrition admixtures and injectable lipid emulsions.
# Device Description
The Lipipor NLF1A and TNA2A Infusion Filters are available in one model each. The Lipipor NLF2A Infusion Filter is available in two models, one for use when additional tubing from the filter to the patient is preferred (NLF2A), and the other for use when the additional extension tubing is not needed (NLF2NTA). All of the subject filters are disposable filters for infusion solutions that are comprised of the following components, with minor variations as outlined below:
- Filter housing - holds the filtering elements comprised of a 1.2 μm Supor (Polyethersulfone) hydrophilic membrane and Polytetrafluorethylene/polyester air elimination membrane.
o In the NLF2A variant, the NLF2A filter housing has microbore tubing at the exit or downstream
Page | 1
{5}
K261403_510K Summary
port and a molded input port that permits connection using a female luer connector; the NLF2NTA filter housing has a male luer connector at the exit or downstream port and a molded input port that permits connection using a female luer connector.
- Female luer connector - provides connection to the tubing that is connected to the packaging that holds the infusion solution.
- Microbore tubing - one section of tubing connects the filter housing to the male luer connector and retains the tubing clamp; the other connects the female luer connector to the filter housing.
- Tubing clamp - provides a method to stop the flow of the infusion solution to the patient;
o The NLF2NTA Infusion Filter is not supplied with microbore tubing or a tubing clamp.
- Male luer connector - provides connection to the medical device in contact with the patient.
### Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The subject and predicate devices have the same fundamental design, consisting of the filter media and housing along with associated connection tubing/hardware. In addition, the subject and predicate filters operate based on the principle of size exclusion, also known as direct interception filtration, where particles larger than the pore size of the filter's hydrophilic membrane (1.2 μm) are retained and do not proceed with the solution to the patient.
The main technological differences between the subject Lipipor Infusion Filters and the predicate device are:
- The device housing sizes and effective filtration areas;
- The holdup volumes (resulting from the differences in filter housing sizes);
- The membrane material is polyethersulfone, versus polyamide (nylon) in the predicate;
- The maximum operating pressures are higher in the subject filters.
- A table comparing the key features of the subject and predicate devices is provided below.
| | Subject Devices | | | Predicate Device | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Element | NLF1A Infusion Filter | NLF2A & NLF2NTA Infusion Filters | TNA2A Infusion Filter | 3N1 (TNA1) Intralipid filter (K905794) | |
| Indications for Use | The Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A, NLF2NTA, and TNA2A Infusion Filters are intended for use within the healthcare environment such as hospitals, healthcare facilities or clinical settings for infusion line filtering. The Lipipor Infusion Filters are indicated for the removal of inadvertent particulate debris and microbial contaminants larger than 1.2 μm and entrained air which may be found in intravenous solutions, parenteral nutrition admixtures, and injectable lipid emulsions. They are also indicated for the removal of inadvertent enlarged lipid droplets from parenteral nutrition admixtures and injectable lipid emulsions. | | | This intralipid filter is indicated for use with any I.V administration set for the removal of microorganisms (Candida albicans), particulates (greater than 0.65 micron) and entrained air from total nutrient admixtures. | Different, supported by verification and validation testing. See note below table. |
| Filter Media | Polyethersulfone (Supor) | | | Polyamide (nylon) | Different, supported by |
Page | 2
{6}
K261403_510K Summary
| | | | | | biocompatibility testing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Air Elimination Membrane | Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) / Polyester - hydrophobic; 0.03 μm rating | | | PTFE / Polyester – hydrophobic; 0.03 μm rating | Different, supported by air elimination testing |
| Typical Maximum Lipid handling / pumped infusion rate | 10 mL/hr for 24 hrs for 20% lipid-emulsion (pumped at 10 mL/hr) & 50 mL/hr for 24 hrs for lipid containing admixture (pumped @ 50 mL/hr) | 10 mL/hr for 24 hrs for 20% lipid-emulsion (pumped at 10 mL/hr) & 75 mL/hr for 24 hrs for lipid containing admixture (pumped @ 75 mL/hr) | 100mL/hr for 5 hrs for 20% lipid-emulsion (pumped at 100 mL/hr) & 500 mL/hr for 6 hrs for lipid containing admixture (pumped @ 500 mL/hr) | 300 mL/hr for 6 hrs for lipid containing admixture (pumped @ 300 mL/hr) | Different, supported by lipid handling tests |
| Lipid handling 1 meter gravity flow | N/A | N/A | 100 mL/hr for >5 hrs for lipid containing admixture | N/A | Different, performance with gravity flow for TNA2A determined via bench testing |
| Water flow rate average 1m gravity flow | 18 mL/min | 24 mL/min (NLF2A) 79 mL/min (NLF2NTA) | 150 mL/min | 24 mL/min | Different, SE supported via bench testing |
| Typical Hold-up Volume | 0.8 ml | 1.2 ml (NLF2A) 1.0 ml (NLF2NTA) | 12 ml | 2.6 ml | Different, Hold up volume was determined via bench testing |
| Maximum operating pressure | 30 psi/ 2 bar/ 1500mmHg | | | | Same |
| Filtration Rating | 1.2 μm | 1.2 μm | 1.2 μm | 0.65 μm | Different, supported by microbial retention testing |
| Effective Filtration Area (cm2) | 1.65 | 4.5 | 18 | 11 | Different, supported by testing confirming equivalent performance for the intended use |
| Air Elimination | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same, per air elimination/ venting testing |
Page | 3
{7}
K261403_510K Summary
| *Filter Life (hrs.)* | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | Same, supported by performance testing over 24 hour period |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| *Shelf Life (yrs.)* | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | Different, supported by shelf life testing |
Note: The differences in labeling does not change the intended use, fundamental scientific technology, route of administration, patient population, or operating principles of the device. The text for the subject devices IFUs clarify and expand the description of established filtration functions rather than introduce new clinical claims. Verification and/or validation data support the stated filtration performance of the subject devices and the differences in labeling do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
### Performance Data
The following non-clinical testing was performed in support of the subject Lipipor Infusion Filters.
- ▪ *Sterilization Validation* in accordance with ISO 11137-1, ISO11137-2 and 11137-3 to ensure a minimum Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶
- ▪ *Biocompatibility* testing demonstrating conformance to ISO 10993-1 and FDA's corresponding June 2020 guidance document
| Biological Endpoint testing | Standard |
| --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity | ISO 10993-5 :2009 |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10: 2010 |
| Irritation | ISO 10993-10 :2010 |
| Hemocompatibility | ISO 10993-4:2017 |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11: 2017 |
| Subchronic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11:2017 |
| Material Mediated Pyrogenicity | ISO 10993-11:2017 |
- ▪ *Bench top* testing : The following non-clinical (bench) testing, including standardized filtration efficiency tests, was conducted to demonstrate the subject devices' performance:
Hold-Up Volume/ Bubble Point
Burst Pressure / Water Flow Rate Lipid Handling
Microbial Retention
Leakage
Air Venting / non-Leakage with Water
Page | 4
{8}
K261403_510K Summary
- Air Venting with Lipid
- Tensile Testing
- Particulate Contamination
- Chemical Requirements Testing
- Slide Clamp Operational Testing
- Visual inspection / Physical test for caps / Air Water Visual Interface
- Lipid Droplet Size
## Conclusion
The Lipipor NLF1A, NLF2A & NLF2NTA, and TNA2A Infusion Filters have the same intended use and similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and principles of operation as their predicate device, the Pall® 3N1 (TNA1) Intralipid Filter (K905794). The minor differences in indications do not alter the intended therapeutic use, nor do they affect the subject devices' safety and effectiveness when used as labeled. In addition, the minor technological differences between the devices raise no new questions of safety or effectiveness. Performance data further support that the subject devices are as safe and as effective as the predicate. Thus, the subject filters are substantially equivalent to the previously cleared predicate device.
Page | 5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.