K261176 · Imperative Care, Inc. · QJP · Aug 28, 2026 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K261176
Device Name
Zoom 4S Catheter
Applicant
Imperative Care, Inc.
Product Code
QJP · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Aug 28, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Zoom 4S Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neuro vasculature.
Device Story
Zoom 4S Catheter is a single-lumen, braid/coil-reinforced, variable-stiffness percutaneous catheter; features radiopaque marker and hydrophilic coating. Used in neurovascular procedures to facilitate introduction of interventional devices (e.g., guidewires, microcatheters). Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Proximal luer hub connects to accessories like Rotating Hemostasis Valve (RHV) for hemostasis control. Device tracks through neurovasculature to target site; provides conduit for secondary interventional tools. Benefits include atraumatic access to neurovascular anatomy and compatibility with standard interventional equipment.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence established through non-clinical bench testing, including simulated use in neurological models, dimensional analysis, bond strength, leakage, burst pressure, torque strength, kink resistance, and coating integrity/particulate testing.
Technological Characteristics
Single-lumen, braid and coil reinforced catheter; variable stiffness; radiopaque marker; hydrophilic coating. Materials: medical grade plastics and metals. Dimensions: 0.045" distal/proximal ID, 0.060" max distal OD, 0.062" max proximal OD. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EO) per ISO 11135 (SAL 10^-6). Accessories: Rotating Hemostasis Valve. Compatible with 0.071" ID guide catheters and 0.014"-0.035" guidewires.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neuro vasculature in adult patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
August 28, 2026
Imperative Care, Inc.
Peter Taylor
Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist
1359 Dell Avenue
Campbell, California 95008
Re: K261176
Trade/Device Name: Zoom 4S Catheter
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250
Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QJP
Dated: July 24, 2026
Received: July 27, 2026
Dear Peter Taylor:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261176 - Peter Taylor
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K261176 - Peter Taylor
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
NAIRA MURADYAN -S
Naira Muradyan, PhD
Assistant Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K261176 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Zoom 4S Catheter | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Zoom 4S Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neuro vasculature. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
| Please select the age group(s) for which the device(s) is to be used. | ☐ Neonates/Newborns (Birth to < 29 days old) ☐ Infants (29 days old to < 2 years old) ☐ Children (2 years old to < 12 years old) ☐ Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old) ☑ Adults (22 years old and greater) | ? |
{4}
# **510(k) Summary**
510(k) #: K261176
# **I. SUBMITTER**
Submitter's Name: Imperative Care, Inc.
Address: 1359 Dell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person: Peter Taylor
Telephone: 831-227-4810
Email: ptaylor@imperativecare.com
Date of Preparation: July 24, 2026
# **II. DEVICE**
Proprietary Names: Zoom™ 4S Catheter
Common/Usual Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Classification Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: QJP
Regulation: 21 CFR 870.1250
# **III. PREDICATE DEVICE**
Proprietary Name: AXS Vecta 46 Intermediate Catheter
Common/Usual Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Classification Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Product Code: QJP
Regulation: 21 CFR 870.1250
Manufacturer: Stryker Neurovascular
510(k) #: K202752
# **IV. REFERENCE DEVICE**
Proprietary Names: Zoom System (Zoom™ 4S Catheter)
Common/Usual Name: Catheter, Thrombus Retriever
Classification Name: Percutaneous Catheter
Product Code: NRY
Regulation: 21 CFR 870.1250
Manufacturer: Imperative Care, Inc.
510(k) #: K252046
Page 1 of 8
{5}
# V. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Zoom™ 4S Catheter is a single lumen, braid and coil reinforced, variable stiffness catheter with a radiopaque marker and a lubricious hydrophilic coating on the distal portion of the catheter.
The Zoom™ 4S Catheter has a luer hub on the proximal end. The Zoom™ 4S Catheter is compatible with guide catheters that have a minimum inner diameter of 0.071” and 0.014”-0.035” guidewires. A microcatheter with a maximum outer diameter of 0.040” may be used with the Zoom™ 4S Catheter to assist in accessing the target vasculature.
The Zoom™ 4S Catheter is packaged with an accessory Rotating Hemostasis Valve (RHV). The RHV is intended to be attached to the proximal hub of the Zoom™ 4S Catheter and used to control hemostasis during use with other devices.
# VI. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Zoom™ 4S Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neuro vasculature.
# VII. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH PREDICATE AND REFERENCE DEVICES
The subject, predicate, and reference devices have similar technological characteristics, and equivalent performance characteristics, as demonstrated through bench testing. Table 1 provides a comparison of the subject Zoom 4S Catheter, predicate AXS Vecta 46 Intermediate Catheter (K202752), and reference Zoom 4S Catheter (K252046).
Page 2 of 8
{6}
**Table 1: Comparison of Technological Characteristics with Predicate and Reference Devices**
| Description | Predicate Device | Subject Device | Reference Device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FDA Product Classification | Class II Product Code: QJP 21 CFR 870.1250 | Class II Product Code: QJP 21 CFR 870.1250 | Class II Product Code: NRY 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Product Name | AXS Vecta 46 Intermediate Catheter | Zoom 4S Catheter | Zoom System (Zoom 4S Catheter) |
| 510(k) Number | K202752 | K261176 | K252046 |
| Manufacturer | Stryker Neurovascular | Imperative Care, Inc. | Imperative Care, Inc. |
| Indications for Use | The AXS Vecta Intermediate Catheter is indicated for use in facilitating the insertion and guidance of appropriately sized interventional devices into a selected blood vessel in the neurovascular system. The AXS Vecta Intermediate Catheter is also indicated for use as a conduit for retrieval devices. | The Zoom 4S Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the neuro vasculature. | The Zoom System, when used with the Zoom Aspiration Pump (or equivalent vacuum pump), is indicated for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral – M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of last known well. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic drug therapy or who have not responded to thrombolytic drug therapy are candidates for treatment. The Zoom Aspiration Tubing and the Zoom POD Aspiration Tubing are intended to connect the Zoom (7X, 71, 55, 4S, 45, 35) Catheter and the Zoom 88 Large Distal Platform, the Zoom 88 Large Distal Platform Support, or the TracStar LDP Large Distal Platform to the Zoom Canister or Zoom DuoPort Canister of the Zoom Aspiration Pump |
Page 3 of 8
{7}
| Description | Predicate Device | Subject Device | Reference Device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | (or equivalent vacuum pump) and to allow the user to control the fluid flow. |
| Condition Supplied | Sterile, Single Use Only | Same | Same |
| Sterilization Method | Ethylene Oxide (EO), SAL 10^{-6} | Same | Same |
| Inner Diameter (Distal) | 0.046” | 0.045” | Same as Subject Device |
| Outer Diameter (Distal) | 0.056” | 0.060” max | Same as Subject Device |
| Inner Diameter (Proximal) | 0.046” | 0.045” | Same as Subject Device |
| Outer Diameter (Proximal) | 0.058” | 0.062” max | Same as Subject Device |
| Effective Working Length | 125cm 146cm 153cm 160cm | 125cm 144cm 160cm | Same as Subject Device |
| Tip Design | Square edge, soft, flexible, and atraumatic | Angled edge, flexible, and atraumatic | Same as Subject Device |
| Materials | Commonly used medical grade plastics & metals with hydrophilic coating | Same | Same |
| Packaged Accessories | Peel-away Introducer, Rotating Hemostasis Valve | Rotating Hemostasis Valve (RHV) | Same as Subject Device |
| Packaging Configuration | Pouch Backing Card Shelf Carton Shipper Box | Same | Same |
| Shelf Life | 3 years | 1 year | Same as Subject Device |
Page 4 of 8
{8}
## VIII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
### Biocompatibility Testing
The device design, materials and manufacturing of the subject Zoom 4S Catheter and the reference Zoom 4S Catheter are identical, and the patient contact type and duration per International Standard ISO 10993-1 “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process” is the same. Therefore, biocompatibility is unchanged from K252046.
### Non-clinical Bench Testing
As the subject and reference devices are technologically identical, applicable performance testing previously completed on the reference device has been leveraged to support the substantial equivalence determination. A summary of the evaluated applicable performance specifications is presented in **Table 2**. Performance specifications and test methods were based primarily on catheter performance standard ISO 10555-1. The test results were reviewed and found to demonstrate that there are no differences between the subject device and predicate device that would adversely affect the safety or effectiveness of the subject device, and to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the legally marketed predicate device.
**Table 2: Tests and Performance Specifications for the Zoom 4S Catheter**
| Test Attribute | Specification | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Delivery (Trackability), Compatibility, and Retraction | The catheter shall be able to be delivered, deployed, and retracted per the IFU within a simulated neurological model without incurring any damage to the catheter. | Pass |
| Distal Tip Flexibility | The flexibility of the catheter tip shall be comparable to competitive products. | Pass |
| Visual Inspection | The catheter shall meet visual inspection criteria. The printing on the strain relief must be legible. | Pass |
Page 5 of 8
{9}
| Test Attribute | Specification | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Dimensional (Distal ID, Proximal ID, Distal OD, Proximal OD) | All defined catheter dimensions are within the specified tolerances. | Pass |
| Catheter Bond Strength | The catheter shall have sufficient bond strengths to remain intact throughout a procedure. | Pass |
| Freedom from Leakage – Positive Pressure | The catheter must remain leak free under specified test conditions. | Pass |
| Freedom from Leakage – Negative Pressure | The catheter must remain leak free under specified test conditions. | Pass |
| Dynamic Burst | The catheter must withstand pressure testing under dynamic flow conditions. | Pass |
| Static Burst | The catheter shall meet criteria for static burst pressure testing. | Pass |
| Catheter Torque Strength | With the catheter tip constrained from movement, the proximal end was rotated until failure. The catheter shall not be damaged when rotated at least two (2) full rotations (720 degrees). | Pass |
| Kink Resistance | There shall be no kinking of the catheter shaft around respective clinically relevant minimum bend radii in distal tip, medial and proximal locations. | Pass |
| Flexibility | The catheter needs to have acceptable flexure values for tracking in the vasculature. | Pass |
| Compatibility with other Devices (External) | The catheter shall be able to be delivered through the minimum introducer sheath or guide catheter size indicated in the product labeling. | Pass |
| Guidewire Compatibility | The catheter shall be able to be delivered over the maximum size guidewire indicated in the product labeling. | Pass |
| Microcatheter / Intermediate Catheter Compatibility | The catheter shall be able to accommodate a microcatheter/intermediate catheter up to the maximum size indicated in the product labeling. | Pass |
| Luer Compatibility | Devices and accessories shall be compatible with standard syringe luer fittings per ISO 80369-7. | Pass |
| Accessory Compatibility | Devices shall be compatible with an RHV. | Pass |
Page 6 of 8
{10}
| Test Attribute | Specification | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Coating - Particulate | The amount of particulate matter generated during simulated use testing shall be determined and compared to a competitive product. | Pass |
| Coating – Lubricity, Durability and Integrity | Coating must be lubricious with a specified average pull force. No coating anomalies or significant wear shall be observed post simulated use. | Pass |
| Flowrate – Positive (forward) Pressure | The catheter lumen shall allow for a minimum flowrate comparable to comparator products. | Pass |
### Sterilization
The Zoom 4S Catheter is sterilized using validated EO processes with a minimum sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶. The sterilization process was validated per the overkill method in accordance with ISO 11135, “Sterilization of Health-Care Products - Ethylene Oxide - Requirements for the Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices.”
### Shelf Life and Packaging
The device design (including packaging) and shelf life of the subject Zoom 4S Catheter and the reference Zoom 4S Catheter are identical and are therefore unchanged from K252046.
### Animal Study
Substantial equivalence was established based on non-clinical testing presented above.
### Clinical Study
Substantial equivalence was established based on non-clinical testing presented above.
### IX. CONCLUSIONS
Where differences were identified between the subject and predicate devices, a risk assessment was completed to determine if the differences would result in new safety or effectiveness issues. As appropriate, bench and laboratory testing were evaluated for applicability and either the rationale for no impact was documented or verification and
Page 7 of 8
{11}
validation was repeated as required. The non-clinical bench data supports the safety of the device and demonstrates that the subject Zoom 4S Catheter performs as intended in the specified use conditions.
Based on the non-clinical data presented above, the subject and predicate devices are substantially equivalent and there are no new questions of safety or effectiveness. The subject device and predicate device share the same intended use, basic technological characteristics, and performance characteristics. Therefore, the subject Zoom 4S catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Page 8 of 8
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.