K260677 · Vcd Medical S.R.L. · FZP · Sep 17, 2026 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K260677
Device Name
Vessel Closure Device (VCD177213P)
Applicant
Vcd Medical S.R.L.
Product Code
FZP · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 17, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Vessel Closure Device (VCD) is indicated for use in open general surgery and percutaneous procedures on superficial and perforator venous vessels, when occlusion through clamping by clips is required. A single clip is intended for vessels within the range of 2.0 and ≤ 7.0 mm in diameter.
Device Story
Vessel Closure Device (VCD) facilitates venous vessel occlusion via a pre-loaded implantable clip. Device comprises a metallic cannula with echogenic distal tip for ultrasound visualization and a plastic handle with a pull-back slider. Operator (surgeon/clinician) uses the device to transfix the target vessel with a needle, then deploys the clip elements to compress and lock the vessel, followed by suture cutting. Used in open surgery or percutaneous procedures; ultrasound guidance enables percutaneous access. Output is the mechanical occlusion of the vessel. Benefits include effective vessel ligation with reduced invasiveness via percutaneous approach. Device is provided sterile (EO) and non-pyrogenic.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data. Evidence includes bench testing (dimensional, tensile, closure force, reliability, corrosion), 12-month shelf-life validation (ASTM F1980, F88, F2096), sterilization validation (ISO 11135), biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series), and a GLP animal study. Animal study compared open and percutaneous approaches against control, demonstrating acceptable device performance, tissue response (equal to or less than mild/moderate severity), and usability.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PEEK (implant). Dimensions: 17G profile. Sensing: Echogenic distal tip for ultrasound visualization. Energy: Mechanical (manual operation). Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (ISO 11135). Standards: ASTM F1980 (aging), ASTM F88 (seal strength), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), IEC 62366-1 (usability).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring vessel occlusion in open general surgery or percutaneous procedures on superficial and perforator venous vessels (2.0–7.0 mm diameter).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
{0}

September 17, 2026
VCD Medical S.R.L.
% David Worrell
Regulatory Consultant
RQM+
5000 Centregreen Way Suite 100
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Re: K260677
Trade/Device Name: Vessel Closure Device (VCD177213P)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300
Regulation Name: Implantable Clip
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FZP
Dated: March 2, 2026
Received: March 2, 2026
Dear David Worrell:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260677 - David Worrell
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K260677 - David Worrell
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
**RACHEL E. NEUBRANDER -S**
for Katherine Trivedi
Assistant Director
DHT2B: Division of Circulatory Support, Structural, and Vascular Devices
OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2023
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K260677
Device Name
Vessel Closure Device (VCD177213P)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Vessel Closure Device (VCD) is indicated for use in open general surgery and percutaneous procedures on superficial and perforator venous vessels, when occlusion through clamping by clips is required. A single clip is intended for vessels within the range of 2.0 and ≤ 7.0 mm in diameter.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
{4}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 1 of 6
K260677
### 510(K) SUMMARY
Vessel Closure Device
# **A. Applicant Name, Address, Telephone**
| Applicant name | VCD Medical, S.r.l. |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant address | Via Pietro Marone 28, 25124 BS, Italy |
| Applicant phone | +39 345 4808994 |
# **B. Applicant Contact**
Mr. Francesco Piccagli
Head of Firm
francesco.piccagli@vcd-medical.com
# **C. Primary Correspondent/Consultant**
David Worrell
Regulatory Consultant
RQM+
dworrell@rqmplus.com
# **D. Date Prepared**
E. 16 September 2026
# **F. Device Name**
| Device trade name: | Vessel Closure Device (VCD) |
| --- | --- |
| Device common name: | Implantable clip |
| Classification name: | An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissue to aid in healing. It is not absorbable. |
| Device class: | Class II |
| Classification regulation: | 21 CFR 878.4300 |
| Product Codes: | FZP |
# **F. Predicate Device**
Amsel Occluder Device K140932 (primary predicate)
LigaClip 20/20 Multiple Clip Applier K864102 (secondary predicate)
# **G. Device Description**
The Vessel Closure Device (VCD) allows for selective closure of superficial and perforator venous vessels using a clip. The VCD consists of:
{5}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 2 of 6
- A metallic cannula, containing the pre-loaded implantable clip (distal and proximal clip elements, suture, and lock element). The cannula includes echogenic features at the distal end to facilitate real time visualization of the device under ultrasound.
- A plastic handle that allows the operator to release the individual elements in the correct sequence with the pull-back slider that brings the two clip elements together to occlude the target vessel and cuts the connecting suture at the end of the procedure.
# H. Indications for Use
The Vessel Closure Device (VCD) is indicated for use in open general surgery and percutaneous procedures on superficial and perforator venous vessels, when occlusion through clamping by clips is required. A single clip is intended for vessels within the range of 2.0 and ≤7.0 mm in diameter.
# I. Indications for Use Comparison
The subject device includes a modified indication for use to allow ultrasound-guided (USG) percutaneous placement of the implantable clip, in addition to open surgical placement of the implantable clip, in superficial and perforator veins. The change in method of procedural access does not change the general purpose of the device or the function of the device and, therefore, the modified indications for use of the subject device fall within the same intended use as the primary predicate device.
# J. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device with respect to same intended use, and similar indications for use, technology, materials of construction, and performance. Table 1 summarizes the comparison between the subject device and the predicate device.
Table 1. Comparison of Subject Device and Predicate Device
| Feature | Subject device | Primary predicate device | Secondary predicate device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Vessel Closure Device | Amsel Occluder Device K140932 | Ligaclip 20/20 Multiple Clip Applier K864102 |
| Device Classification Name | Clip, implantable clip | Clip, implantable clip | Clip, implantable clip |
| Regulation Number | 878.4300 | 878.4300 | 878.4300 |
| Intended Use | Vessel ligation or occlusion | Vessel ligation or occlusion | Vessel ligation or occlusion |
| Indications for Use | The Vessel Closure Device (VCD) is indicated for use in open general surgery and percutaneous | The Amsel Occluder Device is intended for use in open general surgery procedures on tubular | The LIGACLIP MCA Multiple Clip Applier has application for use on vessels or other tubular |
{6}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 3 of 6
K26####
| Feature | Subject device | Primary predicate device | Secondary predicate device |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Vessel Closure Device | Amsel Occluder Device K140932 | Ligaclip 20/20 Multiple Clip Applier K864102 |
| | procedures on superficial and perforator venous vessels, when occlusion through clamping by clips is required. A single clip is intended for vessels within the range of 2.0 and ≤7.0 mm in diameter. | structures or vessels wherever a metal ligating clip is indicated and within the size range of 2.0 and 7.0 mm. | structures wherever a metal ligating clip is indicated. The tissue ligated should be consistent with the size of the clip. |
| Clinical procedure | Open general surgery and percutaneous procedures under ultrasound guidance | Open general surgery | Open general surgery |
| Pre-loaded / Loaded in OR | Pre-loaded | Pre-loaded | Pre-loaded |
| Clip size | One size | One size | One size |
| Secure to vessel mechanism | External compressive force on the vessel | External compressive force on the vessel | External compressive force on the vessel |
| Vessel occlusion method | Penetrating through (transfixing) the vessel using a needle and then compressing and locking the two occlusion elements; external vessel compression. | Penetrating through (transfixing) the vessel using a needle and then compressing and locking the two occlusion elements; external vessel compression. | Positioned around the external vessel wall, then squeezed closed by clip applier to occlude the vessel; external vessel compression |
| Clip material | PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) | Nitinol | Titanium |
| Device profile | 17G | 18G | 11 inches in length |
The different technological characteristics in clip materials do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. Polymer clips and metallic clips both are biocompatible, suitable for long-term vessel occlusion, and remain in the body unless they are removed surgically. Metallic clips may interfere with MRI and CT scans depending on specific metals.
### K. Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
Bench testing was conducted to verify the performance to specifications of the subject device, including dimensional, tensile, closure force, closure reliability, clip strength, delivery and deployment, corrosion resistance.
{7}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 4 of 6
K26####
Shelf-life testing was performed to evaluate the stability of the sterile, finished Vessel Closure Device under accelerated ageing conditions equivalent to 12 months of anticipated storage conditions. Shelf life testing was conducted using the following FDA-recognized standards:
- Accelerated Aging: ASTM F1980 Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices
- Environmental Conditioning: ASTM D4432 Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing
- Simulated Distribution ASTM D4169 Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems
- Visual Inspection ASTM F1886 Standard Test Method for Determining Integrity of Seals for Medical Packaging by Visual Inspection
- Sterile Barrier Integrity: ASTM F2096 Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross Leaks in Packaging by Internal Pressurization (Bubble Test)
- Seal Strength Testing: ASTM F88 Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials
Test results demonstrate the product performs as intended and the package maintains integrity for a shelf life up to 12 months.
The Vessel Closure Device is provided STERILE. The sterilization method is ethylene oxide (EO). A sterilization validation demonstrated a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6 for the device and was performed according to the following FDA-recognized standards:
- ISO 11135 Medical devices – Validation and routine control of ethylene oxide sterilization
- ISO 10993-7 Biological evaluation of medical devices – ethylene oxide sterilization residuals.
Sterile barrier systems were evaluated for performance and stability in accordance with ISO 11607-1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems, and packaging systems.
The Vessel Closure Device is provided non pyrogenic.
A biological evaluation was conducted for all patient-contacting materials of the Vessel Closure Device in accordance with FDA's guidance Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process and ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a Risk Management Process. The biological evaluation included the following tests:
- ISO 10993-4 Selection of tests for interactions with blood
- ISO 10993-5 Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- ISO 10993-6 Tests for local effects after implantation
- ISO 10993-10 Tests for skin sensitization
- ISO 10993-11 Tests for systemic toxicity
{8}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 5 of 6
K26####
- USP <151> Pyrogen test
- ISO 10993-18 Chemical characterization of materials
- ISO 10993-23 Tests for irritation
- ASTM F756-17 Standard practice for assessment of hemolytic properties of materials
- ASTM F2888-19 An in vitro measure for hemocompatibility assessment of cardiovascular materials.
Extractions for all biological testing were performed in accordance with ISO 10993-12, Methods for the establishment of allowable limits for leachable substances. The toxicological risk assessment of the chemical characterization data obtained for the VCD Implant component was performed in accordance with ISO 10993-17, Methods for the establishment of allowable limits for leachable substances.
Based on the data and information evaluated, and from testing results it can be concluded that the VCD device is biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance on biocompatibility.
A usability study was conducted using the following FDA guidance and FDA-recognized standard:
- FDA Guidance for Industry and Staff, titled, Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices
- IEC 62366-1:2015/A1:2020 titled, Medical Devices – Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices.
Usability study results demonstrated the risks associated with healthcare practitioners performing safety-critical tasks when operating the subject device are mitigated to a sufficient level and that no further user interface design or labeling modifications are necessary.
A GLP animal study was conducted to demonstrate the safety and performance of the Vessel Closure Device. The study assessed the safety and performance endpoints during open surgical and percutaneous procedures. The GLP animal study demonstrated acceptable device performance during the implantation procedure, both using open surgical and percutaneous approach, and at the identified timepoint compared to the control device. All pathology was equal to less than mild/moderate severity. Histopathology assessments showed acceptable tissue responses to the subject device at the identified timepoint compared to the control device. Device usability was considered similar (open surgical) or slightly better (percutaneously) than the control device (predicate device).
### L. Conclusion
Non-clinical performance testing results demonstrate the subject device meets established specifications and conforms with FDA-recognized standards for medical devices. The subject device performs as well as the predicate device for its intended use and supports a determination of substantial equivalence. Bench testing, usability testing, and animal testing demonstrate the subject device is as safe and as effective as the predicate device. Differences in technological
{9}
VCD
MEDICAL
Page 6 of 6
K26####
characteristics between the subject device and predicate device do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
Based on the information presented in this submission, it can be concluded that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.