SeptAlign is used to support and straighten deviations in septal cartilage when sufficient healthy cartilage exists, and the cartilage is appropriately mobilized utilizing standard septoplasty techniques.
Device Story
SeptAlign is a bioabsorbable implant system for mechanical correction of nasal septal deviations. The device consists of a polydioxanone implant with bi-directional anchors and a single-use delivery tool featuring a stainless steel trocannula. Used in a surgical setting by physicians, the device is placed into the nasal septum to provide mechanical traction, holding cartilage in a straightened position during the remodeling process. The implant is fully resorbed within six months. The delivery tool includes a depth indicator for tactile feedback and an actuator lock to prevent premature deployment. The implant is trimmed to size during the procedure. The device benefits patients by providing a minimally invasive method to stabilize septal cartilage without requiring cartilage resection.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical or animal performance testing was required. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including design verification and validation, implant performance/integrity, mechanical integrity of the delivery tool, physician usability in a clinically relevant model, and simulated use functionality. Biocompatibility was evaluated per ISO 10993-1. Sterilization (EtO) validated to SAL 10^-6 per ISO 11135-1; pyrogen limits confirmed per USP <85>.
Technological Characteristics
Bioabsorbable polydioxanone implant; stainless steel trocannula; ABS and PVC components. Mechanical sensing via depth indicator. Sterilization: EtO (ISO 11135-1). Shelf-life: 6 months. Dimensions: 100mm length, 0.65mm thickness. Single-use, sterile, prescription-only.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults requiring support and straightening of septal cartilage deviations where sufficient healthy cartilage exists and is mobilized via standard septoplasty.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Ear, nose, and throat synthetic polymer material is a device material that is intended to be implanted for use as a space-occupying substance in the reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. The device is used, for example, in augmentation rhinoplasty and in tissue defect closures in the esophagus. The device is shaped and formed by the suregon to conform to the patient's needs. This generic type of device is made of material such as polyamide mesh or foil and porous polyethylene.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
July 30, 2026
Spirair, Inc.
Tracey Henry
VP Clinical, Regulatory, Quality
415 Grand Ave.
Suite 201
South San Francisco, Ca 94080
Re: K260620
Trade/Device Name: SeptAlign (SPLN001)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.3620
Regulation Name: Ear, Nose, And Throat Synthetic Polymer Material
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: NHB
Dated: June 30, 2026
Received: June 30, 2026
Dear Tracey Henry:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260620 - Tracey Henry
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K260620 - Tracey Henry
Page 3
Sincerely,
JOYCE C.
LIN -S
for Shu-Chen Peng, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and
ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia,
Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K260620 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| SeptAlign (SPLN001) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| SeptAlign is used to support and straighten deviations in septal cartilage when sufficient healthy cartilage exists, and the cartilage is appropriately mobilized utilizing standard septoplasty techniques. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
[LOGO]
SPIRAIR
Pre-market 510(k) Notification
SeptAlign
# 510(k) Summary
## I. SUBMITTER
Spirair, Inc.
415 Grand Avenue, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94080
Phone: (844) 434-9673
Contact Person: Tracey Henry
Date Prepared: July 29, 2026
## II. DEVICE
Name of Device:
SeptAlign (SPLN001)
Common or Usual Name:
Ear, Nose, Throat Synthetic Polymer Material
Classification Name:
Polymer, Ear, Nose and Throat, Synthetic, Absorbable
Regulatory Class:
Class II
Product Code:
NHB
Regulation Number:
21 CFR 874.3620
## III. PREDICATE/REFERENCE DEVICE
Predicate Device:
SeptAlign (K251790)
## IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
SeptAlign consists of a bioabsorbable implant and single use delivery device. The polydioxanone implant is 100 mm long and 0.65 mm thick with bi-directional anchors which enable mechanical correction of cartilaginous nasal septal deviations without cartilage resection. The implant also includes a surgical (implant) needle to enable placement which is trimmed off after use. The implant supports the cartilage in the straightened positioned as the cartilage remodels and is fully resorbed within a 6-month period.
The implant is provided preloaded into a disposable delivery tool comprised of a non-patient contacting handle assembly and a medical grade stainless steel trocannula. The delivery tool enables placement of the distal portion of the implant in a minimally invasive manner.
SeptAlign is provided sterile and is intended for single-use only.
## V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
SeptAlign is used to support and straighten deviations in septal cartilage when sufficient healthy cartilage exists, and the cartilage is appropriately mobilized utilizing standard septoplasty techniques.
Page 1 of 4
{5}
**SPIRAIR**
Pre-market 510(k) Notification^{}[] SeptAlign
## VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The subject and predicate device share the same technological characteristics. Both devices utilize a bioabsorbable polydioxanone implant to support and straighten septal cartilage via bi-directional anchors which are secured through the septum, distal and proximal to the deviation. The implant in both devices applies mechanical traction to the straightened cartilage throughout the cartilage remodeling process and is resorbed within six months. Both devices utilize a single-use delivery tool for placement of the distal anchor portion of the implant in the septum. The proximal end of the implant is placed with an implant needle for both devices, which is trimmed off along with any excess implant material.
The subject device differs from the predicate device with respect to changes in the geometry of the implant features (shorter implant with wider anchors positioned closer together). The subject device delivery tool was also updated to improve the ease of use, specifically with regard to deploying the implant and securing the distal anchor. The subject device also includes two new features, a Depth Indicator attached to the trocannula which provides tactile physician feedback when puncturing the cartilage, and an actuator lock which prevents inadvertent deployment of the implant.
The subject device also includes new packaging designed to simplify presentation of the sterile product to the user.
| Characteristic | SeptAlign (Subject Device) | SeptAlign (Predicate Device) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use/ Indications for Use | SeptAlign is used to support and straighten deviations in septal cartilage when sufficient healthy cartilage exists, and the cartilage is appropriately mobilized utilizing standard septoplasty techniques. | SeptAlign is used to support and straighten deviations in septal cartilage when sufficient healthy cartilage exists, and the cartilage is appropriately mobilized utilizing standard septoplasty techniques. | Same |
| Target Population | Adults | Adults | Same |
| Anatomical site | Nasal passageway: nasal septal cartilage | Nasal passageway: nasal septal cartilage | Same |
| Intended Users | Prescription only. Qualified medical personnel (physicians) | Prescription only. Qualified medical personnel (physicians) | Same |
| Clinical Setting | Surgical setting | Surgical setting | Same |
| Implant Design | Length: 100mm Body Thickness/Width: 0.65mm Bidirectional Anchors 6.9mm (distal) and 1.9mm(proximal) | Length: 190mm Body Thickness/Width: 0.65mm Bidirectional Anchors 2.5mm (distal) and 2.0mm (proximal) | Shorter implant body with larger distal anchor and closer together proximal anchors |
Page 2 of 4
{6}
[Non-Text]
SPIRAIR
Pre-market 510(k) Notification
SeptAlign
| Characteristic | SeptAlign (Subject Device) | SeptAlign (Predicate Device) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Proximal anchor chain: 25.5mm (18 anchors)Implant can be trimmed to dimensions suitable for surgical need. | Proximal anchor chain: 69.5mm (22 anchors)Implant can be trimmed to dimensions suitable for surgical need. | |
| Patient Contacting Materials | Poly(dioxanone) Stainless Steel Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Polyvinyl Chloride Plastisol (PVC) | Poly(dioxanone) Stainless Steel | Addition of ABS component and PVC tip protector. |
| Resorption | 6 months | 6 months | Same |
| Implant Properties | Tensile strength/distal anchor strength >3lbsProximal anchor strength >1.5lbs | Tensile strength/distal anchor strength >3lbsProximal anchor strength >1.5lbs | Same |
| Single patient use? | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Sterilization | EtO | EtO | Same |
| Packaging | Tyvek with integrated foil pouch | Tyvek sealed in foil pouch | Same |
| Shelf-Life | 6 months | 6 months | Same |
| Compatibility with environment/other devices | Labeling specifies “Do not expose the device to high temperatures such as those generated by electro-surgical instruments.” | Labeling specifies “Do not expose the device to high temperatures such as those generated by electro-surgical instruments.” | Same |
## VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
| Performance Testing | Data provided |
| --- | --- |
| Biocompatibility Testing | A biocompatibility evaluation for the modified device was conducted in accordance with ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process (2018) and FDA Guidance: Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process, September, 2023. This evaluation determined that the materials in the modified device do not pose a risk of negative interaction with patients. |
Page 3 of 4
{7}
[LOGO]
SPIRAIR
Pre-market 510(k) Notification
SeptAlign
| Performance Testing | Data provided |
| --- | --- |
| Sterilization | Sterilization testing was successfully completed in accordance with ISO 11135-1:2014 and demonstrated an SAL of 10^{-6}. Bacterial endotoxins test (BET), a.k.a. Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) testing was conducted per current test guidelines: USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxin Test and AAMI ST72 Bacterial endotoxins- test methodologies, routine monitoring and alternatives to batch testing and confirmed that the device meets established pyrogen limit specifications. |
| Distribution, Packaging and Shelf-Life Testing | Distribution testing and Accelerated Aging for the updated packaging was successfully completed. Final packaging and device performance were successfully tested demonstrating integrity of the sterile barrier and preservation of SeptAlign performance for the labeled shelf-life. |
| Performance Testing – Bench | Design verification and validation testing was performed and demonstrated that performance and safety requirements were met and the device performed as intended. Specifically, the following tests were performed to verify the design changes since the predicate: - Implant performance and integrity - Mechanical integrity of delivery tool - Physician usability testing in a clinically relevant model - Deployment/ Simulated Use functionality |
No animal performance testing or clinical performance testing was required to support substantial equivalence.
### VIII. CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the intended use and indications for use are the same as that of the predicate device. Performance testing demonstrates that the modified SeptAlign device design does not affect safety and effectiveness, and the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Page 4 of 4
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.