The Remote Wave Electrode is to be used exclusively for external prosthetic fittings of the upper limbs.
Device Story
Active analog cutaneous electrode; detects surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from residual muscles on amputated limbs; transforms muscle electrical potentials into real-time analog output signal (0-5V) proportional to muscle activation envelope; used by prosthetists to assemble myoelectric prosthetic hands (Adam's Hand family); operates via 6-8.4V DC power from prosthetic system; provides input to prosthetic electronic board to drive terminal device opening/closing; benefits patient by enabling intuitive, proportional control of prosthetic limb; used in professional healthcare facilities and home settings.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical bench testing, including electrical safety (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-11), electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2), and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-5, -10, -23).
Technological Characteristics
Active analog electrode; AISI 316L steel contact domes; 90-450 Hz frequency bandwidth; 6-8.4V DC power; 27x18x7 mm dimensions; notch filter (50Hz or 60Hz models); no software; no wireless communication.
Indications for Use
Indicated for unilateral or bilateral upper limb amputees, including adolescents (12-22 years) and adults (22+ years), requiring external prosthetic fittings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cutaneous electrode is an electrode that is applied directly to a patient's skin either to record physiological signals (e.g., the electroencephalogram) or to apply electrical stimulation.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
March 12, 2026
Bionit Labs Srl
Aventaggiato Matteo
Co-Founder & COO
Via Cracovia 1
Soleto, LE 73010
Italy
Re: K260453
Trade/Device Name: Remote Wave Electrode (AE03-50); Remote Wave Electrode (AE03-60)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1320
Regulation Name: Cutaneous electrode
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: GXY, IQZ
Dated: February 11, 2026
Received: February 11, 2026
Dear Aventaggiato Matteo:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260453 - Aventaggiato Matteo
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K260453 - Aventaggiato Matteo
Page 3
Sincerely,
Tushar Bansal -S
Tushar Bansal, PhD
Acting Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team
DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and
Physical Medicine Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This
textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K260453 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Remote Wave Electrode (AE03-50);
Remote Wave Electrode (AE03-60) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Remote Wave Electrode is to be used exclusively for external prosthetic fittings of the upper limbs. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as
applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
| Please select the age group(s) for which the device(s) is
to be used. | ☐ Neonates/Newborns (Birth to < 29 days old)
☐ Infants (29 days old to < 2 years old)
☐ Children (2 years old to < 12 years old)
☑ Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old)
☑ Adults (22 years old and greater) | ? |
{4}
BIONIT LABS
Special 510(k) Summary
BionIT Labs Srl
Special 510(k) Premarket
Submission
Remote Wave Electrode
# Special 510(k) Summary Remote Wave Electrode
## 1. SUBMITTER INFORMATION
Manufacturer: BionIT Labs Srl
Via Cracovia 1
73010 – Soleto (LE)
ITALY
Contact Person: Matteo Aventaggiato
Contact Information: m.aventaggiato@bionitlabs.com
+39 393 4425 000
Date Prepared: 07/02/2025
Revision: First issue
## 2. DEVICE IDENTIFICATION
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Remote Wave Electrode |
| --- | --- |
| Common/Usual Name: | Cutaneous electrode for External Upper Limb Prosthetic System |
| Model name | AE03-50 and AE03-60 |
| Classification Name: | Cutaneous electrode |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.1320 |
| Product Code: | GXY |
| Subsequent Product Code: | IQZ |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | Neurology |
## 3. LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICE
| 510k number | Predicate Device | Device name | Manufacturer |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K242326 | I - Primary | Wave Electrode | BionIT Labs Srl |
Pag. 1 a 5
{5}
BIONIT LABS
Special 510(k) Summary
BionIT Labs Srl
Special 510(k) Premarket
Submission
Remote Wave Electrode
# 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
Remote Wave Electrode is an active analogue electrode for detecting any surface electromyographic signals, used for controlling prosthetic devices. It is compact and low-power, ensuring an accurate and fast reading of muscle electrical potentials generated voluntarily by the user. It also provides a real-time output signal proportional to the detected muscle activation.
Therefore,
Through the Remote Wave Electrode it is possible to non-invasively detect the electrical signal produced by the residual muscles on the patient's amputated limb (unilateral or bilateral amputees, starting from a transradial amputation level) and send an electrical signal to the electronic board of the prosthetic hand with a proportional width to the detected contraction.
Remote Wave Electrode is only compatible with the Adam's Hand Family, including Adam's Hand (medium e small), Adam's Hand Plus and Adam's Hook prosthetic hands that, according to the Regulation Number 890.3420, are classified as class I medical devices.
Remote Wave Electrode is available in two different models:
- Mod. AE03-50, with notch filter centred on the 50 Hz frequency;
- Mod. AE03-60, with notch filter centred on the 60 Hz frequency
# 5. INDICATION FOR USE
The Remote Wave Electrode is to be used exclusively for external prosthetic fittings of the upper limbs.
# 6. COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE
The following table compares the Remote Wave Electrode to the Wave Electrode, with pre-market authorization (K242326) approved, with respect to indications for use, principles of operation, technological characteristics, materials used, and performance. The comparison of the devices provides more detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence. The subject device does not raise any new issues of safety or efficacy based on the similarities to the predicate devices.
| Elements of Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Comparison Verdict |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Manufacturer | BionIT Labs Srl | BionIT Labs Srl | |
| Trade Name | Remote Wave Electrode | Wave Electrode | |
| Models | AE03-50, AE03-60 | AE02-50, AE02-60 | |
| 510(k) Number | | K242326 | - |
| Classification Name | Cutaneous electrode | Cutaneous electrode | Same |
| Classification Product Code | GXY | GXY | Same |
| Product device Classification | II | II | Same |
| Subsequent Product Code | IQZ | IQZ | Same |
| Intended Use / Indications for Use | The Remote Wave Electrode is to be used exclusively for | The Wave Electrode is to be used exclusively for external prosthetic | Same |
Pag. 2 a 5
{6}
BIONIT LABS
Special 510(k) Summary
BionIT Labs Srl
Special 510(k) Premarket
Submission
Remote Wave Electrode
| | external prosthetic fittings of the upper limbs. | fittings of the upper limbs. | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Target group | The Remote Wave Electrode is suitable for unilateral or bilateral amputees.
Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old)
Adults (22 years old and greater) | The Wave Electrode is designed to be used by adults wearing mono- or bilateral amputations. | Similar: The Orthopedic Technician may prefer the Remote Wave Electrode in cases where the subject's or residual limb's anthropometric dimensions require it.
The target group is the same as the predicate (K223738) used for the 510K of the Wave Electrode. |
| Principle of operation | Detect, process, and transmit physiological signals for use with a prosthesis and controls the terminal device. | Detect, process, and transmit physiological signals for use with a prosthesis and controls the terminal device. | Same |
| Environment of Use | Professional healthcare facility and home use | Professional healthcare facility and home use | Same |
| Assembling procedure | Components are assembled by a prosthetist | Components are assembled by a prosthetist | Same |
| Technological Characteristics - System | | | |
| Signal acquisition | EMG signals | EMG signals | Same |
| Output signal | The output is an analog signal with 0-5V dynamics, proportional to the instantaneous envelope of the EMG signal | The output is an analog signal with 0-5V dynamics, proportional to the instantaneous envelope of the EMG signal | Same |
| Principle of operation | Detect the EMG signal, process it, provide it as output to an electronic system that drives the opening/closing of a myoelectric prosthetic hand; this system can be integrated into the hand itself (as in the case of Adam's Hand) | Detect the EMG signal, process it, provide it as output to an electronic system that drives the opening/closing of a myoelectric prosthetic hand; this system can be integrated into the hand itself (as in the case of Adam's Hand) | Same |
Pag. 3 a 5
{7}
BIONIT LABS
Special 510(k) Summary
BionIT Labs Srl
Special 510(k) Premarket
Submission
Remote Wave Electrode
| | | case of Adam's Hand) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Power Source | The Remote Wave Electrode does not require an additional battery beyond the one present in the upper limb prosthetic system. | The Wave Electrode does not require an additional battery beyond the one present in the upper limb prosthetic system. | Same |
| Power Requirements | 6 - 8.4 V (DC)
2 mA | 6 - 8.4 V (DC)
2 mA | Same |
| Software Control tools | No | No | Same |
| Terminal device (e.g., Hand, wrist, or elbow) included? | No | No | Same |
| Wireless Communication for electrode | No | No | Same |
| Technological Characteristics - Electrode | | | |
| Dimensions | 27 x 18 x 7 mm | 27 x 18 x 8 mm | Similar |
| Operating temperature | 0°C - 40°C | 0°C - 40°C | Same |
| Contact materials | AISI316L | ABS
AISI316L | Similar
In the case of the Remote Wave Electrode, only the steel AISI 316L domes are in contact with the skin. |
| Frequency bandwidth | 90 - 450 Hz | 90 - 450 Hz | Same |
| Safety and Performance Testing | | | |
| Electrical Safety | IEC 60601-1
IEC 60601-1-11 | IEC 60601-1
IEC 60601-1-11 | Same |
| EMC Compatibility | IEC 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1-2 | Same |
| Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-1
ISO 10993-5
ISO 10993-10
ISO 10993-23 | ISO 10993-1
ISO 10993-5
ISO 10993-10
ISO 10993-23 | Same
The contact material is the same approved with the predicate device |
Given both Wave Electrode and the Remote Wave Electrode are intended to acquire the surface EMG signals, filter and amplify them analogically and input them to the electronics of the myoelectric prosthetic hand present in the prosthesis in which the electrodes are integrated, and acknowledging a few distinctions among the devices, it can be affirmed that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
The Remote Wave Electrode has the same characteristics as the Wave Electrode, but it has metallic plates for contact with the skin located outside the electrode case and connected to it through three shielded cables.
Pag. 4 a 5
{8}
BIONIT LABS
Special 510(k) Summary
BionIT Labs Srl
Special 510(k) Premarket
Submission
Remote Wave Electrode
# 7. NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA
Considering that the **Remote Wave Electrode** is intended to be used in conjunction with “Adam's Hand®” prosthetic hand, the safety of the electrodes have been demonstrated through the tests performed on the whole system (Electrodes + “Adam's Hand®” prosthetic hand)
- Electrical safety test according to IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-11 standards
- Electromagnetic compatibility test according to IEC 60601-1-2 standard
The **Remote Wave Electrode** does not require an additional battery beyond the one present in the upper limb prosthetic system, and does not include any software.
The material used for the construction of the applied part of the Remote Wave Electrode (AISI 316L steel) is the same used for the cleared (K242326) Wave Electrode. The material has been directly evaluated for the biological safety to exclude the toxicological concerns, by an accredited laboratory as following:
- Cytotoxicity testing per ISO 10993-5
- Skin irritation testing per ISO 10993-10
- Sensitization testing per ISO 10993-23
The **Remote Wave Electrode** was also tested internally to ensure that it meets design specifications & requirements and operates as intended when is used in conjunction with “Adam's Hand®” prosthetic hand.
# 8. CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA
No human clinical testing was required to support the medical device as the indications for use are equivalent to the predicate device. These types of devices, belonging to product category GXY, have been on the market for many years with proven safety and efficacy for the use of the device. The nonclinical testing detailed in this submission supports the substantial equivalence of the device.
# 9. STATEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The technological characteristics, features, specifications, materials, mode of operation, and intended use of **Remote Wave Electrode** are substantially equivalent to the electrodes included in the Wave Electrode quoted above already placed on the US market K242326.
Pag. 5 a 5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.