K260119 · Boston Scientific Corporation · OVB · Feb 10, 2026 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K260119
Device Name
SpaceOAR Vue System (SV-2101)
Applicant
Boston Scientific Corporation
Product Code
OVB · Radiology
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5725
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
SpaceOAR Vue System is intended to temporarily position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate during radiotherapy for prostate cancer and in creating this space it is the intent of SpaceOAR Vue System to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the anterior rectum. The SpaceOAR Vue System is composed of biodegradable material and maintains space for the entire course of prostate radiotherapy treatment and is completely absorbed by the patient’s body over time.
Device Story
System consists of single-use delivery mechanism and precursors for absorbable hydrogel spacer; used by clinicians to inject hydrogel between anterior rectal wall and prostate. Precursors (trilysine buffer and PEG-SG-TIB) mix in Y-connector to initiate cross-linking; reaction produces no measurable heat. Hydrogel acts as physical barrier to displace rectal wall during radiotherapy; degrades via hydrolysis and excreted via renal filtration. Device maintains space for duration of treatment course. Benefits include reduced radiation exposure to anterior rectum, potentially minimizing side effects. No software or algorithm involved.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench verification and validation testing, including hydrogel swell, gelation time, persistence, injection force, and usability testing.
Technological Characteristics
Absorbable hydrogel spacer composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG), succinimidyl glutarate, triiodobenzoate, and trilysine. System includes delivery mechanism with Y-connector. Principle of operation: in-situ cross-linking of hydrogel precursors upon injection. Biodegradable via hydrolysis; renal excretion. No energy source. Mechanical device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy to temporarily position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate to reduce radiation dose to the rectum.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An absorbable perirectal spacer is composed of biodegradable material that temporarily positions the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate during radiotherapy for prostate cancer with the intent to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the anterior rectum. The absorbable spacer maintains space for the entire course of prostate radiotherapy treatment and is completely absorbed by the patient's body over time.
Special Controls
An absorbable perirectal spacer must comply with the following special controls: (1) The premarket notification submission must include methodology and results of the following non-clinical and clinical performance testing. For all clinical investigations used to support premarket notification submissions for this type of device, line listings of the study data must be provided. Performance bench testing must demonstrate appropriate perirectal space (i) creation and maintenance for the duration of prostate radiotherapy; Performance bench testing must demonstrate that therapeutic radiation levels (ii) do not alter the performance of the device; (iii) Performance in vivo testing must demonstrate appropriate deployment of spacer as indicated in the accompanying labeling, and demonstrate appropriate expansion and absorption characteristics in a clinically relevant environment; (iv) Clinical study must demonstrate appropriate spacer stability and lack of migration for the entire course of radiotherapy, complete absorption, and lack of long term toxicity: Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device and the effects of (v) the sterilization process on the physical characteristics of the spacer; (vi) Shelf-life testing must demonstrate the stability of the physical characteristics of the spacer throughout the shelf-life as indicated in the accompanying labeling: and. (vii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (2) The risk management activities performed as part of the manufacturer's 21 CFR 820.30 design controls must document an appropriate end user initial training program which will be offered as part of efforts to mitigate the risk of failure to correctly operate the device, including, but not limited to, documentation of an appropriate end user initial training program on the proper spacer deployment technique. (3) The device labeling must include the following: A detailed summary of reported or observed complications related to the use (i) of the device; (ii) Appropriate warnings; Detailed instructions for system preparations and detailed implant procedure (iii) instructions; and, (iv) An expiration date that is supported by performance data as specified in subparagraph (b)(i)(vi).
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The premarket notification submission must include methodology and results of the following non-clinical and clinical performance testing. For all clinical investigations used to support premarket notification submissions for this type of device, line listings of the study data must be provided.
(i) Performance bench testing must demonstrate appropriate perirectal space creation and maintenance for the duration of prostate radiotherapy.
(ii) Performance bench testing must demonstrate that therapeutic radiation levels do not alter the performance of the device.
(iii) Performance in vivo testing must demonstrate appropriate deployment of spacer as indicated in the accompanying labeling, and demonstrate appropriate expansion and absorption characteristics in a clinically relevant environment.
(iv) Clinical study must demonstrate appropriate spacer stability and lack of migration for the entire course of radiotherapy, complete absorption, and lack of long term toxicity.
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device and the effects of the sterilization process on the physical characteristics of the spacer.
(vi) Shelf-life testing must demonstrate the stability of the physical characteristics of the spacer throughout the shelf-life as indicated in the accompanying labeling.
(vii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) The risk management activities performed as part of the manufacturer's § 820.10(c) of this chapter design and development activities must document an appropriate end user initial training program which will be offered as part of efforts to mitigate the risk of failure to correctly operate the device, including, but not limited to, documentation of an appropriate end user initial training program on the proper spacer deployment technique.
(3) The device labeling must include the following:
(i) A detailed summary of reported or observed complications related to the use of the device;
(ii) Appropriate warnings;
(iii) Detailed instructions for system preparations and detailed implant procedure instructions; and
(iv) An expiration date that is supported by performance data as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(vi) of this section.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
February 10, 2026
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cassidy Yeomans
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752
Re: K260119
Trade/Device Name: SpaceOAR Vue System (SV-2101)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5725
Regulation Name: Absorbable Perirectal Spacer
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: OVB
Dated: January 14, 2026
Received: January 14, 2026
Dear Cassidy Yeomans:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260119 - Cassidy Yeomans
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K260119 - Cassidy Yeomans
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Lora D. Weidner, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
Radiation Therapy Team
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K260119 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| SpaceOAR Vue System (SV-2101) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| SpaceOAR Vue System is intended to temporarily position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate during radiotherapy for prostate cancer and in creating this space it is the intent of SpaceOAR Vue System to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the anterior rectum.
The SpaceOAR Vue System is composed of biodegradable material and maintains space for the entire course of prostate radiotherapy treatment and is completely absorbed by the patient’s body over time. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K260119
# 510(k) Summary for SpaceOAR Vue System
## A Submitter
Boston Scientific Corporation
Urology and Women’s Health Division
100 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, MA 01752
## B Contact
Cassidy Yeomans
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
508-382-9137
Cassidy.Yeomans@bsci.com
Alternate Contact:
Julie Boylston
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Manager
508-683-5927
Julie.Boylston@bsci.com
## C Subject Device
Trade Name: SpaceOAR Vue System (SV-2101)
Device Type: Absorbable Perirectal Spacer
Device Classification Name: Hydrogel Spacer
Device Classification: Class II per 21 CFR §892.5725
Product Code: OVB
Review Panel: Radiology
Identification of Subject Device: SpaceOAR Vue System, K260119
## D Predicate Device
Trade Name: SpaceOAR Vue System (SV-2101)
Device Type: Absorbable Perirectal Spacer
Device Classification Name: Hydrogel Spacer
Device Classification: Class II per 21 CFR §892.5725
Product Code: OVB
510(k) Submitter/Holder: Boston Scientific Corporation
Identification of Predicate Device: SpaceOAR Vue System, K182971
SpaceOAR Vue System
Special 510(k)
Page 1 of 3
{5}
SpaceOAR Vue System
Special 510(k)
Page 2 of 3
# E Device Description
The SpaceOAR Vue System consists of components for the preparation of an absorbable hydrogel spacer and a delivery mechanism packaged in a single use system. Upon injection, between the anterior rectal wall and prostate, the precursor (trilysine buffer solution with PEG-SG-TIB) and accelerator (a buffered solution) mix in the device Y-connector where the formation of SpaceOAR Vue hydrogel is initiated. The SpaceOAR Vue hydrogel is formed through cross-linking of the polyethylene glycol with succinimidyl glutarate and triiodobenzoate (PEG-SG-TIB) and Trilysine. This reaction gives off no measurable heat. The hydrogel temporarily positions the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate during radiotherapy for prostate cancer and in creating this space it is the intent of SpaceOAR Vue System to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the anterior rectum. The hydrogel is biodegradable and maintains space for the entire course of prostate radiotherapy treatment. The hydrogel degrades via hydrolysis and is excreted via renal filtration.
# F Indications for Use
SpaceOAR Vue System is intended to temporarily position the anterior rectal wall away from the prostate during radiotherapy for prostate cancer and in creating this space it is the intent of SpaceOAR Vue System to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the anterior rectum.
The SpaceOAR Vue System is composed of biodegradable material and maintains space for the entire course of prostate radiotherapy treatment and is completely absorbed by the patient's body over time.
The Indications for Use Statement for the proposed SpaceOAR Vue System is identical to the predicate device.
# G Technological Characteristics Compared to Predicate
The principles of operation and underlying technological characteristics of the proposed SpaceOAR Vue System and the predicate device are identical. Both devices are systems that facilitate implantation of 10cc PEG biodegradable hydrogel between the anterior rectal wall and prostate prior to radiotherapy. This temporarily creates space between the anterior rectal wall and prostate during radiotherapy. The PEG hydrogel is broken down through hydrolysis and excreted from the body through renal filtration. The differences between the subject device and the predicate are minor. Differences include changes to:
- The nominal pH of the accelerator solution
- The inner diameter of the hypotubes within the Y-connector
- The luer ring color of the Y-connector
- The shelf carton color
These differences have been assessed and do not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness. This evaluation demonstrates that the SpaceOAR Vue System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{6}
SpaceOAR Vue System
Special 510(k)
Page 3 of 3
# H Performance Data
Applicable verification and validation testing was performed as required by the Boston Scientific design control process. The following performance data evaluated over the specified shelf life were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- Percent swell of hydrogel
- Hydrogel gelation time
- Hydrogel persistence
- Maximum force required to inject hydrogel
- Hydrogel performance after 60 minutes post precursor solution preparation
- Usability Testing
The predicate and subject device are predominantly identical in device design with limited changes to device components. A risk-based biocompatibility assessment of these limited changes indicates that no new biocompatibility testing is required to assess the proposed device change. The proposed SpaceOAR Vue System is biologically safe for its intended use.
The principles of operation and intended use are identical for both the predicate and proposed device. Verification and usability testing of the proposed device were completed and confirmed that the proposed SpaceOAR Vue System meets the same functional and performance specifications as the predicate SpaceOAR Vue System. The clinical workflow for device implantation is identical for both the predicate and proposed device. Therefore, clinical data were not required to support a determination of substantial equivalence.
The conclusion of the assessments demonstrates that the modified device continues to function as intended in a manner equivalent to the predicate device. The modified device raises no new issues of safety or effectiveness compared to the predicate.
# I Conclusion
Based on the performance data, the same principles of operation the same intended use, and same indications for use, the modified SpaceOAR Vue System is substantially equivalent to its predicate device, K182971.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.