K260038 · Evolution Spine · OVE · Feb 4, 2026 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K260038
Device Name
E3D™-C Interbody System
Applicant
Evolution Spine
Product Code
OVE · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Feb 4, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
E3D™-C Interbody System includes interbody fusion devices indicated at one or more levels of the cervical spine (C2-T1) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD), instability, trauma including fractures, deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, spinal stenosis, and failed previous fusion. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment. These devices are to be filled with autograft bone and/or allogenic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone. E3D™-C Static Interbodies are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation). E3D™-C Integrated Interbodies are intended to be used with screws or anchors. When used with two screws, these devices are stand-alone interbody fusion devices. When used with anchors, or without screws, these devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation).
Device Story
E3D™-C Interbody System provides structural stability for cervical spinal fusion; implants placed via anterior approach. System includes static and integrated interbody cages; integrated versions feature screw holes and cam locking mechanism to prevent screw back-out. Implants are additively manufactured from titanium alloy powder; some feature HA nano Surface® (20-40nm hydroxyapatite). Used by surgeons in clinical settings to facilitate bone growth through double lattice architecture. Static interbodies require supplemental fixation; integrated interbodies function as stand-alone devices when used with two screws, or with supplemental fixation when used with anchors or without screws. Implants filled with autograft or allogenic bone graft to promote fusion.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical performance established via static/dynamic compression, shear, and torsion (ASTM F2077), wear debris analysis (ASTM F1877), and expulsion/subsidence testing (ASTM F2267).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Titanium alloy powder (ASTM F3001) for additively manufactured components; titanium alloy (ASTM F136) for subtractive screws. Surface: Optional HA nano Surface® (20-40nm). Architecture: Double lattice via Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS). Sterilization: Not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with cervical DDD, instability, trauma (fractures), deformity (kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis), cervical spondylotic myelopathy, spinal stenosis, or failed previous fusion at one or more levels (C2-T1) after 6 weeks of failed non-operative treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
Alphatec Spine IdentiTi™ NanoTec™ Interbody System (K211805)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
February 4, 2026
Evolution Spine
Quynh Tran
Associate Product Development Engineer
2300 N. Haskell Ave.
Dallas, Texas 75204
Re: K260038
Trade/Device Name: E3D™-C Interbody System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080
Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ODP, OVE
Dated: January 5, 2026
Received: January 6, 2026
Dear Quynh Tran:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K260038 - Quynh Tran
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K260038 - Quynh Tran
Page 3
Sincerely,
KATHERINE D.
KAVLOCK-S
for
Brent Showalter, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K260038 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| E3D™-C Interbody System | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| E3D™-C Interbody System includes interbody fusion devices indicated at one or more levels of the cervical spine (C2-T1) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD), instability, trauma including fractures, deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, spinal stenosis, and failed previous fusion. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment. These devices are to be filled with autograft bone and/or allogenic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone. | | |
| E3D™-C Static Interbodies are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation). | | |
| E3D™-C Integrated Interbodies are intended to be used with screws or anchors. When used with two screws, these devices are stand-alone interbody fusion devices. When used with anchors, or without screws, these devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation). | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K260038 - Page 1 of 2
# 510(k) Summary
In accordance with Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 807, and in particular 21 CFR §807.92, the following summary of information is provided:
| Company: | Evolution Spine
2300 N Haskell Rd
Dallas, TX 75204 |
| --- | --- |
| Contact: | Quynh Tran
Evolution Spine
2300 N Haskell Ave
Dallas, TX 75204
Phone: 469-486-3305
qtran@evolutionspine.com |
| Date Prepared: | January 5, 2026 |
| Device Trade Name: | E3D™-C Interbody System |
| Common Name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device |
| Classification: | 21 CFR §888.3080 |
| Class: | II |
| Product Code: | ODP, OVE |
| Primary Predicate: | E3D-C™ Interbody System (K241846) |
| Additional Predicate: | Alphatec Spine IdentiTi™ NanoTec™ Interbody System (K211805) |
# Purpose of Submission:
The purpose of this submission is to gain clearance for adding additional implant footprints in 20x14mm, 20x16mm, & 22x19mm size to the Evolution Spine E3D-C™ Interbody System. The Evolution Spine E3D-C™ Interbody System device has been previously submitted and cleared under 510(k) K241846.
# Device Description:
The E3D™-C Interbody System provides interbody fusion devices designed to provide structural stability during spinal fusion. The E3D™-C Interbody System consists of Interbodies offered in various sizes to accommodate surgical needs and anatomic requirements. The E3D™-C Interbodies were designed to be placed via an anterior approach. All Interbodies in the system are additively manufactured from titanium alloy powder, per ASTM F3001. The System offers both Static and Integrated Interbodies. The Integrated version is to be used in conjunction with two (2) screws that are subtractively manufactured from titanium alloy, per ASTM F136 or two (2) anchors that are additively manufactured from titanium alloy powder, per ASTM F3001.
Integrated Interbodies were designed to accept two bone screws or anchors which are used to fixate into the adjacent vertebral bodies. When appropriate, the Integrated Interbodies may be used as a standalone system when used with screws. The Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) Interbodies are manufactured using an additive Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) 3D-printing process which enables the creation of the system's double lattice architecture. The double lattice architecture was designed to encourage bone growth on and through the cage. The Integrated Interbody has two screw holes as well as an integral cam locking mechanism to prevent screw back-out.
{5}
K260038 - Page 2 of 2
# EVOLUTION
## SPINE
The E3D™-C Interbody System's implants are available with and without HA nano Surface®, a 20-40 nanometer thin hydroxyapatite (HA) surface treatment. The surface treatment presents nano-scale topography on the entirety of the implant surface.
## Indications For Use:
E3D™-C Interbody System includes interbody fusion devices indicated at one or more levels of the cervical spine (C2-T1) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD), instability, trauma including fractures, deformity defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, spinal stenosis, and failed previous fusion. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment. These devices are to be filled with autograft bone and/or allogenic bone graft composed of cancellous, cortical, and/or corticocancellous bone.
E3D™-C Static Interbodies are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation).
E3D™-C Integrated Interbodies are intended to be used with screws or anchors. When used with two screws, these devices are stand-alone interbody fusion devices. When used with anchors, or without screws, these devices are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. cervical plates or cervical posterior fixation).
## Substantial Equivalence:
The implants proposed in this submission are identical to the predicate device (K241846) in principle of operation, indications for use, stabilization method, anatomic location and approach, product code and classification, sterilization process, material, and biocompatibility. The additional footprints are within the size range of the additional predicate, Alphatec Spine IdentiTi™ NanoTec™ Interbody System (K211805). The subject E3D™-C Interbody System has been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
## Performance Data:
Mechanical testing performed on the predicate (K241846) applies to the subject devices because the subject devices did not introduce a new worst-case geometry. Testing of the original E3D™-C Interbody System included static compression, static shear, static torsion, dynamic compression, dynamic shear, and dynamic torsion per ASTM F2077. Additional testing included wear debris analysis per ASTM F1877, expulsion, and subsidence per ASTM F2267. Predicate testing remains applicable, and the new subject devices' performance is equivalent to the primary predicate (K241846).
## Conclusion:
Based on the indications for use, technological characteristics, performance testing assessment, and comparison to predicate devices, the subject E3D™-C Interbody System has been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.