The Sofia Lyme FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid differential detection of human IgM and IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi from serum and plasma specimens from patients suspected of B. burgdorferi infection. This qualitative test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A negative result does not preclude infection with B. burgdorferi. All positive results for IgM and/or IgG should be further tested by a corresponding second-tier western blot assay. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures. The Sofia Lyme FIA may be used with Sofia or Sofia 2. Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid qualitative detection of a Campylobacter-specific antigen in human fecal specimens. Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA is designed to detect C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari and C. upsaliensis from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. The test is intended for use with preserved fecal specimens in transport media and unpreserved fecal specimens. Test results should be considered in conjunction with clinical findings and patient history.
Device Story
The Sofia 2 analyzer is a diagnostic instrument that performs immunofluorescence-based lateral flow assays. For Lyme, it detects human IgM/IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum/plasma; for Campylobacter, it detects specific antigens in fecal specimens. The user adds the specimen to a test cassette, which is then inserted into the Sofia 2 analyzer. The device operates in either 'Read Now' (manual incubation) or 'Walk Away' (automated timing) mode. The analyzer uses an internal camera and sensors to scan the test strip, measuring fluorescent signals generated by microparticles bound to the target analytes. Method-specific algorithms interpret these signals to provide qualitative results (Positive, Negative, or Invalid) on an LCD touchscreen. The system is intended for use by healthcare professionals in clinical settings to aid in diagnosis. The updated software (v.2.0.14) enhances usability, modernizes drivers, and adds data encryption for clinical information, while maintaining the same fundamental lateral flow detection principle as the predicate.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence was established through analytical performance testing comparing the updated software (v.2.0.14) to the previous version (v.1.3.0/v.1.9.0). Studies included precision, reproducibility, and method comparison using contrived samples (spiked plasma for Lyme; spiked fecal matrix for Campylobacter). Results showed 100% agreement for negative samples and high concordance for positive samples across both software versions. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were previously established in K173691 and K211342.
Technological Characteristics
Microprocessor-controlled fluorometer; UV LED excitation (365 nm); 618 nm emission detection. Dimensions: 19.7 cm x 11.4 cm x 12.7 cm. Power: 100-240 VAC or rechargeable lithium polymer battery. Software: C++ based firmware, Linux 5.4 kernel, plugin-based assay architecture. Cybersecurity: Added database/clinical data encryption and enhanced user authentication. Sterilization: N/A (analyzer).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients suspected of Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease) using serum/plasma, and patients with signs/symptoms of gastroenteritis using fecal specimens for detection of Campylobacter species (C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Treponema pallidum treponemal test reagents are devices that consist of the antigens, antisera and all control reagents (standardized reagents with which test results are compared) which are derived from treponemal sources and that are used in the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS), the Treponema pallidum immobilization test (T.P.I.), and other treponemal tests used to identify antibodies to Treponema pallidum directly from infecting treponemal organisms in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of syphilis caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Treponema and provides epidemiological information on syphilis.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
# DECISION SUMMARY
# ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
# I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K254295
B Applicant
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Inc. (Quidel Ortho)
C Proprietary and Established Names
Sofia Lyme FIA
Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LSR | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3830 - *Treponema pallidum* treponemal test reagents | MI - Microbiology |
| KHO | Class I, exempt | 21 CFR 862.2560 - Fluorometer, For Clinical Use | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
| LQP | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 866.3110 - *Campylobacter fetus* serological reagents | MI - Microbiology |
# II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for the Sofia Lyme FIA and Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA assays as performed on the Sofia 2 analyzer using an updated software version (v.2.0.14).
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
# **B Measurand:**
# **Sofia Lyme FIA:**
Anti-*Borrelia burgdorferi* (IgM and/or IgG) antibodies
# **Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:**
*Campylobacter jejuni*, *Campylobacter coli*, *Campylobacter lari*, and *Campylobacter upsaliensis* antigens
# **C Type of Test:**
# **Sofia Lyme FIA:**
Lateral flow fluorescent immunoassay (FIA)
# **Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:**
Lateral flow fluorescent immunoassay (FIA)
# **III Intended Use/Indications for Use:**
# **A Intended Use(s):**
See Indications for Use below.
# **B Indication(s) for Use:**
# **Sofia Lyme FIA:**
The Sofia Lyme FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid differential detection of human IgM and IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* from serum and plasma specimens from patients suspected of *B. burgdorferi* infection. This qualitative test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A negative result does not preclude infection with *B. burgdorferi*. All positive results for IgM and/or IgG should be further tested by a corresponding second-tier western blot assay. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures. The Sofia Lyme FIA may be used with Sofia or Sofia 2.
# **Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:**
Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid qualitative detection of a *Campylobacter*-specific antigen in human fecal specimens. Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA is designed to detect *C. jejuni*, *C. coli*, *C. lari* and *C. upsaliensis* from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. The test is intended for use with preserved fecal specimens in transport media and unpreserved fecal specimens. Test results should be considered in conjunction with clinical findings and patient history.
# **C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):**
For Prescription Use Only
K254295 - Page 2 of 12
{2}
# D Special Instrument Requirements:
Sofia 2 v2.0.14
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
# Sofia Lyme FIA:
The Sofia Lyme FIA is an immunofluorescence-based, lateral flow assay for detection of IgM and/or IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in patient specimens. Reagents for the assay are ready-to-use and provided in the kit.
The assay uses a bidirectional test strip format to detect both IgM and IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi. One side of the test strip detects IgM antibodies to B. burgdorferi and the other side of the test strip detects IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi.
To perform the test, a patient serum or plasma specimen is obtained and added to a pre-filled vial containing the lyme running buffer. The diluted sample is then pipetted into the round sample port in the center of the Test Cassette. The Test Cassette is loaded into Sofia 2 in either the READ NOW Mode or WALK AWAY Mode.
In READ NOW Mode, the user allows the cassette to develop on the countertop for 10 minutes. In WALK AWAY Mode, the user immediately after adding the specimen to the cassette, the cassette is inserted into Sofia 2. Sofia 2 will analyze the test strip at 3, 5, 8, and 10 minutes until both IgM and IgG positive results are received. This feature allows for earlier read times. Each Sofia Lyme FIA kit will contain one Positive and one Negative Control—each provided in separate dropper bottles. The Positive QC control is formulated with patient Lyme IgM and IgG positive plasma diluted into 1X PBS, and 0.3% Microcide is added to the solution as an antimicrobial. The Negative QC control is formulated with patient negative serum diluted into 1X PBS and 0.3% Microcide is added to the solution as an antimicrobial. External Controls will be tested by adding 2 drops to the test cassette.
# Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:
The Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA is an immunofluorescence-based, lateral flow assay that uses an antibody sandwich design to detect Campylobacter-specific antigens in stool specimens from individuals with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis.
The patient stool sample is placed in the Specimen Tube, containing Specimen Diluent, to make the antigenic components more accessible to the test antibodies. An aliquot of the diluted sample is dispensed through a filter into the Test Cassette sample well. From the sample well, the sample migrates through a test strip containing various unique chemical environments. If Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter lari, or Campylobacter upsaliensis specific antigens are present, they will be bound by polyclonal antibodies coupled to fluorescent microparticles that migrate through the test strip. The fluorescent microparticles containing bound antigens will be captured by monoclonal antibodies at a defined location on the test strip where they are detected by Sofia 2. If Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter lari, or Campylobacter upsaliensis specific antigens are not present, the fluorescent microparticles will not be trapped by the capture antibodies nor detected by Sofia 2.
The Test Cassette is placed inside of Sofia 2 for automatically timed development (“Walk Away” mode), or pre-incubated on the bench top prior to loading into Sofia 2 (“Read Now” mode),
K254295 - Page 3 of 12
{3}
where Sofia 2 will scan, measure, and interpret the immunofluorescent signal using method-specific algorithms. Note that a supervisor can place Sofia 2 into Locked Walk Away mode, which only allows testing to be performed in Walk Away mode. Once testing is complete, Sofia 2 will display the test results (Positive, Negative, or Invalid) on the screen. The fluorescence signal obtained with this assay is invisible to the unaided eye. The test results can only be obtained with the proper use of Sofia 2.
## **B Principle of Operation:**
Sofia 2 family assays employ immunofluorescence-based lateral flow technology to perform qualitative detection of analytes in human clinical samples.
## **C Instrument Description Information:**
### **1. Instrument Name:**
Sofia 2
### **2. Specimen Identification:**
The Sofia 2 analyzer supports specimen identification through two methods: Barcode entry and manual entry.
### **3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:**
The Sofia 2 analyzer supports multiple specimen types depending on the assay. Specimen collection is performed using the sterile swab or collection device provided or recommended in the test kit following the procedures specified in the assay-specific labeling.
### **4. Calibration:**
The Sofia 2 analyzer uses an automated calibration system to ensure stable optical performance and minimize signal drift. A Calibration Check must be performed at least every 30 days, or as otherwise specified in the applicable assay labeling.
### **5. Quality Control:**
The Sofia 2 analyzer uses Positive and Negative External Controls provided in each assay kit. External QC demonstrates that assay reagents, test cassettes, and procedures are functioning properly.
K254295 - Page 4 of 12
{4}
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Sofia Lyme FIA
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K173691
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | PROPOSED DEVICE: K254295 | | PREDICATE DEVICE: K173691 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Sofia Lyme FIA | Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA | Sofia Lyme FIA |
| **General Device Characteristic Similarities** | | | |
| Intended Use/ Indications For Use | The Sofia Lyme FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid differential detection of human IgM and IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* from serum and plasma specimens from patients suspected of *B. burgdorferi* infection. This qualitative test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A negative result does not preclude infection with *B. burgdorferi*. All positive results for IgM and/or IgG should be further tested by a corresponding second-tier western blot assay. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures. The Sofia Lyme FIA may be used with Sofia or Sofia 2. | Sofia 2 *Campylobacter* FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid qualitative detection of a *Campylobacter*-specific antigen in human fecal specimens. Sofia 2 *Campylobacter* FIA is designed to detect *C. jejuni*, *C. coli*, *C. lari* and *C. upsaliensis* from patients with signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. The test is intended for use with preserved fecal specimens in transport media and unpreserved fecal specimens. Test results should be considered in conjunction with clinical findings and patient history. | The Sofia Lyme FIA employs immunofluorescence for the rapid differential detection of human IgM and IgG antibodies to *Borrelia burgdorferi* from serum and plasma specimens from patients suspected of *B. burgdorferi* infection. This qualitative test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A negative result does not preclude infection with *B. burgdorferi*. All positive results for IgM and/or IgG should be further tested by a corresponding second-tier western blot assay. Test results are to be used in conjunction with information obtained from the patient's clinical evaluation and other diagnostic procedures. The Sofia Lyme FIA may be used with Sofia or Sofia 2. |
| Development Modes | Walk-Away and Read Now modes | | Same |
| Development Time | 10 minutes | | Same |
| User Interface | 4-inch color LCD touchscreen display | | Same |
| User Types | Operator user, Supervisor, Service level | | Same |
| Barcode Scanner (Cassette) | Integrated barcode scanner | | Same |
| Assay/Instrument Interface | Drawer (manual) | | Same |
| **General Device Characteristic Differences** | | | |
| Software Version | v2.0.14 | | v1.3.0 |
K254295 - Page 5 of 12
{5}
| Software | The software has been reengineered to enhance usability and to modernize the device drivers, without requiring any hardware modifications. | The firmware provides a Graphical User Interface and manages the workflow, algorithms, hardware integration (camera, sensors, screen, touch, power), and all interoperability functions. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Programming Language | The firmware code is rewritten and reengineered from the same requirements in C++ (object-oriented programming paradigm). | Python (object-oriented programming paradigm) |
| Assay Framework | Existing assays were refactored to have algorithms, graphical user interface screens, and AMF components migrated into an assay-specific plugin that can be deployed independently of the firmware. Assay-related workflows (e.g., operator workflows and assay calculations) will no longer reside within the firmware. This architecture provides greater flexibility for allowing algorithms and user interface screens to be tailored to each individual assay. | Algorithms and screens reside in the firmware and are configured with an Assay Method File (AMF). Assay related workflows (such as operator workflows and assay calculations) reside inside of the firmware. |
| Assay Data Files | Assay plugin format | Assay Method File (AMF) |
| Operating System | Linux operating system Kernel version 5.4 | Linux operating system Kernel version 4.1 |
| Security - Data Encryption | Encryption was added for database and clinical data | Database and clinical data not encrypted |
| Security - User Authentication | Enhanced support for unique and complex user identification and password | Combination user identification and password available |
| Security - Export Files | Encryption of export setting files to USB i.e., instrument settings | Export setting files to USB were not encrypted |
## VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions (June 14, 2023)
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions (February 2026)
- Bundling Multiple Devices or Multiple Indications in a Single Submission (June 22, 2007)
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
#### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision and reproducibility studies of the Sofia Lyme FIA were previously assessed in K173691. Refer to K173691 Decision Summary for additional details.
The precision and reproducibility studies of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA were previously assessed in K211342. Refer to K211342 Decision Summary for additional details.
K254295 - Page 6 of 12
{6}
2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The analytical specificity/interference studies of the Sofia Lyme FIA were previously assessed in K173691. Refer to K173691 Decision Summary for additional details.
The analytical specificity/interference studies of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA were previously assessed in K211342. Refer to K211342 Decision Summary for additional details.
4. Detection Limit and Assay Reportable Range:
For the purposes of the analytical and comparison studies, previous software versions of the Sofia 2 analyzer (v1.3.0 for the Sofia Lyme FIA assay and v1.9.0 for the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA assay) are collectively referred to as "software version 1," and the updated software version is referred to as "software version 2."
Sofia Lyme FIA:
To assess the equivalency of the two software versions of the Sofia 2 analyzer, the performance of the Sofia Lyme FIA was evaluated with different dilutions of recombinant IgG and IgM antibodies to B. burgdorferi in negative plasma matrix. The plasma matrix consisted of individual human plasma samples collected from donors confirmed negative using the Sofia Lyme FIA. Initially, five (5) replicates were tested for each of the serial dilutions on one lot of Sofia Lyme FIA. Additional confirmatory testing was performed using 20 replicates with concentrations near the assay cut-off. Testing was performed on ten Sofia 2 analyzers (five per software version).
Results demonstrated equivalent performance of Sofia Lyme FIA for IgG and IgM analytes using the Sofia 2 analyzer with both software versions. (Table 1).
K254295 - Page 7 of 12
{7}
Table 1. Performance of the Sofia Lyme FIA – Summary Results
| IgG | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test Phase | Conc. (ng/μL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 (0) | 0 | 10 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 6.6E+00 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 1.32E+00 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Confirmation | 6.6E+00 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 3.3E+00 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 1 | 19 (95.0) |
| | 1.65E+00 | 20 | 0 | 16 | 4 (20.0) | 0 | 14 | 6 (30.0) |
| IgM | | | | | | | | |
| Test Phase | Conc. (ng/μL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 (0) | 0 | 10 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 9.6E+00 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 1.92E+00 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 3.84E-01 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 (20.0) | 0 | 4 | 1 (20.0) |
| Confirmation | 1.92E+00 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 9.60E-01 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 4.80E-01 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) |
### Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:
To assess the equivalency of the two software versions of the Sofia 2 analyzer, the performance of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA was determined by evaluating different dilutions of whole organism culture preparations of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lari in negative uniform fecal matrix (NUFM) and Cary Blair transport medium. The whole organism culture preparations of C. jejuni and C. lari were diluted into negative uniform fecal matrix and Cary Blair. NUFM consisted of each individual stool sample diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Initially, five (5) replicates were tested for each of the serial dilutions on one lot of Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA. Additional confirmatory testing was performed using 20 replicates with concentrations near the assay cut-off. Testing was performed on ten Sofia 2 analyzers (5 per software version).
Results demonstrated equivalent performance of Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA using the Sofia 2 analyzer with both software versions for the Campylobacter spp. evaluated. The results of the study are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
K254295 - Page 8 of 12
{8}
**Table 2. Performance of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA – Summary Results for *C. jejuni***
| Negative Uniform Fecal Matrix (CFU/mL) | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test Phase | Conc. (CFU/mL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 2.0E+06 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 4.0E+05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 8.0E+04 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 (80.0) | 0 | 2 | 3 (60) |
| Confirmation | 8.0E+05 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 4.0E+05 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 2.0E+05 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 | 19 | 1 (5.0) |
| Cary Blair (CFU/mL) | | | | | | | | |
| Test Phase | Conc. (CFU/mL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 5.0E+05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 1.0E+05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 2.0E+04 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 (80.0) | 0 | 2 | 3 (60) |
| Confirmation | 2.0E+05 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 1.0E+05 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 5.0E+04 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 | 19 | 1 (5.0) |
**Table 3. Performance of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA – Summary Results for *C. lari***
| Negative Uniform Fecal Matrix (CFU/mL) | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Test Phase | Conc. (ng/μL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 4.0E+06 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 8.0E+05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 1 | 4 (80.0) |
| | 1.6E+05 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Confirmation | 1.6E+07 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 8.0E+06 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 4.0E+06 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) |
| Cary Blair (CFU/mL) | | | | | | | | |
| Test Phase | Conc. (ng/μL) | n | Sofia 2 Software Version 1 | | | Sofia 2 Software Version 2 | | |
| | | | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) | Invalid | Neg. | Pos. (%) |
| Blank Negative | N/A | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | 5 | 0 (0) |
| Initial | 1.0E+06 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 2.0E+05 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| | 4.0E+04 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 (20.0) | 0 | 4 | 1 (20.0) |
| Confirmation | 4.0E+06 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 2.0E+06 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) | 0 | 0 | 20 (100) |
| | 1.0E+06 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 | 20 | 0 (0) |
K254295 - Page 9 of 12
{9}
# 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The stability studies of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA were previously assessed in K211342. Refer to K211342 Decision Summary for additional details.
# 6. Assay Cut-Off:
# **Sofia Lyme FIA:**
To evaluate performance near the assay cut-off for the Sofia Lyme FIA, a panel of samples were contrived by spiking recombinant IgG and IgM antibodies to *B. burgdorferi* in negative plasma matrix. Samples were tested with the Sofia 2 analyzer with software version 1 and version 2. The panel included a negative sample, low positive sample and moderate positive sample for both recombinant IgG and IgM antibodies. Samples were tested in triplicate over five (5) days, two (2) runs per day, with at least two (2) operators, yielding 30 replicates per sample. Testing was performed on 20 analyzers (10 per software version) using one lot of Sofia Lyme FIA.
All positive and negative samples yielded 100% agreement to the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2. Performance of the Sofia Lyme FIA near the assay cut-off was equivalent between Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2 for IgG and IgM antibodies.
# **Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:**
To evaluate performance near the assay cut-off for the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA, a panel of samples were contrived by spiking whole organism culture preparations of *C. jejuni* and *C. lari* in negative uniform fecal matrix (NUFM) and processed in Cary Blair transport medium were tested with the Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2. The panel included a negative sample, low positive sample and moderate positive sample for both *C. jejuni* and *C. lari*. Samples were tested in triplicate over five (5) days, two (2) runs per day, with at least two (2) operators, yielding 30 replicates per sample. Testing was performed on 20 analyzers (10 per software version) using one lot of Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA.
All positive and negative samples yielded 100% agreement to the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2 for *C. jejuni* and *C. lari*. Performance of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA near the assay cut-off was equivalent between Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2 for the *Campylobacter* spp. evaluated.
# **B Comparison Studies:**
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
# **Sofia Lyme FIA:**
The performance of the Sofia Lyme FIA was evaluated by performing a method comparison study with the Sofia 2 analyzer with software version 1 and version 2. Contrived positive and negative samples were prepared in negative plasma matrix collected from individual donors confirmed negative using the Sofia Lyme FIA. Equivalency between serum and plasma matrices was previously established in K173691; therefore, only plasma samples were tested. Positive samples were spiked independently with recombinant IgG or IgM antibodies to *B. burgdorferi*. The test panel consisted of 30 negative samples and 50 positive samples.
K254295 - Page 10 of 12
{10}
Positive samples were comprised of 18 low positive samples, 17 moderate positive samples, and 15 moderate to high positive samples per analyte. Prior to testing, all samples were coded and randomized and confirmed on the Sofia 2 analyzer using software version 1. Testing was performed on 10 Sofia 2 analyzers (5 per software version) operating in Read Now mode using a single lot.
All IgG positive samples yielded 100% agreement to the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer and software version 2. There was one IgG positive sample prepared at 5-10x LoD that yielded an unexpected IgM-positive result with the Sofia 2 analyzer and software version 1. IgM positive samples yielded 98.0% (49/50) agreement to the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer and software version 2. There was one IgM positive sample prepared at 1x LoD that yielded a negative result with the Sofia 2 analyzer and software version 2. All negative samples yielded 100% agreement with the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2 for IgG and IgM antibodies. Results demonstrated equivalent performance of Sofia Lyme FIA for IgG and IgM analytes using the Sofia 2 analyzer with both software versions.
### Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA:
The performance of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA was evaluated by performing a method comparison study with the Sofia 2 analyzer with software version 1 and version 2. Contrived positive and negative samples were prepared in negative uniform fecal matrix collected from individual healthy donors and processed in Cary Blair transport media. Positive samples were spiked independently with C. jejuni or C. lari. The test panel consisted of 30 negative samples and 50 positive samples. Positive samples were comprised of 18 low positive samples, 17 moderate positive samples, and 15 moderate to high positive samples per analyte. Prior to testing, all samples were coded and randomized and confirmed on the Sofia 2 analyzer using software version 1. Testing was performed on 10 Sofia 2 analyzers (5 per firmware version) operating in Read Now mode using a single lot.
All positive and negative samples yielded 100% agreement with the expected result with the Sofia 2 analyzer software version 1 and version 2 for C. jejuni and C. lari. Results demonstrated equivalent performance of Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA using the Sofia 2 analyzer with both software versions for the Campylobacter spp. evaluated.
### 2. Matrix Comparison:
The plasma and serum matrix equivalency studies of the Sofia Lyme FIA were previously assessed in K173691. Refer to K173691 Decision Summary for additional details.
K254295 - Page 11 of 12
{11}
## **C Clinical Studies:**
### **1. Clinical Sensitivity:**
The clinical sensitivity studies of the Sofia Lyme FIA were previously assessed in K173691. Refer to K173691 Decision Summary for additional details.
The stability studies of the Sofia 2 Campylobacter FIA were previously assessed in K211342. Refer to K211342 Decision Summary for additional details.
### **2. Clinical Specificity:**
Not applicable.
### **3. Clinical Cut-Off**
Not applicable.
### **4. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):**
The clinical supportive studies of the Sofia Lyme FIA were previously assessed in K173691. Refer to K173691 Decision Summary for additional details.
## **D Expected Values/Reference Range:**
Not applicable.
## **E Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:**
Software and cybersecurity documentation was reviewed and found to be acceptable.
## **VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## **IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K254295 - Page 12 of 12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.