K254240 · Neko Health AB · QOK · Sep 22, 2026 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K254240
Device Name
Echo-2
Applicant
Neko Health AB
Product Code
QOK · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Sep 22, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.2786
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Echo-2 device includes an optical module that is intended to capture motion-vibration signals from a illuminated skin surface for assessment of physiological information. Such information, captured during spot-measurement, includes: Heart rate.The Echo-2 device is indicated for use by or under the supervision of healthcare professionals for adult patients in a professional healthcare setting. The Echo-2 device should be used with an individual in a supine position (including with a slightly elevated upper body). The information stored by the system may be reviewed by qualified persons.The Echo-2 device is not intended for continuous monitoring and is only intended for spot-check measurements of heart rate. The Echo-2 device is not intended for use in subjects with arrhythmias.
Device Story
Echo-2 is a contactless sensor system using laser Doppler vibrometry to measure skin surface micro-motions caused by heartbeats. Operated by healthcare professionals in clinical settings, the device captures motion-vibration signals from an illuminated skin surface. It processes these signals to calculate and display heart rate (25–220 bpm) and the acceleration waveform on a host computer's graphical user interface. The device is intended for spot-check measurements only; it does not provide continuous monitoring. It includes interfaces for auxiliary data collection from third-party ECGs or stethoscopes. The system provides clinicians with objective heart rate data to assist in physiological assessment. The device is not intended for use on patients with arrhythmias. Benefits include non-invasive, contactless heart rate acquisition.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective clinical study compared Echo-2 heart rate measurements against ECG reference standard in adult participants from Cardio Alpha and Dermaflow Alpha investigations. Study included diverse ages, sexes, and Fitzpatrick skin types. Results showed strong agreement with ECG; Bland-Altman analysis confirmed mean bias and limits of agreement within clinically acceptable thresholds. Deming regression showed consistent slopes and intercepts. Subgroup analyses confirmed performance consistency across demographics. Bench testing supplemented clinical data, verifying accuracy within ±5 bpm across the 25–220 bpm range.
Technological Characteristics
Contactless laser Doppler vibrometer; 633 nm wavelength, 1 mW max power, Class 2 laser. Mains powered (100–240 VAC). Ethernet over optical fiber connectivity to host computer. Software-based signal processing of skin acceleration waveforms. Dimensions/form factor not specified. Sterilization not applicable (non-contact). Complies with IEC 60601-1:2020, IEC 60601-1-2:2020, and IEC 60825-1:2020.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients in professional healthcare settings for spot-check heart rate measurement. Contraindicated for subjects with arrhythmias. Must be used in supine position (including slightly elevated upper body) under supervision of healthcare professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The device uses an optical sensor system and software algorithms to obtain and analyze video signal and estimate pulse rate, heart rate, breathing rate, and/or respiratory rates. This device is not intended to independently direct therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) A software description and the results of verification and validation testing based on a comprehensive hazard analysis and risk assessment must include:
(i) A full characterization of the software technical parameters, including algorithms;
(ii) A description of all mitigations for user error or failure of any subsystem components (including signal detection, signal analysis, data display, and storage) on output accuracy; and
(iii) Software documentation must include a cybersecurity vulnerability and management process to assure software functionality.
(2) Performance testing must demonstrate the safety of any illuminating optics.
(3) Clinical data must be provided. This assessment must fulfill the following:
(i) The clinical data must be representative of the intended use population for the device. Any selection criteria or sample limitations must be fully described and justified.
(ii) The assessment must demonstrate output consistency using the expected range of data sources and data quality encountered in the intended use population and environment.
(iii) The assessment must compare device output with a clinically accurate patient-contacting relevant comparator device in an accurate and reproducible manner.
(4) A human factors and usability engineering assessment must be provided that evaluates the risk of improper measurement.
(5) Labeling must include:
(i) A description of what the device measures and outputs to the user;
(ii) Warnings identifying sensor acquisition factors or subject conditions or characteristics (garment types/textures, motion, etc.) that may impact measurement results;
(iii) Guidance for interpretation of the measurements, including a statement that the output is adjunctive to other physical vital sign parameters and patient information;
(iv) The expected performance of the device for all intended use populations and environments; and
(v) Robust instructions to ensure correct system setup.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
September 22, 2026
Neko Health AB
% Brittany Valdez Nava
Senior Manager
Healthcare Innovation Catalysts, Inc.
8024 Summer Mill Court
Bethesda, Maryland 20817
Re: K254240
Trade/Device Name: Echo-2
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2786
Regulation Name: Hardware And Software For Optical Camera-Based Measurement Of Pulse Rate,
Heart Rate, Breathing Rate, And/Or Respiratory Rate
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QOK
Dated: September 13, 2026
Received: September 14, 2026
Dear Brittany Valdez Nava:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K254240 - Brittany Valdez Nava
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K254240 - Brittany Valdez Nava
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JENNIFER W. SHIH -S
Jennifer Kozen
Assistant Director
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
Diagnostics, and Monitoring Devices
Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K254240 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Echo-2 | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Echo-2 device includes an optical module that is intended to capture motion-vibration signals from a illuminated skin surface for assessment of physiological information. Such information, captured during spot-measurement, includes: Heart rate.The Echo-2 device is indicated for use by or under the supervision of healthcare professionals for adult patients in a professional healthcare setting. The Echo-2 device should be used with an individual in a supine position (including with a slightly elevated upper body). The information stored by the system may be reviewed by qualified persons.The Echo-2 device is not intended for continuous monitoring and is only intended for spot-check measurements of heart rate. The Echo-2 device is not intended for use in subjects with arrhythmias.Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | | |
{4}
N E K O
1.0 510(K) SUMMARY
This 510(k) summary is in accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Device Act (SMDA) of 1990. The content of this 510(k) summary is provided in conformance with 21 CFR § 807.92.
1.1 Submitter's Information
| **Company Name:** | **Neko Health AB** |
| --- | --- |
| **Address:** | Svärdvägen 19 182 33 Danderyd Sweden |
| **Company Contact:** | **Per Sundström** Head of Regulatory Neko Health AB Svärdvägen 19 182 33 Danderyd Sweden Phone: +46 76 344 42 34 Email: per.sundstrom@nekohealth.com |
| **Official Correspondent:** | Brittany Valdez Nava, MRSc Senior Manager Healthcare Innovation Catalysts, Inc. 8024 Summer Mill Court Bethesda, MD 20817 |
| **Date prepared:** | September 13th, 2026 |
1.2 Subject Device Name
| **Trade Name:** | Echo-2 |
| --- | --- |
| **Common Name:** | Echo-2 |
| **Regulation Name:** | Hardware and software for optical camera-based measurement of pulse rate, heart rate, breathing rate, and/or respiratory rate |
| **Regulation Number:** | 21 CFR 870.2786 |
| **Device Class:** | Class 2 (Special Controls) |
| **Product Code:** | QOK |
| **Product Code Name:** | Hardware and software for optical camera-based measurement of pulse rate, heart rate, breathing rate, and/or respiratory rate |
| **510(k) Review Panel:** | Cardiovascular |
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 1 of 8
{5}
N E K O
# 1.3 Legally Marketed Predicate/Reference Devices
# 1.3.1 Gili Pro Biosensor
The primary predicate device for the Echo-2 is the Gili Pro Biosensor cleared under DEN200038.
Submission Number DEN200038
Trade Name: Gili Pro Biosensor
Common Name: Gili Pro Biosensor, Gili Pro Biosensor System
Regulation Name: Hardware and software for optical camera-based measurement of pulse rate, heart rate, breathing rate, and/or respiratory rate
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2786
Device Class: Class 2 (Special Controls)
Product Code: QOK
Product Code Name: Hardware and software for optical camera-based measurement of heart rate and respiratory rate
510(k) Review Panel: Cardiovascular
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 2 of 8
{6}
N E K O
## 1.4 Device Description
### 1.4.1 Brief Description of the Device
The Echo-2 enables a non-invasive method to measure heart rate. The Echo-2 utilizes a contactless sensor approach, based on a laser vibrometer, to measure the vibrations occurring on the human skin surface caused by heart beats. The laser vibrometer detects the vibrations of the skin surface using doppler principles. The device displays the acceleration of the skin surface as a function of time and outputs heart rate as a measured numeric value.
The Echo-2 has electrical interfaces to be used in conjunction with third-party ECG devices, pulse transducers, or digital stethoscopes, should the end user want to collect auxiliary analogue data complementary to the laser vibrometer data.
The Echo-2 does not include a computer, but it shall be used with a computer compliant with the specified system requirements, running the included application software, that will control the device and output the signals.
The Echo-2 delivers electromagnetic radiation that is non-ionizing in the form of laser from its vibrometer sensor. All sources of radiation are well below limit values as stated by the applicable safety standards.
The Echo-2 is intended to be operated by qualified healthcare professionals.
### 1.4.2 Indications for Use
The Echo-2 device includes an optical module that is intended to capture motion-vibration signals from a illuminated skin surface for assessment of physiological information. Such information, captured during spot-measurement, includes: Heart rate.
The Echo-2 device is indicated for use by or under the supervision of healthcare professionals for adult patients in a professional healthcare setting. The Echo-2 device should be used with an individual in a supine position (including with a slightly elevated upper body). The information stored by the system may be reviewed by qualified persons.
The Echo-2 device is not intended for continuous monitoring and is only intended for spot-check measurements of heart rate. The Echo-2 device is not intended for use in subjects with arrhythmias.
### 1.4.3 Environment of Use
The intended use environment for the product is within clinical settings in professional healthcare facilities or other locations that fulfil appropriate requirements regarding cleanliness and controlled indoor environment. Once transported and installed by qualified personnel the device shall not be moved.
---Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 3 of 8
{7}
N E K O
## 1.5 Key Performance Characteristics
The key performance specifications and characteristics of the Echo-2 are outlined in Table 1.
**Table 1: Key Performance Characteristics**
| Feature | Specification/Characteristic |
| --- | --- |
| Technology | Contactless, laser-based measurement of micro-motions of the skin |
| Electrical Power Supply | Supply Source: Mains Powered Only Voltage Rating: 100 – 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, current less than 10 A (single phase) Power rating: 230 VA |
| Operating Conditions | Operating Temperature: 15 to 30°C (59 to 86°F) Relative Humidity: 20 to 90% (non-condensing) |
| Storage and Transportation | Storage Temperature: -40 to 70°C (-40 to 158°F) Relative Humidity: 10 to 100% (including condensation) Barometric Pressure: 50 to 110kPa (7 to 16 PSI) |
| Expected Service Life | 10 years |
| Laser Specifications | Class 2 Radiation Pattern/Beam Divergence: Collimated beam Wavelength: 633 nm Pulse Durations and Repetition Rate (or description of irregular pulse pattern): Continuous wave (laser frequency modulation but constant amplitude) Maximum Power/Energy Output: 1 mW |
| Data Transfer Method | Ethernet over optical fiber to host computer. |
| Data Storage | Local and Cloud storage |
| Data Display Method | Graphical user interface for touch display. |
| Displayed Calculated Parameter | - Heart Rate - signal waveform is displayed on amplitude Y-axis with time scale on X-axis |
| Heart Rate/Pulse Rate | Measurement Range: 25 to 220 bpm* Measurement Error: ≤ ±5 bpm |
\* Clinical evaluation covered heart rates of approximately 40–90 bpm. Supplemental bench testing demonstrated heart rate measurement accuracy within ±5 bpm at all 17 evaluated setpoints across the claimed range of 25–220 bpm.
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 4 of 8
{8}
N E K O
# 1.6 Comparision of Key Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device(s)
# 1.6.1 Gili Pro Biosensor
The Echo-2 is substantially equivalent to the Gili Pro Biosensor [DEN200038].
The Echo-2 (subject device) and the Gili Pro Biosensor (predicate device) have similar intended use, indications for use, fundamental scientific technology, and principles of operation. Both devices utilize optical sensing technology and software algorithms to acquire and analyze motion signals generated by cardiovascular activity to provide a spot-check measurement of heart rate in adult patients under the supervision of healthcare professionals.
Main Differences between Echo-2 and Gili Pro Biosensor
The following technical characteristics in the Echo-2 differ from those in the Gili Pro Biosensor:
- The Echo-2 utilizes laser Doppler vibrometry to measure skin surface motion, whereas the Gili Pro Biosensor uses a camera-based optical sensing approach.
- The Echo-2 displays the processed vibrometer acceleration waveform together with the measured heart rate, allowing qualified healthcare professionals to visually review the recorded physiological signal. The displayed waveform is provided as supplemental information and is not independently interpreted by the device, does not generate additional diagnostic parameters, and does not alter the intended use of the device.
- The Gili Pro Biosensor provides respiratory rate measurements, while the Echo-2 does not provide or claim respiratory rate measurement.
The differences in technological characteristics have been evaluated through performance testing and clinical validation. These evaluations demonstrate that the Echo-2 provides heart rate measurements that are substantially equivalent to the predicate device and that the differences in sensing technology, waveform presentation, and output features do not raise new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The displayed waveform represents the processed physiological signal used to derive heart rate and serves only as supplemental information for qualified healthcare professionals reviewing the recorded measurement; it does not provide additional automated measurements or clinical interpretations beyond the cleared heart rate output.
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 5 of 8
{9}
N E K O
## 1.7 Performance Data
### 1.7.1 Performance – Bench Testing
Performance testing to support the determination of substantial equivalence of the Echo-2 is summarized in **Table 2** below.
**Table 2: Echo-2 Performance Testing Summary**
| Test Conducted | Test Objective |
| --- | --- |
| System Level Performance Testing | Ensure the device performs in accordance with the product requirements and design inputs |
| Material Verification Testing | Demonstrate that material selection, control, and validation are scientifically justified and support overall device performance and safety. |
| Imaging Verification | Confirm that the imaging system specified performance criteria are met under expected use conditions, with the objective of demonstrating compliance with the applicable system and use requirements |
| Environmental Testing | Confirms that functional environment requirements are implemented correctly and operate as intended |
| Servicing/Installation Testing | Confirm that the device can be correctly installed, configured, and serviced in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and that these activities do not adversely affect device performance or safety |
| Labeling Verification | Confirm that all device labels, packaging labels, and Instructions for Use (IFU) meet applicable regulatory requirements, are legible, durable, and accurately convey the intended information to the user |
| Heart Rate Accuracy | Verify that heart rate measurements are within ±5 bpm of programmed reference values at evaluated setpoints across the claimed operating range of 25–220 bpm, supplementing the clinical validation. |
### 1.7.2 Human Factors/Usability
A Usability Evaluation performed on the Echo-2 found no impact on the safe and effective use of the device compared to the predicate device. Neko Health AB concludes that the system is as safe and effective for the intended users, uses, and use environments as the predicate device.
### 1.7.3 Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity documentation has been provided with this application as recommended by the FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions ". All software components underwent appropriate cybersecurity assessment and testing.
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 6 of 8
{10}
N E K O
### 1.7.4 Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
The Echo-2 was evaluated for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2:2020.
Additional electrical safety testing was conducted in accordance with IEC 60601-1:2020 (Edition 3.2).
### 1.7.5 Radiation Safety
A comprehensive radiation safety evaluation was conducted for the device's optical emission components, including the laser vibrometer integrated into the system. The following testing was performed:
- IEC 60825-1:2020 - Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
- System-level Radiation Hazard Assessment
Across all evaluations, the device was demonstrated to meet the applicable radiation safety requirements and does not pose hazardous levels of optical exposure under normal use.
### 1.7.6 Software Verification and Validation Testing
System level software verification testing were performed to demonstrate the efficacy of the software and to confirm operation of the machine. The following testing was performed:
- Functional and Performance Verification
- Regression Testing
- Code Reviews
Software verification information within this submission is provided in accordance with the following FDA guidance documents:
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions (14 June 2023)
- Guidance for Off-The-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices (11 August 2023)
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions (26 June 2025)
### 1.7.7 Animal Studies
No animal studies were performed on this device.
Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 7 of 8
{11}
N E K O
### 1.7.8 Clinical Studies
A retrospective clinical performance study was conducted to evaluate the Echo-2 device's heart rate measurement performance and the clinical validity of its underlying laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV)-based sensing principles.
The retrospective study evaluated Echo-2's heart rate measurement performance by comparing LDV-derived heart rate values to electrocardiogram (ECG), a clinically accurate and widely accepted patient-contacting reference standard. The analysis used secondary data from adult participants enrolled in the Cardio Alpha and Dermaflow Alpha clinical investigations and included individuals representative of the intended use population, encompassing a broad range of ages, sexes, cardiovascular health statuses, and skin tones.
Echo-2 demonstrated strong agreement with ECG-derived heart rate measurements. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean bias and limits of agreement within predefined clinically acceptable thresholds, meeting the primary effectiveness endpoint. Deming regression analysis demonstrated slopes and intercepts consistent with equivalence expectations, confirming accurate and reproducible agreement between Echo-2 output and the reference comparator. Subgroup analyses across age, sex, and Fitzpatrick skin type showed no clinically meaningful differences in performance, supporting output consistency across demographic subgroups and expected variations in signal quality encountered in the intended use environment.
This retrospective clinical evaluation demonstrates that Echo-2 produces consistent and reliable heart rate measurements when compared with a clinically accurate patient-contacting reference device. The analyzed dataset is representative of the intended use population, selection criteria and exclusions were predefined and justified, and device output was shown to be consistent across the expected range of patient characteristics and signal conditions encountered in clinical practice.
### 1.8 Conclusions
Based on above discussion and enclosed sections regarding substantial equivalence to the predicate device, Neko Health AB concludes that the Echo-2 is substantially equivalent to its predicate device and does not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness.
---Echo-2 510(k) Summary - K254240
Page 8 of 8
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.