REBOHIL is intended for the following uses: - Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge. - Filling of infrabony periodontal defects. - Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy. - Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge. - Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. - Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration(GBR). - Filling of peri implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).
Device Story
REBOHIL is a sterile, single-use bone grafting material composed of 90% porcine-derived anorganic bone mineral (hydroxyapatite) and 10% porcine-derived type I collagen. It is supplied as granules in various weights (0.15g to 2.0g). The device is used by dental surgeons in clinical settings to fill bone-deficient areas, maintain space, and conduct new bone formation in the alveolar process. The material is placed into the defect site, often alongside barrier membranes, to facilitate guided bone regeneration. The device acts as an osteoconductive scaffold. It is provided in a double sterile barrier system (PC bowl/PET blister) and sterilized via ethylene oxide gas. The output is a physical scaffold that supports bone tissue regeneration, aiding in ridge preservation and defect repair.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical trials performed. Evidence consists of bench testing and an animal study. Animal study: 20 beagle dogs with one-wall intrabony alveolar defects; evaluated at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Results showed sufficient bony regeneration comparable to the OCS-B Collagen positive control, confirmed via micro-CT, histomorphometry, and histology.
Technological Characteristics
Composition: 90% porcine hydroxyapatite (ASTM F1185, ISO 13779-3) and 10% porcine type I collagen (ASTM F2212). Form: Granules (0.5-1.0 mm). Sterilization: Ethylene oxide gas. Packaging: Double sterile barrier (PC/PET/Tyvek). Shelf-life: 36 months. Osteoconductive scaffold.
Indications for Use
Indicated for dental patients requiring alveolar ridge augmentation, reconstruction, or defect filling, including infrabony periodontal defects, post-extraction sockets, root resection/apicoectomy/cystectomy sites, and maxillary sinus floor elevation. Used in conjunction with GBR products for periodontal and peri-implant defects.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Bone grafting material is a material such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, polylactic and polyglycolic acids, or collagen, that is intended to fill, augment, or reconstruct periodontal or bony defects of the oral and maxillofacial region.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for bone grafting materials that do not contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. The special control is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Bone Grafting Material Devices.” (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) Class III (premarket approval) for bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. Bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic, such as biological response modifiers, require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
September 25, 2026
Hyundai Bioland Co., Ltd.
Seo Yeji
Official Correspondent
162, Gwahaksaneop 3-Ro, Ochang-Eup, Cheongwon-Gu
Cheongju-Si, Chungcheongbuk-do 28125
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Re: K254210
Trade/Device Name: Rebohil (bgm-1, Bgm-2, Bgm-3, Bgm-4, Bgm-5)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3930
Regulation Name: Bone Grafting Material
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: NPM
Dated: August 25, 2026
Received: August 26, 2026
Dear Seo Yeji:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K254210 - Seo Yeji
Page 2
Before making any change significantly affecting the safety or effectiveness of the device, you must submit a new premarket notification in accordance with 21 CFR 807.81. Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}
K254210 - Seo Yeji
Page 3
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Andrew Steen
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and
ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia,
Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration **Indications for Use** | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 *See PRA Statement below.* |
| --- | --- |
510(k) Number (if known)
K254210
Device Name
REBOHIL (BGM-1, BGM-2, BGM-3, BGM-4, BGM-5)
Indications for Use (Describe)
REBOHIL is intended for the following uses:
- Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge.
- Filling of infrabony periodontal defects.
- Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy.
- Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge.
- Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor.
- Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration(GBR).
- Filling of peri implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)."
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
{4}
# **HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.**
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
**The assigned 510(k) Number: K254210**
**01. Date of Preparation: 2026.09.25**
**02. Applicant**
Company name: HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
Address: 162, Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si,
Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125, Republic of Korea
TEL: +82 43 240 8633
FAX: +82 43 240 8699
Email: bio_ra@hyundaibioland.co.kr
**03. Submission Correspondent**
Yeji Seo
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
Address: 162, Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si,
Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125, Republic of Korea
TEL: +82 43 240 8649
FAX: +82 43 240 8694
Email: bio_ra@hyundaibioland.co.kr
**04. Subject Device Identification**
Trade Name: REBOHIL
Common Name: Bone grafting material
Classification Name: Bone grafting material, animal source
Product Code: NPM
Panel: Dental surgery
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3930
Device Class: Class II
**05. Indication for use**
REBOHIL is intended for the following uses:
- Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge.
- Filling of infrabony periodontal defects.
- Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy.
- Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge.
- Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor.
- Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration(GBR).
- Filling of peri implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
**06. Predicate devices and Reference devices**
Predicate device
510(k) Number: K142040
Device Name: OCS-B Collagen®
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{5}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
Manufacturer: NIBEC Co., Ltd.
### 07. Device Description
REBOHIL (Dental bone graft) is composed of 90% anorganic bone mineral granules derived from porcine cancellous bone and 10% collagen from porcine hide in a powder form, which is derived from veterinary certified pigs and purified and non-cross linked. The REBOHIL is a bone graft obtained by a standardized controlled manufacturing process.
The REBOHIL is packed in a double sterile barrier system consisting of an inner PC (Polycarbonate) bowl and an outer PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) blister. The packaging material composed of a transparent side and Tyvek side and is easy to use by open system of easy peel type. It is easy to check the REBOHIL, because one side of packaging is transparent closed by double packing system in order to protect REBOHIL from microbial formation. Then this packaged REBOHIL is sterilized by ethylene oxide gas.
The surgical procedure consists to preserve ridge dimensions in post-extraction sockets as well as in the treatment of defects in the alveolar process. Grafting materials and barrier membranes to conduct and direct the growth of new bone at defect sites. Material is placed into a bone deficient area, maintaining space and conducting formation of new bone.
The REBOHIL is available to the United States market in 5 version: 0.15g, 0.25g, 0.5g, 1.0g, 2.0g. They are supplied sterile and intended for single use only.
| Model No. | Volume | Packaging (ea/box) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BGM-1 | 0.15g | 1 |
| BGM-2 | 0.25g | 1 |
| BGM-3 | 0.5g | 1 |
| BGM-4 | 1.0g | 1 |
| BGM-5 | 2.0g | 1 |
[Material Composition]
| Material | Molecular formula | Percentages | Specification | Standard |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bone | Hydroxyapatite | 90±5% | Origin: derived from porcine bone | ISO13779-3 ASTM F1185 |
| Collagen | Type I Collagen | 10±1% | Origin: derived from porcine hide | ASTM F2212 |
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{6}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
# 08. Performance data
# 08.1 Bench testing
Bench tests were conducted to verify that the subject device met all design specifications as was
Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device. The test results demonstrated that the
subject device complies with the following standards:
| No. | Test Item | Description and Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Appearance | The appearance test was to check damage or breakage, and foreign materials by inspecting the appearance of the subject and predicate device. Both of devices were no defect at the sample. |
| 2 | Weight | Both of subject and predicate device were checked the weight of product with weighing sacle. Both of them did not exceed the allowance. |
| 3 | pH | The pH test compares the amount of acid or base required to neutralize the device extract with that required for the blank extract to evaluate buffering capacity. Both of devices were not exceed an allowance. |
| 4 | Heavy metal | The heavy metal analysis was to check the limit of cadmium, lead, arsenic and mercury through heavy metal limit test. Both of subject and predicate device did not exceed the allowance. |
| 5 | Amino acid | The Amino acid anslysis was to check the amino acid composition of devices with HPLC. Both of subject and predicated device had similar amino acid composition each other. |
| 6 | Collagen purity | The collagen purity test was evaluated through the SDS-PAGE to confirm the presence of type I collagen, since both of subject and predicate device consist of hydroxyapatite and type I collagen. We confirmed that the type I collagen of subject and predicate devices were not denuatured or degraded in comparison to the type I collagen standard. |
| 7 | Carbohydrate content | The carbohydrate content test was to check residual carbohydrate content in devices.The carbohydrate content was conducted by UV/VIS. Both of subject and predicate device met the criteria of lee than 2.0%. |
| 8 | Sterility | The sterility test was to verify that sterile packing of sterilized device is kept sterilization, and whether device sterilization has been thoroughly completed by bacterial and fungal testing for sterility accroding to ISO 11737-2. Both of subject and predicate device showed nagative results for bacterial & fungus. |
| 9 | Collagen concentration | The collagen concentration test was to check the collagen content of device, since both of subject and predicate device consist of hydroxyapatite and type I collagen. The test was conducted though ASTM F2212-20 and the subject device did not exceed the acceptance criteria of 10±1%. |
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{7}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
| 10 | Residue on ignition | The residue on ignition test was to check the remaining minerals in device through residue on ignition test. Both of subject and predicate device had a similar results. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 11 | Hydroxyapatite analysis | The hydroxyapatite analysis was evaluated according to ISO 13779 to identify hydroxyapatite of devices. The identification of hydroxyapatite was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The subject device had been identified as hydroxyapatite equivalent to predicate device. |
| 12 | Ca/P ratio | The Ca/P ratio test was to evaluate ratio of calcium and phosphorus through XRD according to ISO 13779. Both of subject and predicate device had a similar Ca:P atomic ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. |
| 13 | Porosity | The porosity, which is related to providing space where new tissue and blood vessel grow, was to check the structural characteristics of device through mercury intrusion porosimetry. The subject device had a porosity similar to that of predicate device. |
| 14 | Loss on drying | The Loss on drying was determined by measuring the decrease in sample weight after drying. Both the subject and predicate devices met the predefined acceptance criterion of not more than 20%. |
| 15 | Water binding capacity | The water binding capacity test was to evaluate the maximum water binding capacity that a devices can contain. The subject device had a higher binding capacity compared to predicate devcie. |
| 16 | Lipid content | The lipid content test was to evaluate the residual lipid content of devices with absorbance. The subject device had a lower lipid compared to predicate device. |
| 17 | LAL test | The LAL test was to confirm the biological safety of devices through endotoxin test. The results showed that it enables us to judge that removal of endotoxin was performed smoothly in the manufacturing process and both of subject and predicate confirmed the biological safety. |
| 18 | GAG test | The GAG test was to evaluate whether the decellularization process has been effectively performed or not by checking the contents of glycosaminoglycan. The subject device had a lower GAG content than predicate device. |
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{8}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
### 08.2 Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility testing was conducted for the subject device in accordance with the applicable ISO 10993 standards. The device was non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, and non-irritating and did not demonstrate evidence of acute systemic toxicity, material-mediated pyrogenicity, or genotoxicity under the conditions of the respective tests. The subchronic toxicity and implantation study demonstrated an acceptable local and systemic biological response. The results support the biological safety of the subject device for its intended use.
| No. | Test Item | Standard | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Biological Safety Evaluation Plan | ISO 10993-1 | Satisfied |
| 2 | Biological Risk Assessment | ISO 10993-1 | Satisfied |
| 3 | Cytotoxicity | ISO 10993-5 | Satisfied |
| 4 | Sensitization | ISO 10993-10 | Satisfied |
| 5 | Oral Mucosal Irritation | ISO 10993-23 | Satisfied |
| 6 | Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11 | Satisfied |
| 7 | Material-Medicated Pyrogenicity | ISO 10993-11 | Satisfied |
| 8 | Genotoxicity : Bacterial Gene Mutation Assay | ISO 10993-3 | Satisfied |
| 9 | Genotoxicity: Mouse Lymphoma Assay | ISO 10993-3 | Satisfied |
| 10 | Subchronic Toxicity and Implantation | ISO 10993-11 & ISO 10993-6 | Satisfied |
### 08.3 Sterilization and Shelf-life
- Validation of sterilization per ISO 11135
- Validation of shelf life per ASTM F1980 using are accelerated and real-time aged samples
- Validation of packaging per ISO 11607-2
- Validation of shipping per ISTA 3A
- Physicochemical characterization per ASTM F1581
### 08.4 Animal tissue
- Viral inactivation per ISO 22442-3
### 08.5. Performance Testing – Animal
Animal study was conducted over 4, 8 12 and 24weeks in 20 beagle dogs to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of the REBOHIL developed as a bonegraft. OCS-B Collagen® was used as a positive control group and REBOHIL was used as a study group. After operation, clinical signs were monitored,and radiographic examinations were performed. After the animal sacrificed, micro-CT image analysis, histomorphometrical and histological examinations were performed on the harvested tissues.
In this study, REBOHIL was applied on the one wall intrabony alveolar bone defect on the mandible of beagle dogs and the periodontal regeneration effects of 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks were evaluated . When comparing REBOHIL with OCS-B Collagen®, it showed sufficient bony regeneration effect on the one wall intrabony alveolar bone defect on the mandible of beagle dogs.
### 08.6. Performance Testing – Clinical
No human clinical trials were performed in support of this submission.
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{9}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
# 09. Substantially Equivalent Conclusion
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Comparison
| Product Name | SUBJECT Device REBOHIL | PREDICATE Device OCS-B Collagen® (K142040) | Equivalence Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Classification Name | Bone grafting Material, Animal Source | Bone grafting Material, Animal Source | Identical |
| Class | Class II | Class II | Identical |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.3930 | 21 CFR 872.3930 | Identical |
| Product code | NPM | NPM | Identical |
| Indication for Use | REBOHIL is intended for the following uses; - Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge. - Filling of infrabony periodontal defects. - Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy - Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge. - Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. - Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). - Filling of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). | OCS-B Collagen® is recommended for; - Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge. - Filling of infrabony periodontal defects. - Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy - Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge. - Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. - Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). - Filling of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). | Equivalent Predicate device indications encompass all the subject device indications. |
| Materials | Anorganic derived osteoconductive hydroxyapatite, Collagen | Anorganic derived osteoconductive hydroxyapatite, collagen | Equivalent |
| Source of bone | Porcine | Bovine | Similarities: Both devices are composed of hydroxyapatite. Differences: The subject device is a derived from porcine, while the predicate device is a derived from bovine. Equivalent Discussion: Although the bone source is differed, the chemical composition is the same as hydroxyapatite. |
| Source of collagen | Porcine skin | Porcine skin | Equivalent |
| Dosage form | Powder (Granule) | Block | Similarities: The available forms of the subject device is within the specifications of |
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{10}
# HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr

| | | | predicate device **Differences:** The subject device is a granule form, but predicate device is a block form. **Equivalent Discussion:** The form is different from granule vs block, but it does not affect the product performance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bone particle size range | 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm | 0.1 mm to 1.0 mm | **Similarities:** The both of devices has similar bone particle size. **Differences:** The subject device has more narrow range of bone particle range than predicate device. **Equivalent Discussion:** Both devices are provided in clinically relevant bone particle sizes for intra-oral surgical procedures |
| Product Size | 150 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, 1,000 mg, 2,000 mg | 50 mg, 100 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg | **Similarities:** Both of subject and predicate devices has different sizes available to suit various conditions. **Differences:** The subject device has a larger product sizes than predicate device. **Equivalent Discussion:** Both devices are provided in clinically relevant sizes for intra-oral surgical procedures |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible for the cleared indications for use | Biocompatible for the cleared indications for use | **Equivalent** |
| Packaging | Double sterile barrier: 1st packaging: Tray (Polycarbonate), Lid (Tyvek) 2nd packaging: Blister (Polyethylene terephthalate), Lid (Tyvek) | Double sterile barrier: Packed in a double sterile barrier system consisting of an inner and an outer blister | **Similarities:** Both devices have a two layers for packaging. **Differences:** The subject device is composed of plastic bowl in blister, while the predicated device consists of double blister. **Equivalent Discussion:** Both devices are provided in two layers of sterile barrier packaging. Both devices facilitate the aseptic delivery of the sterile device into the sterile surgical field. |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide Gas | Gamma Irradiation | **Similarities:** Both devices are sterile device. **Differences:** |
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
{11}
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
162 Gwahaksaneop 3-ro, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu,
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28125 Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-43-240-8633 FAX: +82-43-240-8699
Website: www.hyundaibioland.co.kr
HYUNDAI
BIOLAND
| | | | The subject device was sterilized with E.O gas, while the predicate device was sterilized with gamma irradiation. **Equivalent Discussion:** Both the subject and predicate devices achieve a sterility assurance level of 10^{-6} |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Single Use / Reuse | Single use only | Single use only | **Identical** |
| Pyrogenic | Non-pyrogenic | Non-pyrogenic | **Identical** |
| Shelf-Life | 36 months | 36 months | **Identical** |
## 10. Conclusion
The subject and predicate devices have the same intended use/indications for use and substantially similar technological characteristics and principles of operation. In addition, minor technological differences between the two products do not affect the product performance, as supported by the results of the non-clinical data provided within the 510(k) submission, as summarized above. Therefore, the subject device, REBOHIL, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, K142040.
HYUNDAI BIOLAND Co., Ltd.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.