K254109 · GC America, Inc. · EMA · May 18, 2026 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K254109
Device Name
G-CEM UNIVERSAL
Applicant
GC America, Inc.
Product Code
EMA · Dental
Decision Date
May 18, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3275
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
1. Cementation of all types of all ceramic, resin, and metal-based inlays, onlays, crowns and bridges. 2. Cementation of metal, ceramic, fiber posts, and cast post and cores. 3. Cementation of all ceramic and composite veneers. 4. Final cementation of crowns and bridges on implant abutments.
Device Story
G-CEM Universal is a dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cement; supplied as two-paste system in one-body syringe; automixed via mixing tip. Operates via polymerization of methacrylate ester monomers initiated by photo-initiators and chemical initiators. Acidic monomers facilitate self-adhesion to tooth structure; optional primers may be used to enhance adhesion to tooth or indirect restorations. Used by dental professionals in clinical settings for permanent cementation of indirect restorations. Provides physical strength via copolymerization of acidic and frame-forming monomers. Radiopacity enhanced by added contrast agents; color stability improved by UV absorbers. Benefits patient by providing stable, durable fixation of dental prosthetics.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Device evaluated for film thickness, working/setting time, flexural strength, water sorption, solubility, color stability, radiopacity, adhesive bond strength, and ion release per ISO 4049:2019. Biocompatibility assessed per ISO 10993-1:2018 and ISO 7405:2025, including cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5), intracutaneous reactivity (ISO 10993-23), pyrogenicity (ISO 10993-11), acute systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11), and genotoxicity (ISO 10993-3).
Technological Characteristics
Dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cement; methacrylate ester monomer base. Complies with ISO 4049:2019 (Type 2, Class 3). Features acidic monomers for self-adhesion. Includes radiopacity contrast agents and UV absorbers. Supplied in dual-paste one-body syringe with automix tip. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 7405.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring cementation of dental restorations including inlays, onlays, crowns, bridges, posts, cores, and veneers made of ceramic, resin, or metal, and for cementation of crowns/bridges on implant abutments.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Zinc oxide-eugenol is a device composed of zinc oxide-eugenol intended to serve as a temporary tooth filling or as a base cement to affix a temporary tooth filling, to affix dental devices such as crowns or bridges, or to be applied to a tooth to protect the tooth pulp. Dental cement other than zinc oxide-eugenol is a device composed of various materials other than zinc oxide-eugenol intended to serve as a temporary tooth filling or as a base cement to affix a temporary tooth filling, to affix dental devices such as crowns or bridges, or to be applied to a tooth to protect the tooth pulp.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
May 18, 2026
GC America, Inc.
Futoshi Fusejima
Director of PE & Regulatory Affairs
3737 W. 127th St.
Alsip, Illinois 60803
Re: K254109
Trade/Device Name: G-CEM Universal
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3275
Regulation Name: Dental Cement
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: EMA
Dated: April 24, 2026
Received: April 24, 2026
Dear Futoshi Fusejima:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K254109 - Futoshi Fusejima
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K254109 - Futoshi Fusejima
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K254109 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| G-CEM UNIVERSAL | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| 1. Cementation of all types of all ceramic, resin, and metal-based inlays, onlays, crowns and bridges. 2. Cementation of metal, ceramic, fiber posts, and cast post and cores. 3. Cementation of all ceramic and composite veneers. 4. Final cementation of crowns and bridges on implant abutments. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
'GC'
K254109
# 510(k) Summary
## 1. SUBMITTER
GC America Inc.
3737 W. 127th Street
Alsip, IL 60803
Contact Person: Futoshi Fusejima
Phone: (708) 926-3050
Alternate Contact: Tamiko Scott
Phone: (708) 926-3261
Fax: (708) 925-0373
Date Prepared: May 15, 2026
## 2. DEVICE
Name of Device: G-CEM Universal
Common Name: Dental cement
Classification Name: Cement, Dental (21 CFR 872.3275)
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: EMA
## 3. PREDICATE DEVICE
| Product | Applicant | 510(k) No. | Code No. | Predicate | Decision Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| G-CEM ONE | GC America Inc. | K200798 | EMA | Primary | 11/24/2020 |
## 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
G-CEM Universal is a dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cement that can be optionally used in combination with the tooth or other indirect restoration primer. The mixed cement is hardened through polymerization. The adhesive component is an acidic monomer which also can polymerize with frame-forming monomers. This copolymerizing reaction provides higher physical strength than resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Furthermore, applying the primer to the cavity, abutment tooth, or other indirect restorations modifies the surface and/or initiates the polymerization of both the cement and the primer, resulting in stable adhesion. The components consist of Paste A and B, which are filled in a one-body syringe. Both pastes are automixed with a mixing tip and directly applied to restorations or the prepared cavity.
## 5. INDICATIONS FOR USE
1. Cementation of all types of all ceramic, resin and metal-based inlays, onlays, crowns and bridges.
2. Cementation of metal, ceramic, fiber posts, and cast post and cores.
3. Cementation of all ceramic and composite veneers.
4. Final cementation of crowns and bridges on implant abutments.
GC AMERICA INC.
3737 West 127th Street • Alsip, IL 60803 • TEL: 800.323.3386 • FAX: 708.897.4062
www.gcamerica.com
{5}
'GC'
There are no substantial differences between the applicant device and the primary device in indications for use, and there are no differences in the safety and effectiveness of the device when used as labeled.
## 6. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
Applicant device and predicate device are substantially equivalent in the following points.
- Polymer-based dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cement used for cementation.
- The curing mechanism is polymerization of uncured methacrylate ester monomers. This reaction is caused by polymerization initiators and photo-initiator system.
- The adhesive component is an acidic monomer which also can polymerize with frame-forming monomers. This copolymerizing reaction provides higher physical strength than resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
- Can be optionally used in combination with the tooth surface primer to promote the self-adhesion to the tooth structure.
- Can be optionally used in combination with the indirect restoration surface primer to promote the self-adhesion to the indirect restorations made of zirconia or metal.
- Complies with all the requirements of ISO 4049: 2019 Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials.
- Shows substantially equivalent performance when tested based on the FDA guidance document entitled “Dental Cements – Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff”.
The following difference may be noted between applicant device and predicate devices.
- The applicant device does not include a primer.
- The use of primer on indirect restorations made of glass-ceramic or composite resin is optional for the applicant device; however, it is mandatory for predicate device to provide self-adhesion.
- Contrast agents have been added to the applicant device to enhance radiopacity, and UV absorbers have been added to improve color stability.
## 7. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
### Mechanical testing
It is confirmed that the device conforms to the required specifications based on FDA guidance document entitled “Dental Cements – Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff” and ISO 4049:2019 Dentistry – Polymer-based restorative materials, Type 2, Class 3.
Performance testing includes:
- Film thickness
- Working time
- Setting time
- Flexural strength
- Water sorption
- Solubility
GC AMERICA INC.
3737 West 127th Street • Abqu, IL 60803 • TEL: 800.323.3386 • FAX: 708.897.4062
www.gcamerica.com
{6}
'GC'
- Colour stability after irradiation and water sorption
- Radio-opacity
- Adhesive bond Strength
- Ion release profile
## Biocompatibility testing
A biocompatibility assessment was completed according to ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process, and ISO 7405:2025 Dentistry – Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry.
G-CEM Universal is a dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement, so medical device categorization by ISO 10993 for biological evaluation of medical devices is as follows.
| Category | : Externally communicating medical device |
| --- | --- |
| Contact | : Tissue / bone / dentin |
| Contact duration | : Long term (> 30 d) |
In conclusion, biocompatibility of G-CEM Universal is an acceptable device from the biological evaluation result.
## Cytotoxicity (CYTOTOXICITY TEST)
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-5
## Irritation or intracutaneous reactivity (INTRACUTANEOUS REACTIVITY)
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-23
## Pyrogenicity (RABBIT PYROGEN TEST)
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-11
## Acute systemic toxicity
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-11
## Genotoxicity toxicity (BACTERIAL REVERSE MUTATION TEST, In Vitro MICRONUCLEUS TEST and MICRONUCLEUS TEST in MICE)
Based on the criteria of the protocol of ISO 10993-3
## 8. CONCLUSIONS
Based on similarities in indications for use, technology, safety and effectiveness, the applicant device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
GC AMERICA INC.
3737 West 127th Street • Abiyu, IL 60803 • TEL: 800.323.3386 • FAX: 708.897.4062
www.gcamerica.com
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.