Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series
Applicant
Liaoning Upcera Co., Ltd.
Product Code
EIH · Dental
Decision Date
Jan 9, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 872.6660
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The device is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.
Device Story
Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank (GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, SP Series) are ceramic blanks composed of ZrO2, Y2O3, HfO2, Fe2O3, and Er2O3. Used by dental laboratories or professionals to fabricate artificial teeth, crowns, facings, and veneers. Input: zirconia powder processed via molding/sintering into blocks, discs, or rods. Transformation: CAD/CAM machining by dental lab to final restoration shape; subsequent sintering in oven (>1400 °C) to achieve final hardness. Output: finished dental prosthetic restoration. Benefits: provides aesthetic dental restorations with varying translucency and strength profiles (Type II, Class 4/5 per ISO 6872).
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing performed per ISO 6872 (radioactivity, thermal expansion, chemical solubility, flexural strength). Biocompatibility assessment verified material equivalence.
Technological Characteristics
Ceramic dental blanks (ZrO2, Y2O3, HfO2, Fe2O3, Er2O3). Flexural strength: >800 MPa (GT(F) P1, SP) or >500 MPa (GT(F) P2). Conforms to ISO 6872 (Type II, Class 4/5). Processing: dry pressing, multi-layer padding (GT(F) series), and sintering (>1400 °C). Non-sterile. Supplied as blocks, discs, or rods.
Indications for Use
Indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations in patients requiring prosthetic dental devices. Processed by dental laboratories or professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
January 9, 2026
Liaoning Upcera Co., Ltd.
% Charles Shen
Vice President
Manton Business and Technology Services
37 Winding Ridge
Oakland, New Jersey 07436
Re: K253973
Trade/Device Name: Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660
Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder For Clinical Use
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: EIH
Dated: December 11, 2025
Received: December 11, 2025
Dear Charles Shen:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253973 - Charles Shen
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K253973 - Charles Shen
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA
-S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K253973 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The device is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K253973
# 510(k) Summary
This summary of substantial equivalence information for K253973 is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21CFR 807.92
# 5.1 Submitter & Foreign Manufacture Identification
Liaoning Upcera Co., Ltd
No.122 Xianghuai Road, Economic Development Zone, Benxi, Liaoning, China
Tel: (086)-24-45565006
Submitter's FDA Registration Number: 3010582952
www.upcera-dental.com
# 5.2 Contact Person

Charles Shen
Manton Business and Technology Services
37 Winding Ridge, Oakland, NJ 07436
Tel: 608-217-9358
Email: cyshen@aol.com
# 5.3 Date of Summary: December 5, 2025
# 5.4 Device Name:
Proprietary Name: "Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series"
Common Name: Dental Zirconia Ceramics
Classification Name: Powder, Porcelain
Device Classification: II
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660
Panel: General Dental
Product Code: EIH
# 5.5 Predicate Device Information:
(1) K231687, "Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank", manufactured by "Liaoning Upcera Co., Ltd."
# 5.6 Device Description:
"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series" are derived from zirconia powder that has been processed through various molding and sintering techniques – into their final net shapes. These blanks are then further fabricated into
510(k) Summary
{5}
various prosthetic dental devices intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, or for jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The zirconia powder is composed of $\mathrm{ZrO_2 + Y_2O_3 + HfO_2 + Fe_2O_3 + Er_2O_3}$. The performance of formed zirconia dental blanks conforms to ISO 6872, Dentistry, Ceramic Materials.
"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series" are ceramic dental blanks designed for the manufacture of ceramic dental prosthetic devices. The dental prosthetic devices are fabricated by CAD/CAM machining processes. All prosthetic dental devices are intended for single use applications. At the dental lab, the blanks are held to the CAD/CAM machine which is used to machine to the final dental restoration. At the completion of the machining steps, the dental restoration is fired (i.e., sintered) in the oven to harden the $\mathrm{ZrO_2}$ so that its final properties can be achieved.
"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series" are different from the predicate device as they have different manufacture process. GT(F) P1 and GT(F) P2 series use six-layer padding process to produce multi-layer aesthetic effect, while the SP series does not use padding process, produce single aesthetic effect.
GT(F) P1 and SP series have Flexural Strength of $>800\mathrm{MPa}$, They belong to Type II, Class 5 ceramics per ISO 6872.
GT(F) P2 series have Flexural Strength of $>500\mathrm{MPa}$, They belong to Type II, Class 4(a) ceramics per ISO 6872.
"Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series" are supplied in different shapes, such as blocks, discs, rods, or customer ordered shapes. It is also supplied in the combinations of fifty different colors.
The different colors are originated from the different constituent of color additives (such as $\mathrm{Fe_2O_3}$, $\mathrm{Er_2O_3}$); the different translucencies are originated from small difference in the amount of $\mathrm{Y_2O_3}$, and the multilayer aesthetic effect is originated from the different padding method used in the process of dry pressing.
The GT(F) P1 and GT(F) P2 series are supplied in gradual changing translucencies, and multi-layer aesthetic effect. The SP series are supplied with no gradual changing translucencies, and in single-layer aesthetic effect.
## 5.7 Indications for Use:
The device is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.
510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 4
{6}
# 5.8 Technological Comparison with Predicate Device
The following table shows similarities and differences of use, design, and material between our device and the predicate devices.
Table 5.1: Comparison of Intended Use, Design, Material, and Processing
| Description | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K231687) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indication for Use | For fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals. | For fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals. |
| Basic Design | Blocks, disc, and rod | Blocks, disc, and rod |
| Materials | Zirconia (ZrO2+ Y2O3+ HfO2≥98%)Inorganic pigments | Zirconia (ZrO2+ Y2O3+ HfO2≥98%)Inorganic pigments |
| Processing | Sintering at temperature > 1400 °C | Sintering at temperature > 1400 °C |
| Dimension | Various | Various |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes |
| Shade | Fifty colors | Fifty colors |
| Flexural Strength | For GT(F) P1 and SP series: >800 MPAFor GT(F) P2 series: >500 MPa | For GT(F) series: >800 MPAFor GT(E) series: >500 MPa |
| Aesthetic Effect | For GT(F) P1 and GT(F) P2 series: Multilayer aesthetic effectFor SP series: Single layer aesthetic effect | One aesthetic effects: Multilayer aesthetic effect |
| Translucency Effect | For GT(F) P1 and GT(F) P2 series: Each blank has gradual change of translucency effect from low to high, which is similar to nature tooth.For SP series: No translucent effect | Each blank has gradual change of translucency effect from low to high, which is similar to nature tooth. |
510(k) Summary
{7}
| Sterile | Non-sterile | Non-sterile |
| --- | --- | --- |
Our device is also essentially identical to the predicate device in terms of design, material, and processing between our device and the predicate devices. The minor differences do not raise any safety and effectiveness concerns.
## 5.9 Summary of Non-Clinical Testing:
Bench testing was performed per ISO 6872 to ensure that the “Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series” met its specifications. All tests were verified to meet acceptance criteria. Test results on radioactivity, thermal expansion, chemical solubility, and flexural strength of the subject device are very similar to the predicate device.
Biocompatibility assessment was performed to verify the equivalence of the materials that are used.
## 5.10 Summary of Clinical Study:
Clinical Study is not performed for this device.
## 5.11 Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
It has been shown in this 510(k) submission that “Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series” and its predicate devices have similar indications for use, similar composition, and biocompatibility, similar manufacturing process, and similar performance.
The difference between the “Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank - GT(F) P1, GT(F) P2, and SP Series” and their predicate device do not raise any question regarding its equivalence.
In accordance with the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807 and based on the information provided in this premarket notification, the subject device is respectively substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
510(k) Summary
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.