K253692 · Boston Scientific · DQK · Aug 21, 2026 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K253692
Device Name
AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System
Applicant
Boston Scientific
Product Code
DQK · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Aug 21, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1425
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IVUS modality of the System is intended for ultrasound examinations of intravascular pathology. Intravascular ultrasound is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures such as angioplasty and atherectomy. FFR and DFR™ are intended for use in catheterization and related cardiovascular specialty laboratories to compute, and display various physiological parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices. FFR and DFR are indicated to provide hemodynamic information for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients that undergo measurement of physiological parameters. Refer to the Catheter Instructions for Use provided with all Boston Scientific Ultrasound Imaging Catheters to determine compatibility with the System. All Ultrasound Imaging Catheters will be referred to as Imaging Catheters throughout the remainder of this User Guide. The Imaging Catheters generate ultrasound images and are intended for ultrasound examination of vascular and cardiac pathology. Boston Scientific manufactures a wide variety of catheters for different applications. The recommended use of each of these catheters may vary depending on the size and type of the catheter. Please refer to the Imaging Catheter Instructions for Use, packaged with each catheter. Indications for Auto Pullback Use (IVUS Only) Automatic Pullback is indicated when the following occurs: • The physician/operator wants to standardize the method in which intravascular ultrasound images are obtained and documented: procedure-to-procedure, operator-to-operator. • The physician/operator wants to make linear distance determinations post-procedurally, which requires the imaging core of a catheter to be pulled back at a known uniform speed. • Two-dimensional, longitudinal reconstruction of the anatomy is desired.
Device Story
AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System; diagnostic computer for intravascular physiology and ultrasound imaging. Inputs: pressure wire signals (FFR/DFR) and ultrasound transducer data (IVUS). Processing: PC-based data acquisition/processing; includes new Frame Grabber hardware and software features (Automated Stent Assessment, Side Branch Display, IVUSConnect™). Output: interactive display of physiological parameters and ultrasound images. Used in catheterization/cardiovascular labs by physicians. Benefits: standardized IVUS imaging, linear distance determination, 2D longitudinal anatomical reconstruction, and hemodynamic information for diagnosis/treatment planning.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical performance verification and validation, including hardware, software, electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility testing.
Indicated for patients undergoing transluminal interventional procedures (e.g., angioplasty, atherectomy) requiring intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination of vascular/cardiac pathology, or hemodynamic assessment via FFR/DFR in cardiovascular specialty laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
August 21, 2026
Boston Scientific
Kevin Catalano
Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist
One Scimed Place
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311
Re: K253692
Trade/Device Name: AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1425
Regulation Name: Programmable Diagnostic Computer
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DQK, DSK, IYO, ITX
Dated: July 22, 2026
Received: July 22, 2026
Dear Kevin Catalano:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253692 - Kevin Catalano
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K253692 - Kevin Catalano
Page 3
Sincerely,
# Jackson Hair -S
for
LCDR Stephen Browning
Assistant Director
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
Diagnostics, and Monitoring Devices
Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K253692 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The IVUS modality of the System is intended for ultrasound examinations of intravascular pathology. Intravascular ultrasound is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures such as angioplasty and atherectomy. | | |
| FFR and DFR™ are intended for use in catheterization and related cardiovascular specialty laboratories to compute, and display various physiological parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices. FFR and DFR are indicated to provide hemodynamic information for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients that undergo measurement of physiological parameters. | | |
| Refer to the Catheter Instructions for Use provided with all Boston Scientific Ultrasound Imaging Catheters to determine compatibility with the System. All Ultrasound Imaging Catheters will be referred to as Imaging Catheters throughout the remainder of this User Guide. | | |
| The Imaging Catheters generate ultrasound images and are intended for ultrasound examination of vascular and cardiac pathology. Boston Scientific manufactures a wide variety of catheters for different applications. The recommended use of each of these catheters may vary depending on the size and type of the catheter. Please refer to the Imaging Catheter Instructions for Use, packaged with each catheter. | | |
| Indications for Auto Pullback Use (IVUS Only) | | |
| Automatic Pullback is indicated when the following occurs: | | |
| • The physician/operator wants to standardize the method in which intravascular ultrasound images are obtained and documented: procedure-to-procedure, operator-to-operator. | | |
| • The physician/operator wants to make linear distance determinations post-procedurally, which requires the imaging core of a catheter to be pulled back at a known uniform speed. | | |
| • Two-dimensional, longitudinal reconstruction of the anatomy is desired. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
Boston
Scientific
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, MA 01752-1234
508-683-4000
www.bostonscientific.com
# 510(k) Summary
per 21 CFR 807.92
| Sponsor | Boston Scientific Corporation 300 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752 USA |
| --- | --- |
| Contact Name and Information | Kevin Catalano Prin. Regulatory Affairs Specialist Phone: 612.817.2987 E-mail: Kevin.Catalano@bsci.com |
| Date Prepared | November 21, 2025 |
| Proprietary Name | AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System |
| Common Name | Computer Diagnostic Programmable Blood Pressure Computer Ultrasonic Pulsed Echo Imaging System Diagnostic Ultrasonic Transducer |
| Classification Name | Primary: 21 CFR 870.1425 (Programmable Diagnostic Computer) Subsequent: 21 CFR 870.1110 (Blood Pressure Computer) 21 CFR 892.1560 (Ultrasonic Pulsed Echo Imaging System) 21 CFR 892.1570 (Diagnostic Ultrasonic Transducer) |
| Product Code | Primary: DQK (Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable) Subsequent: DSK (Computer, Blood-Pressure) IYO (System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic) ITX (Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic) |
| Classification | Class II, 21 CFR 870.1425 |
| Predicate Device | AVVIGO+™ Multi-Modality Guidance System K230884 cleared Sept 26, 2023 |
# Device Description
The AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System is used by physicians to obtain physiologic, intravascular, and/or intracardiac anatomical information. The system utilizes an interactive display that displays information and allows the physician to:
- Perform intravascular physiology assessment by making measurements with a pressure wire that invasively obtains pressure readings from the vessels, and an FFR Link that retrieves the information from the pressure wire and transfers the information wirelessly to the interactive display, and/or
K253692
Page
1 of 4
{5}
Boston
Scientific
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, MA 01752-1234
508-683-4000
www.bostonscientific.com
- Perform intravascular or intracardiac ultrasound imaging using a specially designed catheter with a miniaturized ultrasound probe attached to the distal end and a Motor Drive. A PC is used for data acquisition and processing to visualize ultrasound images of selected anatomical structures.
The AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System hardware has been modified to include Frame Grabber Hardware.
The AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System software includes new advanced IVUS imaging features: Automated Stent Assessment, Side Branch Display, and IVUSConnect™.
The modified AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System underlying fundamental principles and technology supporting IVUS and Physiology modalities are unmodified from that of the predicate. IVUS and FFR/DFR remain identical to that of the predicate device, AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System.
AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System modifications do not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness.
### Intended Use/Indications for Use
The IVUS modality of the System is intended for ultrasound examinations of intravascular pathology. Intravascular ultrasound is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures such as angioplasty and atherectomy.
FFR and DFR™ are intended for use in catheterization and related cardiovascular specialty laboratories to compute, and display various physiological parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices.
FFR and DFR are indicated to provide hemodynamic information for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients that undergo measurement of physiological parameters.
Refer to the Catheter Instructions for Use provided with all Boston Scientific Ultrasound Imaging Catheters to determine compatibility with the System. All Ultrasound Imaging Catheters will be referred to as Imaging Catheters throughout the remainder of this User Guide.
The Imaging Catheters generate ultrasound images and are intended for ultrasound examination of vascular and cardiac pathology. Boston Scientific manufactures a wide variety of catheters for different applications. The recommended use of each of these catheters may vary depending on the size and type of the catheter. Please refer to the Imaging Catheter Instructions for Use, packaged with each catheter.
Indications for Auto Pullback Use (IVUS Only)
Automatic Pullback is indicated when the following occurs:
K253692
Page
2 of 4
{6}
Boston Scientific
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, MA 01752-1234
508-683-4000
www.bostonscientific.com
- The physician/operator wants to standardize the method in which intravascular ultrasound images are obtained and documented: procedure-to-procedure, operator-to-operator.
- The physician/operator wants to make linear distance determinations post-procedurally, which requires the imaging core of a catheter to be pulled back at a known uniform speed.
- Two-dimensional, longitudinal reconstruction of the anatomy is desired.
### Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System has the same intended use, operational principles and technological characteristics supporting its intended use as the predicate device, AVVIGO+™ Multi-Modality Guidance System. The modified AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in intended use, IVUS and Physiology modalities, fundamental scientific technology and performance features supporting IVUS and Physiology modalities. Modifications within the AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System do not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness as demonstrated via non-clinical performance data.
### Non-Clinical Performance Data
Substantial equivalence of the AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System is determined through non-clinical performance evaluation including hardware, software, electrical safety, packaging verification and validation activities.
Non-clinical performance verification was performed on the complete AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System, including where applicable compatible equipment, according to recognized performance and safety standards including:
- IEC 60601-1 Edition 3.2 2020-08 CONSOLIDATED VERSION Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance FDA Recognition Number 19-49
- ANSI AAMI IEC 60601-1-2:2014 [Including AMD 1:2021] Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests [Including Amendment 1 (2021)] FDA Recognition Number 19-36
- IEC 60601-2-34 Edition 3.0 2011-05 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-34: Particular requirements for the basic safety, including essential performance, of invasive blood pressure monitoring equipment FDA Recognition Number 3-115
- IEC 60601-2-37 Edition 2.1 2015 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-37: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ultrasonic medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment FDA Recognition Number 12-293
- IEC 62304 Medical Device Software – Software Lifecycle Processes, (edition 1.1 2015-06) FDA recognition: 13-79
- AAMI TIR69:2017/(R2020) Technical Information Report Risk management of radio-frequency wireless coexistence for medical devices and systems. FDA Recognition Number 19-22
### Nonclinical Performance Data
K253692
Page 3 of 4
{7}
Boston Scientific
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, MA 01752-1234
508-683-4000
www.bostonscientific.com
The proposed modification introducing the Automated Stent Assessment (ASA) algorithm, Side Branch Display and IVUSConnect™ for AVVIGO™+ IVUS Software was tested in accordance with Boston Scientific internal verification and validation procedures. Prior to user adjustment, automated relative stent expansion measurements demonstrated a mean absolute error of 13.1% (95% CI: 10.7–15.4%), and minimum lumen area measurements demonstrated a mean absolute error of 0.74 mm² (95% CI: 0.61–0.86 mm²) relative to the reference standard during verification testing. Testing was conducted to confirm the continued safe and effective performance of the software in compliance with the following standards:
- IEC 62304: Medical device software – Software life cycle processes, 2006/A1:2016
- IEC 62366-1: Medical devices – Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices, 2015 + AMD1:2020
- ISO 14971: Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices, 2019
Non-clinical verification and validation testing were performed to evaluate the Stent Edge Identification Algorithm and Side Branch Identification Algorithm performance, reliability, and integration with the AVVIGO+ imaging system. Activities included:
- Requirements Review
- Risk Analysis and Management Review
- Product Specification Review
- Design Reviews
To support a determination of substantial equivalence, non-clinical performance verification and validation was conducted in accordance with the following FDA guidance documents:
- Radio Frequency Wireless Technology in Medical Devices – Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff published August 14, 2013
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff February 3, 2026
- Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of Medical Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff June 6, 2022
- Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions June 14, 2023
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions: Lifecycle Management and Marketing Submission Recommendations – Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff January 7, 2025
### Clinical Performance Data
Not applicable; determination of substantial equivalence is not based on clinical performance data. Substantial equivalence is based on an assessment of non-clinical performance data.
### Conclusion
Based on a comparison of intended use, operating principles, and underlying fundamental design technology, including non-clinical performance verification and validation, the modified AVVIGO™+ Multi-Modality Guidance System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, AVVIGO+™ Multi-Modality Guidance System. A comparison of the modified device and predicate, including non-clinical performance verification tests performed, support a determination of substantial equivalence and raise no new issues of safety and effectiveness.
K253692
Page 4 of 4
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.