TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-1000)
K253681 · Graphy, Inc. · EBI · Nov 21, 2025 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K253681
Device Name
TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-1000)
Applicant
Graphy, Inc.
Product Code
EBI · Dental
Decision Date
Nov 21, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3760
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-curable resin indicated for the fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and autopolymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on a digital impression, a DLP, SLA, or LCD additive 3D printer, and a post-curing unit.
Device Story
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a liquid, methacrylate-based photopolymer resin used for additive manufacturing of dental prosthetics. Input consists of digital STL files generated via intraoral scanning and CAD software (e.g., 3Shape Dental System). The resin is polymerized using a 405-412 nm UV light source in a DLP, SLA, or LCD 3D printer. The process requires post-curing in a dedicated unit (Tera Harz Cure). Used in dental clinics/labs; operated by dental professionals. The output is a customized, hard-type removable denture or base plate. The device provides an alternative to traditional heat-curable or autopolymerizing resins, enabling digital workflows for prosthetic fabrication. Dentists review the final printed/polished device for fit and design before patient delivery.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption, water solubility, fracture work, and maximum stress intensity factor, all meeting ISO 20795-1:2013 standards. Biocompatibility testing was performed per ISO 10993-1, covering cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, and implantation.
Technological Characteristics
Methacrylate-based photopolymer resin; liquid state. Polymerization via 405-412 nm UV light. Compatible with DLP, SLA, and LCD 3D printers (40-90 µm horizontal, 100 µm vertical resolution). Non-sterile. Shelf-life: 2 years. Complies with ISO 20795-1:2013 (denture base polymers) and ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility).
Indications for Use
Indicated for fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates in patients requiring dental prosthetics.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin is a device composed of materials such as methylmethacrylate, intended to reline a denture surface that contacts tissue, to repair a fractured denture, or to form a new denture base. This device is not available for over-the-counter (OTC) use.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
November 21, 2025
Graphy Inc.
% Dave Yungvirt
CEO
Third Party Review Group, LLC
7 Giralda Farms, Suite 120A
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Re: K253681
Trade/Device Name: TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-C-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-LP-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-P-1000); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-500); TERA HARZ Hard Denture (THD-CP-1000)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3760
Regulation Name: Denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: EBI
Dated: November 20, 2025
Received: November 21, 2025
Dear Dave Yungvirt:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253681 - Dave Yungvirt
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the
{2}
K253681 - Dave Yungvirt
Page 3
Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and
ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia,
Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2023
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K253681
Device Name
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
Indications for Use (Describe)
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-curable resin indicated for the fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and autopolymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on a digital impression, a DLP, SLA, or LCD additive 3D printer, and a post-curing unit.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
K253681
### 510(k) Summary For
### TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
### [Complying with 21 CFR 807.92]
### I. SUBMISSION SPONSOR
Graphy Inc.
#603, #617, Ace Gasan Forhu, 225, Gasan digital 1-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Office Phone: +82-2-864-3056
Fax: 82-2-864-3057
Contact Person: Mr. Moon-Soo Park / RA Manager
### II. SUBMISSION CORRESPONDENT
### III. DATE PREPARED
20 November 2025
### IV. DEVICE
Trade or Proprietary Name: TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
Model name : THD-C500, THD-C1000, THD-LP500, THD-LP1000, THD-P500, THD-P1000, THD-CP500, THD-CP1000
Common or Usual Name: Denture Base Resin
Classification Name: Denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin. (872.3760)
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: EBI
Classification Panel: Dental
### V. PREDICATE DEVICE
Primary Predicate Device:
K222414, TERA HARZ DENTURE / Graphy Inc. (Class II)
Reference Device.
K202846, TERA HARZ / Graphy Inc. (Class II)
Page 1-12
{5}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
# VI. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-cured, methacrylate-based resin commonly used in additive manufacturing when producing dental structures (both full and partial dentures-Hard type).
Methacrylate-based resin is a known material that is often used in the dental industry for fixed and removable prosthetic devices due to its physical-chemical, mechanical, and biocompatible properties.
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is made from methacrylate-based resins. It is stored in a black 1,000g HDPE bottle. This resin is a liquid photopolymer material that is polymerized by a ultraviolet (UV) laser at 405~412 nm. The resin can be used to create customized removable full and partial dentures with a 3D printer cured by UV light. The UV curable liquid resin is cured at a specific wavelength (405 nm) by the photo-initiator contained in the resin. The process parameters of the 3D printer affect the quality of the 3D printed objects. The printer equipment should be set to a resolution of 40 to 90 µm on the x,y axis (horizontal resolution) and 100 µm on the z axis (vertical resolution). The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE should be used with a specific 3D printer that uses a UV light source and produces 3D printed objects with layer thickness of 100 µm(recommended).
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE does not come with a Intraoral scanner, design software, 3D printer, or post-cure unit.
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE can be used to manufacture customized removable full and partial dentures using compatible equipment.
Digital files can be generated by scanning the patient's intraoral region directly with an intraoral scanner or by scanning the teeth model with a model intraoral scanner under the FDA Classification Product Code NOF, regulation 872.3661.
The digital file consists of a series of CAD files (stl) for building 3D models that can be used to create the denture base. Specialized dental software is used to virtually design a denture base and generate an industry-standard "STL" 3D dataset which reflects the intended shape and contour. The design software used is 3Shape Dental System™ under the FDA Classification Product Code NOF, regulation 872.3661. This software is used to manage 3D scanned teeth models, as well as to measure, analyze, examine, and visualize 3D scanned teeth models to design denture models.
STL files are transferred to a 3D printer. Using the *.stl CAD file data, the 3D printer
Page 2-12
{6}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
begins additive manufacturing, which is used to create customized 3D printed dentures.
The 3D printed dentures are further cured in the post-curing device. Manufactured dentures are polished and washed accordingly.
Before giving the dentures to the patients, the dentist reviews them to ensure the optimal fit and design.
# **Accessories for the Product, Integral Parts of Package**
Not applicable,
This device does not come with a compatible intraoral or model scanners, design software, 3D printers, post-cure unit, and other accessories used in fabrication.
# **VII. INDICATION FOR USE**
The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-curable resin indicated for the fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and auto polymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on a digital impression, a DLP, SLA, or LCD additive 3D printer, and a post-curing unit.
# **VIII. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE**
To demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE and to show substantial equivalence to the predicate device, the following non-clinical tests were completed: Flexural Strength/Modulus, Water sorption, and Solubility.
The result of the performance comparison test demonstrates that the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. Potential minor variance does not introduce additional safety or efficacy concerns. Both devices meet requirements from ISO 20795-1:2013.
The performance characteristics of the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE are comparable to those of the predicate device for this particular indication and raise no questions on safety and effectiveness.
Any differences in technology characteristics are accompanied by information that
Page 3-12
{7}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
demonstrates that the device is as safe and as effective as the predicate device and do not raise questions on safety and effectiveness.
Therefore, it is concluded that the technological differences do not raise questions on safety and effectiveness.
Comparison table: Subject device with Predicate device
| | SUBJECTDevice | PREDICATE Device | Significant Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Graphy Inc. | - |
| TradeName | TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE | TERA HARZ DENTURE | - |
| 510(k) No. | - | K222414 | - |
| Regulation Description | Resin, Denture, Relining, Repairing, Rebasing | Resin, Denture, Relining, Repairing, Rebasing | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.3760 | 21 CFR 872.3760 | Same |
| Product Code | EBI | EBI | Same |
| Class | II | II | Same |
| Indications for Use | The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-curable resin indicated for the fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and auto polymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on a digital impression, a DLP, SLA, or LCD additive 3D printer, and a post-curing unit. | The TERA HARZ DENTURE is a light- curableresin indicated for fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures and baseplates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and auto polymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on digital impression, DLP,SLA,LCD method additive 3d printer, and post-curing light equipment | Same |
| Fabrication of Denture Base | Automated 3D printing(DLP,SLA,LCD) of resin in multiple layers, each light-cured before adding next layer, with post | Automated 3D printing(DLP,SLA,LCD) of resin in multiple layers, each light-cured before adding next layer, with post | Same |
Page 4-12
{8}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
| | curing in light chamber | curing in light chamber | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Device Characteristics | Digital Scan file: STL Design software: 3shape dental system (NOF) Additive 3D printer: DLP/SLA/LCD method -SPRINTRAY PRO 95 -UNIZ NBEE Post-Curing equipment: -Tera Harz Cure (THC) | Digital Scan file: STL Design software: 3shape dental system (NOF) Additive 3D printer: DLP/SLA/LCD method -SPRINTRAY PRO 95 -UNIZ NBEE Curing equipment: -Tera Harz Cure (THC) | Same |
| Device color | - Clear - Light pink - Pink - Coral Pink | - Clear - White - Light pink - Pink - Dark pink - Black pink | Different : The color for these two products is slightly different. But this differences not introduce additional safety of efficacy concerns. |
| Materials of Use | Methacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, inhibitor and pigments | Methacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, inhibitor and pigments | Different : the subject device differs from the predicate device in the material of use. The two products are similar methacrylate-based resins, but they differ in raw material composition. |
| Product State | Pre-mixed resin (liquid) | Pre-mixed resin (liquid) | Same |
| Design | | | Same |
| Performance Testing | ISO 20795-1:2013 Requirements: Visual inspection item | ISO 20795-1:2013 Requirements: Visual inspection item | Different: The SUBJECT Device has higher Flexural strength, |
Page 5-12
{9}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
| | (surface characteristics, shape capability, colour, colour stability, translucency, freedom of porosity) -Residual methyl methacrylate monomer - Flexural strength > 65 MPa. - Flexural modulus > 2,000 MPa. - Water sorption ≤ 32 μg/mm³ - Water solubility ≤ 1.6 μg/mm³ - Maximum stress intensity factor ≥ 1.9 MPa m1/2. - Total fracture work ≥ 900 J/m2 Test Results: -Visual inspection item : All meets the criteria - Residual methyl methacrylate monomer : 0.0% - Average Flexural strength = MPa Avg: 123 MPa (DLP) Avg: 122 MPa (SLA) Avg: 115 MPa (LCD) - Flexural modulus: Average MPa Avg: 3107 MPa (DLP) Avg: 3029 MPa (SLA) Avg: 2827 MPa (LCD) - Average Water sorption=μg /mm³ Avg: 17 μg/mm³ (DLP) Avg: 16 μg/mm³ (SLA) Avg: 17 μg/mm³ (LCD) | (surface characteristics, shape capability, colour, colour stability, translucency, freedom of porosity) -Residual methyl methacrylate monomer - Flexural strength > 65 MPa. - Flexural modulus > 2,000 MPa. - Water sorption ≤ 32 μg/mm³ - Water solubility ≤ 1.6 μg/mm³ - Maximum stress intensity factor ≥ 1.9 MPa m1/2. - Total fracture work ≥ 900 J/m2 Test Results: -Visual inspection item : All meets the criteria - Residual methyl methacrylate monomer : 0.0% - Average Flexural strength = MPa Avg: 116 MPa (DLP) Avg: 112 MPa (SLA) Avg: 108 MPa (LCD) - Flexural modulus: Average MPa Avg: 3092 MPa (DLP) Avg: 3001 MPa (SLA) Avg: 2903 MPa (LCD) - Average Water sorption=μg /mm³ Avg: 9 μg/mm³ (DLP) Avg: 8.5 μg/mm³ (SLA) Avg: 8.6 μg/mm³ (LCD) | Flexural modulus, and Water solubility than the PREDICATE Device.There was no significant difference in their performance testing results between the two devices, and they all satisfied the required standards according to ISO 20795-1:2013. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
Page 6 / 12
{10}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
| | - Average Water solubility =μg/mm³ Avg: 0.6 μg/mm³ (DLP) Avg: 0.6 μg/mm³ (SLA) Avg: 0.8 μg/mm³ (LCD) -Average maximum stress intensity factor = MPa m1/2 Avg: 2.08 MPa m1/2 (DLP) Avg: 2.08 MPa m1/2 (SLA) Avg: 2.05 MPa m1/2 (LCD) -Average total fracture work = (J/m2) Avg: 1055 (J/m2) (DLP) Avg: 1068 (J/m2) (SLA) Avg: 1056 (J/m2) (LCD) | - Average Water solubility =μg/mm³ Avg: 0.6 μg/mm³ (DLP) Avg: 0.6 μg/mm³ (SLA) Avg: 0.8 μg/mm³ (LCD) -Average maximum stress intensity factor = MPa m1/2 Avg: 2.37 MPa m1/2 (DLP) Avg: 2.33 MPa m1/2 (SLA) Avg: 2.33 MPa m1/2 (LCD) -Average total fracture work = (J/m2) Avg: 1651 (J/m2) (DLP) Avg: 1604 (J/m2) (SLA) Avg: 1626(J/m2) (LCD) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Biocompatibility** | Biocompatibility tests were conducted according to ISO 10993-1 | Biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1 | **Same** |
| **Sterile** | To be used Non-sterile | To be used Non-sterile | **Same** |
| **Shelf-life** | 2 years | 2 years | **Same** |
Page 7 / 12
{11}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
Comparison table: Subject device with Reference device
| | SUBJECT Device | Reference Device | Significant Difference |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Graphy Inc. | - |
| Trade Name | TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE | TERA HARZ | - |
| 510(k) No. | - | K202846 | - |
| Regulation Description | Resin, Denture, Relining, Repairing, Rebasing | -Tooth shade resin materials - Crown and Bridge, Temporary, Resin | Different |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.3760 | -21 CFR 872.3690 -21 CFR 872.3770 | Different |
| Product Code | EBI | EBF EBG | Different |
| Class | II | II | Same |
| Indications for Use | The TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is a light-curable resin indicated for the fabrication and repair of full and partial removable dentures (HARD-type) and base plates. The material is an alternative to traditional heat-curable and auto polymerizing resins. Fabrication of dental prosthetics with the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE requires a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system that includes the following components: digital denture base files based on a digital impression, a DLP, SLA, or LCD additive 3D printer, and a post-curing unit. | TERA HARZ is indicated as an indirect restorative for both anterior and posterior restorations, including occlusal surfaces. The TERA HARZ material is used for fabricating temporary or permanent restorations such as crowns and bridges, inlays, onlays, veneers and full crown restorations. Fabrication of TERA HARZ requires a computer-aided and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system tha includes the following: Intraoral scanner, design software, additive 3d printer, and post-cure unit. | Different |
| Manufacturing Technology | Additive 3d printing (DLP,SLA,.LCD method) | Additive 3d printing (DLP,SLA,.LCD method) | Same |
Page 8 / 12
{12}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
| **Device Characteristics** | Digital Scan file: STL Design software: 3shape dental system (NOF) Additive 3D printer: DLP/SLA/LCD method -SPRINTRAY PRO 95 -UNIZ NBEE Post-Curing equipment: -Tera Harz Cure (THC) | Digital Scan file: STL Design software: 3shape dental system (NOF) Additive 3D printer: DLP/SLA/LCD method -SPRINTRAY PRO 95 -UNIZ NBEE Curing equipment: -Tera Harz Cure (THC) | **Same** |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
Page 9 / 12
{13}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
| Materials of Use | Methacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, inhibitor and pigments | Methacrylate-based resins with photo-initiator, inhibitor and pigments | Same : The subject device and the reference device have the same raw material. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product State | Pre-mixed resin (liquid) | Pre-mixed resin (liquid) | Same |
| Design | | | Different |
| Performance Testing | - ISO 20795-1:2013 | ISO 10477:2020 | Difference:The subject device and the reference device applied different technical standards. |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1-Cytotoxicity-Sensitization-Oral irritation-Intracutaneous reactivity-Acute systemic toxicity-Subchronic Toxicity-Genotoxicity-Genotoxicity (In Vitro)-Implantation | Biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1-Cytotoxicity-Sensitization-Oral irritation-Intracutaneous reactivity-Acute systemic toxicity-Subchronic Toxicity-Genotoxicity-Genotoxicity (In Vitro)-Implantation | Same |
| Sterile | To be used Non-sterile | To be used Non-sterile | No difference |
| Shelf-life | 2 years | 2 years | No difference |
Page 10 / 12
{14}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
# IX. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
# Manufacturing Validation
A manufacturing validation was performed with the following printer(s) to demonstrate the manufacturing process for the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE:
| | Manufacturer | Brand(Model) | Remark |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Design: | | | |
| Intraoral scanner | 3Shape A/S | TIROS 3 Basic TRIOS 4 TRIOS 5 | |
| Design software | 3Shape A/S | 3 Shape Dental System™ | |
| Additive Manufacturing System: | | | |
| 3D Printer | SprintRay Inc. | Pro 95 | |
| | UNIZ TECHNOLOGY LLC. | NBEE | |
| Post-Curing: | | | |
| Post-cure unit | Graphy Inc. | Tera Harz Cure(THC) | |
The equipment in this table has been validated by the manufacturer.
The test was conducted to evaluate the effect of manufacturing validation and material reuse on the properties of the final finished device according to the FDA's published guidance document, "Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices".
The test specimens made of TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE were printed under different output conditions and each specimen was measured using the evaluation criteria of a flexural strength greater than 65 MPa and flexural modulus greater than 2000 MPa. All specimens met the criteria. The optimal output angle is 45 degrees, and the optimal position is the center.
In addition, the repeated usage of the resin met the acceptance criteria for flexural strength and modulus when reused up to 6 times.
# Performance Testing
Performance tests in accordance with ISO 20795-1 including visual inspection, capacity, package integrity, surface characteristics, shape capability, porosity, translucency, color, color stability, flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption, water solubility, total fracture work, maximum stress intensity factor were performed. The results of the non-
Page 11 / 12
{15}
Graphy Inc.
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Submission
TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE
clinical tests demonstrate that the results have met the standard criteria, and the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
# Shelf Life Testing
The shelf-life of the subject device is 2 years.
Accelerated Shelf life testing has been conducted with bench tests according to the ISO 20975-1:2013.
# Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility Tests in accordance with the FDA Guidance Document, Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process".
The subject device is considered a surface device that is in contact with the mucosal membrane for > 30 days. The ISO 10993-1 standard was followed, and the following biological safety aspects have been addressed:
Cytotoxicity in accordance with ISO 10993-5
Sensitization in accordance with ISO 10993-10
Intracutaneous reactivity in accordance with ISO 10993-10
Irritation(oral) in accordance with ISO 10993-10
Acute systemic toxicity in accordance with ISO 10993-11
Sub-chronic toxicity in accordance with ISO 10993-11
Genotoxicity test in accordance with ISO 10993-3
Implantation in accordance with ISO 10993-6
# X. CLINICAL DATA
Clinical performance data was not provided for the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE.
# XI. CONCLUSIONS
The test results of the non-clinical tests performed on the subject device supported that the device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices despite the differences.
Based on the information provided in this premarket notification, Graphy Inc. concludes that the TERA HARZ HARD DENTURE is substantially equivalent to the predicate device as described herein.
Page 12 / 12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Guidance alerts
New and changed FDA guidance documents, emailed as a daily digest.
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the ? button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only Software as a Medical Device, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (Software as a Medical Device), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.