Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 30mm (1530VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 38mm (1538VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 30mm (1630VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 38mm (1638VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 30mm (1730VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 38mm (1738VSMM)
K253469 · Mozarc Medical Us, LLC · FIE · Aug 6, 2026 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K253469
Device Name
Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 30mm (1530VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 38mm (1538VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 30mm (1630VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 38mm (1638VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 30mm (1730VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 38mm (1738VSMM)
Applicant
Mozarc Medical Us, LLC
Product Code
FIE · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Aug 6, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5540
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula is intended for use gaining percutaneous vascular access via arteriovenous (AV) fistula for blood removal and blood reinfusion during dialysis, in patients 18 years or older, with kidney failure.
Device Story
Device is a safety fistula cannula for hemodialysis; consists of stainless-steel puncture needle, indwelling polypropylene cannula, integrated luer-activated anti-reflux valve, and safety cap. Used by clinicians in dialysis centers to gain vascular access. Needle assembly removed after access; safety cap automatically locks over needle tip to prevent accidental needle-stick injuries. Anti-reflux valve prevents blood backflow; V-plug hemostatic valve allows air passage but blocks blood, enabling visualization of blood flashback in transparent hub to confirm vessel entry. Cannula tip features side holes to prevent vessel wall occlusion. Device facilitates blood removal/reinfusion; performance comparable to standard steel needles; minimizes blood exposure risk and needle-stick injuries.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-randomized clinical study (n=38 subjects, 1,148 hemodialysis sessions). Primary endpoint: successful dialysis session completion. Results: 98.61% success rate; cannulation success ~98.9%. Mean spKt/V 1.49; mean URR 70.9%. Access-related complications occurred in 0.44% of sessions (minor infiltrations 0.26%, needle dislodgement 0.17%). No serious device-related adverse events reported. Clinical performance comparable to conventional steel needles.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: stainless-steel needle, polypropylene cannula/cone/V-plug, polycarbonate safety cap. Coaxial configuration. Features: luer-activated anti-reflux valve, V-plug hemostatic valve, side-hole cannula tip. Sizes: 15G, 16G, 17G; lengths 30mm, 38mm. Standards: ISO 10993-1, ISO 10555-1, ISO 10555-5, ISO 9626, ISO 80369-1. Mechanical operation; no software/electronics.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients 18 years or older with kidney failure requiring percutaneous vascular access via arteriovenous (AV) fistula for hemodialysis blood removal and reinfusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood access device and accessories is a device intended to provide access to a patient's blood for hemodialysis or other chronic uses. When used in hemodialysis, it is part of an artificial kidney system for the treatment of patients with renal failure or toxemic conditions and provides access to a patient's blood for hemodialysis. The device includes implanted blood access devices, nonimplanted blood access devices, and accessories for both the implanted and nonimplanted blood access devices.(1) The implanted blood access device is a prescription device and consists of various flexible or rigid tubes, such as catheters, or cannulae, which are surgically implanted in appropriate blood vessels, may come through the skin, and are intended to remain in the body for 30 days or more. This generic type of device includes various catheters, shunts, and connectors specifically designed to provide access to blood. Examples include single and double lumen catheters with cuff(s), fully subcutaneous port-catheter systems, and A-V shunt cannulae (with vessel tips). The implanted blood access device may also contain coatings or additives which may provide additional functionality to the device. (2) The nonimplanted blood access device consists of various flexible or rigid tubes, such as catheters, cannulae or hollow needles, which are inserted into appropriate blood vessels or a vascular graft prosthesis (§§ 870.3450 and 870.3460), and are intended to remain in the body for less than 30 days. This generic type of device includes fistula needles, the single needle dialysis set (coaxial flow needle), and the single needle dialysis set (alternating flow needle). (3) Accessories common to either type include the shunt adaptor, cannula clamp, shunt connector, shunt stabilizer, vessel dilator, disconnect forceps, shunt guard, crimp plier, tube plier, crimp ring, joint ring, fistula adaptor, and declotting tray (including contents).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for the implanted blood access device. The special controls for this device are:(i) Components of the device that come into human contact must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. Material names and specific designation numbers must be provided.
(ii) Performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(A) Pressure versus flow rates for both arterial and venous lumens, from the minimum flow rate to the maximum flow rate in 100 milliliter per minute increments, must be established. The fluid and its viscosity used during testing must be stated.
(B) Recirculation rates for both forward and reverse flow configurations must be established, along with the protocol used to perform the assay, which must be provided.
(C) Priming volumes must be established.
(D) Tensile testing of joints and materials must be conducted. The minimum acceptance criteria must be adequate for its intended use.
(E) Air leakage testing and liquid leakage testing must be conducted.
(F) Testing of the repeated clamping of the extensions of the catheter that simulates use over the life of the device must be conducted, and retested for leakage.
(G) Mechanical hemolysis testing must be conducted for new or altered device designs that affect the blood flow pattern.
(H) Chemical tolerance of the device to repeated exposure to commonly used disinfection agents must be established.
(iii) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device.
(iv) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device for continued sterility, package integrity, and functionality over the requested shelf life that must include tensile, repeated clamping, and leakage testing.
(v) Labeling of implanted blood access devices for hemodialysis must include the following:
(A) Labeling must provide arterial and venous pressure versus flow rates, either in tabular or graphical format. The fluid and its viscosity used during testing must be stated.
(B) Labeling must specify the forward and reverse recirculation rates.
(C) Labeling must provide the arterial and venous priming volumes.
(D) Labeling must specify an expiration date.
(E) Labeling must identify any disinfecting agents that cannot be used to clean any components of the device.
(F) Any contraindicated disinfecting agents due to material incompatibility must be identified by printing a warning on the catheter. Alternatively, contraindicated disinfecting agents must be identified by a label affixed to the patient's medical record and with written instructions provided directly to the patient.
(G) Labeling must include a patient implant card.
(H) The labeling must contain comprehensive instructions for the following:
(
*1* ) Preparation and insertion of the device, including recommended site of insertion, method of insertion, and a reference on the proper location for tip placement;(
*2* ) Proper care and maintenance of the device and device exit site;(
*3* ) Removal of the device;(
*4* ) Anticoagulation;(
*5* ) Management of obstruction and thrombus formation; and(
*6* ) Qualifications for clinical providers performing the insertion, maintenance, and removal of the devices.(vi) In addition to Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, implanted blood access devices that include subcutaneous ports must include the following:
(A) Labeling must include the recommended type of needle for access as well as detailed instructions for care and maintenance of the port, subcutaneous pocket, and skin overlying the port.
(B) Performance testing must include results on repeated use of the ports that simulates use over the intended life of the device.
(C) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
(vii) In addition to Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, implanted blood access devices with coatings or additives must include the following:
(A) A description and material characterization of the coating or additive material, the purpose of the coating or additive, duration of effectiveness, and how and where the coating is applied.
(B) An identification in the labeling of any coatings or additives and a summary of the results of performance testing for any coating or material with special characteristics, such as decreased thrombus formation or antimicrobial properties.
(C) A Warning Statement in the labeling for potential allergic reactions including anaphylaxis if the coating or additive contains known allergens.
(D) Performance data must demonstrate efficacy of the coating or additive and the duration of effectiveness.
(viii) The following must be included for A-V shunt cannulae (with vessel tips):
(A) The device must comply with Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section with the exception of paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B), (b)(1)(ii)(C), (b)(1)(v)(B), and (b)(1)(v)(C), which do not apply.
(B) Labeling must include Warning Statements to address the potential for vascular access steal syndrome, arterial stenosis, arterial thrombosis, and hemorrhage including exsanguination given that the device accesses the arterial circulation.
(C) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
(2) Class II (performance standards) for the nonimplanted blood access device.
(3) Class II (performance standards) for accessories for both the implanted and the nonimplanted blood access devices not listed in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(4) Class I for the cannula clamp, disconnect forceps, crimp plier, tube plier, crimp ring, and joint ring, accessories for both the implanted and nonimplanted blood access device. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(4) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.
Predicate Devices
JMS SysLoc MINI A.V. Fistula Needle Set (V4) (K142564)
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
August 6, 2026
Mozarc Medical US LLC
Carol Ming
Sr. Regulatory Manager
15 New Hampshire
Mansfield, MA 02048
Re: K253469
Trade/Device Name: Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 30mm (1530VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 15G x 38mm (1538VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 30mm (1630VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 16G x 38mm (1638VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 30mm (1730VSMM); Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve 17G x 38mm (1738VSMM)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5540
Regulation Name: Blood access device and accessories
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FIE
Dated: October 10, 2025
Received: October 10, 2025
Dear Carol Ming:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and
{1}
K253469 – Carol Ming
Page 2
adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part
{2}
K253469 – Carol Ming
Page 3
803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MAURA ROONEY -S
Maura Rooney
Assistant Director
DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity, and Transplant Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K253469
Device Name
Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve
Indications for Use (Describe)
Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula is intended for use gaining percutaneous vascular access via arteriovenous (AV) fistula for blood removal and blood reinfusion during dialysis, in patients 18 years or older, with kidney failure.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
Mozarc
Empowering patients
Enriching lives
medical
K253469
Page 1 of 6
# 510(k) Summary K253469
The 510(k) Summary is in accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Device Act (SMDA) of 1990. The content of this 510(k) summary is provided in conformance with 21 CFR 807.92.
# 1. Submitter's Information
| Name | Mozarc Medical US LLC |
| --- | --- |
| Address | 15 Hampshire Street Mansfield, MA 02048 |
| Contact Person | Carol Ming (carol.ming@mozarcmedical.com) |
| Preparation Date | July 31, 2026 |
# 2. Device Description
| Trade Name | Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name | Needle, Fistula |
| Regulation Name | Blood access device and accessories |
| Regulatory Class | Class II |
| Product Code | FIE |
| FDA Review Panel | Gastroenterology and Urology |
# 3. Predicate Device
Predicate Device: JMS SysLoc MINI A.V. Fistula Needle Set (V4) (K142564)
Reference Device: SUPERCATH V (K052267)
# 4. Device Description
The Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannulas with Anti-Reflux Valve are composed of a stainless-steel puncture needle and an indwelling polypropylene cannula. They are equipped with an integrated, luer-activated anti-reflux valve to prevent the backflow of blood and a safety cap that covers the needle tip when the puncture needle is removed. The devices come supplied with a V-plug hemostatic valve. The needle-stick prevention feature is intended to minimize accidental needle-stick injuries. The anti-reflux valve feature is intended to minimize blood exposure risk. The V-plug hemostatic valve can also be used to check for blood flashback during insertion. A variety of gauge sizes, lengths, and features are available; product features are detailed on the product packaging.
The product consists of a polypropylene cannula and a hubbed stainless-steel needle in a coaxial configuration. The outer portion of the configuration is the cannula assembly. The cannula is bonded proximally to the cone which is constructed of polypropylene. The cone
{5}
Mozarc
Empowering patients
Enriching lives medical
K253469
Page 2 of 6
component of the cannula portion of the assembly contains an integrated, luer-activated anti-reflux valve that prevents the backflow of blood once vessel access has been attained and the needle assembly is withdrawn. The cannula tip has side holes to help prevent vessel wall occlusion.
The inner portion of the coaxial configuration is comprised of a sharp needle made of stainless steel and a needle hub made of polycarbonate. The needle hub is the portion of the needle assembly that is intended to be gripped as the needle assembly is removed from the cannula. As the needle assembly is removed from the cannula, the polycarbonate safety cap travels along the needle shaft until it locks in place over the sharp needle tip.
Proximal to the needle hub is the v-plug which is constructed of polypropylene. The V-plug is a hemostatic valve that allows air to pass but prevents blood flow. The hemostatic valve allows for blood flashback during insertion. Blood flashback is visible through the transparent needle hub and is used to indicate vascular access.
The Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve is offered in three cannula gauge sizes: 15G, 16G, and 17G, and two lengths: 30mm and 38 mm. Each of the gauge sizes is identified by a different colored cone. The 15G is identified by a blue-grey cone; the 16G is identified by a white cone; and the 17G is identified by a red-violet cone.
# 5. Indications for Use
Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula is intended for use gaining percutaneous vascular access via arteriovenous (AV) fistula for blood removal and blood reinfusion during dialysis, in patients 18 years or older, with kidney failure.
# 6. Comparison to Predicate Device
The technological characteristics, design and performance of the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve is consistent with those of the predicate and reference devices.
- Intended Use: The intended use of the proposed and the predicate device is the same.
- Materials: Both the proposed and the predicate device have stainless steel puncture needles. The proposed device is comprised of polypropylene V-Plug (not present on predicate) and a polycarbonate/stainless steel safety cap, which is different than the propylene cap on the predicate device. Biocompatibility testing was completed, and the difference in material does not impact the safety or effectiveness of the device.
- Principles of Operation and Technology: The proposed device and predicate device have the same fundamental scientific technology.
{6}
**Mozarc**
Empowering patients
Enriching lives
medical
K253469
Page 3 of 6
- **Performance:** The performance of the proposed device and the predicate device are substantially equivalent. Differences in flow rate are due to the differences in material. Performance testing, both bench and clinical testing, demonstrate that the proposed device is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
## 7. Summary of Technological Characteristics
Overall, the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve is substantially equivalent to the predicate device with respect to intended use, technology, design, and performance. Although there are minor differences in design features with the predicate device, Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve is equivalent to the design of the reference device. Materials, biocompatibility, bench, and clinical testing demonstrate that there are no differences that affect safety or effectiveness. Therefore, the proposed device performs as intended and is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
## 8. Performance Data
### Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility testing was conducted based on the requirements of ISO 10993-1:2018 and FDA Guidance on ISO 10993-1. The results of the biocompatibility tests conducted demonstrate that the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve meets the ISO 10993 requirements and is biologically safe for its intended use.
### Performance Testing
#### - Nonclinical Tests
Comprehensive performance testing was conducted on the proposed device to verify compliance with applicable product specifications and relevant standards, including ISO 10555-1:2023, ISO 10555-5:2013, ISO 9626:2016, and ISO 80369-1:2018, and to demonstrate reliable functionality across all critical design features. Testing included evaluation of the luer lock fitting assembly, needle performance, needle-stick prevention mechanisms, anti-reflux valve function, V-plug performance, intravascular catheter integrity, and clinical flow rates. All tests met their predefined acceptance criteria, confirming proper mechanical integrity, leak resistance, safety feature activation, usability, and functional performance across all applicable gauge sizes.
In addition, comparative performance testing was performed against the predicate device to assess equivalence. Hemolysis and static flow rate testing demonstrated that the proposed device performs similarly to, and does not adversely differ from, the predicate
{7}
Mozarc
Empowering patients
Enriching lives medical
K253469
Page 4 of 6
device. Overall, the results confirm that the proposed device is safe, effective, and performs as intended, with performance that is equivalent to or better than the predicate device.
# - Clinical Tests
Clinical data supporting the premarket notification were obtained from a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-randomized clinical study. The study was performed at three U.S. hemodialysis centers and evaluated the Argyle Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-reflux Valve during routine clinical use.
A total of 40 subjects were enrolled, of whom 38 subjects underwent at least one cannulation with the study device, contributing 1,148 hemodialysis sessions to the primary analysis set.
Subjects were adult patients (≥18 years) with end-stage renal disease and a mature arteriovenous fistula undergoing in-center hemodialysis, representing the intended use population.
The primary endpoint was the percentage of successful hemodialysis sessions, defined as completion of the prescribed treatment without access-related complications or clinically significant adjustments attributable to the vascular access device.
The clinical study demonstrated a high rate of successful dialysis treatments. Overall, 98.61% (1,132/1,148) of sessions met the predefined success criteria, and the cannulation success rate was approximately 98.9%.
During treatment, adjustments to dialysis prescription parameters, including blood flow rate and treatment duration, were made as part of routine clinical care. Reductions in blood flow rate occurred in 494 of 1,132 (43.6%) successful dialysis sessions, while reductions in treatment duration occurred in 269 of 1,132 (23.8%) successful sessions. The mean reduction in blood flow rate was 23.2 ± 35.7 mL/min, and the mean reduction in treatment duration was 15.3 ± 26.6 minutes. Dialysis sessions were otherwise completed according to routine clinical practice.
Dialysis adequacy was evaluated using available single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V) and urea reduction ratio (URR) measurements. Mean spKt/V was 1.49 ± 0.28, and mean URR was 70.9 ± 6.8%. Because blood urea nitrogen (BUN) samples were not collected for all sessions, some adequacy assessments could not be evaluated. Analysis of the available data, including
{8}
**Mozarc**
Empowering patients
Enriching lives
medical
K253469
Page 5 of 6
sensitivity analyses to address missing values, demonstrated dialysis adequacy comparable to baseline treatments performed using conventional steel needles.
The study demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of device-related complications. Access-related complications occurred in 0.44% (5/1,148) of sessions. Minor infiltrations were reported in 0.26% (3/1,148) of sessions, with no major infiltrations observed. Needle dislodgement occurred in 0.17% (2/1,148) of sessions. No events involving blood loss requiring intervention, hemorrhage, air embolism, infection, arterial puncture, or pseudoaneurysm requiring treatment were reported.
No device-related serious adverse device effects (SADEs) or unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) were reported. Adverse events observed during the study were consistent with those expected in an ESRD population and were predominantly unrelated to the study device or procedure. No subjects required procedures to correct access-related complications, and all device-related events resolved without sequelae.
Clinical data collection included protocol deviations related to incomplete laboratory and assessment data, primarily affecting dialysis adequacy measures. Several patients did not have Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) measurements drawn appropriately, resulting in missing pre- and post-dialysis BUN values. Consequently, the overall number of evaluable adequacy results, including urea reduction ratio calculations, was reduced.
The clinical results demonstrate that the Argyle Safety Fistula Cannula achieves high rates of successful cannulation and dialysis session completion, exhibits a low rate of access-related complications with no serious device-related adverse events, and maintains dialysis adequacy and blood flow performance comparable to predicate devices.
Based on the totality of the clinical evidence, including safety, effectiveness, adverse event profile, and observed complications, the device demonstrates a safety and performance profile comparable to legally marketed predicate fistula needle devices and supports a determination of substantial equivalence.
# - **Conclusion for nonclinical and clinical tests**
The non-clinical and clinical data support the safety of the device and design verification and validation demonstrate that the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve device should perform as intended in the specified use conditions. The clinical data demonstrate that the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve performs comparably to the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use.
{9}
Mozarc
Empowering patients
Enriching lives medical
K253469
Page 6 of 6
# 9. Summary
The Indications for Use, technological characteristics, design, and performance requirements of the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate and reference devices. Mozarc Medical concludes that within the meaning of the Medical Device Amendments Act of 1976, the Ritus™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-Reflux Valve Hemodialysis System are safe and effective for their intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.