Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-01); Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-02)
K253276 · Shanghai Bangbang Robotics Co., Ltd. · ITI · Jan 15, 2026 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K253276
Device Name
Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-01); Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-02)
Applicant
Shanghai Bangbang Robotics Co., Ltd.
Product Code
ITI · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Jan 15, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 890.3860
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The intended use of the Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Model name: BBR-E80-01 and BBR-E80-02 is to provide outdoor and indoor mobility to persons limited to a seated position that are capable of operating a powered wheelchair.
Device Story
Battery-operated, 2-wheel drive (rear-wheel drive) powered wheelchair; provides indoor/outdoor mobility. Components: seat system, control system, braking system, drive system. User operates via control pad on armrest or smartphone app via Bluetooth 4.1 BLE. Smartphone app enables remote driving, battery status monitoring, speed gear adjustment, and device locking/unlocking. Controller rocker input takes priority over remote app control for safety. Electromagnetic braking system engages upon rocker release. Manually foldable/expandable frame; interchangeable joystick side. Benefits: mobility assistance for seated users. Healthcare provider uses device to facilitate patient independence; output (movement) directly controlled by patient.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data included. Bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Carbon fiber frame; 24V DC lithium-ion battery (12Ah or 20Ah); two DC motors; electromagnetic braking. Connectivity: Bluetooth 4.1 BLE. Dimensions/performance verified per ISO 7176-1 through 7176-25, ISO 16840-10, and ANSI C63.27-2017. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-5, -10, -23.
Indications for Use
Indicated for persons limited to a seated position who are capable of operating a powered wheelchair, requiring indoor and outdoor mobility.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A powered wheelchair is a battery-operated device with wheels that is intended for medical purposes to provide mobility to persons restricted to a sitting position.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
January 15, 2026
Shanghai BangBang Robotics Co., Ltd.
Yihua Ma
RA Manager
Room 501, Building 3, No.188 Zhongchen Road
Songjiang District
Shanghai, 201613
China
Re: K253276
Trade/Device Name: Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-01); Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-02)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3860
Regulation Name: Powered Wheelchair
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ITI
Dated: December 16, 2025
Received: December 16, 2025
Dear Yihua Ma:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253276 - Yihua Ma
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K253276 - Yihua Ma
Page 3
Sincerely,
Tushar Bansal -S
- Tushar Bansal, PhD
- Acting Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team
- DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices
- OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices
- Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This
textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K253276 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-01);
Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) (BBR-E80-02) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The intended use of the Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Model name: BBR-E80-01 and BBR-E80-02
is to provide outdoor and indoor mobility to persons limited to a seated position that are capable of
operating a powered wheelchair. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as
applicable). | ☐ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☑ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
510(K) Summary
Document Prepared Date: 2025/12/16
K253276
A. Applicant:
Shanghai BangBang Robotics Co., Ltd.
Address: Room 501, Building 3, No.188 Zhongchen Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China.
Contact Person: Zephyr Ma
Tel: +86-18616909737
B. Device:
Trade Name: Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80)
Common Name: Powered wheelchair
Models: BBR-E80-01, BBR-E80-02.
Regulatory Information
Classification Name: Powered wheelchair
Classification: Class II.
Product code: ITI
Regulation Number: 890.3860
Review Panel: Physical Medicine
{5}
C. Predicate device:
510Knumber: K231868
Device Name: Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E40)
Model: BBR-E40-01
Shanghai BangBang Robotics Co., Ltd.
D. Indications for use of the device:
The intended use of the Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Models name: BBR-E80-01,BBR-E80-02, is to provide outdoor and indoor mobility to persons limited to a seated position that are capable of operating a powered wheelchair.
E. Device Description:
The Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Models name: BBR-E80-01,BBR-E80-02, is an indoor/outdoor, battery-operated, 2-wheel drive (rear-wheel drive) powered wheelchair.
It consists of four modules: seat system, control system, braking system, and drive system. The user sits in the wheelchair seat and uses the control system.
The control pad positioned on the right armrest, user can turn the wheelchair on, control the speed, and direct the movement.
The braking system employs an electromagnetic brake, when release the controller rocker, the electromagnetic brakes will be actuated, and the electric wheelchair will stop in several seconds.
Electromagnetic brake will not take effect immediately, it will take effect after the wheel rotates for 1/2 cycle.
The wheelchair is powered by a 24V DC,12Ah or 20Ah rechargeable lithium-ion battery charged by an offboard lithium-ion battery charger. The wheelchair is driven by two DC motors.
The Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Models name: BBR-E80-01,BBR-E80-02, contains Bluetooth 4.1 BLE technology. The device can be controlled by the controller rocker or remote control by a smartphone app via Bluetooth 4.1 Low Energy (BLE) wireless communication interface. The smartphone app is used to drive the chair remotely. For safety, controller rocker control is priority over the remote control by design. The smartphone app can also view the battery's status, adjust the speed gear level and lock/unlock the unattended device.
The wheelchair can be folded/expanded manually. The Left and right handrails (joystick) can be interchange.
F. Non-Clinical Test Conclusion
Non-clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications as was Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device. The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards:
{6}
ISO 10993-5: 2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices -- Part 5: Tests For In Vitro Cytotoxicity
ISO 10993-10: 2021 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 10: Tests For Skin Sensitization
ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 23: Tests for Irritation
ISO 7176-1: 2014, Wheelchairs - Part 1: Determination of static stability
ISO 7176-2:2017, Wheelchairs - Part 2: Determination of dynamic stability of Powered Wheelchairs
ISO 7176-3: 2012, Wheelchairs - Part 3: Determination of effectiveness of brakes
ISO 7176-4, Third edition 2008-10-01, Wheelchairs - Part 4: Energy consumption of electric wheelchairs and wheelchairs for determination of theoretical distance range
ISO 7176-5, Second edition 2008-06-01, Wheelchairs - Part 5: Determination of overall dimensions, mass and manoeuvring space
ISO 7176-6: 2018, Wheelchairs - Part 6: Determination of maximum speed, acceleration and deceleration of Powered Wheelchairs
ISO 7176-7:1998, Wheelchairs - Part 7: Measurement of seating and wheel dimensions
ISO 7176-8:2014, Wheelchairs - Part 8: Requirements and test methods for static, impact and fatigue strengths
ISO 7176-9:2009, Wheelchairs - Part 9: Climatic tests for Powered Wheelchairs
ISO 7176-10:2008, Wheelchairs - Part 10: Determination of obstacle-climbing ability of electrically powered wheelchairs
ISO 7176-11:2012 Wheelchairs - Part 11: Test dummies.
ISO 7176-13, First edition 1989-08-01, Wheelchairs - Part 13: Determination of coefficient of friction of test surfaces
ISO 7176-14:2008, Wheelchairs - Part 14: Power and control systems for electrically powered wheelchairs and wheelchairs - Requirements and test methods
ISO 7176-15:1996, Wheelchairs - Part 15: Requirements for information disclosure, documentation and labeling
ISO 16840-10:2021 Wheelchair seating Part 10: Resistance to ignition of postural support devices Requirements and test method.
ISO 7176-21:2009 Wheelchairs - Part 21: Requirements and test methods for electromagnetic compatibility of electrically powered wheelchairs and wheelchairs, and battery chargers
ISO 7176-25:2013 Wheelchairs - Part 25: Batteries and chargers for powered wheelchairs ANSI C63.27-2017 American National Standard for Evaluation of Wireless Coexistence
## G. Clinical Test Conclusion
No clinical study is included in this submission.
## H. Comparison with predicate Device
Compared to the predicate devices, the subject device has the same intended use, similar product design, similar performance, same safety as the predicate device, the summarized comparison information is listed in the following table
Table 1 General Comparison
| Elements of Comparison | Subject Device (K253276) | Predicate Device (K231868) | Remark |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Manufacturer | Shanghai Bangbang Robotics Co.,Ltd | Shanghai Bangbang Robotics Co.,Ltd. | Substantially Equivalent (S.E.) |
{7}
Table 2 Basic Parameters Comparison
| Elements of Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K231868) | Remark |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Models | BBR-E80-01,BBR-E80-02 | BBR-E40-01 | -- |
| Frame Materiel | Carbon fiber | Alloy | Analysis: The predicate device and subject device have different material. Both comply with ISO 7176-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6,-7,-8,-9,-10 so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Device Length | 1040mm | 1000mm | Analysis: The predicate device and subject device have different dimensions. Both comply with ISO 7176-5:2008 Wheelchairs – Part 5: Determination of dimensions, mass, and maneuverings space so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Device Width | 630mm | 624mm | |
| Device Height | 965mm | 930mm | |
| Stowage Length | 710mm | 700mm | |
| Stowage Width | 630mm | 624mm | |
| Stowage Height | 470mm | 450mm | |
{8}
| Number of wheels | 4 | 4 | S.E. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Front Wheel Diameter | 8 in | 8 in | S.E. |
| Rear Wheel Diameter | 10 in | 10 in | |
| Charger | Input 100V-240V AC 50-60hz
Output:29.4VDC-3A | Input: 100-240V AC 50/60Hz 2.2A
Output: 29.4V DC 3A | S.E. |
| Maximum Weight Capacity | 150kg | 150kg | S.E. |
| Maximum forward speed (maximum safe speed) | 8km/h | 8km/h | S.E. |
| Braking System | Electromagnetic | Electromagnetic | S.E. |
| Braking mechanism in case of electrical Brake Failure | Normally closed brakes be employed. When the device is powered off or when electrical power is lost, the brakes engaged on the motors to prevent rotation. | Normally closed brakes be employed. When the device is powered off or when electrical power is lost, the brakes engaged on the motors to prevent rotation. | S.E. |
| Minimum braking distance from max speed | 150cm | 102cm | **Analysis:**
Both the subject device and the predicate device comply with ISO 7176-3:2017 Wheelchairs - Part 3: Determination of effectiveness of brakes, so this difference does not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Turning Radius | 975mm | 900mm | **Analysis:**
The predicate device and subject device have different dimensions. Both comply with ISO 7176-5:2008 Wheelchairs – Part 5: Determination of dimensions, mass, and maneuverings space so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Obstacle Climbing Height | 10mm | 40mm | |
{9}
| Drive system | 2 Wheel Drive (Rear wheel drive) | 2 Wheel Drive (Rear wheel drive) | S.E. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| folding mechanism | Manually fold/expand | Manually fold/expand | S.E. |
| Dynamic Stability | 10° | 9° | Analysis: The predicate device and subject device have different dimensions. Both comply with ISO 7176-2:2017, Wheelchairs - Part 2: Determination of dynamic stability of Powered Wheelchairs so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| On/Off Button | Yes, Power Button on the control pad | Yes, Power Button on the control pad | S.E. |
| Rocker Location | Right/left can be interchange | Right/left can be interchange | S.E. |
| Seat Widths | 540mm | 420mm | Analysis: The predicate device and subject device have different dimensions. Both comply with ISO 7176-5:2008 Wheelchairs – Part 5: Determination of dimensions, mass, and maneuverings space so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Seat Depths | 420mm | 430mm | |
| Back support Height | 520mm | 460mm | |
| Operating Conditions | -10°C~50°C | -10°C~50°C | S.E. |
| Storage Conditions | -20 °C~60 °C | -20 °C~60 °C | S.E. |
| Smartphone App | iOS and Android | iOS and Android | S.E. |
| Wireless RF frequency range | 2.400GHz ~ 2.4835GHz | 2.400GHz ~ 2.4835GHz | S.E. |
| Wireless RF maximum output power | +4dBm~20dBm (in 4dB steps) | +4dBm~20dBm (in 4dB steps) | S.E. |
| Wireless operating range | 10m | 10m | S.E. |
| Remote control | Bluetooth only | Bluetooth only | S.E. |
{10}
Table 3 Specific Component Comparison
| Elements of Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K231868) | Remark |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Battery pack | 1 rechargeable lithium-ion battery Ratings: 12AH (Models: BBR-E80-01) 20AH (Models:BBR-E80-02) | 1 rechargeable lithium-ion battery Ratings: 24 V 20Ah | Analysis: Both the subject device and the predicate device comply with ISO 7176-25:2013 Wheelchairs - Part 25: Batteries and chargers for powered wheelchairs, so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
| Battery weight | 2.9kg(12AH) 3.3kg(20AH) | 3.4kg | |
| Driving Range (full battery charge)/ Maximum distance on fully battery charge | 13.4km (Models:BBR-E80-01) 21.5km (Models:BBR-E80-02) | 21.5km | Analysis: Both the subject device and the predicate device comply with ISO 7176-4: 2008 Wheelchairs - Part 4: Energy consumption of electric wheelchairs and scooters for determination of theoretical distance range, so these differences do not affect safety and effectiveness. |
# Substantially Equivalence Discussion:
The design and technological characteristics of the Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80) is similar to the predicates chosen. There are minor differences between the devices including Folded & Unfolded dimension, Front & Rear wheel diameter, Maximum forward speed (maximum safe speed), Minimum braking distance from max speed, Turning Radius, Obstacle Climbing Height, Battery capacity & weight, Driving Range and Adjustable armrests and backrest. All of the parameter with difference have been tested according to ISO7176 series standards and the test records support its safety and effectiveness. The subject device uses the same user-contacting materials as the predicate device. There is no deleterious effect on safety and effectiveness due to the minor differences do not influence the intended use of the device. Therefore, the proposed Wheelchair is substantially equivalent (SE) to The Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E40) (K231868).
Table 4 Safety comparison
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Devices | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biocompatibility | the subject device uses the same user-contacting materials as the predicate device | All user directly contacting materials are compliance with ISO10993-5, ISO10993-10 and ISO 10993-23 requirements. | S.E. |
| EMC | ISO7176-21 & IEC 60601-2-1 | ISO7176-21 | S.E. |
| Performance | ISO7176 series | ISO7176 series | S.E. |
| Wireless coexistence | wheelchair conforms to ANSI C63.27-2017 | wheelchair conforms to ANSI C63.27-2017 | S.E. |
{11}
Table 5 Safety comparison
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Devices | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ISO7176-1 | The Static stability has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-1, and test results meet its design specification. | The Static stability has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-1, and test results meet its design specification. | S.E. |
| ISO7176-2 | The dynamic stability has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-2, and test results meet its design specification. | The dynamic stability has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-2, and test results meet its design specification. | S.E. |
| ISO7176-3 | The effectiveness of brakes has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-3, and test results meet its design specification. | The effectiveness of brakes has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-3, and test results meet its design specification. | S.E. |
| ISO7176-4 | The theoretical distance range has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-4, and test results meet its design specification. | The theoretical distance range has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-4, and test results meet its design specification. | S.E. |
| ISO7176-5 | The dimensions, mass has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-5 | The dimensions, mass has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-5 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-6 | The dimensions, mass has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-6 | The dimensions, mass has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-6 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-7 | The seating and wheel dimensions has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-7 | The seating and wheel dimensions has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-7 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-8 | All test results meet the requirements in Clause 4 of ISO 7176-8 | All test results meet the requirements in Clause 4 of ISO 7176-8 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-9 | The test results shown that the device under tests could continue to function according to manufacturer's specification after being subjected to each of the tests specified in Clause 8 of ISO 7176-9 | The test results shown that the device under tests could continue to function according to manufacturer's specification after being subjected to each of the tests specified in Clause 8 of ISO 7176-9 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-10 | The obstacle-climbing ability of device has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-10 | The obstacle-climbing ability of device has been determined after the testing according to the ISO 7176-10 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-11 | The test dummies used in the testing of ISO 7176 series are meet the | The test dummies used in the testing of ISO 7176 series are meet the | S.E. |
{12}
| | requirements of ISO 7176-11 | requirements of ISO 7176-11 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ISO7176-13 | The coefficient of friction of test surfaces has been determined, which could be used in other 7176 series tests involved | The coefficient of friction of test surfaces has been determined, which could be used in other 7176 series tests involved | S.E. |
| ISO7176-14 | All test results meet the requirements in Clause 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 of ISO 7176-14 | All test results meet the requirements in Clause 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 of ISO 7176-14 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-15 | The test results shown that information disclosure, documentation and labelling of device meet the requirements of ISO 7176-15 | The test results shown that information disclosure, documentation and labelling of device meet the requirements of ISO 7176-15 | S.E. |
| ISO 16840-10 | The performance of resistance to ignition meet the requirements of ISO 16840-10 | The performance of resistance to ignition meet the requirements of ISO 16840-10 | S.E. |
| ISO 7176-21 | The EMC performance results meet the requirements of ISO 7176-21 | The EMC performance results meet the requirements of ISO 7176-21 | S.E. |
| ISO7176-25 | The performance of batteries and charger of device meet the Requirements in Clause 5 and 6 of ISO 7176-25 | The performance of batteries and charger of device meet the Requirements in Clause 5 and 6 of ISO 7176-25 | S.E. |
I. Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrates that the subject device in 510(K) submission, Electric Wheelchair (Robooter E80), Models name: BBR-E80-01,BBR-E80-02 is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device cleared under K231868.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.